Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Manchester City 2012-13: Now With Three League Titles (So The Stars Sorta Mean Something!)
#1
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:46 PM
All that being said, there was something very Red Sox 2004-esque about this past season's league victory. Not to piggyback on what Zomp said in another thread in here-- not sure if you guys remember Zomp; he's the dude that roots for that other Manchester club; you know, the one that "did the Devon Loch" and choked in historic fashion -- but it wasn't solely about winning, but the thrilling, unforgettable manner in which they won. Coming back from 8 points down with 6 matches to play (I still haven't been able to confirm if this is the greatest collapse in top-flight history), dismantling United in the third to last match of the season, rallying in dramatic fashion against QPR on the final day. I heard "You couldn't have scripted it better" countless times following City's win. Really, you couldn't have.
Anyway, it's time to move on. It's time to defend the league title, improve upon last year's finish in the Champions League, and maybe take more than one fucking point from Sunderland. The season begins Aug. 12.
(I'd also like to mention that I was recently at the receiving end of a City-related jeer. This had never happened before. Walking to the Paradise the other night, a passerby saw my shirt and rather eloquently told me that "Man City sucks." It's a brave new world. Ha.)
#2
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:42 PM
#3
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:42 PM
On the plus side, Chelsea are thumbing their nose at FFP, which makes it interesting. I honestly think City have made and are continuing to make great strides at being in accordance with the rulings, but it's probably helpful to have Chelsea be an even worse offender.
For the upcoming season, it seems like a pacy winger is a target, as was the case last season with the neverending pursuit of Alexis. Hazard is already off the table (and wanted to be a CAM anyway) and so City moves on. RvP rumors just won't go away, but I honestly have no idea why we'd be in on a striker. RvP is also kind of old to buy and truth be told he just sort of remains a Gunner. I'd be ecstatic to have him, but it seems unnecessary.
Supposedly Bayern have agreed a fee with Dzeko. As far as I'm concerned, Bayern can fuck right off. They won't close their stupid mouths about City all goddamned year and during CL qualifications, now they want to unsettle a player who was admittedly likely already unsettled. City should make a nice offer on Kroos just to fuck with them. The Premier League Champions bow to NOONE.
#4
Posted 29 May 2012 - 06:17 PM
#5
Posted 01 June 2012 - 01:02 PM
Shut the fuck up.
Finally Man U and Liverpool fans can agree on something.
#6
Posted 18 June 2012 - 09:39 AM
Really just coming in here to post this for LTF in case he hasn't seen it
Edited by teddykgb, 18 June 2012 - 09:40 AM.
#7
Posted 27 June 2012 - 09:06 AM
#8
Posted 03 July 2012 - 08:12 PM
Fixtures are out...no complaints from me although I wish the CL Home Games were released so I could see if I could sneak another trip in this season.
Really just coming in here to post this for LTF in case he hasn't seen it
Thanks for posting it. I hadn't seen it before, though my frequent watching of old City matches via Fox Soccer's "Premier League Classics" familiarized me with the name.
#9
Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:13 AM
#10
Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:17 AM
#11
Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:23 AM
I agree though, if they're going to use photoshop they should put the gold badges on there.
Next season will be Nike, which is a shame. Umbro have done a great job on the City kits thus far. They're the same company, basically, but Umbro is apparently going to be sold and Nike doesn't want to lose MCFC, so we'll get something more mediocre moving forward. Not really crazy about this season's home or away, but that tends to be the initial reaction to all the new stuff, I bet it'll grow on me
#12
Posted 20 July 2012 - 09:30 AM
I have a training jersey that's very similar in color to the road kit. I'm digging it.
Not that anyone cares, but my favorite recent City kit was the 2009-10 road ones:

Black and yellow for the Manchester bee.
#13
Posted 22 July 2012 - 11:46 AM
#14
Posted 22 July 2012 - 05:13 PM
#15
Posted 24 July 2012 - 09:22 AM
#17
Posted 03 August 2012 - 02:24 PM
and that the mackems will probably pay it
#18
Posted 03 August 2012 - 06:01 PM
#19
Posted 04 August 2012 - 08:39 AM
Can't believe Citeh wants 8M pounds for Guidetti
and that the mackems will probably pay it
I think it's worth it. I wish they were trying to incorporate him instead of sell him. Big fella just has a knack for putting the ball in the net. He really might be world class.
#20
Posted 12 August 2012 - 07:36 AM
#21
Posted 12 August 2012 - 07:56 AM
#22
Posted 12 August 2012 - 08:02 AM
City's kit today looks spectacular. All red with gold trim is the kit of a truly classy side.
