Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo

Broncos at Patriots-The End the Tebow Season Game


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2064 replies to this topic

#1 Dogman2


  • Yukon Cornelius


  • 7,303 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 03:45 PM

Yep, it's Tuesday. I'm treating the gamethread rules like the Pats treated the Bills 2 Sundays ago.

Stage 1: The Turnaround. Complete.
Stage 2: The Momentum Builder. Complete.
Stage 3: The Defensive Posture. Complete.
Stage 4: The Don't Overlook Game. Complete.
Stage 5: The Play 60 Minutes Game. Complete.
Stage 6: The Stop the Tebow Nonsense Game. Complete.
Stage 7: The Saturday Game. Complete.
Stage 8: The Number 1 Seed Game. Complete.
Stage 9: The End the Tebow Season Game.

Pats by 6.

#2 Darnell's Son

  • 2,627 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 03:56 PM

I love Dogman2 unconditionally.

#3 Carmine Hose

  • 3,346 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 04:19 PM

Paraphrasing an ESPNBoston blog post and NFL tweet

PIT @ DEN did a 42.4 rating for CBS. Highest for 2011, highest wild card ever, highest TV show since the last Super Bowl.

Imagine what an 8pm Saturday night game with Tebow @ NEP will do? It may actually draw more viewers than one of the conference title games next weekend.

#4 MentalDisabldLst


  • used to disappointment


  • 10,754 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 04:22 PM

Even more relevant this week:

http://www.nbc.com/a...tml?vid=1374394

edit: I suck at embedding. Can't get raw-HTML mode going. All help appreciated.

Edited by MentalDisabldLst, 10 January 2012 - 04:25 PM.


#5 genoasalami

  • 484 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 04:29 PM

Dry and chilly. Temps in the 20's. NW winds about 15 mph.

Edited by genoasalami, 10 January 2012 - 04:31 PM.


#6 j44thor

  • 3,148 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 04:44 PM

Isn't a Sunday day game more likely to have a bigger share than a Saturday night game when a larger % of people are out than any other day of the week?

I guess we will see when the #'s come in but I wouldn't be surprised to see a drop off from this weeks Pitt DEN game.
There is a reason networks never schedule their "A" shows for Friday/Saturday night. This is part of the reason I was surprised to see the Pats get the Saturday slot.

#7 Omar's Wacky Neighbor

  • 2,291 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 04:50 PM

Yep, it's Tuesday. I'm treating the gamethread rules like the Pats treated the Bills 2 Sundays ago.

The gamethread follows Dogman around everywhere he goes, holding onto Dogman's beltloop at all times. AIN'T THAT RIGHT, GAMETHREAD!!!!!

Edited by Omar's Wacky Neighbor, 10 January 2012 - 05:09 PM.


#8 jacklamabe65


  • A New Frontier butt boy


  • 5,888 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 04:59 PM

Dogman = Cabrera Era

Lead us to the Promised Land.

#9 Rasputin


  • Will outlive SeanBerry


  • 23,204 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 05:14 PM

Paraphrasing an ESPNBoston blog post and NFL tweet

PIT @ DEN did a 42.4 rating for CBS. Highest for 2011, highest wild card ever, highest TV show since the last Super Bowl.

Imagine what an 8pm Saturday night game with Tebow @ NEP will do? It may actually draw more viewers than one of the conference title games next weekend.


You think the additional eyeballs are because of Tebow or because it was a pretty damn good game that looked like an upset candidate pretty early on?

#10 Old Fart Tree

  • 4,125 posts

Posted 10 January 2012 - 08:59 PM

Cast Tebow down with the Sodomites. He'll think he's been fucked by a train! And the library??? Gone! SEALED OFF!

#11 m0ckduck

  • 174 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:08 AM

Dry and chilly. Temps in the 20's. NW winds about 15 mph.


Good. People in the other thread were wishing for snow and making points about Brady's record in snowy conditions, how it actually helps the short passing attack, etc. Factually, these points all ring true... but, wishing for weird weather conditions seems too clever by half. The Pats are the better team > normal conditions lessen chance of flukey outcome > I'll take normal conditions, please.

Edited by m0ckduck, 11 January 2012 - 05:09 AM.


#12 Carmine Hose

  • 3,346 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:25 AM

You think the additional eyeballs are because of Tebow or because it was a pretty damn good game that looked like an upset candidate pretty early on?


