Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Week 10 2012 Game Thread
#1
Posted 07 November 2012 - 04:12 PM
Thursday
Indianapolis at Jacksonville (NFLN)
Sunday
Buffalo at New England (CBS Early)
NY Giants at Cincinnati (Fox Early) (RI, Western Mass, Southern Mass, Northern NH, Northern VT, Maine, Connecticut only)
Dallas at Philadelphia (Fox Late)
Houston at Chicago (NBC)
Monday
Kansas City at Pittsburgh (ESPN)
http://www.the506.co.../2012/wk10.html
#2
Posted 07 November 2012 - 05:15 PM
What awful matchups this week. One decent non-Pats game to watch...ugh
Edited by Seels, 07 November 2012 - 05:15 PM.
#3
Posted 07 November 2012 - 05:38 PM
Jacksonville should be banned from ever having games not on Sunday afternoon. I can't even imagine a more boring team.
What awful matchups this week. One decent non-Pats game to watch...ugh
Houston @ Chicago is going to be epic enough to make up for all of the horrible games this week. Major implications for the Pats, too.
#4
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:30 PM
edit: Looked like a TD but any scoring play that was close has been reviewed this year. No way they decided that quickly it was definitive.
Edited by j44thor, 08 November 2012 - 09:32 PM.
#5
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:31 PM
#6
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:35 PM
What a bizarre thing. Aren't ALL scoring plays supposed to be reviewed?
No, it is not necessarily reviewed by an official on the field. Two steps occur:
1.) The booth reviews the scoring or change-of-possession play.
2.) If the booth concludes that there's a question as to whether the call on the field was correct, they call for an official to go under the hood.
It's not any different than any potentially reviewable play inside of two minutes, in that sense. The purpose of the rule is to take coach's challenges out of the equation for scoring and change of possession plays, not to mandate review of all of them under the hood.
Edited by Mystic Merlin, 08 November 2012 - 09:35 PM.
#7
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:38 PM
Edited by ypioca, 08 November 2012 - 09:39 PM.
#8
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:43 PM
#9
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:44 PM
#10
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:51 PM
On a side note...first pressure on Luck leads to a REALLY bad decision
#11
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:55 PM
EVERY break goind Indy's way
Except bone marrow biopsy results.
#12
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:58 PM
edit: they deserve to miss this now
Edited by tims4wins, 08 November 2012 - 09:59 PM.
#13
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:00 PM
#14
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:02 PM
#15
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:02 PM
No, it is not necessarily reviewed by an official on the field. Two steps occur:
1.) The booth reviews the scoring or change-of-possession play.
2.) If the booth concludes that there's a question as to whether the call on the field was correct, they call for an official to go under the hood.
It's not any different than any potentially reviewable play inside of two minutes, in that sense. The purpose of the rule is to take coach's challenges out of the equation for scoring and change of possession plays, not to mandate review of all of them under the hood.
Yes exactly and given that only one official signaled TD and Luck clearly didn't end up in the end-zone it is beyond belief that the play was not reviewed. I've only seen one angle that appeared to show the ball cross the goal line and it would have been for about 1/10th of a second. It is simply inexcusable not to take a closer look at that play.
#16
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:02 PM
This Jaguars team is just...awful.
And yet you just KNOW they will give the Pats a game. It's inevitable.
#17
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:24 PM
#18
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:25 PM
#19
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:25 PM
#20
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:30 PM
#21
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:31 PM
1.5 years and its already clear that he's a bust.I love crappy quarterbacks. I have the game on mute while writing college essays and I look up for like 2 seconds, which is naturally enough time to see Gabbert throw a pick-6.
#22
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:31 PM
#23
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:33 PM

Lucky that wasn't picked off.
#24
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:35 PM
Jacksonville is just hideous.
Worst team by far in the league.
#25
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:37 PM
#26
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:38 PM
Have you seen the Chiefs this year?Worst team by far in the league.
I don't disagree - they are horrid; but the Chiefs can compete.
#27
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:41 PM
Have you seen the Chiefs this year?
I don't disagree - they are horrid; but the Chiefs can compete.
The Chiefs are bad but they have talent on defense. The Chiefs need a QB badly and they are also so poorly coached. The Jags have very little talent on either side of the ball.
#28
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:54 PM
#29
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:56 PM
Agreed; the Chiefs are loaded on defense. (however, with horrible results this year) Watching the Jags without MJD, makes you wonder what MJD could do on a real team.The Chiefs are bad but they have talent on defense. The Chiefs need a QB badly and they are also so poorly coached. The Jags have very little talent on either side of the ball.
#30
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:07 PM
#31
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:16 PM
#32
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:27 PM
#33
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:44 PM
#34
Posted 10 November 2012 - 08:11 AM
#35
Posted 10 November 2012 - 12:11 PM
Some white guys can pull of the shaved head look and Andrew Luck is definitely not one of them.
So my brother just told me this was for Pagano and now I feel like a dick
#36
Posted 10 November 2012 - 01:34 PM
The joke that will live forever.Seymour is inactive. That is all.
#37
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:36 AM
#38
Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:45 AM
#39
Posted 11 November 2012 - 01:27 PM
#40
Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:43 PM
So my brother just told me this was for Pagano and now I feel like a dick
HaHa! You're a dick.
#41
Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:59 PM
#42
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:36 PM
#43
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:37 PM
#44
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:40 PM
#45
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:40 PM
#46
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:44 PM
#47
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:48 PM
#48
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:49 PM
You never know. Even before Alex Smith got hurt, this looked like the Rams' game. Niners not dead yet.This Rams/Niners game has been one hard-hitting, chippy game.
#49
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:50 PM
And after the game, Rex will tell the NY media he still believes in Sanchez and thinks the Jets will make the playoffs.
#50
Posted 11 November 2012 - 06:51 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











