Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Group D: France, Ukraine, Sweden and Liverpool
#1
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:56 AM
By the way, Ukraine seems like a wonderful place to hold this tournament: http://sports.ndtv.c...ered-in-ukraine
#2
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:56 PM
#3
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:24 PM
sey´d froh:
#4
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:25 PM
#5
Posted 09 June 2012 - 10:35 PM
#6
Posted 09 June 2012 - 11:09 PM
I'm all for a good French pile on,
Then you misunderstood
France and Ukraine to go through.
#7
Posted 10 June 2012 - 05:35 AM
"If it is the most torrid three weeks of my career I hope that it's for the right reasons. By that I mean because the players have let myself and the team down very badly, we have played very badly and that fair-minded people watching us are thinking, 'my God what are they doing?".
Don't blame me, he's saying, it's all the players fault. I prepared them properly but they haven't listened to a word I say. If it all goes well, it's because of Roy, if it's another fuck-up it's the players fault. Typical Hodgson MO, nothing is ever his fault.
France & Ukraine to go through.
Edited by cjdmadcow, 10 June 2012 - 05:36 AM.
#8
Posted 10 June 2012 - 07:08 AM
Home advantage might be worth possibly 2 points to them in the group stage, but that still won't be enough for them to progress. It'll come down to the winner of the Sweden / England game. (Plus France)
There's been a lot of talk from UEFA about referees taking sides off the pitch if players are subject to racist abuse from spectators. If this is going to happen, it'll be in the Ukraine / France game.
#9
Posted 10 June 2012 - 07:25 AM
We see the warts on England, but they have far more talent than Sweden and Ukraine.
#10
Posted 11 June 2012 - 08:11 AM
The Guardian's Daniel Taylor has it, too. Ox in for Downing.
Edited by DLew On Roids, 11 June 2012 - 08:17 AM.
#11
Posted 11 June 2012 - 08:29 AM
#12
Posted 11 June 2012 - 08:47 AM
#13
Posted 11 June 2012 - 09:46 AM
#14
Posted 11 June 2012 - 09:56 AM
#15
Posted 11 June 2012 - 09:58 AM
France: Lloris, Debuchy, Rami, Mexes, Evra, Nasri, Cabaye, Diarra, Malouda, Ribery, Benzema.
Subs: Mandanda, Giroud, Matuidi, Reveillere, Menez, M'Vila, Martin, Ben Arfa, Valbuena, Clichy, Koscielny, Carrasso.
England: Hart, Johnson, Terry, Lescott, Cole, Milner, Gerrard, Parker, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Young, Welbeck.
Subs: Green, Walcott, Henderson, Carroll, Baines, Jones, Jagielka, Downing, Defoe, Butland.
Referee: Nicola Rizzoli (Italy)
#16
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:06 AM
There's a decent chance that more Liverpool players will play in this match than City and United players combined. I have no rooting interest in England and just don't want to see any more injuries to City players, but I reserve the right to relentlessly mock Liverpool fans when this team goes belly up because the FA thought that when you have an opportunity to deploy half of your league's 8th place squad for your country you just have to take it.
Bollocks.
What was the alternative? Outside of Richards, who has made himself look an idiot by not being on the original stand-by list, who would you have preferred?
Check the notice-boards now and in the past and you'll find that a large percentage of LFC fans don't give a fuck about England and would prefer it if 6 players hadn't been selected. England (as a nation) doesn't give a fuck about Liverpool (the city) so the feeling is mutual.
Also, your assertion about player numbers is incorrect. With a possible three subs to be used the max number of LFC players on the pitch can be five. If you include Nasri & some little shit called Evra in the France team, there's already 6 ManU/Citeh.
#17
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:12 AM
I wouldn't take it so seriously, it's just funny how many Liverpool players are on this squad, given how poor they were. There were alternatives, but probably not from City or United who are full of internationals.
#18
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:33 AM
#19
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:34 AM
Not sure about Johnson as the right back over Jones, but thats minor.
#20
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:50 AM
#21
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:52 AM
#22
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:58 AM
#23
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:58 AM
Young has been playing there in the build up. Why did you expect anything different?Er, now they are saying Young in the #10 role with Gerrard next to Parker. Dislike.
#24
Posted 11 June 2012 - 10:59 AM
edit: Young in the hole is bizarre but surely it's an attempt to keep a formation that Rooney will slot into when he returns? I'd probably have just put Milner there and left Young on the wing but neither is really a CAM. Too bad Zinedine Cleverly wasn't available!
Edited by teddykgb, 11 June 2012 - 11:01 AM.
