Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo

The Return of Jabar: Gaffney signs 2-year deal with Patriots


  • Please log in to reply
60 replies to this topic

#1 dynomite

  • 3,559 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 12:36 PM

Leave it to the Redskins to draft a rookie QB (or two) and then cut a guy coming off a 68 catch, 947 yard, 5 TD season.

Before the draft, wide receiver Jabar Gaffney said that the Redskins were trying to trade him. That didn’t happen, but Gaffney is still gone from Washington. Jason Cole of Yahoo! Sports first reported that the team has released Gaffney and PFT has confirmed the news.

http://profootballta...-jabar-gaffney/

I know it's tiring to speculate about possible Patriot signings whenever any veteran is released, and our depth chart makes it unlikely, but...

Essentially, here's how everyone seems to feel about each other: :wub:

McDaniels LOVES Gaffney, and the feeling seems mutual. Gaffney followed McDaniels to Denver in 2009 (indeed, McDaniels' preference for Gaffney was one of the primary contributing causes that lead to Brandon Marshall's exit). For example:

Denver coach Josh McDaniels has called receiver Jabar Gaffney one of the toughest people he’s ever coached. Gaffney is proving Sunday by playing despite breaking his thumb less than three weeks ago.

http://espn.go.com/b...affney/count/31

Also, here's what Gaffney had to say about the Patriots... while he was still a Redskin (before our December game last year):

“I had a great time when I was there, nothing but the utmost respect for the organization and the coaches. I mean, they always have a great team,” he said. And a great quarterback. I mean, (Tom) Brady, in my opinion, is probably the best in the game,” Gaffney said. “Definitely, definitely, the best quarterback I’ve played with. ...

I will never forget what I learned there and playing there under Belichick,” Gaffney said. “He taught me a lot about the NFL and how to survive in the NFL and be a great player. It was the best,” he said. “[He’s] a great coach. He makes his players be students of the game and he helped me out with that aspect a lot. He’s the man.” ...

“It’s a pretty tough offense and if you’re not really used to it, it can be a little overwhelming,” he said. “And with Bill, he doesn’t play you if you don’t know your stuff. He’s not going to put you out there and trust you in those situations. You have to be smart out there and you have to know everything. You can have four or five different routes on each play and you just need to be on the same page with the quarterback and reading the defense at the same time,” he explained.

http://www.providenc...v2.259aace.html

And here's what Brady and Belichick said in response:

“He could do it all; he plays every position,” Brady said when asked about Gaffney. “I think that’s the thing makes him such a good receiver, is his versatility. There are times when you’re in the slot and then you have to go outside and now you’re in a bunch of receivers or you’re in a combination route with another receiver. Whatever it was, he’d always figure out a way to understand what he had to do and then get open.”

Said Belichick, “Of course we know Jabar is an excellent route-runner. He’s a good receiver, very disciplined and dependable guy. He and (Santana) Moss do a good job for them on the outside. They do a number of different things. Again, they change their passing game around from week to week.


-----

In addition, Gaffney:
- Was with the Patriots from 2006-2008, and is familiar with Brady and the playbook
- Is a large (6'2", 200 lbs) physical outside WR
- Has already gotten paid to have a larger role on bad teams (Broncos, Redskins)
- May be willing to accept less money/a smaller role to play for a contender again

At the moment, there's an opening at #3 on our depth chart (after Lloyd and Welker) for a larger, physical WR. Of these 3 options:
1. Gaffney
3. Johnson
3. Stallworth

I'd rather have Gaffney than either of the others. At 31, Gaffney's still got plenty in the tank (coming of 3 straight seasons of 50+ catches) and I think he could seamlessly fit into this Patriots offense.

Thoughts?

Edit: Formatting

Edited by dynomite, 02 May 2012 - 05:41 PM.


#2 E5 Yaz


  • Transcends message boarding


  • 19,593 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 12:46 PM

If you think that Branch has slowed, Welker has become too expensive, Stallworth and Gonzalez are questionable and Ochocinco might never work out, then Gaffney is an extremely attractive piece to bring in.