I admit you got a chuckle out of me.
Zomp, thus far it looks a shame mufc couldn't afford Hazard, he and Ashley young could have been a hell of a diving team
Edited by teddykgb, 12 August 2012 - 08:02 AM.
#23
Posted 12 August 2012 - 09:10 AM
David Silva super sub!
#24
Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:02 AM
#25
Posted 14 August 2012 - 11:01 AM
LTF if you're serious about the home shirt, We Got Soccer down in Foxboro has the shirt for sale locally, which is cool, although it's 80 bucks and you could get it with gold PL badges for the same price from the MCFC store.
#26
Posted 15 August 2012 - 04:44 PM
#27
Posted 16 August 2012 - 09:57 AM
http://www.guardian....ayer-statistics
On Friday, City will make available through its website the data on every player in every team from every game in the Premier League last season. That may not enrapture the supporter fixated on Robin van Persie's next career move but to the growing number of researchers, sports scientists and bloggers seeking new ways to measure performance and value a player, it is potentially ground-breaking.
Until now, data that costs all Premier League clubs a small fortune each season has not been widely available or at least widely accessible to the public. Baseball may have been revolutionised by Bill James's sabermetric findings from the late 1970s onwards, leading to Michael Lewis's book Moneyball and now a film starring Brad Pitt, basketball coaches make tactical decisions based on live data during a game, but developments in football have largely remained in-house.
Somewhere in the English equivalent to Watertown the English equivalent to Eric Van has clicked off the English equivalent to the "Teen Choice Awards" and begun hyperventilating.
#28
Posted 19 August 2012 - 11:25 AM
Sorry, City fans. You'll probably win anyway. That was the best TV quote from last year, so I couldn't help myself.
Edited by DLew On Roids, 19 August 2012 - 11:30 AM.
#29
Posted 19 August 2012 - 02:00 PM
#30
Posted 19 August 2012 - 02:09 PM
#31
Posted 19 August 2012 - 03:17 PM
Dzeko is a tough player to judge. He does so many good things and creates a lot of opportunities, but he really takes some nightmare touches and squanders a bunch as well. I think this is why he's better when he plays the full 90, gives him enough time to make up for 2 or 3 squanders he's going to make. To be fair to him, when Aguero or Tevez squander by dribbling into 3 men I don't notice it as much as when a big player like Dzeko does. Overall, it looks like he and Balotelli are going to get a chance to run off of Tevez, who was as good as he's ever been for us today.
#32
Posted 19 August 2012 - 06:36 PM
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/1137482/sergio-aguero-injury-worries-manchester-city's-roberto-mancini?cc=5901
#33
Posted 20 August 2012 - 06:13 AM
I thought he'd lost his ACL. Lots of times you see a guy's ACL get popped and he walks off the field. Once the initial pain subsides, they think they can go back in, only to realize he doesn't have something in the knee anymore.
#34
Posted 20 August 2012 - 06:55 AM
#35
Posted 20 August 2012 - 11:11 AM
#36
Posted 20 August 2012 - 11:17 AM
Really don't want to see one of my favorite players come to you...especially if it comes with pairing him with Yaya Toure...
#37
Posted 20 August 2012 - 11:26 AM
#38
Posted 20 August 2012 - 01:52 PM
Can we please stop posting about how horrifically njured Sergio Aguero may be? I'm going to be in the fetal position soon
My sister's brother's cousin's friend's nursemaid's bartender's girlfriend works at the MRI facility and she said they had to amputate his leg.
#39
Posted 20 August 2012 - 02:19 PM
Can we please stop posting about how horrifically njured Sergio Aguero may be? I'm going to be in the fetal position soon
Yeah, this Liverpool fan really wishes he had your problems.
#40
Posted 21 August 2012 - 09:46 AM
Yeah, what a midfield it would be. It isn't going to happen, he loves Roma and won't leave
Yup: http://menmedia.co.u...commits-to-roma
Also, the MEN is saying Aguero could be back in a month: http://menmedia.co.u...er-options-open
Sergio Aguero is targeting a first-team comeback for Manchester City next month after a scan on his knee discovered the injury isn’t as bad as first feared.
Roberto Mancini admitted he was ‘worried’ after Aguero was stretchered off 15 minutes into the victory over Southampton at the Etihad Stadium on Sunday.
But after the game Aguero tweeted that there was ‘no significant damage’ and with a scan bringing more positive news, the 24-year-old is in line to make his return when City visit Stoke on September 15.
Finally, tranfer rumblings ... The latest is Scott Sinclair for five millions pounds and Adam Johnson to Sunderland for 10.