#25
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:05 AM
None of you watched any of the friendlies? Young has played the second striker role the last two friendlies. He'll probably move back to the wing once Rooney comes back.edit: Young in the hole is bizarre but surely it's an attempt to keep a formation that Rooney will slot into when he returns? I'd probably have just put Milner there and left Young on the wing but neither is really a CAM. Too bad Zinedine Cleverly wasn't available!
#26
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:05 AM
Young has been playing there in the build up. Why did you expect anything different?
In most of the qualifying games for the tournament, Rooney played in the 10 role, with Young on the left, and Crouch or Bent in front of them. I figured Hodgson was trying things out in the friendlys, but they didn't look too good.
#27
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:08 AM
#28
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:09 AM
Is Rooney playing today?In most of the qualifying games for the tournament, Rooney played in the 10 role, with Young on the left, and Crouch or Bent in front of them. I figured Hodgson was trying things out in the friendlys, but they didn't look too good.
He was experimenting because he needed to figure out what he was going to do without Rooney. They won both games 1-0. Ho hum.
#29
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:12 AM
In most of the qualifying games for the tournament, Rooney played in the 10 role, with Young on the left, and Crouch or Bent in front of them. I figured Hodgson was trying things out in the friendlys, but they didn't look too good.
Would have rather seen Young out wide regardless of who else is in there, also would have rather not seen Milner out wide, dont care too much for him, but it wouldnt be an England match if the lineup made sense
#30
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:12 AM
#31
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:13 AM
Is Rooney playing today?
He was experimenting because he needed to figure out what he was going to do without Rooney. They won both games 1-0. Ho hum.
They looked pretty poor doing so though, the result isnt always the most important factor, especially when you need to step up in talent level from Norway and Belgium to play France.
#32
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:13 AM
Would have rather seen Young out wide regardless of who else is in there, also would have rather not seen Milner out wide, dont care too much for him, but it wouldnt be an England match if the lineup made sense
I agree, but I'm sure sachmoney will reply to you soon that you didn't watch qualifying.
#33
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:14 AM
#34
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:15 AM
#35
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:15 AM
Fucking Milner. You sucks.
#36
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:17 AM
#37
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:18 AM
as is usual for him, a strong first touch made the finish nearly impossible for Milner. Slipped trying to get his foot around, which is happening a lot to the England players
What was the typical breakdown of Milner's matches this season for City in terms of playing wide or in the center? I cant remember the last time I watched him play wide and actually be worth a damn
#38
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:19 AM
#39
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:19 AM
#40
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:20 AM
18th minute: Ian Darke brings up 1066 as an example of the "longtime rivalry"
More very useful info when attempting to enjoy a football match
#41
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:21 AM
What was the typical breakdown of Milner's matches this season for City in terms of playing wide or in the center? I cant remember the last time I watched him play wide and actually be worth a damn
He's better in the center than out wide by a large margin. In the center his outrageous workrate is an asset that makes up for some of his shortcomings. He's also pretty good at spotting a pass. City seldom played him out wide this season with Nasri being brought in, as we don't really line up with wingers and play Silva and Nasri "wide" and have them come in. Milner didn't play much once Yaya Toure came back from the ACoN as a result.
Only defense I'd say of Milner as a winger is that he can cross a ball, city just don't play with a target man striker, so it's wasted. I could see playing Milner wide right with Carroll on the field, Milner will work very hard on his wing and get plenty of opportunities to fire a cross in.
Edited by teddykgb, 11 June 2012 - 11:22 AM.
#42
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:22 AM
Get up Danny!
#43
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:22 AM
tons of prime open seats at anthem-time, considering the size, wealth, and history of the 2 nations playing, plus a successful club team in the city/stadium
No one wants to go to the fucking Ukraine.
#44
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:25 AM
#45
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:25 AM
What would be your preferred line up? If you take out Milner, who do you put in?Would have rather seen Young out wide regardless of who else is in there, also would have rather not seen Milner out wide, dont care too much for him, but it wouldnt be an England match if the lineup made sense
EDIT: trying to visualize what you're thinking
They looked poor because they are a poor side.They looked pretty poor doing so though, the result isnt always the most important factor, especially when you need to step up in talent level from Norway and Belgium to play France.
Edited by sachmoney, 11 June 2012 - 11:26 AM.
#46
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:27 AM
No one wants to go to the fucking Ukraine.
I realize Wales has its own futbol team, but I would have thought that the English hooligans travel well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hughes_(businessman)
Perhaps everyone is at the aquapark
http://uefaeuro2012....st/aquapark.php
#47
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:30 AM
#48
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:30 AM
#49
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:31 AM
#50
Posted 11 June 2012 - 11:31 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











