Carl Crawford on the field for BP too. Line drives galore. Stance much more closed. Nice easy swing.
Obviously we often read glowing reports on guys who are rehabbing, but the fact that he's closed his stance is very encouraging.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:32 PM
Carl Crawford on the field for BP too. Line drives galore. Stance much more closed. Nice easy swing.
Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:51 PM
Obviously we often read glowing reports on guys who are rehabbing, but the fact that he's closed his stance is very encouraging.
Posted 09 June 2012 - 06:10 PM
Why? He was hurt that year. I don't understand why we want an offensive force to change what made him great.
Posted 09 June 2012 - 06:26 PM
He was pretty helpless against anything over the outside part of the plate. Even when he got a hit on a pitch out there it looked like a fluke. How can it hurt to go to a more conventional approach? OK, with this team's luck...nah, can't say it.Why? He was hurt that year. I don't understand why we want an offensive force to change what made him great.
Posted 10 June 2012 - 01:48 AM
Crawford's never really been an "offensive force" at the plate outside of the 2010 outlier year
Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:17 PM
Crawford hopes to join Pawtucket this weekend and then return after the break. Says elbow still isn't 100 percent.
Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:21 PM
Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:40 PM
Posted 06 July 2012 - 04:52 PM
Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:04 PM
Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:10 PM
I understand the Red Sox medical staff has not earned the benefit of the doubt but not every injury like Crawfords needs Tommy John surgery and when non pitchers come back from rehabbing the injury without surgery I would think it's pretty common they are not yet 100%.
Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:12 PM
Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:33 PM
Yes, but it's hard to believe that re-tooling Carl's throwing motion to protect his elbow is anything but a desperate measure.
For that, Crawford can thank Niemann, who spent five seasons helping Mets pitchers and outfielders rehab from arm injuries. Niemann has been teaching Crawford to better utilize his legs and his core while throwing in order to take stress off his arm. “In order to throw a ball as a pitcher, you’re constantly talking about the delivery and how you can make it more efficient and less stress on the arm while still commanding the ball,” Niemann said. “Throwing from the outfield is the same thing. We want him to be in the best position to create less stress on the arm and the best throw direction. I don’t want to say it’s command, but it is. You want to be able to throw to your target and hit what you’re throwing at. It’s the same thing.”
Posted 06 July 2012 - 05:51 PM
Posted 06 July 2012 - 10:58 PM
Edited by Plympton91, 06 July 2012 - 10:58 PM.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 09:48 AM
Crawford will be shut down for at least five days, after which the clock on his 20-day minor league rehab assignment will restart
Edited by drtooth, 07 July 2012 - 09:48 AM.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 09:50 AM
Posted 07 July 2012 - 09:59 AM
Posted 07 July 2012 - 10:52 AM
Yeah, as I posted in a previous game thread, this whole Crawford comeback is likely to be a mirage. He'll play for a week or so before the elbow shreds. Off to surgery, and maybe we'll see him playing in Fenway in late 2013.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 11:09 AM
TJS for hitters actually requires far less recovery time. IIRC, players have had it after the season ends and have been ready for Opening Day.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 11:20 AM
Edited by irinmike, 07 July 2012 - 11:20 AM.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 12:06 PM
From Scott Lauber's (and several other) Twitter feed
Mild groin strain.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 12:45 PM
No, it's still at least none months. That's assuming that the theoretical surgery he's talking about is indeed TJ - he may need an elbow scope or sonething else entirely
Posted 07 July 2012 - 01:47 PM
You're really going out on a limb with that one.
This latest setback, combined with the apparent slide of the team out of playoff contention while playing against tougher competition, would seem to argue for just shutting him down for the season. Hopefully the team has some solid insider knowledge indicating that Crawford can be healthy and contributing to the 2012 team in a meaningful way if they keep trying to get him back this year, and are not just working off of a combination of hope and self-imposed pressure to return a high-dollar starter to the lineup.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 02:10 PM
Lackey will contribute more wins to the Sox than Crawford over the balance of their contracts. That's spotting Crawford two years. Crawford is an unmitigated disaster for this franchise.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 02:28 PM
Posted 07 July 2012 - 02:40 PM
I believe he meant to type nine months.
Posted 07 July 2012 - 03:31 PM
Posted 07 July 2012 - 06:59 PM
Lackey will contribute more wins to the Sox than Crawford over the balance of their contracts. That's spotting Crawford two years. Crawford is an unmitigated disaster for this franchise.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 07:32 AM
Crawford told ESPNBoston.com's Joe McDonald a couple of days ago that if he can't handle the pain in the elbow, he'll "probably" have surgery to repair a sprained ulnar collateral ligament after the season. He has told friends, a baseball source said Saturday, that doctors have told him he will need the operation.
