Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Pedroia's thumb
#101
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:01 PM
Shut him down. For his own sake.
#102
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:31 PM
#103
Posted 31 May 2012 - 07:32 PM
Shut him down. For his own sake.
Seriously. Didn't we learn our lesson when he tried to come back from the broken foot too soon?
#104
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:36 PM
If I break my ankle, is the ligament torn?Strains involve muscles, sprains are ligament injuries (i.e., you sprain your ankle, you strain your hamstring).
I'm glad they are thinking about this, but I hope that unlikely occurrence isn't the only scenario they will consider an emergency with Pedroia unavailable. If the tying run is in scoring position is in scoring position in an away game in the eighth or later, don't they have to PH for Punto?According to @AlexSpeier, Valentine said today that Middlebrooks will take some grounders at SS during BP as the emergency solution should Aviles or Punto go down.
#105
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:39 PM
If I break my ankle, is the ligament torn?
If it's a supination-external rotation type-IV equivalent, then, yes, the deep deltoid is torn, that's why it requires an ORIF.
Duh.
#106
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:51 PM
Seriously. Didn't we learn our lesson when he tried to come back from the broken foot too soon?
To be fair, his foot wasn't broken enough, either.
#107
Posted 01 June 2012 - 05:50 AM
#108
Posted 01 June 2012 - 07:13 AM
He has "Pete Reiser' Syndrome" - he's simply that type of player. (Although I don't think we'll witness Pedroia issued extreme unction on the playing field.) Only one way to control - sort of - the DL.
Even that won't work, really.

The dude just has no off switch. Taking away baseball for him is like taking away oxygen. He needs to be locked up and shackled.
#109
Posted 01 June 2012 - 07:48 AM
Even that won't work, really.
The dude just has no off switch. Taking away baseball for him is like taking away oxygen. He needs to be locked up and shackled.
It's all true. Force him to take a vacation in the Carribean and he'd end up playing ball with a bunch of kids from some barrios.
Edited by fineyoungarm, 01 June 2012 - 08:27 AM.
#110
Posted 01 June 2012 - 08:02 AM
Even that won't work, really.
The dude just has no off switch. Taking away baseball for him is like taking away oxygen. He needs to be locked up and shackled.
I'm waiting for Aceves to duct-tape him to a pole in the dugout, myself.
#111
Posted 01 June 2012 - 08:17 AM
#112
Posted 01 June 2012 - 09:13 AM
#113
Posted 01 June 2012 - 04:14 PM
PeteAbe: "Pedroia will take grounders today and BP on Tuesday. #RedSox"
#114
Posted 01 June 2012 - 04:27 PM
I love his attitude. But, the Sox should really DL the guy and let him heal. Think long term.
+1
I will love Pedroia forever for the the fact that nothing short of a wheelchair is going to keep him off the field (even that might not be enough), but he's his own worst enemy when hurt. The team needs to take the decision out of his hands or he'll keep trying to get back out there.
15 days won't kill the season. They wouldn't even need to keep him on the shelf that long as they could back date it. There is so little downside to DLing him at this point that it's mind boggling it hasn't happened.
#115
Posted 02 June 2012 - 10:13 AM
None of this speaks to the potential risks of not allowing his thumb to recover properly and, frankly, my version of common sense tells me they should DL him even now, especially with the rest of the team playing so well. But I'll leave the purely medical component of this debate to the experts.
Edit: To clarify my "logic."
Edited by dwainw, 02 June 2012 - 10:21 AM.
#116
Posted 02 June 2012 - 10:28 AM
+1
I will love Pedroia forever for the the fact that nothing short of a wheelchair is going to keep him off the field (even that might not be enough), but he's his own worst enemy when hurt. The team needs to take the decision out of his hands or he'll keep trying to get back out there.
15 days won't kill the season. They wouldn't even need to keep him on the shelf that long as they could back date it. There is so little downside to DLing him at this point that it's mind boggling it hasn't happened.
And this, IMHO, is what makes him the anti-Drew to many of us. I know that's completely irrational to many on this board, but there are plenty of us who love not only the sabre stuff and history of the game but also relish the fact that there are players in the majors who appreciate the opportunity they have to play a game we all love. Many of us believe that we'd leave it all on the field if just given the chance to be in their shoes.
As someone getting longer in the tooth and somewhat maturing, this becomes a combination of sense of pride and frustration when guys like Pedroia take possibly unnecessary risks with their future especially when being enabled by the grown ups who should know better.
A couple of weeks of maybe 70% Pedroia is certainly better than 100% Punto, but aggravating this and leading to ten weeks of 100% Punto would be an unmitigated disaster.
