The sox consider clay mortenson a starter.
For the PawSox, I hope.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:38 PM
The sox consider clay mortenson a starter.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:38 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:39 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:39 PM
The Scutaro trade frees up some $$ for
#RedSox to make an "aggressive bid'' for Roy Oswalt, said a baseball source
https://twitter.com/#!/jcrasnick/status/160868472895700993
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:40 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:41 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:41 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:43 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:45 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:45 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:47 PM
So, moving Scutaro saves $6M, but I still don't see how this gets us under the cap enough for Floyd or Oswalt. Either here upthread or elsewhere someone had the current at ~ $170M plus medicals, so roughly $180M. Floyd could fit snuggly under or close to, as he's about a $4M hit, but that leaves us with literally zero flexibility for an inseason pickup. Oswalt puts us over. At the very least it will be a boring trade dealine unless Ben has something else up his sleeve.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:50 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:50 PM
I think the "plus medicals" was a joke, PP.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:51 PM
Mortensen is the Rockies revenge for Manny Delcarmen.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:51 PM
Not likely mainly because the money doesn't work. The Cuban Missile brings along fresh new extension and an AAV of $7.8MM. Plus Floyd's $7MM.#redsox's trade of M Scutaro raises possibility -- Gavin Floyd talks w/#whitesox expand to include SS Alexei Ramirez or Eduardo Escobar.
http://twitter.com/C...869828368941057
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:51 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:52 PM
No, he was actually serious. Each team is hit for $9-10M a year for benefits.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:52 PM
No, he was actually serious. Each team is hit for $9-10M a year for benefits.
Edited by rembrat, 21 January 2012 - 06:54 PM.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:53 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:53 PM
#redsox's trade of M Scutaro raises possibility -- Gavin Floyd talks w/#whitesox expand to include SS Alexei Ramirez or Eduardo Escobar.
http://twitter.com/C...869828368941057
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:53 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:55 PM
Escobar would seem to be almost completely redundant with Iglesias. Ramirez, now that's another story.....but that would entirely negate the salary relief factor.#redsox's trade of M Scutaro raises possibility -- Gavin Floyd talks w/#whitesox expand to include SS Alexei Ramirez or Eduardo Escobar.
http://twitter.com/C...869828368941057
Posted 21 January 2012 - 06:55 PM
GIven that Scutaro is close to an average SS on a 1 year deal at reasonable money, I'm surprised the Sox couldn't get anything of value for him. A lot of teams (including the Red Sox now ironically) could use an average major league SS considering some of the guys getting trotted out there. He certainly is not worth a big prospect package, but I would have thought maybe a decent prospect or two.
Can't really judge this deal until we see what happens with the money, but at this point it certainly doesn't make the Sox any better.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:03 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:03 PM
The Red Sox have all the "payroll flexibility" in the world. There is no hard ceiling in play here. Management is saying they don't want to pay more. They're not signing or trading for more expensive pieces this offseason because of anything other than a management decision.
You seem intent on pinning that on Epstein's past moves. I find that narrowminded
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:04 PM
Not likely mainly because the money doesn't work. The Cuban Missile brings along fresh new extension and an AAV of $7.8MM. Plus Floyd's $7MM.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:07 PM
Mortensen is a sinker-slider-changeup pitcher with a low swinging strike%, low K/BB, and low velocity on the fastball (~87 mph). Last year he was lucky on BABIP (.257), so he's even worse than his results.
This looks awful. The Red Sox now have holes at SS, RF, LF and on the bench. They have lost their best relievers in Papelbon and Bard, replacing them with inferior substitutes in Bailey and Melancon.
The team must have confidence that Middlebrooks and Iglesias can perform in the event of an infield injury. That's more confidence than I have.
Edited by bombdiggz, 21 January 2012 - 07:13 PM.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:08 PM
I would assume Iglesias is one of the traded pieces in any deal for Floyd, freeing up another $2MM.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:10 PM
Maybe they'll pull a Hanley Ramirez trade from out of nowhere?
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:11 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:14 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:16 PM
I wouldn't assume that. Iglesias for potentially 1 year of Floyd is a steep price.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:17 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:20 PM
AL SS' hit .266/.321/.386 last year - that's a pretty low bar and something Aviles should be able to approach. Punto can be mixed in when the Sox have a GB pitcher going against a RHP.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:20 PM
Crawford and Iglesias for Hanley?
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:22 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:22 PM
unless Ben thinks that Iglesias will never hit and thus will never play every day for the Sox. then its understandable. There will also be a draft pick coming back when Floyd leaves.