Both actually. The Tebow Hallelujah win over the Steelers combined with the Brady-Belichick Pats. Their regular season game was the highest rated regular season game of the year for CBS. The public may even think Tebow has a chance over the "evil" Pats. Of course, Vegas has it at - 13 1/2.

#13 judyb

  • 2,738 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:29 AM

Good. People in the other thread were wishing for snow and making points about Brady's record in snowy conditions, how it actually helps the short passing attack, etc. Factually, these points all ring true... but, wishing for weird weather conditions seems too clever by half. The Pats are the better team > normal conditions lessen chance of flukey outcome > I'll take normal conditions, please.

Were they people who don't live around here or people who own plows?

#14 epraz


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,042 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 11:44 AM

Isn't a Sunday day game more likely to have a bigger share than a Saturday night game when a larger % of people are out than any other day of the week?

I guess we will see when the #'s come in but I wouldn't be surprised to see a drop off from this weeks Pitt DEN game.
There is a reason networks never schedule their "A" shows for Friday/Saturday night. This is part of the reason I was surprised to see the Pats get the Saturday slot.


Well they certainly don't schedule A shows for Sunday at 4pmET/1pmPT, or 1pmET/10amPT!

Edited by epraz, 11 January 2012 - 11:44 AM.


#15 Bucknahs Bum Ankle


  • SoSH Member


  • 8,247 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 01:38 PM

Is it Saturday night yet??? Jesus H. Chrrrrrrrrrist on a cracker, this feels like the slowest week ever.

#16 CreedBratton

  • 460 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 03:13 PM

Just found out I am going to my first ever Patriots game this Saturday!!!!!! I live around 7-8 hours away in Canada (please don't shoot me) and have seen the other 3 teams but never seen the Pats. I am through the roof right now that I am coming to the playoff game. Unreal.

#17 jsinger121


  • @jsinger121


  • 8,395 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:11 PM

Did Not Practice

DL Kyle Love (not injury related)



Limited Participation

CB Kyle Arrington (foot)


S Patrick Chung (foot)


C Dan Connolly (groin)


WR Julian Edelman (back)


LB Dane Fletcher (thumb)


S James Ihedigbo (shoulder)


T Matt Light (ankle)


G Logan Mankins (knee)


CB Devin McCourty (shoulder)


LB Rob Ninkovich (hip)


WR Matthew Slater (shoulder)


LB Brandon Spikes (knee)


T Sebastian Vollmer (back/foot)


WR Wes Welker (knee)


LB Tracy White (abdomen)



Full Participation

QB Tom Brady (left shoulder)



#18 mabrowndog


  • Ask me about total zone...or paint


  • 29,237 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:23 PM



#19 doc

  • 2,325 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:26 PM

When we win will we get to see Tebow ascend to the heavens?

#20 Old Fart Tree

  • 4,125 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:26 PM

Just found out I am going to my first ever Patriots game this Saturday!!!!!! I live around 7-8 hours away in Canada (please don't shoot me) and have seen the other 3 teams but never seen the Pats. I am through the roof right now that I am coming to the playoff game. Unreal.


That is a Doozy of a first Pats' game, man. Congratulations!

#21 BigSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 7,566 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:01 PM



Really should have waited until at least Friday before I watched this. Too amped to work now.

#22 CreedBratton

  • 460 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:19 PM

That is a Doozy of a first Pats' game, man. Congratulations!


Thanks! So stoked, they better win this!

#23 JerBear

  • 581 posts

Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:23 PM

Pats win, 31-6

#24 Jnai


  • is not worried about sex with goats


  • 8,143 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:09 AM



I feel crazy but weren't most of those shots from last season?

#25 CaptainLaddie


  • dj paul pfieffer


  • 19,356 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:11 AM

I feel crazy but weren't most of those shots from last season?

All of em!

#26 Old Fart Tree

  • 4,125 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:21 AM

Yeah, I felt the same way. We didn't play the Vikings this year, and we sure as fuck didn't have any "highlights" against the Steelers.

#27 SoxScout


  • SoSH Member


  • 28,753 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 01:34 AM

New 8-11pm temps: 22-20-18-16 with the windchill progressing from 10-9-5-2

#28 judyb

  • 2,738 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 02:07 AM

All of em!

Some are even older, there are Pats players named Harrison and Gay in one of those scenes.

#29 ilol@u

  • 1,411 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 05:02 AM

I am 99% sure that the Broncos will run a flea-flicker sometime during the game. I remember in the broadcast last week they were talking about watching their practice and noting that the Broncos were practicing new plays (such as a flea-flicker) that they would use during the playoff game. They didn't use a flea flicker against Pittsburgh so they still have that saved in that their bag of tricks.

#30 Mystic Merlin


  • SoSH Member


  • 17,539 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:31 AM

New 8-11pm temps: 22-20-18-16 with the windchill progressing from 10-9-5-2


Hot damn.

Not quite Packers-Giants in '07, or Titans-Patriots in '03, and certainly not the Bengals game like 30 years ago (-59 or something), but fuck that's cold. Stay home, old people.

#31 gtmtnbiker

  • 106 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:37 AM

I am 99% sure that the Broncos will run a flea-flicker sometime during the game. I remember in the broadcast last week they were talking about watching their practice and noting that the Broncos were practicing new plays (such as a flea-flicker) that they would use during the playoff game. They didn't use a flea flicker against Pittsburgh so they still have that saved in that their bag of tricks.


I think they already used it in the previous NE-Denver game. Wasn't it this one?

Posted Image

#32 tims4wins


  • PN23's replacement


  • 5,314 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 09:58 AM

That wasn't a flea flicker, at least by my understanding of the term, which is a handoff to the running back, who then pitches back to the QB, who then throws.

#33 Curtis Pride

  • 589 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 11:13 AM

New 8-11pm temps: 22-20-18-16 with the windchill progressing from 10-9-5-2

It's the 20-mph winds that might have a bigger impact on the game.

#34 Mystic Merlin


  • SoSH Member


  • 17,539 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 11:20 AM

I swear to God that some people think Joe Montana never lost a big game.

And this isn't in response to much, so don't mind me! (unfortunate D and C comments) HEEL, HEEL, BONGER

Edited by Mystic Merlin, 12 January 2012 - 11:23 AM.


#35 Smiling Joe Hesketh


  • now batting steve sal hiney. the leftfielder, hiney


  • 23,325 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 11:25 AM

I swear to God that some people think Joe Montana never lost a big game.


No kidding. He went out in the first round 3 years in a row for fuck's sakes!

1985: 3-17 @ NYG. 26-47, 296 yards, 1 INT

1986: 3-49 @ NYG. 8-15, 98 yards, 2 INTs

1987: 24-36 vs. MIN. 12-26, 109 yards, 1 INT. To make it worse SF had gone 13-2 that year.

How many people threw that asinine "HE HASN'T WON A PLAYOFF GAME IN 4 YEARS!!" idiocy at him back then, like they do at Brady now?

Christ on a crutch. I hate everyone.

#36 Titoschew

  • 2,483 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 11:53 AM

Hot damn.

Not quite Packers-Giants in '07, or Titans-Patriots in '03, and certainly not the Bengals game like 30 years ago (-59 or something), but fuck that's cold. Stay home, old people.


I was at that game in '03 and holy shit was it frigid.

#37 Al Zarilla


  • SoSH Member


  • 12,551 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:37 PM

No kidding. He went out in the first round 3 years in a row for fuck's sakes!

1985: 3-17 @ NYG. 26-47, 296 yards, 1 INT

1986: 3-49 @ NYG. 8-15, 98 yards, 2 INTs

1987: 24-36 vs. MIN. 12-26, 109 yards, 1 INT. To make it worse SF had gone 13-2 that year.

How many people threw that asinine "HE HASN'T WON A PLAYOFF GAME IN 4 YEARS!!" idiocy at him back then, like they do at Brady now?

Christ on a crutch. I hate everyone.

Joe wasn't above everything at all. In 1986 when he hurt his back and was out for most of the season, there were even some rumors that he was actually in drug rehab. And, of course, the 9ers brought Steve Young to the team long before Joe was close to done. Overreacting dumb shit that I am, I said to my son that they should put in Steve Young for that last drive in super bowl 23 against the Bengals. I liked Steve's great run ability to go with his passing. He disagreed and was of course right. Montana is probably best remembered for the super bowls, in which he was stellar, e.g., 0 INTs and 11 TD passes in 4 games and an average passer rating (not the new one) of 127.8. He did have some not so stellar postseason games though.

#38 Smiling Joe Hesketh


  • now batting steve sal hiney. the leftfielder, hiney


  • 23,325 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:39 PM

Joe wasn't above everything at all. In 1986 when he hurt his back and was out for most of the season, there were even some rumors that he was actually in drug rehab. And, of course, the 9ers brought Steve Young to the team long before Joe was close to done. Overreacting dumb shit that I am, I said to my son that they should put in Steve Young for that last drive in super bowl 23 against the Bengals. I liked Steve's great run ability to go with his passing. He disagreed and was of course right. Montana is probably best remembered for the super bowls, in which he was stellar, e.g., 0 INTs and 11 TD passes in 4 games and an average passer rating (not the new one) of 127.8. He did have some not so stellar postseason games though.