#117
Posted 02 June 2012 - 10:43 AM
And this, IMHO, is what makes him the anti-Drew to many of us. I know that's completely irrational to many on this board, but there are plenty of us who love not only the sabre stuff and history of the game but also relish the fact that there are players in the majors who appreciate the opportunity they have to play a game we all love. Many of us believe that we'd leave it all on the field if just given the chance to be in their shoes.
As someone getting longer in the tooth and somewhat maturing, this becomes a combination of sense of pride and frustration when guys like Pedroia take possibly unnecessary risks with their future especially when being enabled by the grown ups who should know better.
A couple of weeks of maybe 70% Pedroia is certainly better than 100% Punto, but aggravating this and leading to ten weeks of 100% Punto would be an unmitigated disaster.
As long as you understand that this is what's called "wanting to have it both ways".
Make no mistake, I love Pedey and I love how he plays the game, and I understand why players bs their managers and coaches. But as a A&O and others have mentioned, he's .232/.262/.250 since May 14th. The man plays with pride, no doubt, but he may have actually hurt the ball club with that pride; it cuts both ways. The basic difference is, like holding the guy at third or not going for it on 4th and short, you only get blamed for one version of the mistake and not the other--and Pedey will never be blamed even if he does do damage because we love him for being a gamer.
And again, I love the spirit too. I'm ambivalent, though, as to where it fits into being a professional. I think that's why so many people adopt the stance of wanting the manager to step in--that way we get the unbridled player without the potential harm to the team. Cake. Eat it. Cake.
Edited by Reverend, 02 June 2012 - 10:43 AM.
#118
Posted 02 June 2012 - 10:57 AM
#119
Posted 02 June 2012 - 10:58 AM
As long as you understand that this is what's called "wanting to have it both ways".
Make no mistake, I love Pedey and I love how he plays the game, and I understand why players bs their managers and coaches. But as a A&O and others have mentioned, he's .232/.262/.250 since May 14th. The man plays with pride, no doubt, but he may have actually hurt the ball club with that pride; it cuts both ways. The basic difference is, like holding the guy at third or not going for it on 4th and short, you only get blamed for one version of the mistake and not the other--and Pedey will never be blamed even if he does do damage because we love him for being a gamer.
And again, I love the spirit too. I'm ambivalent, though, as to where it fits into being a professional. I think that's why so many people adopt the stance of wanting the manager to step in--that way we get the unbridled player without the potential harm to the team. Cake. Eat it. Cake.
That pretty much says it all. Also, given that we appear to live in an age of miracles, as this team remains very competitive in a very competitive division, it's clear that if they are going to make a run at it after the All Star Break, a very healthy Dustin Pedroia will be essential (I always stop short of indispensable).
#120
Posted 02 June 2012 - 11:00 AM
Not arguing rev's point at all. I agree that what I live about Pedroia and what frustrates me about Pedroia are some of the same things.
My reference yesterday to Pete Reiser Syndrome was only partly tongue in chief. There is a history with these "gamers" - and it often is an unhappy one.
#121
Posted 02 June 2012 - 11:10 AM
#122
Posted 02 June 2012 - 11:29 AM
If the Red Sox had gone 0 - 4 in the last 4 games and continued to lose through the weekend, would the ensuing urgency make the presumed risk of keeping Pedey active and bringing him back sooner worth it at this point of the season? Also, does anyone know how long he's expected to wear the brace?
I don't think so, given his preinjury production issues and the risk of long term injury to the teams most important every day player.
#123
Posted 05 June 2012 - 09:33 AM
http://www.overthemo...-lineup-tuesday
We'll see how he does, but had they DLed him he would have been ineligible to play for another week.
#124
Posted 05 June 2012 - 10:14 AM
#125
Posted 05 June 2012 - 10:19 AM
Are they thinking that his recent subpar performance is unrelated to the injury, or that the current amount of rest was sufficient to heal it and more rest would be useless?
I'd guess it's more the latter, combined with the padded thumbguard (plus the likely assurance that it 'probably' won't get any worse - which, given recent history ...).
#126
Posted 05 June 2012 - 10:20 AM
I'm a little confused by this. Are they thinking that his recent subpar performance is unrelated to the injury, or that the current amount of rest was sufficient to heal it and more rest would be useless? Is there a more permanent fix to this or are we stuck with a less than 100% Pedroia for the rest of the year? Pedey is exactly the kind of player that you'd be concerned would try to play through an injury when he shouldn't.
He did hit .395 / .489 / .684 in his first 8 injured games (47 PA, May 4 to 12). That suggests that there's a level of hurt that doesn't affect his play, and that they think they've gotten back to it.