In other words ... yeah, sure, absolutely

#3 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,501 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:38 PM

You know who should really go after Gaffney? Everyone in the AFCE not named the Patriots.
  • Jets: would provide a tougher, and much bigger red zone thread than Kerley and buy time for Hill
  • Phins: take a look at the 4 receivers currently on the roster: Clyde Gates ®, Julius Pruitt, Brian Hartline, and Davone Bess
  • Bills: perfect #2 after Johnson and buy time for Graham, who's purely a burner and an outside guy
In other words, more the reason to go after the old binky and bring Gaffney into camp. I'd be shocked if he doesn't beat out Branch, Stallworth, Gonzalez, and Ocho (Edelman sticks around). Christ - that's a loaded group:
  • Lloyd at pure outside wideout
  • Gaffney as #2 wideout
  • Welker at the slot
  • Branch and one of Ocho/Gonzalez/Stallworth (my money is on Ocho) to fill out the roster
Plus the McDaniels angle that dynomite mentioned above, this seems like a win-win situation. Oh yeah, and Pats have more than enough room to make the numbers work.

#4 Seels

  • 1,365 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:57 PM

I think Gaffney is a lot better than every WR on this team after Welker and Lloyd, and obviously has a lot of chemistry with the team. I'd enjoy seeing him back.

#5 Stitch01

  • 3,078 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 04:00 PM

A little ahead of things, and maybe better in the Welker thread...but if the Pats do add Gaffney, I wonder if there's a chance they'd give Welker permission to seek a long-term offer elsewhere in a sign and trade as this season's preseason shocker.

They'd have Gaffney, Branch, Stallworth, and Lloyd as guys who should fit in/know the system to some extent. They'd still have Johnson, Gonzalez, and Edelman and Ebert for depth/training camp compeition. They still have Gronk and Hernandez as receiving threats. It seems like the personnel they have been adding this offseason (Fells, multiple fullbacks) indicate they're looking to move the offense towards fewer 5 wide packages lessening the overall usage of the WR group. They only have 5 picks in the 2013 draft and dont have multiple picks in the early rounds for the first time in five years. Welker is the only real chip they have that can return early round picks unless someone takes a real shining to Brian Hoyer and the team thinks Mallet is ready for the number 2 spot. It seems like Welker and the Pats may be far apart on a long-term deal, and I can't imagine that the money this years WR crop received in FA made cutting a deal any easier.

Am I totally nuts?

#6 Old Fart Tree

  • 4,120 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 04:46 PM

I kind of had the same thought irrespective of adding someone like Gaffney... With Lloyd and the two tight ends on the field, you could maybe get away with Edelman/Gonzalez replacing Welker, taking the picks, and spending that money elsewhere. I would hope to see Welker back, but it wouldn't be unlike BB to let a popular player go over money.

#7 Mugsys Jock


  • Longtime Member


  • 2,640 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 05:14 PM

If you need to trade Wes, the two teams that play the Jets this year but not the Pats are PIT and SD. Both feel like too strong potential division rivals to get so cute, however.

#8 E5 Yaz


  • Transcends message boarding


  • 19,593 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 05:16 PM

If you need to trade Wes, the two teams that play the Jets this year but not the Pats are PIT and SD. Both feel like too strong potential division rivals to get so cute, however.


The Rams. A consistent safety valve option for Bradford would be ideal ... and they have oodles of picks

#9 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,501 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:03 PM

The Rams. A consistent safety valve option for Bradford would be ideal ... and they have oodles of picks


There's always the Danny Amendola to Pats rumors:
  • to Pats: Amendola (RFA) + off-setting 2nd rounder + 4th rounder
  • to Rams: Welker
So net gain for the Pats is Amendola & a 4th rounder for Welker. I'd do that trade with a boatload of medical tests.

#10 Seels

  • 1,365 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:57 PM

There's always the Danny Amendola to Pats rumors:

  • to Pats: Amendola (RFA) + off-setting 2nd rounder + 4th rounder
  • to Rams: Welker
So net gain for the Pats is Amendola & a 4th rounder for Welker. I'd do that trade with a boatload of medical tests.


Why would anyone do that? That trade seems really awful. Maybe Amendola and a 2nd, but Amendola and a 4th? No way.

#11 Dick Pole Upside

  • 2,531 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:19 PM

"Gaff" was always a little bit of a Brady binky when he was here. If the progress with the Welker negotiations is not to the Pats' satisfaction, I could see Gaffney as the short term transition WR if Welker forced to leave. Along with Gronknandez, the WR corps could really be dynamite if Lloyd stays healthy and plays the burner/separator role on the outside.

I am soundly pro-Gaff.

#12 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,501 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 09:16 PM

Why would anyone do that? That trade seems really awful. Maybe Amendola and a 2nd, but Amendola and a 4th? No way.


