Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
4/6: Sabathia vs. Shields
#201
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:15 PM
#202
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:16 PM
I think its easier for teams like the Rays and Padres to put together good pens because of the park factors of their home park, or so I told myself as I watched Padilla, Melancon, and Aceves shit their pants yesterday.
Sadly, they shit the pants in Detroit which is also a pitcher's park.
#203
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:16 PM
#204
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:16 PM
#205
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:17 PM
Sadly, they shit the pants in Detroit which is also a pitcher's park.
Sigh.
#206
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:19 PM
#207
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:20 PM
#208
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:22 PM
#209
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:22 PM
Six through nine in the Sox lineup yesterday (Sweeney, Ross, Salty, Aviles). It isn't very scary at all. But neither is Tampa's.
Once Crawford returns I would prefer it to a bottom four of Swisher (.822 OPS), Ibanez (.707 OPS), Gardner (.732 OPS) and Gardner (.713 OPS).
#210
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:22 PM
#211
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:22 PM
Maddon is an idiot. Why take away the power option from your best power hitter?
PS: West may be the worst umprie in the big leauges.
#212
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:23 PM
#213
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:23 PM
Bizarre strike zone.
Agreed. Gameday has Pitch #4 to Pena right over the plate and not particularly low.
#214
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:23 PM
Edited by Foulkey Reese, 06 April 2012 - 05:23 PM.
#215
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:23 PM
Once Crawford returns I would prefer it to a bottom four of Swisher (.822 OPS), Ibanez (.707 OPS), Gardner (.732 OPS) and Gardner (.713 OPS).
It's better against righties. Gardner only bats once.
#216
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:23 PM
#217
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:24 PM
#218
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:24 PM
It's better against righties. Gardner only bats once.
So is the Red Sox lineup. My bad, #8 is supposed to be Martin.
#219
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:25 PM
The Montgomery Biscuits?
#220
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:25 PM
Six through nine in the Sox lineup yesterday (Sweeney, Ross, Salty, Aviles). It isn't very scary at all. But neither is Tampa's.
About that: by May, Sweeney and Ross will be two halves of a platoon that projects to be about two wins better than the Red Sox' 2011 RF situation. Even if Crawford doesn't improve (doubtful) and Ellsbury regresses a bit, they should be better in the OF than the lineup that led the majors in runs scored.
I think most people consider Aviles promising offensively — ZIPS likes Aviles a touch better than Jeter, for example. He may turn out to be a liability as a defensive shortstop, however.
Saltalamacchia is a cypher. I have no idea what to expect.
#221
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:25 PM
Once Crawford returns I would prefer it to a bottom four of Swisher (.822 OPS), Ibanez (.707 OPS), Gardner (.732 OPS) and Gardner (.713 OPS).
OK, you can have them.
#222
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:27 PM
Saltalamacchia is a cypher. I have no idea what to expect.
Yeah, I'd say Martin and Salty are a wash offensively even though Salty had the better OPS last year. But the Yankees traded away their offensively minded catching prospect and the Red Sox still have theirs. Lavarnway will probably make an impact at some point this year.
#223
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:27 PM
#224
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:27 PM
#225
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:27 PM
#226
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:27 PM
#227
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:28 PM
#228
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:28 PM
The Rays are fucking stupid.
Thought you might have enjoyed that.
#229
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:29 PM
#230
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:29 PM
*punch to the gut*
#231
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:29 PM
Still probably should have had the bunt play earlier in the count though.
#232
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:31 PM
#233
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:31 PM
#234
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:31 PM
#235
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:32 PM
#236
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:34 PM
David Robertson is the fucking man. I love everything about him.
The only things I like about him are his walk rates and his ERA-FIP. That pitch was nasty though.
Edited by SpruceTrap, 06 April 2012 - 05:34 PM.
#237
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:34 PM
#238
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:35 PM
#239
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:36 PM
#240
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:36 PM
/joke
#241
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:36 PM
Jon Lester yesterday: 7.0 ip, 6 h, 1 r, 1 er, 3 bb, 4 k, in line for the loss before a Sox 9th inning rally
CC Sabathia today: 6.0 ip, 8 h, 5 r, 5 er, 3 bb, 7 k, probably gets the win
EDIT: And Valverde yesterday: 1.0 ip, 3 h, 2 r, 2 er, 0 bb, 1 k, blows a save but gets the win when the Tigers score one in the 9th
Edited by ivanvamp, 06 April 2012 - 05:38 PM.
#242
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:37 PM
Piniella and Kay were hilarious that inning, it took them two batters to figure out why Luke Scott wasn't pinch hitting (because, um, he hit the inning before). I'm surprised the producer let them go as long as they did, Piniella is a disaster.
What in the world made YES think: A. they needed to add to their already ridiculously large roster of announcers and B. that a senile guy would be the best addition?
#243
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:38 PM
Why wins are a dumb and useless stat:
Jon Lester yesterday: 7.0 ip, 6 h, 1 r, 1 er, 3 bb, 4 k, in line for the loss before a Sox 9th inning rally
CC Sabathia today: 6.0 ip, 8 h, 5 r, 5 er, 3 bb, 7 k, probably gets the win
You could have just used Verlander and Valverde.
#244
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:38 PM
#245
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:39 PM
The only things I like about him are his walk rates and his ERA-FIP. That pitch was nasty though.
You are aware that his FIP was 1.86 last year, right? Why are you acting like this is some kind of weakness?
#246
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:39 PM
#247
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:39 PM
#248
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:39 PM
#249
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:39 PM
#250
Posted 06 April 2012 - 05:39 PM
It's a credit to Maddon's bullpen management in this game that Girardi didn't get a chance to use Andruw Jones to mash a lefty.
He could have hit him for Gardner against McGee earlier but he stuck with the better defender.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










