2nd highest. David Ortiz is hitting .408 since August 1st.
Ah, blame either YES or MLBN for that mistake, I saw it on one of them last night.
Hopefully Ortiz keeps that up for another month, I'm looking forward to those negotiations.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 02 September 2011 - 10:05 AM
2nd highest. David Ortiz is hitting .408 since August 1st.
Posted 05 September 2011 - 10:35 AM
The Captain continues to be on fire at the plate.
August .417/.467/.488/.955
3 for 6 today his 12th multi-hit game in August now hitting .299/.359/.388/.747 on the season.
Hes been so hot even his year to date numbers look good now.
Slits show improvement even against right handers and just killing lefties.
VS LH .356/.437/.508/.945
VS RH .274/.325/.334/.659
So was last year the abberation or is this just a really long hot streak? Is moe likely to hit .300 or .260s next year?
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:23 PM
Posted 04 May 2012 - 02:59 AM
Posted 04 May 2012 - 07:41 AM
Assuming he doesn't tear his ACL too, Jeter is closing in on a handful of players on the alltime hits list. He's currently 19th at 3132, with 15th in sight:
15. George Brett 3154 16. Paul Waner 3152 17. Robin Yount 3142 18. Tony Gwynn 3141
Edited by DanoooME, 04 May 2012 - 07:42 AM.
Posted 04 May 2012 - 12:55 PM
Good stuff. Minor quibble. He's on pace for 285 hits right now. I suspect your number is closer to reality.He needs 152 hits this year (which he could get at the pace he's on now - 196 total hits for the season) to break into the top 10, passing Willie Mays for 10th at 3283. Another healthy year next year likely gets him to 6th, passing Yaz at 3419. Then it gets tough, Tris Speaker is 5th with 3514, then Musial at 3630.
Posted 04 May 2012 - 12:57 PM
Posted 04 May 2012 - 01:11 PM
Ah. Reading comprehension issues.No, he meant he already has 44 hits, so 152 more would put him at 196 total, very reachable.
Posted 15 May 2012 - 12:25 AM
Posted 08 June 2012 - 07:15 PM
Posted 10 June 2012 - 10:49 PM
Posted 11 June 2012 - 02:25 PM
Posted 11 June 2012 - 05:46 PM
Posted 19 August 2012 - 11:49 PM
Posted 20 August 2012 - 11:25 AM
Posted 20 August 2012 - 11:35 AM
Posted 20 August 2012 - 11:54 AM
It's probably a bad headline by some overnight copy editor who was transferred over from the news side. However, the reporter does place a premium on hits in his article. One might suggest this is how the NY media handle Jeter. Except for the 2010 season and into contract negotiations, Jeter's assets are usually emphasized and the fielding deficiencies are overlooked.That's not much of an article, and back in the real world, it should be noted that Jeter's .794 OPS is not only nowhere close to a career year, it's still decidedly below his career average of .830 (he peaked at .989 in 1999).
Of course if by "career year", they mean worst UZR/150 since they've been keeping track (-18.9 currently, just worse than his 2007), then that's very accurate.
Edited by terrynever, 20 August 2012 - 12:01 PM.
Posted 04 September 2012 - 07:38 AM
Posted 12 September 2012 - 10:46 PM
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:01 PM
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:12 PM
Willie got more ass in his career than Jeter. Roger Kahn told a great anecdote about Mays in one of his books. Willie walks in bar, raises an eyebrow at the best looking woman in the place, leaves, and she follows five minutes later. Nobody knew what happened except Kahn. That was back in the days when newsmen and players drank together. Don't ask, don't tell.Jeter is racking up some high-level testimonials on his way up the hit list, today Willie Mays:
http://web.yesnetwor...2&oid=36019
Edited by terrynever, 14 September 2012 - 07:14 PM.
Posted 14 September 2012 - 11:20 PM
Posted 15 September 2012 - 02:24 AM
Willie got more ass in his career than Jeter. Roger Kahn told a great anecdote about Mays in one of his books. Willie walks in bar, raises an eyebrow at the best looking woman in the place, leaves, and she follows five minutes later. Nobody knew what happened except Kahn. That was back in the days when newsmen and players drank together. Don't ask, don't tell.
Posted 15 September 2012 - 04:39 AM
Posted 15 September 2012 - 05:11 AM
Posted 15 September 2012 - 10:02 AM
Posted 15 September 2012 - 08:57 PM
Posted 15 September 2012 - 09:57 PM
Edited by mabrowndog, 16 September 2012 - 09:28 AM.
Posted 16 September 2012 - 09:17 AM
Posted 16 September 2012 - 09:37 AM
I just realized the Yankees have 3 of the top 5 active MLB leaders in hits:
Posted 16 September 2012 - 09:55 AM
It just makes me appreciate Pete Rose that much more. How anybody can be a position player in their 40's is well beyond me.
Posted 16 September 2012 - 10:22 AM
Posted 16 September 2012 - 11:47 AM
Edited by mabrowndog, 16 September 2012 - 11:49 AM.