#127
Posted 05 June 2012 - 10:46 PM
#128
Posted 06 June 2012 - 01:10 AM
No, in that case it would be about 15 days past time to pull the plug.If he goes 10 days of hitting .222 / .259 / .290 then it's time to pull the plug.
Not that we haven't seen that kind of thing before.
#129
Posted 06 June 2012 - 09:30 AM
#130
Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:23 AM
He did hit .395 / .489 / .684 in his first 8 injured games (47 PA, May 4 to 12). That suggests that there's a level of hurt that doesn't affect his play, and that they think they've gotten back to it.
Possibly. But then my concern would be that from that point--that "it"--his play then deteriorated. So I don't want him to get back to that point; I want him healthy enough such that play will not cause the injury to worsen (if that is what's going on, of course).
When Salty hit the home run in the 9th last night, Pedroia could be seen high fiving with both hands with quite a bit of force, without any sort of wince of pain. If the thumb was sore at all, I'd think he may not have offered up the bad hand.
I guess they can just lock the thread now, huh?
I'm thrilled to have such clarity.
#131
Posted 06 June 2012 - 12:50 PM
The diving play against Detroit towards the end of the game, shortly before he was removed was a clear point of the injury taking a turn for the worst. He played well the three games prior to and including the one where he was pulled.
He has since rested, and resumed action
The player reported no pain after the game last night. He clearly demonstrated that there wasn't any pain during the game. He just batted poorly(after being out of action for a week). In a year where injuries are coming at the training staff from every direction, it's natural to blame injury for everything.
What will convince you that the injury is not a factor?
#132
Posted 06 June 2012 - 12:57 PM
http://www.boston.co...ia_feeling.html
But before he wrote out the lineup, manager Bobby Valentine said he had a “heart to heart conversation” with Pedroia to make sure he was ready to go.
“It was just, ‘Tell me the truth. You’re not allowed to cross your fingers or any of that stuff,’ ” Valentine said. “He said he feels perfect. He has no reservations about doing everything that he has to do on the field.
“There’s no swelling, there’s no pain; there’s 100 percent green light from the training room.”
“My thumb was good,” Pedroia said. “I just got to get used to the guard and get my timing back a little bit. Other than that I felt fine. My last few at-bats I felt more comfortable.”
#133
Posted 06 June 2012 - 01:42 PM
If you look at his historical batting stats, you'll find that his yearly low points seem to occur at this same point in the last few seasons. Assumptions are being made that the thumb injury has caused the diminshed performance. Eric Van showed that he was still hitting well while injured.
The diving play against Detroit towards the end of the game, shortly before he was removed was a clear point of the injury taking a turn for the worst. He played well the three games prior to and including the one where he was pulled.
He has since rested, and resumed action
The player reported no pain after the game last night. He clearly demonstrated that there wasn't any pain during the game. He just batted poorly(after being out of action for a week). In a year where injuries are coming at the training staff from every direction, it's natural to blame injury for everything.
What will convince you that the injury is not a factor?
I dunno. What will make clear to you why your last was a much more potentially useful and informative post than your analysis of his high fiving ability?
It could be more interesting still, though, if we actually took a look at the data--something like this:
| Date | G__ | PA_ | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | BAbip |
| May 14, 2007 to Jun 1, 2007 | 13 | 49 | 0.465 | 0.521 | 0.651 | 1.172 | 0.475 |
| May 14, 2008 to Jun 1, 2008 | 17 | 77 | 0.211 | 0.253 | 0.366 | 0.620 | 0.197 |
| May 14, 2009 to Jun 2, 2009 | 18 | 83 | 0.333 | 0.427 | 0.478 | 0.905 | 0.333 |
| May 14, 2010 to Jun 1, 2010 | 16 | 74 | 0.154 | 0.257 | 0.246 | 0.503 | 0.158 |
| May 14, 2011 to Jun 1, 2011 | 17 | 79 | 0.257 | 0.342 | 0.371 | 0.713 | 0.271 |
| May 14, 2012 to May 28, 2012 | 14 | 60 | 0.232 | 0.267 | 0.250 | 0.517 | 0.271 |
| Date | G__ | PA_ | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | BAbip |
| May 12, 2007 to May 27, 2007 | 10 | 37 | 0.333 | 0.389 | 0.455 | 0.843 | 0.323 |
| May 6, 2008 to May 20, 2008 | 14 | 62 | 0.263 | 0.300 | 0.316 | 0.616 | 0.275 |