Well, Amendola is years younger, and is and will be much cheaper, so there's that.

#13 Seels

  • 1,365 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 10:11 PM

Yea, but 27 isn't young, and it's not like Amendola has done anything in this league. Rams or not his career high is like what Welker had through 4 games last year.

I don't think Amendola is capable of producing anywhere near what Welker does, and for a 4th round pick, I'd rather not take the chance. A young cornerstone WR is one of the highest priorities on the team going into next offseason, but Amendola is none of that.

#14 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,501 posts

Posted 01 May 2012 - 11:14 PM

Yea, but 27 isn't young, and it's not like Amendola has done anything in this league. Rams or not his career high is like what Welker had through 4 games last year.

I don't think Amendola is capable of producing anywhere near what Welker does, and for a 4th round pick, I'd rather not take the chance. A young cornerstone WR is one of the highest priorities on the team going into next offseason, but Amendola is none of that.


This belongs in the Welker thread, but are you sure about that?

http://www.pro-footb.../A/AmenDa00.htm

Before he was hurt, he was the next Welker. #1 in all purpose yards, #4 in yds per touch in 2010, #1 in kick/punt returns in 2009 and 2010.

I would have been thrilled to get him straight up for a #2.

#15 dynomite

  • 3,559 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 11:26 AM

Back to Gaffney:

"I just heard. I just talked to Mike Shanahan. He said I was going to be making too much, and that they wanted to see what the other players can do," Gaffney told ESPN. "He said there is a chance I can come back, but he said it would be for around the minimum because I wouldn't be the starter anymore. I am not interested in going from being their leading receiver to being third-string, and having my number taken from me. That is pretty much telling me that I am not going to be making the team. Now Drew (Rosenhaus) can start talking to other teams to find me a new home."


http://www.cbssports...1/jabar-gaffney

1) Sounds like he won't be expecting a lot of money (if Shanny was only offering league min, it's easy to beat that offer while keeping the dollar numbers low)
2) I'm certain Tiquan Underwood can and will part with #10 if needed.

Personally, I think we can (and should) keep Welker even if we sign Gaffney.

Edited for clarity

Edited by dynomite, 02 May 2012 - 11:26 AM.


#16 CaptainLaddie


  • dj paul pfieffer


  • 19,334 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:39 PM

From Mike Reiss:

RT: @JosinaAnderson: Just got text from WR Jabar Gaffney: "I'm going to the Patriots." Gaffney told me he's planning on signing deal soon

#17 CaptainLaddie


  • dj paul pfieffer


  • 19,334 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:39 PM

GIGGITY

#18 RedOctober3829


  • SoSH Member


  • 11,130 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:44 PM

Hell yeah. Lloyd/Welker/Gaffney is an outstanding top 3.

#19 soxhop411

  • 3,375 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:47 PM


Jason La Canfora @JasonLaCanfora

WR Jabar Gaffney has agreed to 2yr deal with the Pats. Released by Skins this week.




Two year deal


#20 Mystic Merlin


  • SoSH Member


  • 17,534 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:48 PM

Hell yeah. Lloyd/Welker/Gaffney is an outstanding top 3.


Plus whoever survives out of Ocho/Branch/Stallworth/Gonzalez/Ebner.

#21 Eck'sSneakyCheese

  • 3,207 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:48 PM

Hell yeah. Lloyd/Welker/Gaffney is an outstanding top 3.


That's pretty awesome news. Add Gronk and Hernandez to that and it's going to be impossible to cover. Training camp and the pre-season is going to be very interesting. Can't come soon enough.

#22 E5 Yaz


  • Transcends message boarding


  • 19,593 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:55 PM

On a sad football day, something to look forward to

#23 phragle


  • wild card bitches


  • 8,798 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 03:58 PM

Checkmate

#24 Ed Hillel


  • Wants to be startin somethin


  • 24,367 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:05 PM

Hell, we may start lining up receivers at tackle and having them declare as elligible.

This is awesome news.

Someone please edit title to: The Return of Jabar pls.

Edited by Ed Hillel, 02 May 2012 - 04:06 PM.


#25 NortheasternPJ

  • 3,838 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:07 PM

I'm concerned that Chad Johnson isn't going to get enough looks, not to mention Underwood. Maybe the Pats think the NFL is going to go to 13 people on the field??