I guess my point and Merlin's point are that even the great Joe Montana, "Best QB to have ever played the game," had a series of truly horseshit playoff games. No one seems to remember that any more. I'm just saying that in general that should be kept in mind before folks rush to throw dirt on Tom Brady's playoff career.

#39 Mystic Merlin


  • SoSH Member


  • 17,539 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:41 PM

Those fucks really need to win this damn game, though. Enough is enough.

/Captain Obvious

Edited by Mystic Merlin, 12 January 2012 - 12:41 PM.


#40 Smiling Joe Hesketh


  • now batting steve sal hiney. the leftfielder, hiney


  • 23,325 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:42 PM

Well yeah.

#41 Mystic Merlin


  • SoSH Member


  • 17,539 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 12:44 PM

So, the question becomes...do you guys think the Pats will win if they score more points than the Broncos? Even with that defense?

Posted Image

Well, I'll tell ya what, Rich, I'm not so sure.

Posted Image

Edited by Mystic Merlin, 12 January 2012 - 12:48 PM.


#42 Al Zarilla


  • SoSH Member


  • 12,551 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 01:26 PM

I guess my point and Merlin's point are that even the great Joe Montana, "Best QB to have ever played the game," had a series of truly horseshit playoff games. No one seems to remember that any more. I'm just saying that in general that should be kept in mind before folks rush to throw dirt on Tom Brady's playoff career.

Of course. And, Joe, or the team and Joe, came back from those mid 80s losing playoff games with victories in SB 23 and 24. That's what we want with Tom and the Patriots, starting with Saturday and culminating in SB 46 (and what the hell 47 and any more with which they want to bless us). :love:

#43 Ed Hillel


  • Wants to be startin somethin


  • 24,469 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 01:30 PM

And what about that Packers-Giants game? Will the Giants be able to keep up with Aaron Rodgers and his high-powered offense?

Posted Image

Not a chance. That Aaron Rodgers guy is something special. And that defense is wily!

Posted Image

#44 Bucknahs Bum Ankle


  • SoSH Member


  • 8,247 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 01:38 PM

Is it Saturday night yet??? Jesus H. Chrrrrrrrrrist on a cracker, this feels like the slowest week ever.

#45 Darnell's Son

  • 2,627 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 02:09 PM

That wasn't a flea flicker, at least by my understanding of the term, which is a handoff to the running back, who then pitches back to the QB, who then throws.


Your understanding is correct, the ball has to go back to the QB for it to be a flea flicker.

#46 ilol@u

  • 1,411 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 03:24 PM

Posted Image

#47 jsinger121


  • @jsinger121


  • 8,395 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 03:28 PM




RapSheet Ian R. Rapoport




Takeaway from today: Patriots G Logan Mankins was limping. Noticeably. There is still two days to go, and he's a tough dude. Game decision



#48 jsinger121


  • @jsinger121


  • 8,395 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 04:22 PM




NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS


LIMITED PARTICIPATION: CB Kyle Arrington (foot), OT Marcus Cannon (ankle), C Dan Connolly (groin), LB Dane Fletcher (thumb), S James Ihedigbo (shoulder), G Logan Mankins (knee), LB Rob Ninkovich (hip), WR Matthew Slater (shoulder), LB Brandon Spikes (knee), T Sebastian Vollmer (back/foot), WR Wes Welker (knee), LB Tracy White (abdomen).


DENVER BRONCOS


DID NOT PARTICIPATE: S Brian Dawkins (neck), WR Eric Decker (knee), LS Lonie Paxton (personal).


LIMITED PARTICIPATION: S David Bruton (Achilles), TE Daniel Fells (ankle), DE Elvis Dumervil (ankle).


FULL PARTICIPATION: LB Von Miller (thumb).



#49 RedOctober3829


  • SoSH Member


  • 11,141 posts

Posted 12 January 2012 - 04:44 PM

Mankins




I'd expect Mankins to shoot up and give it a go, but how effective can he be?

#50 Rasputin


  • Will outlive SeanBerry


  • 23,204 posts

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:29 AM

You should have seen the commercial I saw tonight for the game here in fundyland.

Do you believe?

Is
He
UNSTOPPABLE?

Tebow v Brady and the Pats...


Holy crap it was hysterical.




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users