#41
Posted 22 August 2012 - 05:43 AM
Edited by bosox4283, 22 August 2012 - 05:44 AM.
#42
Posted 22 August 2012 - 10:57 AM
#43
Posted 22 August 2012 - 11:49 AM
It's a good move to bolster the City squad, but selfishly, I'm disappointed to see this move by Sinclair. He's an excellent player who's entertaining to watch and could be a regular at a side challenging for the CL, and we won't see him much for the foreseeable future. I guess you go when you're 25 and Mansour backs up the armored truck for the payday that sets you for life, but it seems pretty likely that he'll end up like Wayne Bridge.
I don't think he'll be a Wayne Bridge, that's a bit of a strange comparison to make. He's presumably being brought in for some of Adam Johnson's time, and AJ played quite a bit last season. City has absolutely nothing in the wingers department, so if Sinclair comes in and makes a strong claim, I think you'll see a lot more of him than you'd think. That said, I don't think we're going to setup with traditional wingers all that often, but I think Mancini is going to vary his tactics quite a bit more this season. In any case, I don't think he ever ends up out in the cold like Bridge did, but he may have to be content with 15 minute spells as an attempted impact sub while getting run in cup games for a while.
#44
Posted 22 August 2012 - 12:09 PM
I don't think he'll be a Wayne Bridge, that's a bit of a strange comparison to make. He's presumably being brought in for some of Adam Johnson's time, and AJ played quite a bit last season. City has absolutely nothing in the wingers department, so if Sinclair comes in and makes a strong claim, I think you'll see a lot more of him than you'd think.
If you're right about the second bolded bit, then you'll be right about the first bolded bit. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see him getting 90 minutes anytime soon. The Bridge case is a bit extreme, so let's say I'm concerned he won't get to play more than 25% of the minutes in high-profile competitions.
Edited by DLew On Roids, 22 August 2012 - 12:09 PM.
#45
Posted 22 August 2012 - 04:55 PM
As for City being interested? Idk, he clearly isnt at their standard. Maybe it's just because we can type of move.
#46
Posted 22 August 2012 - 05:18 PM
I just don't get the move for the player, he left Chelsea because he didnt think he'd get enough playing time.
As for City being interested? Idk, he clearly isnt at their standard. Maybe it's just because we can type of move.
How many domestic home grown players does City have on their roster? Don't you still need 8 (and 4 trained at the club) for the Champions League?
#47
Posted 22 August 2012 - 05:30 PM
How many domestic home grown players does City have on their roster? Don't you still need 8 (and 4 trained at the club) for the Champions League?
That's initially why I figured they were interested(and to an extent in Rodwell), but I have no idea.
#48
Posted 22 August 2012 - 05:37 PM
How many domestic home grown players does City have on their roster? Don't you still need 8 (and 4 trained at the club) for the Champions League?
They have... Hart, Richards, Lescott, Milner, Barry, A. Johnson, Rodwell, Boyata, Nimely and Michael Johnson. Abdul Razak will count in a year. I think Clichy might count too, he's 27 and has been in England since 2003. They have 2 more on loan and 2 more in the reserves.
Edit: there's also Guidetti, I'm not clear on what the deal is with youth players loaned out to clubs in other countries. So he might count too.
Edited by ethangl, 22 August 2012 - 05:39 PM.
#49
Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:09 PM
#50
Posted 22 August 2012 - 06:20 PM
They have... Hart, Richards, Lescott, Milner, Barry, A. Johnson, Rodwell, Boyata, Nimely and Michael Johnson. Abdul Razak will count in a year. I think Clichy might count too, he's 27 and has been in England since 2003. They have 2 more on loan and 2 more in the reserves.
Edit: there's also Guidetti, I'm not clear on what the deal is with youth players loaned out to clubs in other countries. So he might count too.
Thanks. And you're right about Clichy; he counts towards the 8 but not the 4 club-grown. Those are Hart, Richards, Boyata & Nimely. Milner, Lescott, Barry, Clichy, Rodwell gives them 9, if the Johnsons are, indeed, gone.
To the best of my understanding, the ECC roster includes only players currently at the club, meaning Guidetti and anyone else on loan, is ineligible to be included this season.
Going forward, this is one area to keep an eye, City fans. You have to have 4 club-grown players and (IMO) guys like Boyata & Nimely aren't good enough to be on such a roster when it will force Mancini to leave two more talented players out. So in future years, Guidetti probably slots into one of those spots. Finding one more talented player "Trained at the Club" would ease some roster concerns for a team (presumably) in the ECC for the next few seasons at least.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked








