Maureen Mullen @MaureenaMullen
Reply Retweet Favorite ·More
#RedSox also bringing up a pitcher today. Clayton mortensen.
Edited by mabrowndog, 02 May 2012 - 02:16 PM.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:14 PM
Edited by mabrowndog, 02 May 2012 - 02:16 PM.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:15 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:15 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:15 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:16 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:17 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:17 PM
huh? why?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:19 PM
Maybe because he's pitching extremely well?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:19 PM
Edited by Bucknahs Bum Ankle, 02 May 2012 - 02:20 PM.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:22 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:22 PM
Sure, but adding another reliever and continuing to give big at bats to guys like Punto, McDonald, etc. seems like total mismanagement of the roster.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:22 PM
Even if Cook were added to the roster tonight, he's not going to work out of the pen since he's set to start on Saturday. Tazawa was optioned to add Iglesias to the roster. They need another bullpen arm. That's all this is.Sure, but adding another reliever and continuing to give big at bats to guys like Punto, McDonald, etc. seems like total mismanagement of the roster.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:22 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:25 PM
Teeny-tiny sample size, but: 10 IP, 5 H, 2R, 1 ER, 4 BB, 10 K is pretty damn good. Then again: 2 HBP, 1 WP suggests he could be an adventure?
Edit: Is there any chance he had an opt-out clause?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:26 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:26 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:27 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:29 PM
Well, Cook is starting Saturday in Beckett's place. The club is already short a pitcher with Tazawa having been optioned, so I'm guessing this is just to give them a full bullpen until Cook is activated.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:30 PM
Cook doesn't need to be added to the roster until 48 hours after he exercised his opt out. Since he's going to start on Saturday it makes sense to use his spot on the roster for a reliver until they need to add him.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:30 PM
Where do you read Cook is starting for Beckett?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:32 PM
Rob Bradford @bradfo
39m
Valentine says on @WEEI Beckett sore from last outing. Says Beckett feels stiffness
Rob Bradford @bradfo
40m
Cook to start Saturday for Beckett
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:38 PM
Edited by mabrowndog, 02 May 2012 - 02:40 PM.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:40 PM
Did I miss anything?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:41 PM
1.354 WHIP for Colorado in 58 IP last year. 4.6 K/9.
Was anyone aware he had this guy on the roster? He's got to be better than Justin Thomas at least. But, why this dude is coming up now - and Tazawa is staying in Pawtucket for another day - is befuddling.
Edited by Lose Remerswaal, 02 May 2012 - 02:42 PM.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:42 PM
Looks like Iglesias going back, and Lars last night, gives
#RedSox two roster spots for Middlebrooks and Mortensen.#redsoxtalk
Got the call to the Majors! Thanks to all for your well wishes. Looking forward to help the
#redsox put up more W's.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:45 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:01 PM
Many of us are familiar with the Marco Scutaro trade.
Edit: My reply is because I read your post as "Was anyone aware we had this guy on the roster?"
Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:10 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:15 PM
Any chance Buchholz (blister) is heading to the DL, then rehab assignments?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:25 PM
So, to recap all the roster crap:
Tue pre-game: Tazawa optioned, Iglesias called up
Tue post-game: Anderson optioned
Wed pre-game: Mortensen called up
Wed pre-game: Middlebrooks called up (I assume either Iglesias optioned or Youk to the DL)
Sat pre-game: Mortensen optioned, Cook's contract purchased (Repko DFA or Crawford 60-day DL to clear a spot on the 40-man)
Did I miss anything?
Edited by Phenom, 02 May 2012 - 03:30 PM.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:49 PM
If Youkilis heads to the DL to make room for Middlebrooks on the 25-man roster, does that mean they're going to keep Iglesias on the big league roster? Would that be the wrong move to make for his development, or do the Red Sox feel it's beneficial to keep Iglesias up here for the next 10 days (until Youkilis comes off the DL) in a defensive replacement/pinch-runner role, as they did last May?
With Lars Anderson being optioned for Clay Mortensen, the move to option Junichi Tazawa yesterday looks puzzling to me. Why not keep both Tazawa and Anderson up here? The team would be better in the short-term with Tazawa/Anderson than they are with Mortensen/Iglesias.
Edit: Just read a post about Beckett possibly heading to DL. I guess that would mean Beckett goes to the DL, and Cook takes his roster spot. Still though, why did the team feel the need to send down Tazawa/Anderson and call up Mortensen/Iglesias?
Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:57 PM
With Youk out, Iglesias was there as an emergency backup IF.
With Tazawa now in AAA, Mortensen takes his place in the bullpen for added depth.
If Beckett goes on the DL, the Sox will bring up yet another pitcher, likely Tazawa again (he can be brought back up earlier than the the usual 10-day post-option waiting period if there's a verifiable injury to another active player).
