Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
The glass is half filled. What has done/gone right & the bright future?
#1
Posted 13 May 2012 - 09:36 AM
So in this thread things are looking up. 9 positives right off the top of the bat.
1. Papi
2. Sweeney
3 WMB
4. Ross
5 Doubront
6. Pedroia
7. Aceves after the 1st week of the season
8. A significant amount of sucktitude is due to having the RS DL loaded with 2 starting OFers, closer, all star third baseman, 4th and 5th staters. Not sure any other team would do any better with the magnitutide of the injuries.
9. Bullpen is now looking serviceable. If Bailey comes back and stakes claim to the closer role, the bullpen actually could be a strength.
So what trades have worked out, who will soon be off the disabled list to help the team, what prospects are looking especially promising, who is playing good baseball, what brilliant moves has BV and the front office made or generally any Red Sox news that gets me off the ledge to safety?
#2
Posted 13 May 2012 - 12:18 PM
And while he isn't Iglesias defensively he hasn't exactly sucked in the field. He's fundamentally sound, turns the DP well, positions himself properly for cutoffs, and has an above-average arm. A solid shortstop by any measure.
He's under club control through 2014. There's a long way to go, but for a guy acquired for Yamaico Navarro & Kendall Volz, this is clearly a trade that's worked out -- and I'm confident we'll still view it that way in hindsight.
Edited by mabrowndog, 13 May 2012 - 12:21 PM.
#3
Posted 13 May 2012 - 05:25 PM
#4
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:02 PM
From IML's list, Doubront may be the biggest positive surprise. He has outstanding command of the fastball, and can stay on the edges of the strike zone all game long. I've been a Doubront fan since the Doubardelbon days of 2010, but I didn't think he'd be this good as a starter.
#5
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:19 PM
#6
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:25 PM
Not having Bogar at third base coach seems like a positive, but I'm not convinced it is a net gain having him as bench coach.
#7
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:45 PM
I really have liked the way Valentine stays with a reliever pitching well for multiple innings. Given how hard the pen has been ridden, I think long, less frequent outings are preferred to warming up and pitching nearly everyday.
#8
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:53 PM
#9
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:56 PM
#10
Posted 13 May 2012 - 07:33 PM
Jackie Bradley and Matt Barnes are looking a lot like Jacoby Ellsbury and Jonathan Papelbon v2.0
#11
Posted 13 May 2012 - 07:56 PM
#12
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:12 PM
Why don't you think that Bogar might not be a good bench coach? He was also in charge of defensive positioning when he coached 3B. I'm not sure if he relinquished those duties to Royster or not.Papi is the biggest surprise for me. While he is hitting well, he seems in better shape. He doesn't have dreamboat speed, but is noticably quicker on the bases. I can't help but think the lost weight will pay dividends over the long season. The defense of Aviles is also nice to see.
Not having Bogar at third base coach seems like a positive, but I'm not convinced it is a net gain having him as bench coach.
#13
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:30 PM
#14
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:34 PM
I'd add Bard, to some degree. It hasn't been perfect, it hasn't even been all positive, but I think he has shown enough to prove that he will be a valuable starting pitcher for this team over the long haul. I feel reasonably confident that he will be a sub-4.00 ERA (or FIP or xFIP or whatever you want to use) pitcher going forward.
I have to disagree with this. To me, starter-Bard is a guy who can't locate his pitches on the corners (even his fastball), and doesn't have the stuff to generate swings and misses and can't strike people out. It's sad, really.
Today, he was bad. The only reason he didn't get lit up is because the Indians happen to hit a whole bunch of line drives right at people.
Edited by Noah, 13 May 2012 - 08:35 PM.
#15
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:45 PM
In other words, given the extra wild card team, other than TX, no one is running away with anything, and despite te early season struggles, Red Sox are still in play for the playoffs.
Right now, the Sox's biggest problem is their 1-2-3 starters. I can easily imagine a world where they get back on track, and the Sox start winning 4 out of every 5 starts a few times through the rotation. And if that happens - and if Ells and Crawford and Bailey come back and contribute - I can also imagine a world where the Sox are the best team in the AL East in September.
