The thing is, you can do that and also not expose yourself as a raging, selfish asshole, especially on a day when your team's accomplishments are being celebrated.
Edited by miracleofmidre, 23 January 2012 - 08:25 PM.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:21 PM
Edited by miracleofmidre, 23 January 2012 - 08:25 PM.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:22 PM
Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:25 PM
Sorry, I took week to mean 7 days.That's why I said "this week". If the All-Star Game wasn't this weekend, it likely wouldn't ever be mentioned again beyond Wednesday. He'll be asked after tomorrow's game, he'll say he's already said everything he's going to say, and everyone will forget and move on.
Thomas does plenty for charitable causes, is one of the best interview subjects in the league, and has never had any controversy around him. Nobody in the media is going to care enough about this in a couple of days to give him a hard time.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:27 PM
"As an organization we were honored by President Obama's invitation to the White House. It was a great day and a perfect way to cap our team's achievement from last season. It was a day that none of us will soon forget. We are disappointed that Tim chose not to join us, and his views certainly do not reflect those of the Jacobs family or the Bruins organization. This will be the last public comment from the Bruins organization on this subject."
Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:46 PM
Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:46 PM
Posted 23 January 2012 - 09:03 PM
As my wife said, if he felt so passionately about these issues, this was his chance to address them with the Leader of the Free World.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 09:42 PM
Posted 23 January 2012 - 09:46 PM
Posted 23 January 2012 - 09:55 PM
Posted 23 January 2012 - 10:26 PM
You know, I was initially pissed about this, because I thought it was classless, but the more I've thought about it, the more I think that if Thomas really believes Obama is destroying the country, making a small statement in this way is a reasonable thing to do.
I think his belief is incredibly stupid and wrongheaded, but if he feels that strongly, sure, why not do it.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 11:53 PM
Nope, message would've reached the same target, he'd just look a lot less selfish doing it.
Posted 23 January 2012 - 11:58 PM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:07 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:34 AM
CSNNE was doing a piece weeks ago on Andrew Ference’s efforts to recycle and encourage his B’s teammates to live environmentally-conscious lifestyles in their day-to-day existences as hockey players.
Several of Ference’s teammates, like Tyler Seguin and Zdeno Chara for instance, smiled and spoke about the nuanced ways the forward-thinking defenseman had affected them in a positive way. Seguin said he now shops for all his groceries at Whole Foods for the environmentally-agreeable organic foods recommended by Ference, and Chara mentioned taking his bicycle everywhere rather than driving.
But Tim Thomas politely declined when asked his opinions about Ference’s efforts, and admitted “we’ve got pretty opposite viewpoints on that kind of stuff.”
Thomas went on to say – with the wonderful usage of paraphrasing in hindsight – that he didn’t believe in the scientific theories powering the greenhouse effect and global warming. Instead Thomas felt like the efforts behind both notions were being pushed by those interested in growing the current green industry that’s turned into a cash cow in the United States over the last decade.
Edited by PedroSpecialK, 24 January 2012 - 12:34 AM.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:39 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 01:04 AM
That's kind of fucked up (Thomas/Kampfer). If you don't respect the man, you can still respect the title.
Edited by Rico Guapo, 24 January 2012 - 01:04 AM.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 03:40 AM
The title means something? After all the horrific presidents we've had in the last 100 years????
Edited by Sparky Lyle, 24 January 2012 - 03:45 AM.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:38 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:41 AM
I'm with Sparky on this one. No matter what you think about the President, I think you've lost some perspective homie.The title means something? After all the horrific presidents we've had in the last 100 years????
Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:44 AM
The title means something? After all the horrific presidents we've had in the last 100 years????
Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:58 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:59 AM
It's the office which demands respect. We have had and unfortunately currently have lots of people dying for what it stands for.
The move Tim Thomas should have made was attend, shut up, shake his hand then afterwards use his same Facebook platform to say something like 'if he did his job 1/10th as well as we did, this country wouldn't be in this mess'. The process would have gone well, he would have made his point and fostered a team spirit even if people didn't agree with him. Then it would be on him to explain himself and if you wanted to ignore him you could just not follow his Facebook account.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 08:23 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 08:50 AM
At this point I'm not really rolling my eyes - they have now merely receded into the back of my head. From Haggs:
Fuck science and that hippy lib Ference. This is the lowest of low-hanging fruit, but it speaks volumes to Thomas's thought process and overall intellect. It kills me to say it, but I am legitimately worried about the backlash of this on his and/or the team's game.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 08:56 AM
What!!! You, are a douche bag. Go fuck yourself. The title means a lot. A real lot. I read Chris cross examine everyone here. Because he thinks things out and respects opinions. And when Shyness Clinic, like me not the greatest poster on the planet, offers equanimity in a point of view, I listen. What the fuck are you talking about, you jerk fucking jerk!!!!! Horrific presidents!!!! What planet are you from!!!!!!
Oh, and here's the other thing, by the way, I'm a liberal. I have very little in common with Weebs, Nip, Shyness, et al. But I listen to them! They know things I don't. If Tim Thomas wants to be ill-mannered that's fine. It's not that big a deal in the big scheme of things I guess, but he could have at least been a good sport about it. He wasn't. So he can kiss my Irish ass. You can too.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 08:59 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:00 AM
First and foremost, Thomas absolutely has the right to decline that invitation. And everyone else has the right to agree with him or to criticize him. That's the interesting thing about the US.
