Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
2013 Managerial Candidates
#51
Posted 01 September 2012 - 09:46 AM
http://www.boston.co...hqIJ/story.html
So how does he evaluate Bobby Valentine’s job as manager?
Werner’s answer was perhaps telling about what ownership is thinking.
“I don’t really want to get into that today,” he said. “I don’t want to talk too much about him. But he’s had a challenging year. I think, as we’ve said before, he’s doing a good job.”
Will Valentine return in 2013?
“I don’t really want to go there,” Werner said. “I think we all thought we’d bounce back more this year.”
#52
Posted 01 September 2012 - 10:40 AM
But Werner was expansive in his praise for general manager Ben Cherington, who replaced Theo Epstein 10 months ago.
“I thought for example, that he was extremely impressive in his press conference [that announced the Dodgers trade],” said Werner. “But it’s not just that he’s articulate. Ben is methodical, he’s thoughtful. He’s a good manager, he’s a good leader.
“We give him high marks in how he’s dealt with the challenges this season, and he’s going to be with us for a long time.
“We just have to be more disciplined. One of the things we’ve talked to Ben about is supplementing his staff with a few more evaluators. I’m confident that we’ll get back because now we have the resources and the talent with Ben, and under Ben, to do so.”
#53
Posted 01 September 2012 - 10:55 AM
#54
Posted 01 September 2012 - 12:39 PM
#55
Posted 01 September 2012 - 12:48 PM
Okay, I admit I had to look up who the hell Bo Porter is. He's the third base coach for the playoff bound Washington Nationals. (Boy, wish our team was a contender like the Nationals!). And he was in the running for a couple of managing jobs in the last few years.1. Bo Porter
2. Torey Lovullo
3. Dave Martinez
Why is he a good candidate?
#56
Posted 01 September 2012 - 12:50 PM
Wasn't Larry the one who hired him? Don't know what an abrasive old man saw in an abrasive old man, but this is two managerial hires essentially by Larry, Grady Little and Bobby Valentine. LL should probably stick to other sections of the organization.Did they put a muzzle on Larry? Tom is the one doing a lot of the talking lately.
#57
Posted 01 September 2012 - 01:10 PM
The same reason as any of the names being thrown around. Former Player, well respected, has risen up through the coaching/managing ranks.Okay, I admit I had to look up who the hell Bo Porter is. He's the third base coach for the playoff bound Washington Nationals. (Boy, wish our team was a contender like the Nationals!). And he was in the running for a couple of managing jobs in the last few years.
Why is he a good candidate?
Porter is supposedly a strong presence who commands respect. He also coaches baserunning and outfielders in WAS and is known for innovative drills.
Interesting interview here: http://nats320.blogs...d-presence.html
He talks about how baserunning tells you a lot about a team because it is a selfless act, also how the Nats were terrible at baserunning before he came in.
More in depth interview with fangraphs here: http://www.fangraphs...league-manager/
Talks about using data, setting a lineup, defensive positioning, bunting, pitch counts, and adapting your managing style to the roster.
#58
Posted 01 September 2012 - 01:30 PM
Bring on Bo with Matt Stairs as bench coach. Get Mazzone for pitching coach. Prosper.
#59
Posted 02 September 2012 - 06:49 AM
http://www.weei.com/...e-decision-mana
#60
Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:04 AM
■ Bobby Valentine, Boston — Still a 50-50 proposition as to whether he stays. With the team gutted, Valentine should do well with grooming younger players for bigger roles. He’s done that with Pedro Ciriaco, for one, and had begun with Will Middlebrooks. Ryan Kalish could be the next outfielder groomed for a bigger role next season when he is completely healthy and over his shoulder surgeries. (Dustin Pedroia had the same shoulder issues as Kalish and said you don’t feel better until the following year.) Ownership is fair-minded and realizes that this mess was not Valentine’s fault. Most managers get more than one clean year to show what they can do.
http://www.bostonglo...xBuJ/story.html
Edited by TheoShmeo, 02 September 2012 - 08:05 AM.
#61
Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:02 AM
#62
Posted 02 September 2012 - 10:56 AM
Time to pull the plug on this TV show.
#63
Posted 02 September 2012 - 12:23 PM
I never liked BV, so his apparent misuse of Aceves is enough to push me into the "fire BV immediately" camp, but if the FO's confidence in him isn't similarly shaken, I can see why they prefer to let BV play out the string.
Edit: Should note that I'm reading a lot into Werner's interview -- the strong vote of confidence in BC, coupled with evasion on BV's future, has me convinced that BV is certain to be sacked at the end of the season, if not before.