#16
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:46 PM
Mike Aviles, specifically his defense. I expected him to hit well enough now that he's not hurt, playing full time, and playing in Fenway Park with a decent supporting cast in the lineup, but his defense, to my totally untrained eye, has been better than I had expected. I was hoping for "it won't hurt...much" and got "hey, he's not bad", which is a nice upgrade.
In a ridiculously SSS, Daniel Nava. I thought the book was out on him after his debut stint with the team in 2010, but he's proving himself to be more than just AAA filler to start this time around. At the very least, he's apparently capable of making some adjustments, so it'll be interesting to see how long he can keep it up.
#17
Posted 13 May 2012 - 08:57 PM
The best part of this season: Os at 22-13, MFYs at 19-15, and Angels at 15-19.
In other words, given the extra wild card team, other than TX, no one is running away with anything, and despite te early season struggles, Red Sox are still in play for the playoffs.
Right now, the Sox's biggest problem is their 1-2-3 starters. I can easily imagine a world where they get back on track, and the Sox start winning 4 out of every 5 starts a few times through the rotation. And if that happens - and if Ells and Crawford and Bailey come back and contribute - I can also imagine a world where the Sox are the best team in the AL East in September.
Yep....unless you believe the O's are in it for the long haul, the Sox have plenty of time to overcome yet another atrocious start.
#18
Posted 13 May 2012 - 10:34 PM
Why? ...because there is no tangible evidence to suggest that Bogar is either good or bad as his role as bench coach. He enjoys relative anonymity among the coaching staff sharing the blame/credit. Third base coaching duties put you front and center, where blame is easily assigned for mistakes.Why don't you think that Bogar might not be a good bench coach? He was also in charge of defensive positioning when he coached 3B. I'm not sure if he relinquished those duties to Royster or not.
He could be the best bench coach ever, but it isn't a role the makes a lot of measurable evidence aside from the teams overall performance. Just like you are unsure whether he relinquished duties to Royster or not, I am unsure what to give him credit/blame for.
#19
Posted 13 May 2012 - 10:42 PM
That's why I asked. Why did you even bring him up if there is no way to measure his performance?Why? ...because there is no tangible evidence to suggest that Bogar is either good or bad as his role as bench coach. He enjoys relative anonymity among the coaching staff sharing the blame/credit. Third base coaching duties put you front and center, where blame is easily assigned for mistakes.
He could be the best bench coach ever, but it isn't a role the makes a lot of measurable evidence aside from the teams overall performance. Just like you are unsure whether he relinquished duties to Royster or not, I am unsure what to give him credit/blame for.
#20
Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:43 AM
Because his absence at third base IS a positive and worthy of mention. Whether the team is better off with him at bench coach remains to be seen.That's why I asked. Why did you even bring him up if there is no way to measure his performance?
#21
Posted 14 May 2012 - 08:59 AM
Well, that was me, and you ignored my main argument which was that with the money spent on Gonzalez they could have re-signed Beltre and left Youk at first and had an extra $6 mil and the team would overall be better (they weren't just trading for Gonzalez, they were trading for the right to pay him a ton of money which could maybe be better spent on a tougher-to-fill position.For chrissakes, people are complaining about the Adrian Gonzalez trade in which the RS gave up 4 prospects (Rizzo has been traded after batting .141 with Padres, Patterson - released, Fuentes - not lighting the minors on fire and Kelley remains a good, but certainly not a can't-miss prospect).
Also Rizzo was poor in his limited MLB time but has absolutely lit up AAA - a 1.053 OPS last year and a 1.073 OPS this year. The only reason he hasn't been given another chance in the majors is because LaHair came out of nowhere and has a 1.100 OPS for the Cubs. And hey, he plays the same position as Adrian.