| May 16, 2009 to May 30, 2009 | 14 | 61 | 0.340 | 0.443 | 0.420 | 0.863 | 0.347 |
| May 12, 2010 to May 27, 2010 | 14 | 64 | 0.164 | 0.281 | 0.255 | 0.536 | 0.170 |
| May 10, 2011 to May 26, 2011 | 14 | 69 | 0.271 | 0.368 | 0.356 | 0.724 | 0.319 |
| May 14, 2012 to May 28, 2012 | 14 | 60 | 0.232 | 0.267 | 0.250 | 0.517 | 0.271 |
And for reference:
| Date: Gibberish to line up rit | G__ | PA_ | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | Babip |
| 2007 | 139 | 581 | 0.317 | 0.380 | 0.442 | 0.823 | 0.333 |
| 2008 | 157 | 726 | 0.326 | 0.376 | 0.493 | 0.869 | 0.331 |
| 2009 | 154 | 714 | 0.296 | 0.371 | 0.447 | 0.819 | 0.297 |
| 2010 | 75 | 351 | 0.288 | 0.367 | 0.493 | 0.860 | 0.291 |
| 2011 | 159 | 731 | 0.307 | 0.387 | 0.474 | 0.861 | 0.325 |
| 2012 | 49 | 225 | 0.291 | 0.347 | 0.443 | 0.790 | 0.310 |
#134
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:48 AM
#135
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:55 AM
#136
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:58 AM
#137
Posted 09 June 2012 - 06:42 PM
#138
Posted 10 June 2012 - 09:33 AM
#139
Posted 10 June 2012 - 09:37 AM
Iglesias is on the minor league DL. He's not healthy, either.I think at this point, Iglesias' glove>Pedroia's bat. Get him healthy.
My inclination is that Pedey isn't ready to be out there, but with Punto as the only realistic option (am I missing another one?), I'm OK with the Sox giving Pedroia a little more time to get his timing down or definitively show that he needs a DL stint.
#140
Posted 10 June 2012 - 09:38 AM
Are you talking about getting Pedroia healthy or Iglesias? Because at the moment, Iglesias is on the DL.I think at this point, Iglesias' glove>Pedroia's bat. Get him healthy.
#141
Posted 10 June 2012 - 09:49 AM
#142
Posted 13 June 2012 - 06:40 PM
I dislike it when they try to get these players to play through injuries. Small samples, anything can happen, yada, yada, yada. I don't think they should have put him back out there. Does the front office track injuries by type, and have a sense of what can be played through and what can't? Is there any reason to think continuing to play will slow healing or worsen the injury? He'd missed 6 games before he game back, and he's now played 8 with minimal contribution on offense -- wouldn't they have been better putting him on the DL?
FWIW, in his 18 PA in June Punto has a 1.069 OPS.
Edited by Worst Trade Evah, 13 June 2012 - 06:52 PM.
#143
Posted 19 June 2012 - 09:15 PM
#144
Posted 19 June 2012 - 09:32 PM
Awesome.
#145
Posted 19 June 2012 - 09:35 PM
Pedroia expected to start tonight courtesy of Bradford and others.
http://www.overthemo...-lineup-tuesday
We'll see how he does, but had they DLed him he would have been ineligible to play for another week.
In the last 14 days, Baseball Reference has him hitting .170/.235/.213.
I guess we're seeing how he does.
Edited by Buzzkill Pauley, 19 June 2012 - 09:36 PM.
#146
Posted 19 June 2012 - 10:03 PM
Punto would have been an upgrade over Pedey these last few weeeks.
#147
Posted 19 June 2012 - 10:09 PM
#148
Posted 20 June 2012 - 08:17 AM
Congrats Pedey, you're gritty and we love you for it. Now go on the goddamned DL.
A month later than he should have. Just brilliant management of one of the team's most important assets. We really benefitted from having him play through it, as one can see by looking at his terrible slash line for the last 4 weeks or so. What a royal fuckup this whole situation has been.
#149
Posted 20 June 2012 - 08:19 AM
Congrats Pedey, you're gritty and we love you for it. Now go on the goddamned DL.
Thank you. Redassery helps no one over the long term. He's hurting himself and the team. As much as I detest Punto, I can live with him getting 15 days of playing time while Pedroia heals up.
#150
Posted 20 June 2012 - 08:53 AM
Ok, he wasn't very good. I still think it was worth the risk and he seemed to be getting better so maybe there's something to Remy's assertion that his timing was off. 2 hits Sunday, nice double last night. He said he wasn't limited by the injury or pain once he removed the brace.In the last 14 days, Baseball Reference has him hitting .170/.235/.213.
I guess we're seeing how he does.
There's just an incredible amount of know-it-all-ness (and knee-jerk assumption that the team's medical staff is wrong) regarding any injury a player has when we really know very little about the specific injury, its expected healing time, whether it will heal with rest, whether it's something that's just going to have to be managed for the rest of the year, etc.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)