Edited by maufman, 02 September 2012 - 12:24 PM.
#64
Posted 02 September 2012 - 12:27 PM
#65
Posted 02 September 2012 - 12:38 PM
Meet Arnie Beyeler
#66
Posted 02 September 2012 - 12:55 PM
Fixed it for ya."Whoa, That's one of my sources!," says Nicky.
http://www.bostonglo...xBuJ/story.html
#67
Posted 02 September 2012 - 02:13 PM
When you're losing by 8 runs, 9 runs, 18 runs, and you're stringing those losses together, you're done.
Ben has just made his bones. He owes it to himself -- and to us -- to get his guy in there as the next manager, or walk over "philosophical differences".
#68
Posted 02 September 2012 - 02:58 PM
This may be odd... but I was reading a puff piece in the Projo... and it hit me that the best manager for this team may already be in the organization. And, the Red Sox may very well place him in the position after the Pawsox end their playoff run.
Meet Arnie Beyeler
Develop talent and promote when the level is no longer challenging. 3 years in Portland, two (very successful) seasons at Pawtucket, a lead-by-example manager who visibly works hard with everyone. Ben has been his direct supervisor for his entire Red Sox tenure. He has some relationship history with almost every player on the current roster but isn't part of the current shitshow.
I love this idea. Beyeler in 2013.
#69
Posted 02 September 2012 - 06:11 PM
#70
Posted 02 September 2012 - 06:26 PM
#71
Posted 02 September 2012 - 06:31 PM
Love the Beyeler idea. It's hard to conjure up any reason to not fire BV tomorrow. They have flatlined.
As suggested above, I doubt they will promote the AAA manager while the Pawsox are in the playoffs.
#72
Posted 02 September 2012 - 07:15 PM
As suggested above, I doubt they will promote the AAA manager while the Pawsox are in the playoffs.
I'd interim Bogar for the remainder of the season.
#73
Posted 02 September 2012 - 07:16 PM
Very nice read. Seems as though he could be as plausibly successful as any of the other leading candidates names we've heard thrown around thus far. It sounds as though he'll get a chance sooner rather than later somewhere also.This may be odd... but I was reading a puff piece in the Projo... and it hit me that the best manager for this team may already be in the organization. And, the Red Sox may very well place him in the position after the Pawsox end their playoff run.
Meet Arnie Beyeler
#74
Posted 02 September 2012 - 07:34 PM
I'd interim Bogar for the remainder of the season.
Lou Gorman and Joe Torre would disagree.
#75
Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:54 PM
OAKLAND, Calif. — With the losses mounting, including today’s 6-2 loss to the Athletics, Red Sox manger Bobby Valentine has appeared increasingly weary, even disengaged, as though he knows the axe is about to fall. .......
If the Red Sox continue to get blown out over the next three days in Seattle against the equally dreadful Mariners, or if there’s more infighting like Saturday night’s dugout dust-up between Dustin Pedroia and embattled reliever Alfredo Aceves, it’s worth wondering seriously whether Valentine will have a seat on the charter flight back to Boston.
How difficult has this week been for the embattled manager? “What difference does it make?” Valentine said after today’s game, almost whispering.
When Lauber is writing stuff like this...
#76
Posted 02 September 2012 - 10:03 PM
As
@MikeSilvermanBB first reported, Cherington, Henry both will be in Seattle, but sources says to not look to much into it
Cherington had trip planned a while ago, and Henry was scheduled to attend meetings
Rob Bradford
http://www.twitter.com/bradfo
#77
Posted 02 September 2012 - 10:04 PM
Sounds like the anti-Valentine. I'm on board too.This may be odd... but I was reading a puff piece in the Projo... and it hit me that the best manager for this team may already be in the organization. And, the Red Sox may very well place him in the position after the Pawsox end their playoff run.
Meet Arnie Beyeler
I haven't been as anti-Bobby V as many. I felt he deserved a chance. He didn't really get much of one, and I was ready to give him another one. But with the post Punto Trade performance, I just can't see it anymore. Time to move on. I love promoting from within at my work. Sounds like A.B. (after Bobby?) has earned his shot.
Edited by ItOnceWasMyLife, 02 September 2012 - 10:06 PM.
#78
Posted 02 September 2012 - 10:44 PM
#79
Posted 02 September 2012 - 10:51 PM
Experience is overrated, but this is not a good place or time for on-the-job learning, and seems like Beyeler would have more to learn than other first-time managers who might be considered for the job.