On the topic of the thread, I'll add Vicente Padilla. Besides the game against the Yankees where no member of the bullpen could get an out, he has a 2.57 ERA and has been pretty versatile, going anywhere from a couple batters to 2+ innings when the situation dictates it. And his eephus is fun to watch.
#22
Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:21 AM
Why do you think his absence is a positive? I mean, we all saw the runners that were thrown out at home, but do we know how many runs he might have cost the team by not sending runners or how many fell into the plus side of the ledger because he was aggressive? Here's an interesting article from BPro that makes the case that 3B coaches are not aggressive enough and most cost their teams runs. It was written with information prior to Bogar becoming the 3B coach, but maybe the Sox did the same sort of cost/benefit analysis and reached the same conclusion and Bogar was told to be more aggressive. After all, they did keep him in that position for 2 years and then promoted him to bench coach. I'd think he was viewed pretty positively by the FO, wouldn't you?Because his absence at third base IS a positive and worthy of mention. Whether the team is better off with him at bench coach remains to be seen.
#23
Posted 15 May 2012 - 05:42 AM
The top 4 doubles-hitters in the AL are all Red Sox.
Ortiz 15
Gonzo 14
Pedroia 13
Sweeney 13
(next guy is Brantley with 12)
They also rank top 4 in the majors but are joined in the rankings by Votto 16, and Yadi Molina (!) at 13.
#24
Posted 15 May 2012 - 06:07 AM
I like that
- WMD is playing so well that the realistic options include trading or even sitting Youks. It's a problem, to be sure, but a much lesser problem than dying the slow death of witnessing Nick Punto at third.
- When Ells and Crawford return, they may have to figure out how to deal with playing time for Sweeney, Ross and now Nava. That's a far cry from seeing Darnell and his "lower than his weight" batting average in the line-up on a regular basis.
- There's no obvious starter to send to the pen when Daisuke returns. Injuries could "solve" the problem for them, and often do, but as of right now, they will have to force a solution if and when Matsuzaka is ready.
- Mark Melancon has been pretty lights out in the minors and he still can't crack the pen in Boston.
Edited by TheoShmeo, 15 May 2012 - 06:11 AM.
#25
Posted 15 May 2012 - 07:59 AM
If we're talking prospects, add Henry "47 whiffs in 29 IP" Owens to the list.
Talk about a raw prospect. 6.44 BB/9 -- but 14.42 K/9!
They ought to bring him up just to scare the crap out of some people.
Seriously, this guy looks pretty interesting.
#26
Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:12 AM
The fact that the Sox are going to have to make some tough decisions in the next few weeks is a "glass half filled" event in my eyes.
I like that
- WMD is playing so well that the realistic options include trading or even sitting Youks. It's a problem, to be sure, but a much lesser problem than dying the slow death of witnessing Nick Punto at third.
- When Ells and Crawford return, they may have to figure out how to deal with playing time for Sweeney, Ross and now Nava. That's a far cry from seeing Darnell and his "lower than his weight" batting average in the line-up on a regular basis.
- There's no obvious starter to send to the pen when Daisuke returns. Injuries could "solve" the problem for them, and often do, but as of right now, they will have to force a solution if and when Matsuzaka is ready.
- Mark Melancon has been pretty lights out in the minors and he still can't crack the pen in Boston.
Agreed. All "good problems" to have. The tough ones are "what to do with WMB and Youks at third" and "what to do when Dice-K is ready."
WMB may well be sent back down, as hard as that is to contemplate. And, it looks as if Dice-K is not physically ready to come up to the big club even though his clock is up soon and they may ask him to agree to stay down there a while longer which will put off THAT decision a while longer.
The outfield PT issue is a good one to have, and Ross/Sweeney are going to have to platoon, as intended. Melancon is just the "odd man out" of the pen at the moment and will have to wait until something opens up. But, unless there's an injury or someone just craps the bed from here on out, Ben may just have to swing a trade or two to make all this work out. Collectively, this is going to be a test of the front office's intentions and capabilities.
Hopefully, when all this shakes out, Byrd, McDonald, and Punto are elsewhere.
