Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
2012 Tennis thread
#1
Posted 17 March 2012 - 02:20 AM
Today/Night is the semis at Indian Wells, a Masters 1000 and we have another Federer v Nadal match.
Last year Rafa smoked Roger off the court in two easy. This year Federer's just recovered from a cold but played well against del Potro while Rafa struggled against Nalbandian. But with these two, it's all mental. If Federer can keep it together then he'll win, even on these ridiculously slow hard courts.
The other semi is Isner v Djokovic.
In the grand scheme of things, this Masters is not so vital except in the race for #2. If Federer beats Nadal today, he'll inch closer to the two spot and thus opening up the possibility that Rafa and Novak are on the same side of the draw at the French/Wimby/Olympics. That's going to be important for Federer's chances.
It's Miami in a week and then we're off to the European clay season.
#2
Posted 17 March 2012 - 06:30 PM
#3
Posted 17 March 2012 - 07:48 PM
Edit: linky for anyone interested
Edited by Deweys Stache, 17 March 2012 - 07:50 PM.
#4
Posted 17 March 2012 - 08:02 PM
Federer is playing very well under awful conditions.
Edited by AMS25, 17 March 2012 - 08:48 PM.
#5
Posted 17 March 2012 - 09:17 PM
#6
Posted 17 March 2012 - 10:57 PM
#7
Posted 18 March 2012 - 05:56 PM
#8
Posted 18 March 2012 - 08:40 PM
Roger has now won 6 of the last 8 events he has entered with his only loss being that epic choke job at the Australian open. The other event he didn't win he withdrew in the semis with a back injury
And he's only about 800 points behind Nadal for the #2 ranking. Miami next week is a huge tournament. Hypothetically, if Fed were to win and Nadal lost before the semis, Fed would be #2 in the world. Either way, he's made some great progress towards getting that #1 ranking back, if only for 2 weeks, to break the all time record for most weeks at #1.
Edited by Deweys Stache, 18 March 2012 - 08:41 PM.
#9
Posted 22 March 2012 - 11:55 AM
Djokovic has Del Potro in his quarter, which is going to be a tasty encounter. Djokovic has looked more lethargic this year and Del Potro looks better with each passing week (except against Federer).
Rafa has a pretty easy draw until the semis. He has Tsonga in his quarter but Jo's been in bad form lately so I don't expect Nadal to have too much difficulty in getting to the semis, where he might face Murray.
It's going to be hot and the court is the slowest hard-court around so it's a good chance for Rafa to get back on course before we head into the clay season. If Federer can take out Djokovic and keep up his run, oh man, that'd set things up tastily for the clay season, even though Nadal would still be the favourite.
Edited by Apisith, 22 March 2012 - 11:55 AM.
#10
Posted 26 March 2012 - 09:14 PM
Rogers's quest for #2 is on hold.
#11
Posted 22 April 2012 - 07:41 AM
#12
Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:51 AM
#13
Posted 23 April 2012 - 07:17 AM
Regardless, it's still a big win for Nadal. He's still got the 3 straight GS final losses vs Djokovic to deal with, but at least the overall head-to-head losing streak is over.
#14
Posted 07 May 2012 - 06:49 AM
#15
Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:53 AM
#16
Posted 31 May 2012 - 04:38 AM
#17
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:04 AM
#18
Posted 03 June 2012 - 02:40 AM
crazy finish to this point.
Edited by Infield Infidel, 03 June 2012 - 02:54 AM.
#19
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:35 AM
The top 8 are all still alive to make the quarters, not a lot of parity on the men's side these days.
#20
Posted 04 June 2012 - 07:40 PM
#21
Posted 05 June 2012 - 10:42 AM
#22
Posted 05 June 2012 - 10:51 AM
#23
Posted 05 June 2012 - 11:42 AM
Djokovic is in a bigger hole currently, down 2 sets to 1 and 2-2 in the 4th.
#24
Posted 05 June 2012 - 01:02 PM
#25
Posted 05 June 2012 - 05:56 PM
Djokovic may shortly be playing for his #1 ranking, too. A loss there would have halved the point differential between him and Nadal.
#26
Posted 06 June 2012 - 08:47 AM
Although I reckon Almagro can take a set. His best shot is the first one. If he loses it then it'll be three easy.
#27
Posted 06 June 2012 - 09:29 AM
#28
Posted 06 June 2012 - 09:42 AM
#29
Posted 07 June 2012 - 09:18 PM
Edited by Infield Infidel, 07 June 2012 - 09:19 PM.
#30
Posted 10 June 2012 - 07:48 AM
#31
Posted 10 June 2012 - 11:56 AM
Weather was terrible all day Nadal had nothing to say about it, but as soon as Djokovic started playing better and winning games, suddenly the court is unplayable and Nadal is whining like a petulant 10 year old.
Funny Nadal finally stops being a pussy, and instead plays hard in the 3rd game and wins it, then they stop play, and Nadal berates the official for a minute about why they were playing for the last hour (when Nadal was getting blown off the court)
#32
Posted 10 June 2012 - 08:55 PM
#33
Posted 10 June 2012 - 09:32 PM
#34
Posted 11 June 2012 - 12:36 AM
http://www.usatoday....work/55498962/1
#35
Posted 11 June 2012 - 06:54 AM
#36
Posted 11 June 2012 - 07:07 AM
Greatest clay court player of all time. No player has owned a surface like Nadal owns Clay.
#37
Posted 11 June 2012 - 07:16 AM
#38
Posted 11 June 2012 - 07:42 AM
#39
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:05 PM
#40
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:06 PM
#41
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:08 PM
#42
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:10 PM
#43
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:22 PM
That's a huge break for Andy Murray, since inexplicably Djokovic (1) and Federer (3) are on the same side of the draw again.
I've been wondering about this for a while -- why isn't the draw structured to set up a 1v4, 2v3 semifinal? The same thing happened at Roland Garros and I thought it was a big advantage for Nadal to avoid both Federer and Djokovic until the final.
#44
Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:42 PM
#45
Posted 28 June 2012 - 05:32 PM
#46
Posted 28 June 2012 - 09:20 PM
I've been wondering about this for a while -- why isn't the draw structured to set up a 1v4, 2v3 semifinal? The same thing happened at Roland Garros and I thought it was a big advantage for Nadal to avoid both Federer and Djokovic until the final.
Because it would mean always the same semifinals, which apparently makes for worse TV if 2 never plays 4 and 1 never plays 3. So it's a random draw, and 50/50.
#47
Posted 29 June 2012 - 05:00 AM
Because it would mean always the same semifinals, which apparently makes for worse TV if 2 never plays 4 and 1 never plays 3. So it's a random draw, and 50/50.
It would only mean the same semifinals if the rankings never changed, which of course they do, and if the same four players always make them, which admittedly has been happening in most recent men's majors but very rarely did before that.
It's an indefensible and silly way to do things, and I'd do all I can to get it changed if I was involved in the sport professionally.
#48
Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:34 AM
#49
Posted 29 June 2012 - 08:35 AM
#50
Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:40 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













