Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Should the Sox sign Derek Lowe?
#1
Posted 02 August 2012 - 03:26 PM
I figure, why not. The season is in te toilet anyway. We're not going anywhere this year. May as well bring back one of the 25 and remember the good old days. Besides, he can't be worse than Cook.
#2
Posted 02 August 2012 - 03:28 PM
this isn't a "let's remember 2004" season, the team is still in the playoff mix and Derek Lowe has been worse than Aaron Cook.
#3
Posted 02 August 2012 - 03:32 PM
Not worth the nostalgia tour
#4
Posted 02 August 2012 - 03:44 PM
If you want to remember the good ol' days they have DVDs and stuff.
#5
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:00 PM
#6
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:08 PM
#7
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:14 PM
#8
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:21 PM
He stopped being an effective starter two years ago.
Well, a few months ago anyway. Cafardo:
Lowe was 6-1 with a 2.05 ERA, but is 2-9 since with his ERA ballooning to 5.52...Lowe has had more stretches where he’s gotten off kilter the last two years, but if you know Lowe, and it will be interesting to see which teams will understand this, once he gets his mechanics right he tends to go on a good roll
Sounds like a dude Bobby could get something out of.
#9
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:25 PM
Says no one will have to push him out of the game, when he loses his stuff, he is gone, but he had it going so well earlier that he wants to fix it.
Edited by SoxScout, 02 August 2012 - 04:26 PM.
#10
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:31 PM
Will have to give up his number!
(null)
#11
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:34 PM
#12
Posted 02 August 2012 - 04:37 PM
I'll always love hime for 2004, but as hard as it is to believe, that was almost a decade ago.
As far as a rotation spot, no thanks. I'd be happy to buy him a beer though.
#13
Posted 02 August 2012 - 07:29 PM
this isn't a "let's remember 2004" season, the team is still in the playoff mix and Derek Lowe has been worse than Aaron Cook.
If you want to remember the good ol' days they have DVDs and stuff.
I agree with these sentiments.
Derek Lowe has a K/BB ratio of 0.91. Worst ratio in the ML amongst qualifiers.
However this stat is misleading. Lowe is a sinkerballer and so he has a lower K rate than other pitchers. His career average K/9 is about 6. He's at 3.31 right now, ranked 43/43 of qualifying pitchers in the AL. If he was at his career average he'd only be at 37/43.
I'm not debating he's been bad - but K/BB ratio isn't the best indicator of performance for sinkerballers.
for reference:
| Age | Tm | W | L | W-L% | ERA | G | GS | GF | CG | SHO | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | IBB | SO | HBP | BK | WP | BF | ERA+ | WHIP | H/9 | HR/9 | BB/9 | SO/9 | SO/BB | ||
| 34 | Clay Buchholz | 27 | BOS | 9 | 3 | .750 | 4.75 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 115.2 | 117 | 64 | 61 | 16 | 41 | 0 | 77 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 495 | 93 | 1.366 | 9.1 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 6.0 | 1.88 |
| 35 | Jason Vargas* | 29 | SEA | 12 | 7 | .632 | 3.71 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 153.0 | 133 | 64 | 63 | 25 | 42 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 611 | 102 | 1.144 | 7.8 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 5.9 | 2.38 |
| 36 | Jerome Williams | 30 | LAA | 6 | 7 | .462 | 4.82 | 18 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 104.2 | 116 | 59 | 56 | 13 | 29 | 1 | 69 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 449 | 79 | 1.385 | 10.0 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 5.9 | 2.38 |
| 37 | Jeremy Hellickson | 25 | TBR | 6 | 6 | .500 | 3.23 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 111.1 | 99 | 46 | 40 | 18 | 40 | 3 | 72 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 469 | 117 | 1.249 | 8.0 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 5.8 | 1.80 |
| 38 | Bartolo Colon | 39 | OAK | 7 | 8 | .467 | 3.78 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 123.2 | 136 | 54 | 52 | 15 | 20 | 2 | 78 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 520 | 104 | 1.261 | 9.9 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 3.90 |
