I thought the same thing.
Me too! But I bet he wasn't thinking, "Missed field goals ain't gonna beat us!"
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 26 January 2012 - 03:12 PM
I thought the same thing.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 03:13 PM
OK, I didn't know that about McDermott. Gronk seems like a big kid that just enjoys the hell out of what he does, and he gets paid for it too?!!?Not a comp - only using him as a guy with some talent who destroyed himself by going overboard with the partying. Natural exuberance can get a guy into trouble if he doesn't check himself now and then.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 06:57 PM
They also put Doris Dickerson on practice squad IR.Pats sign TE Carson Butler; Gronk misses Thursday practice.
Gulp?
Posted 26 January 2012 - 06:58 PM
Pats sign TE Carson Butler; Gronk misses Thursday practice.
Gulp?
Posted 26 January 2012 - 06:59 PM
They also put Doris Dickerson on practice squad IR.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 07:01 PM
I just mean that Butler's signing probably has more to do with that than with Gronk's injury.We're doomed.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 07:24 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 07:59 PM
Pats sign TE Carson Butler; Gronk misses Thursday practice.
Gulp?
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:01 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:10 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:17 PM
I thought Dave Roberts Shoes said it best when Gronk returned to the last game. He wouldn't have been playing if he was seriously hurt.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:24 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:27 PM
They likely need another TE to run through their sets in practice no?
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:40 PM
Let's look at the likeliest scenario:
Gronk will not practice this week. He will be "limited" every practice next week. His injury comments to the media will be sparse and in the vein of "I'm fine", "Just taking it a day at a time", "Doing everything I can to get myself ready to play the Giants", and "GRONK SMASH!" He will be listed as questionable for the game. He will play and be 100-X% effective. We will spend the first series solving for X.
Prepare yourselves accordingly.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:45 PM
See Terrell Owens in Super Bowl 39. Reports all week had him near amputation and what did he do? 9 catches for 122 yards.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:47 PM
That's what I was thinking. Another body for practice.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:47 PM
Well if you recall he did sleep in a hyperbaric chamber.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 08:58 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:01 PM
I thought Dave Roberts Shoes said it best when Gronk returned to the last game. He wouldn't have been playing if he was seriously hurt.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:04 PM
Yeah, what he said. Besides, I'm not just some shitty dermatologist, I know things about ankles and shit.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:08 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:20 PM
Just saw the miked up half hour special on NFL network. Post game, Gronk is on the field near the podium and Belichick leans down from the stage to get his ear. BB says that's why we brought you here, are you OK? Gronk replies I'm good. That footage also showed him coming back to the sidelines from the locker room, he wasn't just meandering, he was outright bouncing out to the huddle. No noticeable restrictions. I think we've got a weeks worth of conservative news, doing nothing to inflame it, and tight tape and a full go for Indy.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:36 PM
To be fair, though, it doesn't take a doctor to reach that conclusion.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:41 PM
I have zero doubt he'll play. I also suspect he won't be 100%. But a 90% Gronk is still a force of nature. My only real concern is if the Giants (who were targeting Williams of SF, if the reports are accurate, because he had suffered a concussion and they wanted to knock him out) go after it...make a hard tackle there.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:43 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:45 PM
Gronk sleeps in a race car bed. I'm sure of it.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 09:52 PM
Yeah, but I'm the only one who will charge you a co-pay for the privilege.
Posted 26 January 2012 - 10:07 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 11:19 PM
Posted 26 January 2012 - 11:22 PM
You would think so, but I kept waiting and nothing happened to Pollard, so . . .