Posted 16 September 2012 - 05:16 PM
I also see some parallels to what the Sox will face with Ortiz this winter. Obviously Papi hasn't generated a team- or game-wide legacy anywhere close to Jeter's, but his relative value to his club as a marketing draw and his surprising production at an advanced age after appearing to be done 2-3 years ago are certainly comparable, and that translates into significant bargaining leverage. The biggest differences are their ages (Ortiz is 3 years younger than Jeter will be next winter), their physical health, and the value or their respective positions.
Posted 17 September 2012 - 01:49 PM
It just makes me appreciate Pete Rose that much more. How anybody can be a position player in their 40's is well beyond me. If Jeter can do it, he should be bronzed the day he gets the final record breaking hit. Heck, I say do it now
Posted 15 October 2012 - 12:26 AM
Next winter's going to be an interesting one for the Yankees if Jeter is nearly as productive in 2013 as he's been this year. He's got an $8M player option for 2014 with a $3M buyout. After the way the club played hardball with him during his last contract negotiation, I could see Jeter declining the option and forcing the club's hand (with the obvious leverage of fan pressure and the continued legacy draw) to bring him back on a much more lucrative deal, perhaps even a multi-year package with further options. He'd certainly net a minimum one-year qualifying offer (probably ~$13.5M by then) at the very least along with the buyout, unless Cashman was to work out a fresh deal before free agency.
I know I wasn't alone in thinking Jeter had used the aforementioned leverage to great success two winters ago after what seemed like the start of his decline phase in 2010. Many of us were laughing at how the $51M cost (plus committing to him at a premium defensive position as a 36-yo despite a weakening arm and glacial range) would hamstring the Yankees' flexibility in transitioning to the next era. Well, he's been worth every penny so far (despite his defense, which has continued to erode) and has shut most of us up. I really don't think a 2-year deal for at least $30M, plus a $12M option, is out of the question, even for a guy who turns 39 next summer. Hell, I can see him sitting back in his chair and smirking while confidently demanding the same total package he signed for post-2010. I'm not saying he'd end up being worth either contract, but he'd absolutely have the leverage to dig in his heels and the Yankees wouldn't have much room to avoid capitulation -- far less room than they had 2 years ago.
I also see some parallels to what the Sox will face with Ortiz this winter. Obviously Papi hasn't generated a team- or game-wide legacy anywhere close to Jeter's, but his relative value to his club as a marketing draw and his surprising production at an advanced age after appearing to be done 2-3 years ago are certainly comparable, and that translates into significant bargaining leverage. The biggest differences are their ages (Ortiz is 3 years younger than Jeter will be next winter), their physical health, and the value or their respective positions.
Posted 17 October 2012 - 03:33 PM
Derek Jeter will have surgery on his injured left ankle, leaving some doubt whether he'll be ready for the start of the Yankees' 2013 season.
When Jeter broke his ankle last Saturday night, in the 12th inning of Game 1 against the Tigers, the original estimate was that he would need three months to recover. Wednesday, when the Yankees announced Jeter decided to have surgery, they changed that estimate to 4-5 months for what they called a "complete recovery."
Jeter was hurt diving for a Jhonny Peralta ground ball. While it's not unheard of for a baseball player to break an ankle, several veteran athletic trainers said they couldn't remember an infielder suffering that injury in that fashion.
Posted 17 October 2012 - 03:41 PM
Posted 15 November 2012 - 08:47 PM
Posted 04 December 2012 - 01:40 PM
Posted 10 April 2013 - 05:59 PM
The next best thing to having Jeter back is having Jeter's Diary back. The Youkilis description killed me.
Just because you're wearing the uniform doesn't mean you're a Yankee. It only means that we made you shave your goatee, and now you kind of look like a drunk baby in pinstripe pajamas who's trying to start a bar fight.
Posted 11 April 2013 - 02:25 PM
Jete's, the master of the dugout.
Posted 18 April 2013 - 03:02 PM
Derek Jeter made an unscheduled trip to Charlotte to see his ankle surgeon Thursday. Doesn't sound like good news. More to come..
Not good news.....
Posted 18 April 2013 - 03:08 PM
Do you know if that's good news?
Posted 18 April 2013 - 03:25 PM
Derek Jeter will be out until after the All-Star break after a CT scan revealed a small crack in his surgically-repaired ankle.
https://twitter.com/...980845393887233
Posted 18 April 2013 - 03:25 PM
Not that it even fucking matters; the Yankees could plug Billy Martin's corpse in at shortstop and still get a .750 OPS out of the position somehow.
Posted 18 April 2013 - 03:31 PM
Does this mean that after he doesn't exercise his player option NY can low ball him with a 3/48 offer instead of renewing his 3/51 deal?
Posted 18 April 2013 - 03:34 PM
Derek Jeter will be out until after the All-Star break after a CT scan revealed a small crack in his surgically-repaired ankle.
Edited by singaporesoxfan, 18 April 2013 - 03:34 PM.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users