Edited by Pumpsie, 15 May 2012 - 08:13 AM.
#27
Posted 15 May 2012 - 09:23 AM
But, unless there's an injury or someone just craps the bed from here on out, Ben may just have to swing a trade or two to make all this work out. Collectively, this is going to be a test of the front office's intentions and capabilities.
Hopefully, when all this shakes out, Byrd, McDonald, and Punto are elsewhere.
I think most of these good problems are going to sort themselves out with performances normalizing. Nava is a ton of fun to watch and I love rooting for him, but he's not this good. He'll cool off at some point. Middlebrooks as well. He's got real power, but he's going to have cold spells too. He was hot as hell when he got called up but has already cooled a bit. He's still very good, though and gives Youk the chance to take as much time as he needs to get healthy, which is great.
Ross and Sweeney I can see continuing to play well, but as you pointed out, they can be platooned like originally planned to increase the chances that they do maintain their level of play.
The pen is hot right now too, but at some point someone is going to come back down to Earth and there will be room for Melancon to come back up. I'll be shocked if they're forced to make a trade to accommodate all the awesome. I'm guessing we'll see Middlebrooks end up back in AAA eventually, with an outfield of Crawford, Ellsbury, Ross/Sweeney and Byrd on the bench with Miller, Padilla, Albers and/or Morales struggling enough to get Melancon and eventually Bailey back in the pen.
I'm guessing down the stretch they'll settle on a roster something like Gonzalez, Pedroia, Aviles, Youk, Salty, Crawford, Ellsbury, Ross/Sweeney, Ortiz with Byrd, Shoppach and Punto on the bench (replaced by Middlebrooks for the playoffs) with Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Matsuzaka, Doubront in the rotation, Bailey, Bard, Melancon and Aceves definitely in the pen and a combination of whomever is playing best out of Albers, Morales, Atchinson, Padilla, Hill and Miller to fill out the remaining four spots. Although, Hill is starting to look like he may be one of the definites.
That's actually a really exciting roster and the only person currently around that they'd be at any risk to lose is McDonald when they're forced to DFA him.
Edit: Of course, they could just cut Byrd and keep McDonald if they would rather have him. Either way, the team isn't really losing much.
Edited by Snodgrass'Muff, 15 May 2012 - 09:27 AM.
#28
Posted 15 May 2012 - 09:34 AM
If Buchholz can get it together, the rotation should be fine. If not, I can see them making a deal for a starter like Dempster who can chew some serious innings and not tax the bullpen.
#29
Posted 15 May 2012 - 11:37 AM
- The offense is still among the best in MLB, even with all the injury-time missed by key cogs;
- The 4th and 5th starters have proved adequate at little cost, rather than wasting money on vets;
- Aceves has really grown into the closer's role, and is showing unexpected velocity and K-rate;
- The bullpen has started to excel, now that the pitchers are being asked to perform suitable roles;
- There's exciting farmhands performing better in the minors than we've seen for a long while; and
- Watching kids like Bard, Doubront, Middlebrooks, and Nava have success is really just a lot of fun.
#31
Posted 16 May 2012 - 02:12 PM
I still think this is one of the best teams in the majors, and I still think they can end up in that 91-95 win range, but the road there is a lot tougher than I was envisioning during the off season or in spring training.
#32
Posted 17 May 2012 - 11:23 AM
#33
Posted 21 May 2012 - 12:04 AM
The Sox hitters have been the foundation for the continuing string performance of the starting staff.
Plus it is nice to see the coincidental disappearance of the drama concerning the strike zone on the part of the hitters and ppitching staff.
The Red Sox in Philly played like a bunch of guys who took genuine joy in the game, as opposed to the group of guys who looked afraid to win OR lose who had beeen wearing their uniforms from 9/1/11 through 4/30/12.
Maybe this has something to do wth all this blame being placed on Bobby V.
Who knows but they were damned likeable this weekend.
