---
Karl Ravech tweeted this 5 minutes ago, FWIW.
Punto in lineup for red sox, nothing official yet but hearing Pedroia likely to miss a month
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 02:58 PM
Punto in lineup for red sox, nothing official yet but hearing Pedroia likely to miss a month
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:03 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:05 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:11 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:15 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:16 PM
This team can literally not catch a break the past few years. Good God.
Edited by Joe Shlabotnick, 29 May 2012 - 03:16 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:17 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:19 PM
Can someone please look up the possible bad luck with injuries the Sox have had recently and put in in historical perspective?
No GM or manager of any team can be expected to deal with stuff like this.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:20 PM
Sounds like a grade 2 UCL. Goddamnit.
Iglesias up, Aviles to second?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:20 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:25 PM
Isn't the best move to bring up either up either Iglesias or Ciriaco and move Aviles to second and let Punto do what he does best, take up space?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:27 PM
2 thoughts on Pedroia: 1) Iglesias has been out/injured last few games.
#pawsoxmgr Arnie Beyeler told@TBritton_Projo he's out Tues, too...
Edited by trekfan55, 29 May 2012 - 03:39 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:34 PM
Yeah, but in true Sox timing Iglesias seems to be injured (cannot find the link now but it was all over the gamethread yesterday)
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:35 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:35 PM
Here you go -- this just describes them as "nagging injuries" http://blogs.provide...g-injuries.htmlYeah, but in true Sox timing Iglesias seems to be injured (cannot find the link now but it was all over the gamethread yesterday)
Edited by Toe Nash, 29 May 2012 - 03:35 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:39 PM
Isn't the best move to bring up either up either Iglesias or Ciriaco and move Aviles to second and let Punto do what he does best, take up space?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:42 PM
Could this be some sort of karmaic revenge for the two WS championships?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:44 PM
Could this be some sort of karmaic revenge for the two WS championships?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:45 PM
Edited by Rasputin, 29 May 2012 - 03:59 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:48 PM
Considering the circumstances, is it time to make a trade for a decent 2B (i.e. someone like Graffanino back in '05), who can eventually just take Punto's job once Pedroia is healthy?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:48 PM
The problem was never really the prior medical staff. It was the evil front office, who forced the doctors to make decisions based on the perceived best interests of the team, as opposed to the players. Without getting rid of the Evil Trio, the medical problems will continue.It's karmic revenge for all the shit everyone talked about the previous medical staff. Somewhere Tom Gill is laughing his ass off.
Edited by TheoShmeo, 29 May 2012 - 03:56 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:49 PM
Insert rehash of all the arguments against having Punto as your primary backup infielder here.
So, um Jose, how about making an awesome debut?
Edited by Dogman2, 29 May 2012 - 03:54 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 03:58 PM
Insert rehash of the no guarantee they get injured argument here.
Relax Ras, I'm joking with you here.
Maybe.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:00 PM
Could this be some sort of karmaic revenge for the two WS championships?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:01 PM
Edited by Dogman2, 29 May 2012 - 04:04 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:05 PM
Considering the circumstances, is it time to make a trade for a decent 2B (i.e. someone like Graffanino back in '05), who can eventually just take Punto's job once Pedroia is healthy?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:10 PM
This team can literally not catch a break the past few years. Good God.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:13 PM
Unless you're willing to explain how it is guaranteed that all our most important players will spend more than the usual time on the DL, you can feel free to not pretend you're joking. it's not me you're making look silly.
Edited by reggiecleveland, 29 May 2012 - 04:14 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:21 PM
Doesn't McNamara claim to this day that Clemens had something about the severity of a paper cut?In terms of #s, this is tough to beat. In terms of severity and timing to key members - there is some competition. Obviously, there are Conigliaro in 1967 (the Bob Gibson factor may have reduced his importance) and Jim Rice in 1975. WIth him in the Series in 1975 - well ...
Jim Lonborg and his (stupid f***ing) broken leg in 1968 (and to a lesser extent his broken toe in 1969 - ?). Losing him, given the caliber of the rest of the staff, was like a #1 and a #2 going down for an entire season.
Petrocelli played in pain, but when his arm went, that tore the heart out of the team - defensively and, some maintain, offensively. The post 1967 leader in the clubhouse was Rico - not Yaz.
And, the most dreadful of all, the blister on Roger Clemens finger in game 6 of the 1986 Series. Not only did that keep him from completing game 6, but must have prevented McNamara from using him in game 7, when Hurst tired, because otherwise it certainly would have had a couple of innings in him, given his youth, strength, the importance of the game and the fact that he could then REST for 4 months.
Edited by Al Zarilla, 29 May 2012 - 04:21 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:21 PM
Pedroia
Ellsbury
Gonzales
Beckett
Lester
Ortiz
Youkilis*
Buchholz
Bailey
Crawford
I think "all" is a silly over statement. 3 of the top ten, yeah that's bad. Mind you one of them was one of the worst players in baseball last year, som him being ijured my be a plus.Has Youkilis spent more than normal time?
