4/20 is about celebrating the greatest facility in the history of sport. It is not about any player, manager, championship, owner or anything else.
Well, it is Hitler's birthday
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 11 April 2012 - 10:06 PM
4/20 is about celebrating the greatest facility in the history of sport. It is not about any player, manager, championship, owner or anything else.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:45 AM
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:47 AM
Well, it is Hitler's birthday
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:50 AM
Ah, well. He can't show up "for the fans" and "take the high road" at the same time. It's not that simple. He will get cheered and huzzahed and worshiped as Caesar -- which necessarily, and although he wouldn't mean to do it, cast the organization as the evil empire.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:50 AM
Yup. I first heard about this at the gym early this evening and someone was interviewing CHB and it was high comedy watching him try to tiptoe down the line of simultaneously acknowledging that the Sox seem to stab a lot of people in the back and not antagonize his source and column writer Larry Lucchino. In the end he can do it because he's CHB. Nothing's too low to write and no one's too low to refuse to let them write his column for him.
I support Tito in this.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 08:03 AM
That's what I was getting at. I'm very frustrated this is still going on.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 09:00 AM
But who is he supposed to be mad at? LL and JH ?
From that article, it seems he is taking them both at face value that they weren't involved.
So what are they supposed to do to appease him? I don't fault the guy for being pissed about the article, but if he's accepting that Sox ownership/management weren't the sources - what the heck does he want? Why Isn't he going after the Globe or Hohler and demanding their source or at least pissing and moaning about them?
I just don't see an end game here, and he has clearly continued to play this up in the media. And regardless if he is asked or not, he can certainly say "no comment" or "I have moved on" or whatever - but he's not. Again, what does he want the Sox to do???
Edited by Average Reds, 12 April 2012 - 09:04 AM.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:03 AM
I'm sure it was side splitting, but pace yourself because this is CHB's spring training. He is writing Tito's book.
With regard to "what are the RS suppose to do here?", the answer is pretty simple: man up on your decisions and the consequences that naturally flow from them. They are just harvesting a crop they planted last November.
Don't act surprised or aggrieved. Try for once not to approach everything with the emotional maturity of a 7 year old boy by wanting everything your way.
If they had taken the high road 5 months ago and dealt with Tito forthrightly, there is little doubt he'd still be hurt and disappointed. But there is a decent chance he would attend. They didn't take that approach, so effing live with it.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:26 AM
Where is the evidence that they did not "deal with Tito forthrightly"?
Basically, this whole thing comes down to the fact that Tito got some bad press on the way out the door, press which included airing a couple of details about his personal life that, if true, probably affected his work as manager. So he's still throwing a hissy fit six months later.
Fine, that's his business and if he doesn't feel like attending the Fenway 100 thing, that's his prerogative as well. I'm not really big on these types of celebrations myself -- they just distract from the season and I probably won't even watch it. Still, I have the feeling that as time goes by, Tito will regret his decision and wish that he had been there.
But I'll just say what I said a few weeks ago. For eight years Terry Francona held one of the best jobs in the world. Sure, it's a demanding job, but he was paid quite generously for it. In fact, he became a multimillionaire as a result and probably could spend the rest of his life on a beach somewhere with no worries if he felt like it. The job and his mostly commendable performance on it made him famous and respected (as well as rich), so much so that he now holds one of the most prominent baseball broadcasting positions in the entire industry, a job he obtained with no prior experience.
And yet, he's still so pissed off about a single piece of negative press -- the source of which was probably not anyone representing the Red Sox in any official capacity -- that he can't attend an event where he is certain to be one of the favorite attractions. To me, that reflects much more poorly on Tito than on the Red Sox or anyone else.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:10 PM
If Grady isn't there, does this mean Timlin and Williamson will be let on the field?
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:57 PM
Same here. Tito deserves an appreciation day for what he gave to this city. To see it happen twice was beyond my wildest dreams.This is just top notch, well done.
I couldn't be happier to see Tito telling the ownership where they can stick their Ballpark Party. That said, if the whole band isn't back together for, say, Opening Day 2014 ... to celebrate 10 years ... it will be very upsetting.
Posted 12 April 2012 - 02:33 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:14 AM
After a follow-up question about his decision not to attend the 100th anniversary celebration at Fenway Park next week, Francona backpedaled a bit on comments he made Wednesday regarding the invitation issued by the Red Sox.