"That is false," general manager Ben Cherington said in an e-mail late Saturday afternoon. "It's a possibility down the road, but plenty of position players play with UCL injuries."
Posted 08 July 2012 - 07:50 AM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 08:23 AM
Fangraphs WAR is calculated based on FIP and not his actual results. This is fundamentally different from b-ref's WAR which is based on what he actually accomplished on the field and has him at 2.1 WAR below replacement level.I was about to respond saying that Lackey was already in a hole given all the negative WAR he earned last year, but then I looked it up. Fangraphs has Lackey at 1.1 WAR in 2011. What? I kept hearing how he was the worst Red Sox starter ever.
And indeed B-R tells me that with an ERA+ of 67, he is the 5th worst pitcher who started at least 20 games since 1980.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 09:24 AM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 09:35 AM
No, it's still at least nine months. That's assuming that the theoretical surgery he's talking about is indeed TJ - he may need an elbow scope or sonething else entirely
Edited by czar, 08 July 2012 - 09:37 AM.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 11:45 AM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 12:25 PM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 01:06 PM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:23 PM
http://www.bostonher...ng-to-blow-out/Given the condition of his left elbow, and considering the lack of significant improvement after receiving a platelet-rich plasma injection in late April, Crawford has been told by doctors that he likely will need Tommy John surgery to repair his damaged ulnar collateral ligament. So, why wait?
“Thought about it,” Crawford said today, “but at this point, if I can play, I think (the Red Sox) want me out on the field. I’m just trying to do everything I can to get back out on the field. Right now, I feel like if I couldn’t help the team I wouldn’t get out there.”
Crawford’s minor league rehab assignment has been interrupted by minor tightness in his groin, an issue he said that isn’t any different from the routine soreness he experiences each year during spring training. But he’s hoping to play Thursday at Triple-A Pawtucket and believes he’s still “very close” to rejoining the Red Sox.
For how long, though? Crawford’s elbow may be a ticking time bomb.
“Probably at some point it’s going to blow out on me,” Crawford said. “It’s one of those things that is what it is.”
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:29 PM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:35 PM
That is...awesome. I just don't understand why the club doesn't just shut him down. I see no upside in letting him play when his elbow is shredded.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:37 PM
Edited by Ed Hillel, 08 July 2012 - 04:39 PM.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:48 PM
Because this team is run by a bunch of revenue-driven chimps. Getting a big name player on the field to help keep the sellout streak alive is more important that fielding a healthy, winning team.
Edited by ScubaSteveAvery, 08 July 2012 - 04:48 PM.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 04:56 PM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:03 PM
Because this team is run by a bunch of revenue-driven chimps. Getting a big name player on the field to help keep the sellout streak alive is more important that fielding a healthy, winning team.
This is probably the most frustrating part about being a fan of this team right now. We have no clue why the decisions are being made like they are. I don't want to pretend like I know what is going on in the front office, but so far this year they have not talked out, or shown any sort of reasonable plan for this club. I understand that Cherington was handed a crap sandwich, but from the manager search to insisting that Crawford play with a shredded elbow, none of the moves have made sense, especially when viewed in total. At this point, its hard to have any confidence in either Cherington or the ownership.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:10 PM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:48 PM
Carl should just pull a Jacoby and shut himself down. I know that he's probably worried about proving himself in Boston and what not, but it's pretty clear that the FO have no clue what they're doing.
There's no sense in potentially risking the rest of his career and the idiots making these decisions should be ignored. And they wonder why their own players don't trust the medical staff.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 05:52 PM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 06:35 PM
Posted 08 July 2012 - 07:20 PM
Were you asking anyone in particular or is this just another stream of consciousness post?What's really going on here? This injury was initially supposed to cost Crawford a few weeks of the regular season, now he's claiming surgery is inevitable, and the team disputes it? Add in the claim of racial insults from fans from rehab, and it seems clear that were this a marriage, we'd be getting divorced. Does Carl not want to play unless he's 100%? The idea that the club wants him on the field to help sell tickets is ridiculous; no one is buying tickets to see this guy play, he's not really a popular player in Boston. Just a hideous situation, where we are 1.5 years into an 8 year deal that both sides wish never happened.
Posted 08 July 2012 - 07:20 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users