http://msn.foxsports...-dodgers-071812How’s this for a blockbuster?
Left fielder Carl Crawford to the Miami Marlins for either shortstop Jose Reyes or third basemanHanley Ramirez, with other pieces and significant cash involved.
The Boston Red Sox are contacting teams to gauge their trade interest in Crawford, according to major-league sources.
No trade appears close. Such a deal would be difficult to accomplish, given the size of Crawford’s contract and his lingering elbow problems. But the first lesson of the July 31 non-waiver deadline is that nothing is impossible.
The Red Sox, sources said, reached out to both the Marlins and Los Angeles Dodgers, though another source said that no discussions took place with the Dodgers. The Marlins, historically open to any possibility, would at least consider the concept, sources said.
“There’s nothing going on with Carl,” Red Sox general manager Ben Cherington said. “He’s our left fielder and we’re glad to have him back in our lineup.”
Yet, while there are conflicting accounts about the nature of the Crawford talks, a trade could make sense for the Red Sox — if not now, then this offseason, assuming that Crawford plays well enough in the second half to restore his value.
The Sox could try to move Crawford to a variety of clubs; his contract allows him to block trades to only two teams, and states that any club that acquires him cannot trade him to the New York Yankees.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Rosenthal: Sox gauging interest in Crawford
#1
Posted 18 July 2012 - 11:58 AM
#2
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:20 PM
Seems like he's a little fragile mentally, so I'm not happy with this getting leaked right now.
Now if he wants to get the hell out of dodge and is excited about playing to get OUT of Boston, maybe that's different.
Edited by StuckOnYouk, 18 July 2012 - 12:21 PM.
#3
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:24 PM
#4
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:29 PM
#5
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:30 PM
#6
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:33 PM
The Marlins are a good mark....they are frustrated and might be apt to do something stupid. I'm sure the Sox would prefer Ramirez, and if they ate enough money, get Josh Johnson out of the deal.
Do we want Ramirez? He's a headcase and his OPS the last three seasons: .853, .712, .763.
And he's no great shakes defensively.
edit: fixed OPS numbers
Edited by Corsi, 18 July 2012 - 01:01 PM.
#7
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:34 PM
#8
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:34 PM
#9
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
Do we want Ramirez? He's a headcase and his OPS the last three seasons: .853, .712, .713.
And he's no great shakes defensively.
I just meant contract wise....
#10
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:54 PM
The Sox finally have the starting OF they envisioned in ST, why would they trade Crawford now? The Marlins just spent a fortune and opened a new stadium. Would they really trade Hanley (I agree that at this point he's not what he used to be) or Reyes, one of their big splashes to take on Crawford? If they decide to sell, they may dump some contracts, but may do so in the interest of rebuilding.
#11
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:54 PM
Bob Nightengale
@BNightengale
The#RedSox and#Marlins discussing blockbuster: Carl Crawford and prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.#MLB
https://twitter.com/...648887715729408
#12
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:54 PM
BNightengale: The
#RedSox and#Marlins discussing blockbuster: Carl Crawford and prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.
#13
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:58 PM
Edited by Rudy Pemberton, 18 July 2012 - 01:20 PM.
#14
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:58 PM
#15
Posted 18 July 2012 - 12:59 PM
Hanley doesn't even play short anymore (third base, sometimes OF last year). Sox have a third baseman, don't they?BNightengale: The
#RedSox and#Marlins discussing blockbuster: Carl Crawford and prospect to Miami for Hanley Ramirez and Heath Bell.
#16
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:00 PM
#17
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:01 PM
Awesome. Is this more of the buy high, sell low strategy that the Cherington regime has been carrying out? How does one investigate Crawford for over a year, give him a massive contract, and then decide that they effed up? And, how can those same folks be then trusted to move him?
If true, this just confirms what we already know, that this organization has no god damn plan at all.
To be fair, you can't really buy any lower on someone than you can on Heath Bell.
Also, I think this trade proposal is a) silly and b) will never happen. But I know nothing about these things, so...
Edited by Jnai, 18 July 2012 - 01:01 PM.