#26 ( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)


  • T&A


  • 1,214 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:16 PM

I'm concerned that Chad Johnson isn't going to get enough looks, not to mention Underwood. Maybe the Pats think the NFL is going to go to 13 people on the field??


Was this meant to be tongue in cheek?

(My sarcasm meter is broken today. Thanks)

Edited by ( . ) ( . ) and (_!_), 02 May 2012 - 04:23 PM.


#27 NortheasternPJ

  • 3,838 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:21 PM

Was this meant to be tongue in cheek?


Outside of my love for Underwood's flat top which I'd miss, yes.

#28 PedroKsBambino


  • SoSH Member


  • 12,776 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:24 PM

I know it is fanboyish, but I really enjoy that vets with a lot of options clearly decide they'd rather play here than somewhere else...and almost surely for less money and less role security. It is a big advantage the Pats have at this point---they have much better access to the middle-tier vets than any other team in football.

#29 ( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)


  • T&A


  • 1,214 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:32 PM

please delete

Edited by ( . ) ( . ) and (_!_), 02 May 2012 - 04:34 PM.


#30 TheoShmeo


  • made johnny damon think long and hard


  • 7,030 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:35 PM

I wonder what Gonzalez, Branch and Stallworth* are thinking. They have to know or at least suspect that Gaffney is ahead of them on the depth chart heading into camp.

Similarly, this can't be good for Welker's negotiating position. Yeah, he's a unique player, but the Pats' WR corps is as deep as it's ever been.

* I mentioned these three because they recently signed with the Pats. The same holds true, of course, for Edelman, Chad and Ebert and, to a lesser extent, Slater.

No matter how you slice it, some good WRs will get cut by the Pats or be 5th WRs and/or in street clothes on most games days.

Imagine being an opposing defensive coordinator and having to deal with a 5-skill player set of Welker, Llloyd, Gaffney, Gronk and Hernandez.

Edited by TheoShmeo, 02 May 2012 - 05:20 PM.


#31 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,501 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:48 PM

BB is mad. He's really mad.

I'm convinced he won't retire until he wins a SB to shut all the Spygaters up, or his eyesight gives out. Thank you Skins for cutting your leading receiver to help out RGIII.

P.S.

Plus whoever survives out of Ocho/Branch/Stallworth/Gonzalez/Ebner.


I think you meant Ebert. Ebner is the crazy rugby safety guy. Ebert is the Welker-esque WR.

Edited by SeoulSoxFan, 02 May 2012 - 04:50 PM.


#32 dcdrew10

  • 829 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 04:57 PM

Does McDaniels have some sort of harem that he supplies his players on demand (HO On Demand?) Guys seem to love to play for him so much that they will take less to go where he is, which is fine by me as long as he is coaching the Pats.

#33 Stitch01

  • 3,078 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:21 PM

Good guy to have back in the fold.

Deep enough receiving corps now that trading Welker becomes viable and, IMHO, reasonably likely if he doesnt come in on a team friendly long-term deal..

Lloyd/Gaffney/Hernandez/Gronk are a fine group of receivers who all should know the system. Branch is a known factor, Johnson/Gonzalez/Ebert/Stallworth/Underwood can fight to see if they can displace him and act as injury insurance. Plus they can easily keep Edelman as further insurance given his ability to contribute on special teams.

Seems like a little bit of overkill if they intend to keep Welker unless BB really isnt sold on Lloyd fitting in and intends to have a quick trigger finger

#34 RedOctober3829


  • SoSH Member


  • 11,130 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:26 PM

I wonder what Gonzalez, Branch and Stallworth* are thinking. They have to know or at least suspect that Gaffney is ahead of them on the depth chart heading into camp.

Similarly, this can't be good for Welker's negotiating position. Yeah, he's a unique player, but the Pats' WR corps is as deep as it's ever been.

* I mentioned these three because they recently signed with the Pats. The same holds true, of course, for Edelman, Chad and Ebert and, to a lesser extent, Slater.

No matter how you slice it, some good WRs will get cut by the Pats or be 5th WRs and/or in street clothes on most games days.

Imagine being an opposing defensive coordinator and having to deal with a 5-skill player set of Welker, Llloyd, Gaffney, Gronk and Hernandez.


Isn't this what we want? Having quality depth means not having to rely on guys like Brandon Tate, Sam Aiken, Tiquan Underwood, and even Julian Edelman to produce. I want as many quality guys on the roster as humanly possible. This will create intense competition in training camp as well. Lloyd, Welker, and Gaffney are safe but the others aren't. Love it.