The only real surprising move was the Sox sending down Tazawa (rather than Anderson, who they ended up optioning anyway after the game) in order to activate Iglesias. That was a brain fart.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:04 PM
With Youk out, Iglesias was there as an emergency backup IF.
With Tazawa now in AAA, Mortensen takes his place in the bullpen for added depth.
If Beckett goes on the DL, the Sox will bring up yet another pitcher, likely Tazawa again (he can be brought back up earlier than the the usual 10-day post-option waiting period if there's a verifiable injury to another active player).
The only real surprising move was the Sox sending down Tazawa (rather than Anderson, who they ended up optioning anyway after the game) in order to activate Iglesias. That was a brain fart.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:06 PM
Doesn't that still leave Iglesias on the roster?
(It is possible I'm just having a complete brain fart, though)...
Edited by mabrowndog, 02 May 2012 - 04:06 PM.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:07 PM
My guess is they still thought that Youls might make it back (or at least that he would not need a DL stint) and since Middlebrooks had a jammed thumb they brought Iglesias up. Now that Youks indeed needs a DL it changes everything.
Edited by mabrowndog, 02 May 2012 - 04:08 PM.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:44 PM
Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:52 PM
The only real surprising move was the Sox sending down Tazawa (rather than Anderson, who they ended up optioning anyway after the game) in order to activate Iglesias. That was a brain fart.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:02 PM
Tazawa was destined to be sent down in favor of Cook and they thought that Cook would be joining the bullpen, today. They decided to go with 1 less guy in the pen for a day and keep Anderson around since Youk is also the backup 1B.
The move that made no sense was optioning Anderson last night when they knew they might disable Youk today.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:37 PM
Tazawa was destined to be sent down in favor of Cook and they thought that Cook would be joining the bullpen, today. They decided to go with 1 less guy in the pen for a day and keep Anderson around since Youk is also the backup 1B.
The move that made no sense was optioning Anderson last night when they knew they might disable Youk today.
Posted 02 May 2012 - 10:40 PM
Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:56 AM
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:43 AM
We were in the bleachers last night. When I watched him with the first batter I saw FB at 88, CH at 81 and thought the sky was going to fall. The first batter got him pretty good and I KNEW the sky was falling. He retired the next 9 batters and watching their reactions I thought he is surprising batters with movement and location - because after Bard at 93/95 this should feel like batting practice to Oakland players. Good for him - but until I see later career Maddux show up a bunch more times... I'm afraid I agree with you - the sky is still falling.He's got some incredibly filthy movement on his offerings. But with a slow fastball, and not much velocity differential between that and his changeup and slider, major league hitters will start figuring him out sooner than later. Hopefully he bucks the trend, but repetition and familiarity tend to breed predictable outcomes for guys without dominant arsenals.
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:45 AM
Edited by Pumpsie, 03 May 2012 - 09:53 AM.
Posted 04 May 2012 - 07:22 AM
The Red Sox hope they have figured out what Mortensen needed to bring him closer to becoming the pitcher the Cardinals were envisioning when they drafted him as a first-round sandwich pick in the 2007 draft. We asked R.J. Anderson to give us a hand pinpointing what was different, and thanks to him, we can see the little change they've already made, one that might make a much larger difference:
On the left, you see Mortensen on the third base side of the rubber. On the right, in Wedneday night's relief appearance against the Athletics, he's on the first base side. What's significant about this little shift? Potentially a lot, given Mortensen's repertoire. He's a sinker, slider, change-up pitcher, one who relies on his secondary stuff and angles in order to succeed, especially since he tops out in the 87-88 mph range. In his first major-league appearance of the season, he essentially pitched backwards, relying on his change-up more than one-third of the time, and often using it to set up his sinker, in order to make it appear faster than the radar gun suggested it was. Perceived velocity is, in many ways, more important than actual velocity.
According to Anderson, who has been paying attention to these shifts on the rubber in 2012:One talent evaluator I spoke to fingered sinkerballers, citing the angles the move creates against same-handed hitters. Going back to Peterson's Hudson move, a slide towards the first-base side gave Hudson free rein to throw his fastball and let the run take it to the inside corner against righties. The evaluator also pointed out that a better angle on secondary stuff away from the batter is an added benefit.
Mortensen is all secondary stuff and sinkers, and he fits what this talent evaluator believes to be the profile of a potential rubber shifter perfectly. The Red Sox agree, if last night was any indication, when Mortensen tested out that new starting point in the majors for the first time. The results? Three innings of shutout relief, with six strikeouts, no walks, and a hit allowed to his first base that was then followed by nine-straight retired A's, as well as a release point that more closely resembled his pre-Colorado days:
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users