| 39 | Matt Harrison* | 26 | TEX | 12 | 6 | .667 | 3.19 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 135.1 | 134 | 49 | 48 | 11 | 36 | 0 | 81 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 554 | 140 | 1.256 | 8.9 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 5.4 | 2.25 |
| 40 | Rick Porcello | 23 | DET | 8 | 6 | .571 | 4.65 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 122.0 | 155 | 69 | 63 | 8 | 31 | 2 | 73 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 539 | 90 | 1.525 | 11.4 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 5.4 | 2.35 |
| 41 | Scott Diamond* | 25 | MIN | 9 | 5 | .643 | 2.93 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 107.1 | 111 | 41 | 35 | 9 | 15 | 2 | 59 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 438 | 140 | 1.174 | 9.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 3.93 |
| 42 | Henderson Alvarez | 22 | TOR | 7 | 7 | .500 | 4.43 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 126.0 | 142 | 68 | 62 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 48 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 535 | 97 | 1.365 | 10.1 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 1.60 |
| 43 | Derek Lowe | 39 | CLE | 8 | 10 | .444 | 5.52 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 119.0 | 156 | 79 | 73 | 8 | 45 | 3 | 41 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 542 | 70 | 1.689 | 11.8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 0.91 |
edit: better tableization
Edited by crystalline, 02 August 2012 - 07:33 PM.
#14
Posted 03 August 2012 - 12:04 AM
However this stat is misleading. Lowe is a sinkerballer and so he has a lower K rate than other pitchers. His career average K/9 is about 6. He's at 3.31 right now, ranked 43/43 of qualifying pitchers in the AL. If he was at his career average he'd only be at 37/43.
I'm not debating he's been bad - but K/BB ratio isn't the best indicator of performance for sinkerballers.
I'll quibble. Sure sinkerballers don't strike a lot of guys out. No doubt about that. But, this trait also means that if they plan on being successful they can't be issuing a lot of free passes because they have to deal with contact and the BABIP gods, given their sub par K rate. The fact that Lowe has regressed significantly in both his K/9 and BB/9 compared to his career averages is why I cited his abysmal K/BB ratio. However, if you would prefer that I decouple the two metrics and say that he is walking almost a full batter more per 9 vs. his career average (3.4 to 2.7) and is striking out batters at half the rate of his career average (3.1 to 5.8), I'm happy to decouple them. Taken seperately both are evidence of declining skill, it's just magnified by the abysmal K/BB rate.
#15
Posted 03 August 2012 - 08:14 AM
I'll quibble. Sure sinkerballers don't strike a lot of guys out. No doubt about that. But, this trait also means that if they plan on being successful they can't be issuing a lot of free passes because they have to deal with contact and the BABIP gods, given their sub par K rate. The fact that Lowe has regressed significantly in both his K/9 and BB/9 compared to his career averages is why I cited his abysmal K/BB ratio. However, if you would prefer that I decouple the two metrics and say that he is walking almost a full batter more per 9 vs. his career average (3.4 to 2.7) and is striking out batters at half the rate of his career average (3.1 to 5.8), I'm happy to decouple them. Taken seperately both are evidence of declining skill, it's just magnified by the abysmal K/BB rate.
Fair enough, thanks. The guy is 39 so it was bound to happen soon.
#16
Posted 03 August 2012 - 02:51 PM
He's washed up. Damon was just released by Cleveland as well. Please tell me we don't need to start a thread for him too.
Can we all agree that the worst thing that this team could do, is bring in two older players on a nostalgia tour?
This team needs to look forward not back. Even if the white flag is raised, I would rather that they bring up kids to see how they respond in the majors than to trot out retreads.
Edited by Manramsclan, 03 August 2012 - 02:52 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