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:40 AM
Posted 27 January 2012 - 06:17 AM
So you are suggesting that Gronk might catch a ball and a Giant's defender might try to make a hard tackle on his ankle? So basically you are expecting someone to dive at his feet instead of making a sure tackle, knowing full well that Gronk is likely athletic enough to avoid them and keep romping down the field. Yea, let the Giants try that.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 08:25 AM
As long as no one gets pics of Gronk taking bong hits, I'm fine with it.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 08:25 AM
Dave, my non-doctor conclusion was that we learned when Gronk returned that he had no structural damage but not much else. I'm mouthing words here but I assume that the adrenaline played a role in his return and that his ankle swelled up on Monday.Yeah, what he said. Besides, I'm not just some shitty dermatologist, I know things about ankles and shit.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 08:59 AM
Gronk doesn't need bong hits. I strongly suspect that his brain contains some some natural substance that closely mimics the effects of cannabis.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 09:19 AM
Posted 27 January 2012 - 09:30 AM
Personally I'm not going to fret about Gronk's participation in practice until next week at the earliest.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 09:31 AM
Posted 27 January 2012 - 09:31 AM
For sure. It's not in the least bit surprising that they're keeping him out of practice now. Based on all that we know and past examples like TO, I think the only time to fret would be if the Pats declare him out. Until then, no manner of caution regarding practice is going to worry me.Personally I'm not going to fret about Gronk's participation in practice until next week at the earliest.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 09:53 AM
I think this scenario is about as perfect as it can be for a coach like Belichick. Keep your opponent guessing about your biggest offensive weapon.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:03 AM
Yeah, what he said. Besides, I'm not just some shitty dermatologist, I know things about ankles and shit.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:07 AM
Does it really matter that much though? Coughlin and his staff are going to game plan primarily for Gronk being there. They'll also game plan for situations where Gronk won't be available. But I don't think that latter game planing will detract from the amount of work they'll be putting in to preparing for the Gronk. I think the only situation it might make a difference in is if it turns out Gronk isn't available. Then maybe the Giants will be under prepared for how Belichick will try to make up for his absence, but that's not a situation that's likely benefit the Pats at all.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:07 AM
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:09 AM
No, but you could form tackle him (a hard enough task as it is), and as you slide down his
legs, you could give the ankle a little extra jolt. There's no way in the history of football there haven't been situations like this.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 10:43 AM
Dave, my non-doctor conclusion was that we learned when Gronk returned that he had no structural damage but not much else. I'm mouthing words here but I assume that the adrenaline played a role in his return and that his ankle swelled up on Monday.
Should we conclude from the fact that he had no structural damage that he'll be close to 100% two weeks later? Will the Pats give him some kind of a shot before the game?
Posted 27 January 2012 - 11:09 AM
Posted 27 January 2012 - 11:47 AM
The elder Gronkowski also told WIVB sports reporter John Murphy off camera that his son suffered a high ankle sprain.
Edited by drleather2001, 27 January 2012 - 11:50 AM.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 11:54 AM
Based on what I've seen from the plays when he came back and the footage after the game, he was moving and feeling pretty good. It's true that adrenaline can play a role in this, but if he had a very significant injury he still would have been more limited, I think. I would expect that he would be a little less than 100% but still able to be a significant factor. As for an injection, if he does have a "high ankle sprain", this is a hard thing to inject - the area of injury is much bigger than can really be effectively injected. He'll get the usual toradol pre-game, but probably not a local injection.
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:04 PM
I agree to an extent. It's not like there is much doubt as to "what" the injnury was, esp. when watching the NFL films piece with Gronk saying "my ankle." I do think it was kind of smarmy of the reporter to spill it if it was said off camera. At the very least, he took advantage of Mr. G's politeness and ignorance of they way things are, vis a vis comments on the record vs. off.Um... is his dad familiar with Bill Belichick's preferred way of doing things? Like...at all?
EDIT:
That's some pretty low shit right there. Guy pretty clearly A) was not talking about the injury during the actual interview; and B) thought it was off the record.
If I were the Patriots I'd be pissed off to the nth degree.
Edited by steveluck7, 27 January 2012 - 12:05 PM.
Poll Pats 2012-13 Rookie of the YearStarted by Beomoose , 09 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Ninkovich: old Vrabel same as new?Started by FL4WL3SS , 15 Jan 2012 |
|
|
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users