What's sad, at least from my perspective, is that it seems as if everyone is talking about Tim Thomas this morning and not about the Bruins. Yesterday was really not a day about Obama nor was it a day about the Office of the Presidency. It was a day about the Bruins...or it was supposed to be. How sad for each of them that this morning, we're all talking about Tim Thomas, and President Obama, and the US government and even Theo Epstein.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:01 AM
I'm a liberal. I have very little in common with Weebs, Nip, Shyness, et al. But I listen to them! They know things I don't.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:07 AM
What!!! You, are a douche bag. Go fuck yourself. The title means a lot. A real lot. I read Chris cross examine everyone here. Because he thinks things out and respects opinions. And when Shyness Clinic, like me not the greatest poster on the planet, offers equanimity in a point of view, I listen. What the fuck are you talking about, you jerk fucking jerk!!!!! Horrific presidents!!!! What planet are you from!!!!!!
Oh, and here's the other thing, by the way, I'm a liberal. I have very little in common with Weebs, Nip, Shyness, et al. But I listen to them! They know things I don't. If Tim Thomas wants to be ill-mannered that's fine. It's not that big a deal in the big scheme of things I guess, but he could have at least been a good sport about it. He wasn't. So he can kiss my Irish ass. You can too.
I'm with Sparky on this one. No matter what you think about the President, I think you've lost some perspective homie.
It's the office which demands respect. We have had and unfortunately currently have lots of people dying for what it stands for.
The move Tim Thomas should have made was attend, shut up, shake his hand then afterwards use his same Facebook platform to say something like 'if he did his job 1/10th as well as we did, this country wouldn't be in this mess'. The process would have gone well, he would have made his point and fostered a team spirit even if people didn't agree with him. Then it would be on him to explain himself and if you wanted to ignore him you could just not follow his Facebook account.
But what he did was no better than what Code Pink does, in a little less upfront way.
What Epstein did was worse as he was part of management. The more days go by I miss that dude less and less. Thanks for Cody Ross and Nick Punto you fuck.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:20 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:32 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:33 AM
Wait - Did Sparky just lump me in with Weebs and Nip politically?
Don't get me wrong, they're great men and great company to be associated with...but come on, I drove a Prius.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:35 AM
It's the office which demands respect. We have had and unfortunately currently have lots of people dying for what it stands for.
The move Tim Thomas should have made was attend, shut up, shake his hand then afterwards use his same Facebook platform to say something like 'if he did his job 1/10th as well as we did, this country wouldn't be in this mess'. The process would have gone well, he would have made his point and fostered a team spirit even if people didn't agree with him. Then it would be on him to explain himself and if you wanted to ignore him you could just not follow his Facebook account.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:51 AM
Weebs is gonna shot you in the face with an AR-15.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:59 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 10:16 AM
Myt, you're not wrong in anything you've written here but... isn't there something to be said for picking your spots? Do the event with your teammates that in no way speaks to or infringes upon your beliefs, and then spout off with that facebook statement to every microphone in sight after the next game.
I think that's why its drawing this sort of reaction--no one seems really upset, but it's an eyeroll move. Would have been cool if he could have sucked it up for his teammates too.
We're not talking about a brutal dictator or some sort of despotic extreme here either, by the way. Standing there while he cracks some jokes is hardly a test of too much patience, right?
First and foremost, Thomas absolutely has the right to decline that invitation. And everyone else has the right to agree with him or to criticize him. That's the interesting thing about the US.
What's sad, at least from my perspective, is that it seems as if everyone is talking about Tim Thomas this morning and not about the Bruins. Yesterday was really not a day about Obama nor was it a day about the Office of the Presidency. It was a day about the Bruins...or it was supposed to be. How sad for each of them that this morning, we're all talking about Tim Thomas, and President Obama, and the US government and even Theo Epstein.
Edited by Myt1, 24 January 2012 - 10:16 AM.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 10:30 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 10:53 AM
That's just an awesome example of internal contradiction and questioning the patriotism of those with opposing political views. Thomas was selfish for making yesterday about him, but what he really should have done was show up and then confront Obama in person while his team was being feted.
And, last time I checked, the USA jersey didn't have a politician's name one it.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:01 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:01 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:02 AM
Edited by Dewey for Prez, 24 January 2012 - 11:07 AM.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:11 AM
I think Brick missed Myt1's point.
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:20 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:27 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:29 AM
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:32 AM
Admittedly, I approach these sorts of things from a different perspective because of what I do. But, you're really talking about a subjective matter of degree here, right? At some point, ones political beliefs could be so diametrically opposed to a head of ones state to the point where even meeting with him would infringe on ones beliefs, right?
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:39 AM
Skipping a meeting with the President has rhetorical force? Says who?
Why is the goalie for the Bruins worried about his "rhetorical force"?
Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:50 AM
I think a lot of the confusion keeps coming in on the fact that people are claiming it has to do with politics. While I agree that with some people I am sure it does, I think there are many of us who don't give a rat's ass about it. I don't see a lot of the comments being lefty bias here, we are more worried about how this could possibly affect the team going forward.I don't think Tim's pov is new to anyone and I doubt the other guys give even a hair on the rats ass as long as he doesn't play like shit. He should have gone and it sucks that he didn't. The outrage and projection of statements seems to be the same old lefty bias of SoSH. Also, I don't have time at the moment for an extensive search, but weren't Thomas's views well enough known that there was speculation about whether he would even make the trip right after they won?
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users