#35 dynomite

  • 3,559 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 05:39 PM

:kitty:

Great signing.

So what's the depth chart currently? Something like:

1. Lloyd (outside)
2. Welker (slot)
3. Gaffney (outside)
4. Branch (scrappy)
5. ?
6. Edelman (more of a punt/kick returner and versatile backup than WR)

Fighting for the 5th spot: Johnson, Stallworth, Gonzalez (with one and maybe both of the losers getting cut)
Fighting for the practice squad: Underwood, Davis, Ebert?

Edit: Also, Gaffney and Stallworth have now been teammates on 3 separate teams: the 2007 Patriots, the 2010 Redskins, and the 2012 Patriots. That has to be rare, right?

Edited by dynomite, 02 May 2012 - 05:45 PM.


#36 Ed Hillel


  • Wants to be startin somethin


  • 24,367 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 06:42 PM

Good guy to have back in the fold.

Deep enough receiving corps now that trading Welker becomes viable and, IMHO, reasonably likely if he doesnt come in on a team friendly long-term deal..

Lloyd/Gaffney/Hernandez/Gronk are a fine group of receivers who all should know the system. Branch is a known factor, Johnson/Gonzalez/Ebert/Stallworth/Underwood can fight to see if they can displace him and act as injury insurance. Plus they can easily keep Edelman as further insurance given his ability to contribute on special teams.

Seems like a little bit of overkill if they intend to keep Welker unless BB really isnt sold on Lloyd fitting in and intends to have a quick trigger finger


I don't see the overkill at all. Gaffney and Lloyd play outside and Welker stays inside. Gaffney is likely a significant upgrade over Branch.

As for the Welker trade. I just don't see it. No player comes close to what he can do, and he and Brady have unreal chemistry. Go for it this year and take his cap space next year, if you have to.

#37 ragnarok725

  • 3,572 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:16 PM

We all know what happened last time the Pats loaded up on receiving talent in an offseason.

This offense could be scary good next season. I think we see more explosiveness from the RB position, albeit maybe with less reliability. Vereen and Ridley should be able to run on opposing team's nickel defenses. We'll see a lot more production from outside the numbers with guys like Lloyd and Gaffney, and Hernandez and Gronk will be a year older and more experienced.

I know it's not anything new to say it, but when you take stock of things... barring catastrophic injuries to the key cogs, this offense is going to be very, very good, and a hell of a lot of fun to watch.

#38 bigsid05

  • 692 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:29 PM

I don't see the overkill at all. Gaffney and Lloyd play outside and Welker stays inside. Gaffney is likely a significant upgrade over Branch.

As for the Welker trade. I just don't see it. No player comes close to what he can do, and he and Brady have unreal chemistry. Go for it this year and take his cap space next year, if you have to.


I agree, I see this as a taking an opportunity to build even more elite offensive talent around Brady while the window is still open. Gaffney and Lloyd are very, very good WRs and have come here pretty cheap, since they're not 'superstars.'

Estimated cap space is ~15M before this signing (source). Could they front load a Welker deal to make him happy?

#39 axx

  • 4,327 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:38 PM

We all know what happened last time the Pats loaded up on receiving talent in an offseason.


Same as last season?

If this means the end of Ochocinco, then I'm all for it.

#40 CaptainLaddie


  • dj paul pfieffer


  • 19,334 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:02 AM

It's kind of wild that a guy with nearly 1000 yards and 5 TDs decided to be the FIFTH receiving option on an offense (Welker/Gronk/Lloyd/Hernandez). I mean.... wow.

#41 riboflav

  • 941 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:07 AM

Same as last season?

If this means the end of Ochocinco, then I'm all for it.


I assume the poster meant the 2007 team which broke many offensive records.

#42 Dick Pole Upside

  • 2,531 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 06:41 AM

It's kind of wild that a guy with nearly 1000 yards and 5 TDs decided to be the FIFTH receiving option on an offense (Welker/Gronk/Lloyd/Hernandez). I mean.... wow.


My hunch is that if he was going to need to take the "minimum" to stay in DC, he had to decide whether getting paid minimum on the Redskins meant as much to him (age/experience/future) as taking a lesser role but getting paid minimum on the Pats, where he is comfortable with the HC, OC, QB, and system. Oh... and he probably has a better chance of one more ring with the NEP than he does with the 'Skins.