I have not seen Pedroia DLed yet. Maybe we should wait a day.
Just as big a problem is the poor performance of the top ten that are healthy. Gonzales, Lester, have been below what is expected. That has amplified the injury problems.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:31 PM

Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:34 PM
6. As fun as it was to see the latter's contribution Wednesday, I never thought I'd see the day when Scrappy 'N' Gutty Hall of Famers Nick Punto and Scott Podsednik were on the Red Sox roster. Somewhere, David Eckstein stands alone on a Little League field, air bunting, sprinting out imaginary walks, and waiting for his phone to ring.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:38 PM
That joke has been made in the game threads a dozen times. Tsk tsk Chad.Chad Finn's joke may come true yet:
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:42 PM
Doesn't McNamara claim to this day that Clemens had something about the severity of a paper cut?
Doesn't McNamara claim to this day that Clemens had something about the severity of a paper cut?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:49 PM
Edited by mabrowndog, 29 May 2012 - 05:59 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:52 PM
https://twitter.com/...589725404540928If
#Tigers decide to upgrade at 2B, Marco Scutaro a name to keep an eye on.#Rockies should be sellers.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:54 PM
THREE WEEKS AGO!!! Isn't this what was happening last year with guys "gutting out injuries?"
Posted 29 May 2012 - 04:56 PM
Considering the circumstances, is it time to make a trade for a decent 2B (i.e. someone like Graffanino back in '05), who can eventually just take Punto's job once Pedroia is healthy?
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:05 PM
He's been .232/.262/.250 since May 14, so there might be something to that.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:06 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:18 PM
2010 was a pretty awful year for injuries as well. Sibpin put together a spreadsheet to track the missed days that season. Alex's last update that year was August 20, and by then the Sox had lost 767 man-games to injury. They'd also used 50 different different players.
The 2012 Sox have already used 50 different players in about 3 fewer months' time. By my count, they've lost 500 man-games to injury through tonight. Admittedly that data is skewed by the likes of Carpenter and Repko, but I'm counting anyone who has been on the active roster or the 60-day DL since the season started.
Andrew Bailey 49
Josh Beckett 5
Chris Carpenter 49
Aaron Cook 23
Rich Hill 18
Bobby Jenks 49
Daisuke Matsuzaka 49
Andrew Miller 26
Dustin Pedroia 1
Kevin Youkilis 22
Carl Crawford 49
Jacoby Ellsbury 42
Ryan Kalish 49
Darnell McDonald 17
Jason Repko 36
Cody Ross 9
Ryan Sweeney 7
TOTAL 500
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:41 PM
Sure, I got no argument with that, though you should add Buchholz to the underperforming list. Maybe he isn't among our "best" players whatever that means but his under performance has been the biggest anchor on the team outside of the injuries.
Edited by maufman, 29 May 2012 - 05:42 PM.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:44 PM
He's been .232/.262/.250 since May 14, so there might be something to that.
vs Punto's .128/.286/.154 this season? Nope, I don't see it.So basically, Punto may be an upgrade over a busted Dustin.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 05:56 PM
Your list left out Lackey, who I believe is also on the 60 day DL (why wouldn't he be?) so tack on another 49 games.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 06:01 PM
Your list left out Lackey, who I believe is also on the 60 day DL (why wouldn't he be?) so tack on another 49 games.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 06:10 PM
Matsuzaka, too. And Rich Hill. And the complications from Jenks' surgery were in December; I think the FO would have had to operate assuming he wasn't going to contribute much.I think it is reasonable to exclude from the calculations, those injuries which were known about when the front office was making their off season decisions. This would be Lackey, the first month of Crawford, and Kalish.
The remaining list is still extreme.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 06:44 PM
Absolutely. This winter, we heard repeatedly that replacing Lackey with a random body who was a little better than replacement level would be a significant upgrade. Felix Doubront has exceeded expectations as that "random body"; unfortunately, Buchholz has replaced Lackey as the rotation's black hole. More significantly, almost none of the other fixes for the pitching staff have worked as planned -- Bard has struggled after a slow start, Bailey is hurt, Melancon got himself shipped to Pawtucket, and Aceves has regressed to the mean as many of us feared he would.
Without doing a full-blown statistical analysis, it seems the failure of the FO's plan to fix the pitching staff on the cheap is more responsible for the club's early-season struggles than the rash of injuries -- which mostly affected position players, and which the offense has weathered surprisingly well. I'm not even sure you can blame the FO -- very few pitching staffs are constructed to succeed with only one key player exceeding expectations. That is the crux of the problem, imo.
Posted 29 May 2012 - 08:15 PM
Posted 29 May 2012 - 10:44 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users