Thanks I am trying to live up to the standards put forth by our SOSH four fathers...
Not to judge but i am fascinated, you are the product of a polygamous gay marriage?
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 31 January 2012 - 10:56 PM
Thanks I am trying to live up to the standards put forth by our SOSH four fathers...
Posted 02 February 2012 - 09:59 AM
Posted 02 February 2012 - 10:32 AM
Pidailla facing arrest in Nicaragua for non-payment of child support (in spite of making around $50 million so far in the majors). His passport was revoked and a capture order was issued.
Peter Abraham
Posted 02 February 2012 - 12:18 PM
Update from Abraham: Arrest order has been revoked, but he still has passport issues until he settles his support issues.
Posted 02 February 2012 - 04:46 PM
Not to judge but i am fascinated, you are the product of a polygamous gay marriage?
Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:16 AM
"There were other teams that wanted my services but as a reliever," Padilla said. "I think I can still start games and the Red Sox had the opportunity here for me to be a starter and they gave me a chance to win a rotation spot."
For that reason, Padilla's mentality during this spring training is to win the starting job or bust. When asked if he would accept a bullpen role with the Red Sox, the veteran answered "probably not."
"Because I want to be a starter and I'd just keep looking for a chance to become a starter," Padilla said. "If I can't do it here, then I'll try somewhere else."
Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:20 AM
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:34 PM
No, apparently we collectively all are.
Posted 26 February 2012 - 06:28 PM
Posted 26 February 2012 - 08:48 PM
Um, does he have some kind of gentleman's agreement with the Red Sox that he'll get released if he's not in the rotation? Because, otherwise, its not like he can just walk away if they slot him in the pen, right? I guess he's not a team player, so maybe he's making it known that he'll be a pain in the ass if he's not accommodated. Frankly, given this bit of attempted blackmail, I'd be inclined to send him packing unless its pretty clear he's the best option.
Posted 26 February 2012 - 09:35 PM
Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:17 PM
He's not a prospect. If he signed with the expectation that he was competing for a starters job and that he would not be used in the bullpen (and it seems likely that was the case given his recent comments) then he has every right to make public that fact to put pressure on the club to hold to its promise. I think you are overreacting here. If he isn't working out, the Red Sox can send him packing later. Right now, he could very well be the frontrunner for the 5th starter slot that he wants, so why cut him because he doesn't want to end up in the bullpen if he doesn't get the starter slot? He's on a minor league contract. He can start games in AAA and be injury insurance if he doesn't make the 25 man. Frankly, that's a better use for him than joining the bullpen at the start of the season anyway.Um, does he have some kind of gentleman's agreement with the Red Sox that he'll get released if he's not in the rotation? Because, otherwise, its not like he can just walk away if they slot him in the pen, right? I guess he's not a team player, so maybe he's making it known that he'll be a pain in the ass if he's not accommodated. Frankly, given this bit of attempted blackmail, I'd be inclined to send him packing unless its pretty clear he's the best option.
Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:23 PM
He's not a prospect. If he signed with the expectation that he was competing for a starters job and that he would not be used in the bullpen (and it seems likely that was the case given his recent comments) then he has every right to make public that fact to put pressure on the club to hold to its promise. I think you are overreacting here. If he isn't working out, the Red Sox can send him packing later. Right now, he could very well be the frontrunner for the 5th starter slot that he wants, so why cut him because he doesn't want to end up in the bullpen if he doesn't get the starter slot? He's on a minor league contract. He can start games in AAA and be injury insurance if he doesn't make the 25 man. Frankly, that's a better use for him than joining the bullpen at the start of the season anyway.
Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:27 PM
Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:15 AM
Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:36 AM
The Red Sox have a reputation for treating their acquired veteran pitchers well. Both Brad Penny and John Smoltz spoke well of the shoulder strength programs. It's worth playing softball with people like Padilla and Cook -- honor their wishes, and the word gets around.
It might even get around to Roy Oswalt someday.
Posted 27 February 2012 - 07:58 AM
With the new CBA, they don't have to release him if he's unhappy with where they send him or what role they give him. He can opt-out on May 1. And I would think that unless there's a team that is in real need of a starter when camp breaks, he's not going to gain anything by demanding to be released on April 4. And if there was such a team, and Padilla fit their need, a trade would be worked out rather than a release.If he's not willing to relieve for the Sox, I find it hard to believe he's interested in reporting to Pawtucket. I assume if he doesn't win the 5th starters spot, he's released.
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:53 AM
I hope it's just down to merit. Meaning that I want the guy in the 5th starter role who they think will do the best getting the ball every fifth day (or whenever called upon if they skip the fifth starter once in a while). It's not that I don't take your points about attitude and flexibility. I just don't mind a guy who says "I'm a starter dammit" and more to the point, I assume they all of the guys they have in contention will be motivated enough to behave in the early part of the season and will, in the end, give them enough flexibility. If there comes a time when they would have preferred to move Padilla to the pen and just can't do that for whatever reason, so be it.I thought he was on a major league contract, my bad.
But I wasn't saying cut him now, I was saying that I would hold this lack of willingness to be a team player against him if the decision at the end of spring training were a close call between him and someone else. I could easily see Padilla, Cook, and Ohlendorf making this a tough decision. Frankly, I'd be even more so inclined since he's on a minor league contract and can be stuck in Pawtucket while a guy who looks equally good as of March 31st and wouldn't object to more of a swingman role -- they can skip the 5th starter quite a bit -- gets the first chance.
Posted 27 February 2012 - 11:05 AM
"There were other teams that wanted my services but as a reliever," Padilla said. "I think I can still start games and the Red Sox had the opportunity here for me to be a starter and they gave me a chance to win a rotation spot."
Posted 13 March 2012 - 09:45 PM
Padilla has thrown seven innings in three games. Valentine said there are no plans to give him a start, which could indicate Padilla is not in the mix for a rotation spot.
"Padilla made it look easy, didn't he?" Valentine said. "There's probably a change in the lineup that made it [easier]. But I think he does that. He can throw a lot of pitches that get off the head of the bat. He's a strike thrower, probably the best strike-thrower we have."
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:01 PM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:07 PM
Padilla eyes rotation, but would accept 'pen roleHas he said anything since he told the media he was starting or leaving?
Edited by redsox2020, 13 March 2012 - 10:08 PM.
Posted 28 March 2012 - 02:48 PM
Padilla said through translator that he would rather stay with Red Sox in bullpen than go to another team right now
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users