#43 Caspir

  • 2,972 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 07:02 AM

Oh... and he probably has a better chance of one more ring with the NEP than he does with the 'Skins.


His next ring will be his first. I love Gaffney, and he was a monster in the '07 playoffs. Makes the offense that much more dynamic.

#44 Gambler7

  • 3,014 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:01 AM

Great news. I don't have a ton to add other than what has been said, but I can't believe he is only 31.

#45 simplyeric

  • 1,790 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:06 AM

It's kind of wild that a guy with nearly 1000 yards and 5 TDs decided to be the FIFTH receiving option on an offense (Welker/Gronk/Lloyd/Hernandez). I mean.... wow.

That's true but, if he can still bring it, no question that he might become 4th, or 3rd, or....
BB will scheme for, and Brady will throw to, whoever is producing. If Gaffney can get open and catch, he'll see the ball.

#46 wutang112878

  • 3,921 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:23 AM

Awesome for the Pats, bad for Ocho, Stallworth and Branch. It seems crazy that somehow Rosenhaus can get Ocho to restructure his deal, Stallworth to sign here and then get Gaffney to sign here as well. He now has 3 clients basically fighting for maybe 2 jobs on the same team.

#47 Shelterdog


  • SoSH Member


  • 7,720 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:28 AM

Awesome for the Pats, bad for Ocho, Stallworth and Branch. It seems crazy that somehow Rosenhaus can get Ocho to restructure his deal, Stallworth to sign here and then get Gaffney to sign here as well. He now has 3 clients basically fighting for maybe 2 jobs on the same team.


It might only be one spot. Your top three (Welker, Gaffney, and Lloyd) are older and useless on STs so Edelman/Ebert makes a little more sense if you're only keeping five true wideouts (and slater as a sixth).

Stallworth is very unlikely to make an NFL roster (he's almost 32, he has 24 catches in three seasons, and he appears to be losing his best attribute, speed.

I see an AFC East team, maybe the Jets, picking up the loser of the Ocho/Branch battle.

EDIT: Rosenhaus is smart; cap space is tight and decent veterans are cheap, cheap, cheap, so at least he's getting his guys into situations where they should get a fair shot at making a team. Plus you still have a viable chance of making another roster if you get cut by the Patriots.

Edited by Shelterdog, 03 May 2012 - 08:31 AM.


#48 wutang112878

  • 3,921 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:04 AM

It might only be one spot. Your top three (Welker, Gaffney, and Lloyd) are older and useless on STs so Edelman/Ebert makes a little more sense if you're only keeping five true wideouts (and slater as a sixth).

Stallworth is very unlikely to make an NFL roster (he's almost 32, he has 24 catches in three seasons, and he appears to be losing his best attribute, speed.

I see an AFC East team, maybe the Jets, picking up the loser of the Ocho/Branch battle.


Considering they gave Gaffney a 2 year deal I agree that chances are he is on the team. But still he somehow got 3 clients to sign fighting for 2 jobs, or 2 clients signed fighting for 1, kind of crazy. If you are Chad or Stallworth today I would have to imagine you are giving Drew a call and asking what is going on, and where they rank in his client list.

The thought of Ocho and Sanchez working together could be priceless. If that happens I hope that Chad is wired all season.

#49 Salva135


  • Cassandra


  • 1,107 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:45 AM

Considering they gave Gaffney a 2 year deal I agree that chances are he is on the team. But still he somehow got 3 clients to sign fighting for 2 jobs, or 2 clients signed fighting for 1, kind of crazy. If you are Chad or Stallworth today I would have to imagine you are giving Drew a call and asking what is going on, and where they rank in his client list.

The thought of Ocho and Sanchez working together could be priceless. If that happens I hope that Chad is wired all season.


It sounds crazy but Ocho might actually perform much better playing for the Jets. Sparano's system should be much less complicated than the one in Foxboro and could actually be beneficial for Chad.

#50 Shelterdog


  • SoSH Member


  • 7,720 posts

Posted 03 May 2012 - 10:35 AM

It sounds crazy but Ocho might actually perform much better playing for the Jets. Sparano's system should be much less complicated than the one in Foxboro and could actually be beneficial for Chad.


Who knows--I have no idea what "Sparano's system" is going to be. He's never been an OC or a primary play caller, and I haven't seen anything yet describing what system/terminology he's going to use.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users