#34
Posted 21 May 2012 - 12:59 AM
#35
Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:18 AM
It was great to see Middlebrooks have a good weekend. He had been really struggling. Hopefully if he keeps the power up, he'll see more balls out of the strike zone and can hold back from chasing them. 3:24 BB:K ratio doesn't exactly scream "belongs in the majors" to me.
#36
Posted 21 May 2012 - 01:47 PM
#37
Posted 21 May 2012 - 02:30 PM
#38
Posted 21 May 2012 - 05:12 PM
#39
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:28 PM
#40
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:33 PM
#41
Posted 21 May 2012 - 09:41 PM
Take this team and add Ellsbury, Crawford and Bailey ... its not a bad team at all.
I'd say those three and possibly a starter to replace Bard....and the sky is the limit. Their bullpen has transitioned from abject failure to a strength in a shockingly short time. Hill and Miller are formidable from the left, Aceves and Padilla have been fantastic and Atchison and Albers have been terrific in middle relief. Melancon can't force his way back into this pen right now.
#42
Posted 22 May 2012 - 10:01 AM
#43
Posted 22 May 2012 - 12:56 PM
#44
Posted 22 May 2012 - 06:16 PM
A lot of different guys are getting the privilege to play outfield for the Boston Red Sox.
It really is just like a fantasy camp. I expect LoweTek, SJH and ToeKneeArmAss to suit up any day now.
#45
Posted 22 May 2012 - 06:29 PM
That looks more like it'll take 91-92 wins to win the division. Toronto has an expected win total of 90 but only wins the division 33.8% of the time. Generally, the number of wins that it takes to win the division is a bit higher than the highest individual win expectation. This makes intuitive sense too.Here's the icing on the cake. While the Sox are still in 4th place, this division is probably a lot more even than anyone expected. Obviously this will change, but according to coolstandings, it's only going to take 88-89 wins to take the division.http://www.coolstandings.com/baseball_standings.asp?sn=2012&i=1
Other than the above point, I agree that this team is very much in the race for the division still and I still believe they can be a formidable force if they can ever regress toward normal injury luck.
#46
Posted 22 May 2012 - 08:17 PM
With all the other goofy things that have gone on with this team, the (re)emergence of a 24 year-old lefty who you will have control of for low money in the 5 or even 4th spot in your rotation is a darn good thing.
Before tonight, he had only one start giving less than 5 innings, and had only given up 5 or more ER in one start. Solid and sometimes above-average. A few too many walks still, but promising strikeout numbers and experience pitching out of the pen for use in late-season or post-season work. A valuable guy has re-emerged.
#47
Posted 23 May 2012 - 07:41 AM
That looks more like it'll take 91-92 wins to win the division. Toronto has an expected win total of 90 but only wins the division 33.8% of the time. Generally, the number of wins that it takes to win the division is a bit higher than the highest individual win expectation. This makes intuitive sense too.
Other than the above point, I agree that this team is very much in the race for the division still and I still believe they can be a formidable force if they can ever regress toward normal injury luck.
I was looking at the projected wins for the 2nd place team, and adding one to that. I know that's not precisely relevant to the Sox, but the greater point is that historically you had to project the 2nd place team in the division to win at least 92-93, and therefore 93-94 would be required to win the division. And since it doesn't look like anyone is running away with this division, 90 is probably the best the 2nd place team will be.
#48
Posted 23 May 2012 - 08:22 AM
Even before tonight's performance, Doubront.
With all the other goofy things that have gone on with this team, the (re)emergence of a 24 year-old lefty who you will have control of for low money in the 5 or even 4th spot in your rotation is a darn good thing.
Of 62 AL starters with 30 or more IP (which is 4.5 starters per team, just right), Doubront is 7th in FIP- and 18th in SIERA, which is not park-adjusted (and less predictive). He's arguably been a #2 starter so far.
He has the 6th best K% and the 12th worst BABIP. The latter may be worth looking into.
#49
Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:47 PM
#50
Posted 23 May 2012 - 04:58 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users