#18
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:02 PM
The Miami Marlins have approached the Boston Red Sox about a blockbuster trade that would send left fielder Carl Crawford and a prospect to South Florida for infielder Hanley Ramirez and closer Heath Bell, according to three officials with knowledge of the talks who spoke to USA TODAY Sports on the condition of anonymity because negotiations are ongoing.
http://www.usatoday....rade/56309810/1The biggest impediment to a deal, according to one of the officials, is the Marlins' indecision whether to unload their high-paid players and abandon playoff hopes for this season and build for next season, or try to overcome the nine-game deficit they face in the NL East and 5½ games they trail for an NL wild-card berth
Edited by Corsi, 18 July 2012 - 01:04 PM.
#19
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:02 PM
The Miami Marlins have approached the Boston Red Sox about a blockbuster trade that would send left fielder Carl Crawford and a prospect to South Florida for infielder Hanley Ramirez and closer Heath Bell, according to three officials with knowledge of the talks who spoke to USA TODAY Sports on the condition of anonymity because negotiations are ongoing.
The biggest impediment to a deal, according to one of the officials, is the Marlins' indecision whether to unload their high-paid players and abandon playoff hopes for this season and build for next season, or try to overcome the nine-game deficit they face in the NL East and 5½ games they trail for an NL wild-card berth.
The Red Sox have coveted Ramirez, 28, almost since the day he left. He was the 2006 National League Rookie of the Year and won the batting title in 2009 with a career-high .342 average, but he has struggled the past 1½ seasons. He hit a career-low .243 with 10 homers and 45 RBI last season, and after moving to third base this year to make room for All-Star shortstop Jose Reyes, is hitting just .249 with a .326 on-base percentage, 14 homers and 47 RBI.
#20
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:04 PM
Reyes? He makes $92M over the next 5 (+ club option in 2018 for $22M), so there's no savings.
FWIW (i.e., keep in mind position and defense matter!) their OPSs going back a bit, with seasons with few ABs not included.
yr HR JR MA CC 06 0.833 0.841 ----- 0.830 07 0.948 0.775 ----- 0.821 08 0.940 0.833 0.834 0.719 09 0.953 ----- ----- 0.816 10 0.853 0.749 0.748 0.851 11 0.712 0.877 0.698 0.694 12 0.763 0.708 0.703 -----
#21
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:04 PM
#22
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:05 PM
He wasn't good at short, not much better at third. Career UZR/150 at short of -9.1.They could put him back at SS couldn't they? Or maybe he goes to LF.
#23
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:07 PM
#24
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:07 PM
https://twitter.com/...652631622782976
Sources:There is no current discussion involving Crawford and Hanley Ramirez/Heath Bell. Was brought up briefly as concept,immediately died.
#25
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:08 PM
What does Heath Bell do to improve the bullpen? He's been awful for the Marlins and as shaky as Alfredo has been, I wouldn't trust him to close in the AL East.
All about the money man, Marlins want him gone
#26
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:08 PM
I doubt anything will come of this, but really?
And Olney now says it was never a thing. Good.
#27
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:08 PM
#28
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:09 PM
If that was straight up, how much cash would it save us?
Ramirez: 12:$15M, 13:$15.5M, 14:$16M
Bell: 12:$6M, 13:$9M, 14:$9M, , 14:$9M (can become guaranteed based on performance)
Crawford: 12:$19.5M, 13:$20M, 14:$20.25M, 15:$20.5M, 16:$20.75M,17:$21M
So, if there's no cash involved, it's a savings of $44M from 2013-onward.
I'd have to imagine some cash is involved, though.
#29
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:10 PM
#30
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:11 PM
Ramirez: 12:$15M, 13:$15.5M, 14:$16M
Bell: 12:$6M, 13:$9M, 14:$9M, , 14:$9M (can become guaranteed based on performance)
Crawford: 12:$19.5M, 13:$20M, 14:$20.25M, 15:$20.5M, 16:$20.75M,17:$21M
So, if there's no cash involved, it's a savings of $44M from 2013-onward.
I'd have to imagine some cash is involved, though.
And AAV is just about a push, so the Sox would probably have to fork over $30-35M.
Funny little exercise that was.
#31
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:12 PM
Wait, MIAMI initiated this? Immediate red flag. Sounds like they know something about Hanley no one else does. Why else would they be trying to get a clearly underperforming, overpaid guy? So weird.
Because they'd be trading one, too.
#32
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:16 PM
Wait, MIAMI initiated this? Immediate red flag. Sounds like they know something about Hanley no one else does. Why else would they be trying to get a clearly underperforming, overpaid guy? So weird.
