Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Pierce: Can We Trust the Truth Anymore?
#1
Posted 21 January 2012 - 08:04 AM
#2
Posted 21 January 2012 - 08:58 AM
Edited by Koufax, 21 January 2012 - 08:59 AM.
#3
Posted 21 January 2012 - 09:28 AM
#4
Posted 21 January 2012 - 09:31 AM
This is a young man's game and the 66 game schedule is a young man's schedule. KG looks just as bad. I think we all knew this team was in trouble when they announced the schedule and the fast track to playing on Xmas. For the C's to compete, it would have been better for them to have a full training camp and 45ish game schedule starting around now. Oh well.
Pierce also had a foot injury. Part of me wonders whether he would even be playing if Jeff green were healthy. Because he doesn't look comfortable running, moving laterally, or pivoting. Could be age and conditioning, could be the injury.
(and just as an aside, this is what really pisses me off about the compromise, the players and the league basically said "let's try to grab as much money out of this shit season as we can, even if it affects the product on the court.")
#5
Posted 21 January 2012 - 10:13 AM
#6
Posted 21 January 2012 - 10:19 AM
Edited by Koufax, 21 January 2012 - 10:20 AM.
#7
Posted 21 January 2012 - 10:35 AM
He's hurt. That is the answer in a nutshell. The heel injury is still a bother and with so many games in such a short time he can't recover. It's happening all over the league. Due to the bad start they can't rest him but he needs a week to two weeks off and conditioning.
Exactly.
Pierce didn't have a training camp and is injured so part of the deal with these two factors is that he is going to have to play himself into shape. I'd say the money is on Pierce's heel getting worse before it gets better and he shuts it down at some point.
To pin this season on Pierce is irresponsible.
(and just as an aside, this is what really pisses me off about the compromise, the players and the league basically said "let's try to grab as much money out of this shit season as we can, even if it affects the product on the court.")
No different than any other conglomerate. We shouldn't expect anything different.
Edited by HomeRunBaker, 21 January 2012 - 10:38 AM.
#8
Posted 21 January 2012 - 08:20 PM
No different than any other conglomerate. We shouldn't expect anything different.
Oh, I didn't expect any different. I'm still pissed that they met my expectations. Of course, I'm also a fan of a very old team.
#9
Posted 26 January 2012 - 11:03 PM
#10
Posted 27 January 2012 - 08:15 AM
Thus goes Paul Pierce's lot in Boston.
#11
Posted 27 January 2012 - 08:23 AM
He was a stud.
#12
Posted 27 January 2012 - 08:32 AM
#13
Posted 27 January 2012 - 08:51 AM
I don't think he had the "yips." I think he was gassed from playing so hard all game.
Yup. Pierce played 44 minutes and all but 23 seconds of the second half. That was a hell of a performance.
#14
Posted 27 January 2012 - 02:01 PM
#15
Posted 27 January 2012 - 04:27 PM
#16
Posted 27 January 2012 - 05:19 PM
It would be hard pressed to find a more impressive performance by anyone in the NBA this year...if you find one, its probably going to be either James or Durant.
Do you really mean this on a night he shot 7/18 from the field and had 5 TO's? Good game, yes, but the most impressive performance in the NBA barring James/Durant? What a homer...
#17
Posted 27 January 2012 - 06:02 PM
Do you really mean this on a night he shot 7/18 from the field and had 5 TO's? Good game, yes, but the most impressive performance in the NBA barring James/Durant? What a homer...
I was talking about the second half performance. I can only recall a few performances like James against the Spurs about a week ago that was more impressive than what Pierce did in the 2nd half last night. Not sure if you watched the game or not...
#18
Posted 28 January 2012 - 04:57 PM
#19
Posted 07 February 2012 - 10:28 PM
Thanks for everything #34!
#20
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:58 AM
Also, while the rules are not the same and it is really difficult to compare eras, I know a lot of people would get on him for being a chucker on bad teams. But, his 1.36 pts per FG is better than Bird (1.26) and Havlicek (1.10).
#21
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:05 PM
Also, while the rules are not the same and it is really difficult to compare eras, I know a lot of people would get on him for being a chucker on bad teams. But, his 1.36 pts per FG is better than Bird (1.26) and Havlicek (1.10).
This is probably directly related to Pierce being 1617/4370 from 3 (7135FG/15939FGA) vs Bird being 649/1727 from 3 (8591/17334)
The 3 point line obviously didn't exist for Havlicek (10513/23930)
#22
Posted 08 February 2012 - 07:10 PM
But it's not out of the realm of possibility that Pierce can finish somewhere in the Top 15-20 on the NBA all-time scoring list. An amazing accomplishment.
#23
Posted 13 February 2012 - 12:24 PM
But here's the thing. Every time Pierce is handling the ball is not an Iso so stop complaining about it every damn time he touches the ball for more than a catch and shoot. I'm seeing people whining about the Pierce iso when he is already on the dribble and just backing down his man. I have seen people complain about it if he so much as carries the ball across midcourt. I even saw a complaint when he was setting up a pick and pop with Garnett (it was defended well and didn't materialize). Again, I realize that people complain about it so much that it is fun to participate every time he touches the ball, but holy shit it is about ten times more tired than the actual plays where the Celtics choose to execute an Iso.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