Crawford and Iglesias for Hanley? and sign Oswalt?
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:30 PM
unless Ben thinks that Iglesias will never hit and thus will never play every day for the Sox. then its understandable. There will also be a draft pick coming back when Floyd leaves.
Crawford and Iglesias for Hanley? and sign Oswalt?
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:30 PM
I'm sure Aviles can outhit most SS, I'm just unconvinced he can be an everyday SS at the big league level defensively.
Edited by Rudy's Curve, 21 January 2012 - 07:37 PM.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:31 PM
I don't see any reason to pretend that this offseason has improved the Red Sox in any way. Every step seems to be a step backwards. The bullpen has plenty of volume, but the closer and set-up positions are weaker, not stronger. If you want to push Bard back to the bullpen, then his value is reduced. Moving Bard to the starting rotation was one of the very few hopes for improvement from existing talent. If you want to hope that RF will be improved with a career minor-leaguer and a zero-power flop platooning, by all means knock yourself out. Presumably you would then acknowledge that Ellsbury, Pedroia and Gonzalez will regress from career years.There are 6 million reasons why the Sox made this deal and Mortensen isn't one of them. We need to see what they do with the money.
If they are able to get Floyd, then the rotation is likely to be much improved with a stronger front four and either Bard or Padilla in the 5 spot, though it raises the likelihood Bard goes back to the pen, improving the pen from last year's edition.
On paper we look weaker in RF, but JD Drew ended up being a whole lot of suck, the liklihood of a McDonald/Sweeney platoon out-producing the RF from last year is pretty great and we are likely to get better production out of LF as well.
I know this offseason is different, but we don't need to keep pretending the world has ended every time the Sox make a move...
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:37 PM
This is a weaker team on paper and in the field, but there is lots of depth in fungible relievers and scrap-heap starters.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:42 PM
Edited by kieckeredinthehead, 21 January 2012 - 07:43 PM.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:45 PM
If you want to hope that RF will be improved with a career minor-leaguer and a zero-power flop platooning, by all means knock yourself out. Presumably you would then acknowledge that Ellsbury, Pedroia and Gonzalez will regress from career years.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:45 PM
I don't see any reason to pretend that this offseason has improved the Red Sox in any way. Every step seems to be a step backwards. The bullpen has plenty of volume, but the closer and set-up positions are weaker, not stronger. If you want to push Bard back to the bullpen, then his value is reduced. Moving Bard to the starting rotation was one of the very few hopes for improvement from existing talent. If you want to hope that RF will be improved with a career minor-leaguer and a zero-power flop platooning, by all means knock yourself out. Presumably you would then acknowledge that Ellsbury, Pedroia and Gonzalez will regress from career years.
The team discovers that it can't afford anything, so it spends 1.75m/yr on a utility infielder -- but that's OK: he's now the regular shortstop, so he must be a bargain!
Floyd will not be free: he's a bargain-priced innings-eater, and will cost dearly in prospects -- presumably including one or both of Middlebrooks and Iglesias.
This is a weaker team on paper and in the field, but there is lots of depth in fungible relievers and scrap-heap starters.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:57 PM
This is absolutely correct IMO -- there is no reason to think that the Sox have improved this offseason. At best they've maintained an even talent level with last year.
Trading Scutaro may free up enough guaranteed payroll to allow Ben the chance to shoot his wad. Here's hoping he aiming at the right target, because I haven't seen any move he's made as in any way impressive.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 07:58 PM
I don't see any reason to pretend that this offseason has improved the Red Sox in any way. Every step seems to be a step backwards. The bullpen has plenty of volume, but the closer and set-up positions are weaker, not stronger. If you want to push Bard back to the bullpen, then his value is reduced. Moving Bard to the starting rotation was one of the very few hopes for improvement from existing talent. If you want to hope that RF will be improved with a career minor-leaguer and a zero-power flop platooning, by all means knock yourself out. Presumably you would then acknowledge that Ellsbury, Pedroia and Gonzalez will regress from career years.
The team discovers that it can't afford anything, so it spends 1.75m/yr on a utility infielder -- but that's OK: he's now the regular shortstop, so he must be a bargain!
Floyd will not be free: he's a bargain-priced innings-eater, and will cost dearly in prospects -- presumably including one or both of Middlebrooks and Iglesias.
This is a weaker team on paper and in the field, but there is lots of depth in fungible relievers and scrap-heap starters.
Posted 21 January 2012 - 08:02 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 08:07 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 08:09 PM
Posted 21 January 2012 - 08:19 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users