#80
Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:04 PM
#81
Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:06 PM
General manager Ben Cherington will join the team in Seattle for the final series of what so far has been a winless road trip. Team officials said that was his plan right along.
As of yet, there are no signs the Sox will return to Boston with a new manager. But that could change if there is not some flicker of life...
Valentine, in word and deed, seems resigned to his fate. He is not the sort to resign, but with Cherington in Seattle you have to wonder if some sort of move will be made.
The mood around the team is funereal at this point. The Sox aren't going to accomplish anything tangible before the end of the season....But Arnie Beyeler or Tim Bogar might at least get the team to play a respectable brand of ball.
I'm not a hater, Mauidano -- I actually liked what Bobby did to keep this team in it for as long as he did. But I think the sharks are circling at this point.
Edit: link
Edited by Van Everyman, 02 September 2012 - 11:06 PM.
#82
Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:29 PM
#83
Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:45 PM
Bobby is here for the duration. Get over it haters. He will ride out the season along with the rest of the doomed. This steam sucks regardless of him. Not even Terry Francona could have survived this nightmare. He had enough issues of his own last couple seasons. Bobby may not be here next year but he'll make it the rest of the year. Losing is draining on everyone from the ownership down to the fans. Managers get too much credit when they win and too much blame when they lose. No matter who he has run out on the field, they stink. But look what he's had to work with. David Copperfield couldn't make that junk work.
When is the last time you heard about a manager showing up to the park only three hours before game time because he had to pick up his son at the airport?
When is the last time you heard a manager claim not to know where various guys had been placed in his lineup?
When is the last time you heard a manager admit that he had to change his lineup at the last minute because he was wrong about what hand the opposing pitcher threw with?
When it the last time you saw a player literally leap out of the way rather than being patted on the butt by his manager because he so dislikes his manager?
When's the last time a reliever on a team out of the playoffs threw 143 pitches over five days?
We're long past the "Francona couldn't win with these guys" trope. The guy is embarrassing himself and the organization at this point. Further, if BV (or whoever is making out the lineup card these days) is going to keep Kalish planted on the bench while Podsednik and Ross play every day, he is doing very real damage to the long-term prospects of the organization.
#84
Posted 03 September 2012 - 01:28 AM
Some of those are legitimate issues (getting the handedness of the pitcher wrong) Some are not (getting stuck in unusually heavy traffic.), some are likely him fucking with the media (Pretending he didn't know Pods was batting third).When is the last time you heard about a manager showing up to the park only three hours before game time because he had to pick up his son at the airport?
When is the last time you heard a manager claim not to know where various guys had been placed in his lineup?
When is the last time you heard a manager admit that he had to change his lineup at the last minute because he was wrong about what hand the opposing pitcher threw with?
When it the last time you saw a player literally leap out of the way rather than being patted on the butt by his manager because he so dislikes his manager?
When's the last time a reliever on a team out of the playoffs threw 143 pitches over five days?
We're long past the "Francona couldn't win with these guys" trope. The guy is embarrassing himself and the organization at this point. Further, if BV (or whoever is making out the lineup card these days) is going to keep Kalish planted on the bench while Podsednik and Ross play every day, he is doing very real damage to the long-term prospects of the organization.
I disagree about Kalish, he has shown himself to be nowhere near ready for everyday at bats in the majors and sending him out there to be totally overmatched is detrimental to his development. Ross is a player who has a good shot to be on this team next year and is the best hitter on this team at present, he should be out there everyday.
The idea that he is embarrassing the organization is silly, few if any people outside this board think that, what is far more embarrassing is that our pitchers are terrible, and we have almost no hitters who should be regulars in a major league lineup. There is no reason not to have Bobby play out the string, and valid reasons not to want an interim manager for the remaining games.
#85
Posted 03 September 2012 - 02:21 AM
Kalish hit .252/.305/.405 two years ago as a 22 year old in 179 MLB PA. That performance was reasonably in line with his AA and AAA performance of the same year (AA was much better, AAA moderately better).I disagree about Kalish, he has shown himself to be nowhere near ready for everyday at bats in the majors and sending him out there to be totally overmatched is detrimental to his development. Ross is a player who has a good shot to be on this team next year and is the best hitter on this team at present, he should be out there everyday.
While he has looked completely overmatched in MLB this year, he has certainly shown himself to be ready for MLB at bats prior to this year. This team isn't competing for anything at this point. Additionally, looking at this as a choice between Ross and Kalish is silly. Ross should be playing everyday. So should Ellsbury. However, there is no good reason to continue to give playing time to Podsednik. The one blessing of being bad enough to be out of the playoff hunt for September is that it grants the opportunity to let prospects play through their struggles in MLB and adjust without any pressure related to winning games. Even if he is overmatched, he needs to be able to play at this level by the start of 2014 so the organization would be best served by getting him as much experience as possible right now while they have a no consequences opportunity to do so.