"That came out the other day and I wish I had handled it a little differently," he said. "I think I'm smarter than that. ... But I'm not comfortable going back there. But I wish I would have kept some of the reasons to myself and I'm a little disappointed in myself for that."
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:42 AM
I'm glad he spoke his mind, but Tito said he regrets going into detail:
http://m.espn.go.com...ed-sox&id=18134
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:53 AM
I'm glad he spoke his mind, but Tito said he regrets going into detail:
After a follow-up question about his decision not to attend the 100th anniversary celebration at Fenway Park next week, Francona backpedaled a bit on comments he made Wednesday regarding the invitation issued by the Red Sox.
"That came out the other day and I wish I had handled it a little differently," he said. "I think I'm smarter than that. ... But I'm not comfortable going back there. But I wish I would have kept some of the reasons to myself and I'm a little disappointed in myself for that."
http://m.espn.go.com...ed-sox&id=18134
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:09 AM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:25 AM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:37 AM
Now he's just playing a childish game. He pours out his bitterness and anger in public, then says, oh gee, I regret saying that, I wish I'd taken the high road. He wants it both ways and there's no way he doesn't know exactly what he's doing. He's not exactly green when it comes to dealing with the media. The reality is, either you take the high road or you don't. I mean, Larry Lucchino hasn't exactly covered himself in glory in this episode, but at least he isn't engaging in this sort of nonsense.
Tito will always have a unique and special place in my Red Sox fan's heart and I've even enjoyed his ESPN work so far. But I'm losing respect for him as a person the longer he keeps this up.
Edited by Rocco Graziosa, 13 April 2012 - 08:40 AM.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:06 AM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:16 AM
He's not exactly green when it comes to dealing with the media.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 09:40 AM
I love Tito and really would like to see him attend the celebration.
That said, he and the FO need to get together and put this bullshit to rest, once and for all.
Tito also needs to return whatever the advance is that he received from the Globe for the book he's writing with the CHB. Based upon comments Tito has already made for which he's apologized, no good will come from allowing the CHB to air the dirty laundry in public. The book smacks of revenge. Tito is dealing with the devil. I thought he was smarter than this.
This will not end well.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 10:10 AM
I totally agree with this.
While I'm dying to read a book written by Francona about his tenure with the Sox, we all know the vitriol that will spill out with CHB in charge.
Besides, I feel dirty when I click on one of his links (and I very rarely ever do so) so I really don't know if I can purchase that book.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 11:41 AM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:09 PM
But he's in a position we've never seen him in before, and that maybe he's never been in before. It was always fun watching Tito's press conferences, and a large part of the reason is that Tito came across as a guy with a very low bullshit factor. His natural response to any question seems to be to tell the truth--but this was always tempered by the need to protect and affirm his players. So you got to see two very appealing qualities at work: honesty and loyalty (along with some self-deprecating wit).
Now he's in a situation where the honesty impulse is still at work, but the loyalty impulse isn't there to temper it--quite the opposite. If he's going to resist the temptation to say what's on his mind, it has to be out of regard for his own reputation and image.
Edited by Gene Conleys Plane Ticket, 13 April 2012 - 12:09 PM.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:10 PM
Adam Jones
@adamjonesESPN
Just spoke to Curt Schilling. Says he just got his invite to the 100th anniversary of Fenway Park today and that he likely can't go.
Edited by Gambler7, 13 April 2012 - 12:12 PM.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:11 PM
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:13 PM
Schilling said he just got his invitation to the 100-year celebration a few days ago. Seriously? They are botching this thing so badly.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:23 PM
FYI Gresh and Zo just said on 98.5 Schilling spoke with someone (missed the name) who just tweeted that Schilling just got the invitation for the 100th Anniversary event today.
Edit: Found it, it was Adam Jones, ESPNBoston
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:26 PM
Schilling said he just got his invitation to the 100-year celebration a few days ago. Seriously? They are botching this thing so badly.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:31 PM
And the reason we believe anything Schilling says is, what, again?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:32 PM
And the reason we believe anything Schilling says is, what, again?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:37 PM
LMAO ... that's like the Carlton Fisk contract renewal sent too late
Edited by The Allented Mr Ripley, 13 April 2012 - 12:37 PM.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 12:38 PM
Why the hell would he lie about something like that?
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:07 PM
Well, it's a good bet Fisk's contract was mailed late on purpose.
Posted 13 April 2012 - 01:42 PM
He tells it like he sees it. I may not always like what I hear but I do not believe he is a liar.And the reason we believe anything Schilling says is, what, again?
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users