Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
What does the future hold for ARod?
#1
Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:32 PM
So immediate time-frame aside, what does the future hold for ARod in NY? Assuming he doesn't hit some magical series clinching pinch-hit HR tonight or do something down the line in the next two weeks if they advance, does this pinch-hitting/benching effectively end his time in NY? Can they continue to coexist? Is he movable in any way, shape or form? He's owed approximately $30M per year for five more seasons and he's seemingly fallen off a cliff - especially vs righties. How much of the contract would the Yankees have to eat in order to move him? And who would take him? Miami? The Dodgers?
#2
Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:34 PM
#3
Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:35 PM
Ahhhh, take him out back and shoot him……..Plenty more where that came from
#4
Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:45 PM
#5
Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:46 PM
Edited by glennhoffmania, 12 October 2012 - 01:46 PM.
#6
Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:52 PM
Barring a team being dumb enough to do a Punto-type trade I don't see him going anywhere.
Well, the Red Sox have a lot of payroll flexibility and a hole a 1B.
"Ducking"
#7
Posted 12 October 2012 - 01:58 PM
And if he's part Mexican, maybe the Dodgers will trade for him and two other unmovable contracts.
#8
Posted 12 October 2012 - 02:07 PM
#9
Posted 12 October 2012 - 02:24 PM
#10
Posted 12 October 2012 - 02:38 PM
I don't think ARod has 120 home runs left in him.Gun to your head: Who would you rather have hold the all time HR record, A-Rod or Bonds? Is it terrible that the most prestigous individual record in all of sports is/could be held by two of the most unlikeable players to ever play?
Love Bonds. Always have/will, whatever his sins are.
#11
Posted 12 October 2012 - 03:13 PM
#12
Posted 12 October 2012 - 03:15 PM
#13
Posted 12 October 2012 - 04:10 PM
"Ducking"
"Throwing something at you for even suggesting it"
#14
Posted 12 October 2012 - 09:33 PM
#15
Posted 14 October 2012 - 01:18 AM
#16
Posted 14 October 2012 - 04:32 AM
#17
Posted 14 October 2012 - 07:29 AM
I don't think ARod has 120 home runs left in him.
Love Bonds. Always have/will, whatever his sins are.
I think he might. If he's just a dh, maybe his hip/body doesn't get worn down playing the field and a few more of his long outs go over the fence. It's not like 18 in 122 was horrible. He needs 23 per year for 5 years. If he plays 145-150 games, it's probably doable. If he can eek out a few extra in the next 2 years, then he's down to the high teens, which even non power guys like Jeter can do. It did seem like he was coming around before he got hit in the hand. I'm sure you guys have the numbers if he really was or not.
#18
Posted 14 October 2012 - 08:03 AM
Well, I'd say shortstop.
Would be interesting if they let him try - I believe 2005 was the last time he played the position. I fear (and presume they fear) that it would be about as great as the Cabrera back to 3rd base switch....
#19
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:27 AM
#20
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:30 AM
Equal opportunity fail - ARod 0-3 (6 LOB), Chavez 0-3 - 3 K's between em, and both only saw 8 pitches...
A-Rod's ABs were all against righties, though, at least one of Chavez's was against a lefty, maybe more.
Chavez had a .908 OPS against RHP this year, .382 against LHP, that's why you start him against RHP over the current version of A-Rod.
#21
Posted 14 October 2012 - 11:47 AM
Edited by bankshot1, 14 October 2012 - 11:48 AM.
#22
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:03 PM
no
#23
Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:17 PM
#24
Posted 14 October 2012 - 06:48 PM
#25
Posted 17 October 2012 - 02:43 PM
#26
Posted 17 October 2012 - 02:58 PM
I will never ever understand why the Yankees signed him to that extension. They were out. OUT. And then, in one fell swoop, they were fucked.
In 2007, the prospect of being "out" was a bad thing. ARod was the best player in the game and the Yankees had to have him as a nice shiny toy for the nice, shiny new stadium they were building.
Why they bid against themselves and went to 10 years is a different question, because that was simply insane and most of us said so at the time. But I can completely understand why they would make the effort to re-sign him.
#27
Posted 17 October 2012 - 03:07 PM
South Beach
But he's got no talents left to take with him.
#28
Posted 17 October 2012 - 03:11 PM
But he's got no talents left to take with him.
Kobe told Lebron to give him some
#29
Posted 17 October 2012 - 04:42 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