#87
Posted 03 September 2012 - 07:07 AM
I am going to be disappointed if he isn't managing the team in 2013. He seems like the perfect fit, even moreso now that The Punto Trade went down. I'd love to see what he can do with a roster constructed of many young players, filled in with our few remaining vets and some '03 Ortiz/Mueller/Millar-type signings/acquisitions.Has anyone ever given an explanation as to why Dave Martinez's name never seems to get an serious consideration?
(Why isn't there a poll?)
#88
Posted 03 September 2012 - 08:22 AM
#89
Posted 03 September 2012 - 10:24 AM
#90
Posted 03 September 2012 - 10:34 AM
Anyway, does replacing Bobby V, combined with the trade raise Ben Cherington's stock? He didn't want Valentine, and he orchestrated the trade. Doesn't this give him more leeway with ownership? He'll likely be allowed to choose his own manager.
#91
Posted 03 September 2012 - 10:40 AM
Assuming LAA misses the playoffs, I'd think Mike Scioscia gets replaced by Tito. You'd have to think Scioscia would be part of a short list if that came to fruition (as if that makes anything better).
Scioscia in a Bill James-inspired organization? To quote Cyrano de Bergerac, "No thank you! No, I thank you and again I thank you!"
#92
Posted 03 September 2012 - 10:43 AM
Assuming LAA misses the playoffs, I'd think Mike Scioscia gets replaced by Tito. You'd have to think Scioscia would be part of a short list if that came to fruition (as if that makes anything better).
Scioscia has six years left on his deal. If he gets fired he can take a few years off (well, six years) and not have to worry about working. Especially in Boston.
Edited by Bowlerman9, 03 September 2012 - 10:43 AM.
#93
Posted 03 September 2012 - 11:14 AM
#94
Posted 03 September 2012 - 11:45 AM
Who was that? My Sox attention has fallen about 98%.When it the last time you saw a player literally leap out of the way rather than being patted on the butt by his manager because he so dislikes his manager?
#95
Posted 03 September 2012 - 11:59 AM
I agree, using the old saw they can hopefully "hit the ground running" next year if they get a new manager in there now. There isn't as much new stuff for players to get used to as there is in changing football coaches, but why not get the guys used to the new manager's signs, philosophies, gameday arrival times, BP, fielding practices, etc. Yeah, not a lot of things change in baseball, manager to manager, compared with football, and there isn't much time left anyway. They won't do it.If Bobby isn't coming back, I think we need to cut ties right now and put in an interim manager. This team positively died since the trade. I didn't except them to go on a hot streak without AGone but they're totally lifeless.
#96
Posted 03 September 2012 - 11:59 AM
Assuming LAA misses the playoffs, I'd think Mike Scioscia gets replaced by Tito. You'd have to think Scioscia would be part of a short list if that came to fruition (as if that makes anything better).
Game threads would be interesting.
#97
Posted 03 September 2012 - 12:00 PM
Who was that? My Sox attention has fallen about 98%.
Aceves. About the 34 second mark of this video...
http://mlb.mlb.com/v...py_24422203&v=3
#98
Posted 03 September 2012 - 12:12 PM
Thanks. So, from core guys coming into the season, viz., Youkilis and Pedroia, to one of the teams wackos, Aceves, a lot of guys couldn't stand him.Aceves. About the 34 second mark of this video...
http://mlb.mlb.com/v...py_24422203&v=3
#99
Posted 03 September 2012 - 01:12 PM
Aceves. About the 34 second mark of this video...
http://mlb.mlb.com/v...py_24422203&v=3
Huh. First time I've seen that and it told a way different story than I imagined. Aceves didn't look hot at Pedroia at all, Pedey looked more intense than angry, even when Royster came over. The real moment was post-ass-pat-dodge, Ace's body language ticks up and he points his thumb at Bobby while yelling at the coaches.
Or am I just seeing what I want to see?
#100
Posted 03 September 2012 - 01:14 PM
- Improve his attitude, at least with the press, finish the season and make a face-saving "retirement for personal issues" (or some similar euphemistic bullshit)
- Get fired today.
- We're just trying to win every game
- We're jsut doing what's best for the team
- He did some good things out there and some bad things.
- We all need to try to get better every day.
- It is what it is.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked






