Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Who manages this team?
#1
Posted 30 September 2011 - 06:05 AM
#2
Posted 30 September 2011 - 06:26 AM
Any chance we can lure Torre out of retirement? I know the guy isn't a spring chicken...but he's a kid compared to Jack McKeon.
Bobby Valentine is always mentioned on these managerial lists. I actually like him, but think he'd be like gasoline on the fire that is the Boston media market.
#3
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:34 AM
Pena
Martinez
Cora
A rising minor league star (Joe McEwing)
A respected bench coach (Olney mentioned Pete Mackanin)
I think that's a half dozen pretty good choices.
#4
Posted 30 September 2011 - 07:42 AM
#5
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:05 AM
#6
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:12 AM
Seriously though, I think Valentine is the best guy listed so far. But I'd imagine other avenues, beyond "available" managers would also be explored. Any chance they'd try and pry Farrell away from Toronto?
#7
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:19 AM
#8
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:20 AM
Epstein will choose someone not that well known or expected, with some sort of issue that will have many of us questioning him. But it'll work out all right.
#9
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:27 AM
#10
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:43 AM
Also, I suspect they'll prefer someone younger than Valentine and Macha, who are both in their 60s.
#11
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:49 AM
Perhaps someone with experience with Crawford (Dave Martinez fits the bill). I'm sure we'll hear John Farrell, Mills, and even Maddon mentioned too (no chance, IMO).
Maddon would be my first choice, he has shown a lot of ability in Tampa, and he was one of the guys interviewed when Tito got the job. Getting him from Tampa would probably be very difficult though, although worse case scenario Tampa might have to give him a new contract to retain him and that would reduce their resources a bit which also isnt a bad thing.
#12
Posted 30 September 2011 - 08:59 AM
#13
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:02 AM
The thing is, with guys like Farrell and Mills, can they really bring in someone who already has ties to the current roster, or do they need a total outsider? I think based on what happened this year it needs to be an outsider.I'm sure we'll hear John Farrell, Mills, and even Maddon mentioned too (no chance, IMO).
#14
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:07 AM
#15
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:13 AM
Just kidding.
#16
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:15 AM
#17
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:48 AM
It would be quite the ballsy move for Theo given his lack of experience. But if he's looking for someone to bring accountability and professionalism to the team, Kapler would bring that.
#18
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:52 AM
#19
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:54 AM
I also wonder if they're looking at someone with some experience to run it for a couple of years to train someone for the long term.
#20
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:57 AM
Bobby Valentine - accountability, experience
Rich Dubee - good pitching background, very good with the media, well spoken, professionalism, but no managerial experience
Wally Backman - it may never happen, but if you want accountability, and fire, he absolutely eats, sleeps and breathes baseball, may be a media disaster
#21
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:59 AM
A couple years is the long term, unless they can find another Francona. Managers have short shelf lives unless they are exceptional.I like the Macha idea. They know him and I believe he understands our system.
I also wonder if they're looking at someone with some experience to run it for a couple of years to train someone for the long term.
#22
Posted 30 September 2011 - 09:59 AM
I also would be perfectly fine with McEwinig, Sandberg, Martinez, or the like.
Would be pretty disappointing with Macha, would be upset with Valentine.
Edited by SoxScout, 30 September 2011 - 10:00 AM.
#23
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:02 AM
Has anyone seen this clown on TV for the past 2 years? Fucking no thanks.
#24
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:05 AM
#25
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:06 AM
So, most of these names being thrown around seem rather unlikely to me.
#26
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:07 AM
Yeah, Theo's about as likely to hire a guy like Valentine to be the manager as he is to sign a speed guy with no plate discipline and not much power to a 7-year, $140-million contract to play left field for us.The Red Sox don't need a manager who is bigger than the team. How would Valentine work out? I can't imagine him working well with Theo or management; he wants the spotlight and isn't going to answer to anyone, there's a reason nobody has hired him despite him being a good tactician. No way.
#27
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:09 AM
I think Martinez, McEwing, Macha, and Pena are all interesting candidates, but I don't know enough about how they think to say for sure. I was in Missouri when Pena was the KC manager, and was very impressed in how he outwardly handled himself to the fans and media, even once all the We Believe stuff went to hell in a handbasket. Out of anyone mentioned so far, he's the one I'd have the most confidence could replace Tito's media/Boston pressure handling skills.
I think (and this is totally speculative) it increasingly didn't sit well with Theo when Tito would refuse to pinch-hit or bench a veteran even when the matchup numbers strongly called for it. I think that Theo is basically looking for someone who can keep a good clubhouse and be an extension of front-office philosophies on the field. This can be good or bad - those philosophies can be trusted to be sounds, but also encourages groupthink which can be obviously negative for an organization.
Edit: grammar
Edited by JimBoSox9, 30 September 2011 - 10:10 AM.
#28
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:09 AM
Seriously. He makes a complete fool of himself every Sunday night on ESPN. I can't imagine a worse choice.STOP WITH VALENTINE.
Has anyone seen this clown on TV for the past 2 years? Fucking no thanks.
#29
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:13 AM
I kind of like the Dave Martinez idea though.
Edited by greek_gawd_of_walks, 30 September 2011 - 10:16 AM.
#30
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:14 AM
I don't know why we never hear about Tom Kelly's name being floated for managerial openings.
The guy that wanted David Ortiz to play more small ball? No, thank you.
#31
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:14 AM
I don't think the PawSox manager, Arnie Beyeler, figures in Theo's thinking yet for a big league manager, although Arnie did a nice job in 2011 for Pawtucket.
And, of course, maybe Theo is gone in a few days, or weeks, too. Stranger things have happened.
Edited by terrynever, 30 September 2011 - 10:15 AM.
#32
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:14 AM
STOP WITH VALENTINE.
Has anyone seen this clown on TV for the past 2 years? Fucking no thanks.
While we're vetoing people, it'd be nice if Maddon wasn't brought up either. No chance he makes that move. He's not an NCAA football coach.
Phillip Seymour Hoffman would be an intriguing choice. It'd also be fun to be on this board if they hired away Scioscia, just for the meltdowns. He'd turn Jacoby into Juan Pierre 2.0 in no time at all.
#33
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:15 AM
I like the idea of a young guy (like Francona was) but who fits the mold? I like Joe McEwing, but the only basis I really have for that is youth, and the vague idea that crappy former players who were fairly highly touted seem to have a lot of insight.
#34
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:16 AM
#35
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:16 AM
I thought Macha was considered oddly uncommunicative by the players in Oakland. That doesn't seem very good if true.I like the Macha idea. They know him and I believe he understands our system.
I also wonder if they're looking at someone with some experience to run it for a couple of years to train someone for the long term.
#36
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:18 AM
Valentine is a self-righteous self promoter who is consistently moronic on ESPN. His drivel is always lacking any logic. He seems like he'd take managing with hunches to the extreme. Valentine's antics would wear out quickly.
I kind of like the Dave Martinez idea though.
The players better hide their wives if Dave Martinez is hired.
What would be an awesome experiment in how to handle pressure and adversity is a group interview with Dave Martinez and Ryne Sandberg. That would be awesome.
Edited by ScubaSteveAvery, 30 September 2011 - 10:20 AM.
#37
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:22 AM
#38
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:24 AM
There is also the question of temperament. There are hardass, "I'm the boss" managers and easygoing, "I'm one of the guys" managers. It seems like a good strategy to go from one type to another. After way too many years of Jimy Williams' topsy-turvy fiefdom, Grady Little and Tito Francona were good picks. Little, unfortunately, was a wipeout but a manager with his temperament was the right call. They got it right with Tito.
Now, after 8 years of Tito, and with a veteran club with high expectations every year, they can't hire an inexperienced manager now. That would be pulling a "Lou Lamoriello" in the John MacLean scenario. They really DO need a Bobby Valentine type for a few years and THEN hire a young guy to take over from HIM. Anyway, that's how I see it today.
#39
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:27 AM
Now, after 8 years of Tito, and with a veteran club with high expectations every year, they can't hire an inexperienced manager now. That would be pulling a "Lou Lamoriello" in the John MacLean scenario. They really DO need a Bobby Valentine type for a few years and THEN hire a young guy to take over from HIM. Anyway, that's how I see it today.
Not sure I agree with this. Look at Maddon, Washington, Roenicke, Gibson, even Girardi...those guys were all pretty inexperienced and are in the playoffs. Different markets, for sure, but I think things have changed in terms of a manager. It's a much more collaborative process, and needing the right fit with management and team personnel; I'm no longer convinced that experience matters. In some cases, it may be a negative.