Yeah, they know something about Hanley that everyone else does. He's not that good, making a ton of money, and unhappy with the position he's playing.
And when it says Miami came to us asking for Crawford and a prospect is there any doubt the prospect was Xander? Sounds like a crappy deal for the Sox and one that got shot down.
#33
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:19 PM
The Marlins are a good mark....they are frustrated and might be apt to do something stupid. I'm sure the Sox would prefer Ramirez, and if they ate enough money, get Josh Johnson out of the deal.
The Marlins are a good mark in these circumstances, based on track records particularly of late? This scares the hell out of me.
ps ... We're going to be featured in lots of these reports because the RS have done a splendid job of making themselves the designated mark for mlb.
Edited by dcmissle, 18 July 2012 - 01:22 PM.
#34
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:27 PM
This. Exactly. Fuck Rosenthal and his bow tie.Teams gauge interest on every player on their roster all the time. Rosenthal is just stirring the pot so he can write an article next week about how unhappy Crawford is about the trade rumors.
#35
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:33 PM
And that hole he stands in whenever he interviews anybody? Fill it with concrete.This. Exactly. Fuck Rosenthal and his bow tie.
#36
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:34 PM
#37
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:36 PM
#38
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:55 PM
#39
Posted 18 July 2012 - 01:58 PM
Nightengale is like Tim Brown, not a rumormonger like Rosenthal or Heyman, but when they say something, there is at least smoke.
Remember, a quick denial was issued on Youkilis trade talks too. I'm not sure what a Crawford-Reyes or Ramirez trade would accomplish. I'd rather keep Crawford than take other teams headaches which is all you can do with the 110 million left on his deal. Heath Bell is awful too.
#40
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:01 PM
BNightengale: @JdMcAuliffe No, obviously still on table if #Marlins decide to sell. VP Dan Jennings is in Boston scouting Crawford right now.
#41
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:02 PM
I was just about to post that. Wow, it's more than just a rumor now. When management is scouting someone, that's big.
#42
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:03 PM
I think it's possible they both heard the same rumor/story, then reported it from complete opposite angles. Nightengale's report implies that Miami is the one initiating the whole thing inquiring about Crawford, while Rosenthal's report implied that the Red Sox were shopping Crawford.Nightengale is like Tim Brown, not a rumormonger like Rosenthal or Heyman, but when they say something, there is at least smoke.
Rosenthal's report makes the Red Sox look like the aggressors, so obviously we as Sox fans get all up in arms and think he's making things up to stir the pot. But since Nightengale's report makes the Sox look like their taking calls rather than making them, we're more inclined to believe him.
#43
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:06 PM
At this pt, how much can you trust what he says?
#44
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:06 PM
#45
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:09 PM
#46
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:10 PM
But if Ben (or LL) make a deal for Hanley and Bell it would be beyond stupid. If the Sox want to exchange contracts with anyone I am pretty sure the contracts they will be taking on would not be that of a closer who cannot close and an unhappy, overweight 3rd baseman who can barley hit anymore.
#47
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:11 PM
I'm trying to understand how getting Crawford would be part of Miami's plans to sell. Unless Boston eats a majority of his contract it's swapping one problem for another.
Very much this. If Miami is shopping Bell and Ramirez, they're looking to dump the salary obligation, not trade one obligation for a bigger/longer commitment. If the rumor was they were offering Hanley and/or Bell to the Sox for Bogaerts and Bradley or something, I think there'd be more to the plausibillity of the whole thing.
#48
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:17 PM
Sources:There is no current discussion involving Crawford and Hanley Ramirez/Heath Bell. Was brought up briefly as concept,immediately died.
https://twitter.com/...652631622782976
#49
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:19 PM
Well, sure, but if I was going to have an underperforming guy with a chance to turn it around, I'd choose the guy with higher upside and a cheaper, shorter contract. IOW, what problem does taking on Carl Crawford solve for the Marlins? It isn't money or years or performance. Dumping Bell doesn't make this any more palatable from their end either.Because they'd be trading one, too.
Edited by uncannymanny, 18 July 2012 - 02:23 PM.
#50
Posted 18 July 2012 - 02:20 PM
Gammons: "Inaccurate. Marlins deal not happening. The Sox have not called anyone. This isn't happening. You think Nava is going to be in LF every day?"
Well, he has been for the past few months, no?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