#40
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:39 AM
What's the old line about experience? I believe it was, "Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again." Bobby V can certainly do that.I hope they consider the following for interviews:
Bobby Valentine - accountability, experience
What part of Bobby V's 1117-1072 record, including presiding over one of the most disappointing teams in recent history (the 2001-02 Mets) gets people around here so excited? Or is it the fact that when he interviewed for the Sox position after the 2003 season, he told management that in Game 7, he "didn't know if he would have pulled Pedro, either"? I get that he won a pennant at one point, but c'mon - there's a reason he hasn't managed in the bigs for a decade.
I still expect that it's going to be someone who has some familiarity with the way the Sox do things (Hale, Mills, or Sveum) or else somebody who would be able to quickly learn (someone who is like Joe Madden, although Madden himself isn't going anywhere). I get that the Sox are pissed and want to retool, but I don't think they're going to tear down the whole system they've built up over the last decade.
Edited by cannonball 1729, 30 September 2011 - 10:39 AM.
#41
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:44 AM
STOP WITH VALENTINE.
Has anyone seen this clown on TV for the past 2 years? Fucking no thanks.
Thank you.
Plus, what on god's green earth gives you the sense that (Pedroia notwithstanding) this organization likes guys with big mouths and personalities?
#42
Posted 30 September 2011 - 10:53 AM
I'll throw out Jim Riggleman. I know his career record isn't great (neither was Tito's), but I thought he did a good job with Nats before his departure, especially this year.
He's closer to 60 than 50, so if the CW holds that they want to skew young and new, he ain't the guy.
Hasn't he always been replacement level or worse as manager?
And didn't the way he left Natstown this year sort of taint him as a viable choice? At least for this year. I don't see it unless he's on staff as a 3rd base coach to rehab his "image."
#43
Posted 30 September 2011 - 11:35 AM
Several people brought up Gabe Kapler in another thread. At first I laughed off the idea but it's not nearly as crazy as it first sounded. He did manage in the Sox' organization in 2007 and from all accounts was one of the most respected players in the game during his career and specifically during his time in Boston.
It would be quite the ballsy move for Theo given his lack of experience. But if he's looking for someone to bring accountability and professionalism to the team, Kapler would bring that.
Seconded. This was the first guy I thought of. I hope Theo is thinking along the lines of uncovered, rising talent rather than tried-and-true, been around the block "names".
#44
Posted 30 September 2011 - 11:58 AM
EDIT- May be tough...we'd have to buy out 2 years...
Edited by bsj, 30 September 2011 - 12:00 PM.
#45
Posted 30 September 2011 - 12:08 PM
Maddon and Farrell aren't walking through that door. Farrell has 2 more years on his deal in Toronto, Maddon has one more year in Tampa.
#46
Posted 30 September 2011 - 12:12 PM
#47
Posted 30 September 2011 - 12:14 PM
He could also give fitness tips to Fat Albers and the bunch. Kapler always gave me the overachieving vibe; there would be worse choice, for sure.Several people brought up Gabe Kapler in another thread. At first I laughed off the idea but it's not nearly as crazy as it first sounded. He did manage in the Sox' organization in 2007 and from all accounts was one of the most respected players in the game during his career and specifically during his time in Boston.
It would be quite the ballsy move for Theo given his lack of experience. But if he's looking for someone to bring accountability and professionalism to the team, Kapler would bring that.
#48
Posted 30 September 2011 - 12:14 PM
Among former big-league managers, Don Baylor and Alan Trammell are guys who might be considered. Don Wakamatsu, A.J. Hinch and Trey Hillman, as well. Of guys who have yet to manage in the majors, Torey Lovullo and Brett Butler might merit consideration.
Lovullo is an interesting name considering his ties to the organization.
McEwing, Pena, Joey Cora....all good choices as well.
#49
Posted 30 September 2011 - 12:15 PM
He could also give fitness tips to Fat Albers and the bunch. Kapler always gave me the overachieving vibe; there would be worse choice, for sure.
Cheri would be in heaven for one.
#50
Posted 30 September 2011 - 12:15 PM
A guy with closer ties to the organization would be DeMarlo Hale, who interviewed for the job back when Tito was hired. He was move to bench coach not too long ago as well.Lovullo is an interesting name considering his ties to the organization.
McEwing, Pena, Joey Cora....all good choices as well.
If they're looking for an incremental rather than a radical change that's their likely choice.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked







