Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo

Derek Jeter: Countdown to 3500 Hits


  • Please log in to reply
485 replies to this topic

#51 Lose Remerswaal


  • Leaves after the 8th inning


  • 19,506 posts

Posted 08 May 2011 - 05:46 PM

EXTENSION!

#52 glennhoffmania


  • peaks prematurely


  • -8,379,597 posts

Posted 08 May 2011 - 09:47 PM

NY really dodged a bullet there, he'd probably be on the second year of a 6/150 deal (seriously).


Do you really think so? Tons of people knew that 2009 was an aberration. I can't imagine that a MLB front office would get duped that badly. Cashman's too smart for that. Hank may have strongarmed him into giving Jeter a bigger deal than he deserved, but I bet Cashman walks out before giving him 6/150.

#53 mabrowndog


  • Ask me about total zone...or paint


  • 29,372 posts

Posted 08 May 2011 - 09:58 PM

EXTENSION!


Rarely has a one-word post made me laugh so hard. Well played.

#54 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 08 May 2011 - 11:59 PM

Do you really think so? Tons of people knew that 2009 was an aberration. I can't imagine that a MLB front office would get duped that badly. Cashman's too smart for that. Hank may have strongarmed him into giving Jeter a bigger deal than he deserved, but I bet Cashman walks out before giving him 6/150.


He might have had to. NY was coming off another World Series win, Jeter was third in the AL MVP voting (and actually deserved to be that high), and the media couldn't stop drooling over the Core Four. Go back and scan last year's 'What Does Jeter Get?' thread (http://sonsofsamhorn...does-jeter-get/), there were guesses of 5/120 and that was even after a half season of obvious decline.

#55 rembrat


  • SoSH Member


  • 14,729 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 10:49 AM

I'll be the one to say it. He hit his dingers in Texas. On the same day Lord Noodle Bat Francisco Cervelli drove one to straight away center field. Not exactly sold on what I'm seeing.

#56 foulkehampshire


  • hillbilly suburbanite


  • 2,456 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 10:57 AM

I'll be the one to say it. He hit his dingers in Texas. On the same day Lord Noodle Bat Francisco Cervelli drove one to straight away center field. Not exactly sold on what I'm seeing.


My hate of CI aside...he poked it pretty well. Thats a line drive XBH in any park.

#57 Doug Beerabelli


  • Killer Threads


  • 7,016 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 11:17 AM

It seems Derek's hopes and dreams for 2011 finally came true.

It's also my hope and dream to avoid hearing Sterling make the call of any successful AB by El Capitano.

#58 th@tkid

  • 312 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 12:17 PM

I'll be the one to say it. He hit his dingers in Texas. On the same day Lord Noodle Bat Francisco Cervelli drove one to straight away center field. Not exactly sold on what I'm seeing.


Those were gone in most parks and even without the wind they were at least xbh. Now if you want to say it was the pitching he was facing, well then...

#59 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 12:52 PM

Dunno why people think he's overhyped, on both the front and back covers of the Post today:

Posted Image

Posted Image

:lol:

#60 terrynever

  • 3,578 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 01:58 PM

Jeter still sells newspapers. If I'm the Mets, the double-cover bothers me, but I guess the Post editors thought it was a slow day for news on Page 1.
It's funny. Our various threads operate on the same premise that newspaper editors do. Wingack started a thread on Granderson at the beginning of 2010 and it has 109 hits so far. JA started one on Jeter five days ago and it has 58 hits so far. Grandy is more valuable player but Jeter is not fading away quietly. Everybody wants a piece of Jeter on the way down.

#61 drleather2001


  • given himself a skunk spot


  • 10,191 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 02:06 PM

On a side note, it still grinds my gears that the Post never fails to refer to the Mets as "The Amazin's."

It's neither clever nor efficient. Nor is it meant to be ironic, although it usually is.

#62 abty

  • PipPip
  • 2,149 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 05:33 PM

On a side note, it still grinds my gears that the Post never fails to refer to the Mets as "The Amazin's."

It's neither clever nor efficient. Nor is it meant to be ironic, although it usually is.


A large market team with 0 prime homegrown starting pitchers who can stay healthy (in the last 25 years) 0 no hitters, a new ballpark and tv network and they are still bankrupt - that's amazin! Oh, and did you hear about Fred's weekend(s) at Bernie's?

As for Jeter, he reminds me of what David Wright went through a few weeks ago. He was 0 for his last 22 and the fans were killing him. Then the Diamondback 'pitchers' came to Citi Field. Magically he was hitting again. For power, too. Sadly, the clock struck midnight once the 'pitchers' went back to Arizona. One thing I've learned is that slumping hitters will hit a homer vs awful pitching faster than they start to hit singles/doubles with authority - consistently. You don't want to look for the homer games - even Melky Cabrera had them. You want to look for the sharp opposite field shots (hit or out, it won't matter) and you want to see consistency. For instance, I can assure you that you can find a hitter is breaking out, even if the ball doesn't fall for hits, just by the contact he makes and his mechanics.

Please note, this is not to troll or to attack Derek. It is simply an observation about all slumping hitters I've noticed as they slump. Jason Bay is another extreme example this year.

#63 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 06:01 PM

You want to look for the sharp opposite field shots (hit or out, it won't matter) and you want to see consistency.


The signs of life weren't just yesterday, he pulled a ball off the wall in LF for a double the game before, and his LD% in May (33 PAs) is 26.3% and his OPS is .975.

I'm certainly not saying he'll keep it up, but any signs of life are welcome, since he's not going anywhere.

#64 steveluck7

  • 861 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 06:13 PM

A large market team with 0 prime homegrown starting pitchers who can stay healthy (in the last 25 years)


This quote got me thinking about the Yankees. Add 1 to the above total to get the NYY total for essentially the same time-frame. Which i find amazing given their abundance of homegrown positional players over the same period.
It also may make me think twice about the potential of the Killer B's

Edited by steveluck7, 09 May 2011 - 06:15 PM.


#65 yeomen

  • 22 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 07:10 PM

This quote got me thinking about the Yankees. Add 1 to the above total to get the NYY total for essentially the same time-frame. Which i find amazing given their abundance of homegrown positional players over the same period.
It also may make me think twice about the potential of the Killer B's



Hmmm, Agreed in principal on the number (desperately want to add Hughes to Andy to make 2 but I know I can not, or at least not yet). However I am not sure I agree on the Killer B's in that we have not had a lot of hyped minor league starters other than Phil in that period. We did have the Hughes Kennedy and Joba thing, which failed, but Kennedy did not, or at least I do not recall him, getting all sorts of pub as he moved up in the minors. Joba is a story we all know. Hughes is the only "highly touted guys in the bunch; we have read about him since he joined the organization. He did win 18 games last year and the verdict is still out as to weather he can be a legitimate major league 2 or 3. So, as far as that goes I am still hopeful that the killer B's can generate at least 2 quality major leagues with the outside hope of one of them being an ace or just below.

#66 steveluck7

  • 861 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 07:29 PM

Hmmm, Agreed in principal on the number (desperately want to add Hughes to Andy to make 2 but I know I can not, or at least not yet). However I am not sure I agree on the Killer B's in that we have not had a lot of hyped minor league starters other than Phil in that period. We did have the Hughes Kennedy and Joba thing, which failed, but Kennedy did not, or at least I do not recall him, getting all sorts of pub as he moved up in the minors. Joba is a story we all know. Hughes is the only "highly touted guys in the bunch; we have read about him since he joined the organization. He did win 18 games last year and the verdict is still out as to weather he can be a legitimate major league 2 or 3. So, as far as that goes I am still hopeful that the killer B's can generate at least 2 quality major leagues with the outside hope of one of them being an ace or just below.

I certainly think Hughes has shown the stuff to be a successful major league pitcher. At this point, however, he's really beginning to earn the dreaded "oft-injured" prefix. Maybe my views were tainted by yankee fans bluster re: prospects but I remember everyone from Clippard to Karstens to Chase Wright (poor bastard) being touted fairly highly. None to the level of Joba & Hughes, though.

#67 Freddy Linn


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,465 posts

Posted 09 May 2011 - 07:32 PM

Hmmm, Agreed in principal on the number (desperately want to add Hughes to Andy to make 2 but I know I can not, or at least not yet). However I am not sure I agree on the Killer B's in that we have not had a lot of hyped minor league starters other than Phil in that period. We did have the Hughes Kennedy and Joba thing, which failed, but Kennedy did not, or at least I do not recall him, getting all sorts of pub as he moved up in the minors. Joba is a story we all know. Hughes is the only "highly touted guys in the bunch; we have read about him since he joined the organization. He did win 18 games last year and the verdict is still out as to weather he can be a legitimate major league 2 or 3. So, as far as that goes I am still hopeful that the killer B's can generate at least 2 quality major leagues with the outside hope of one of them being an ace or just below.


Well, Kennedy was only in the minors for 25 starts before making the bigs and being compared to Mussina.

Ian Kennedy's shaping up as Yanks' mini-Mussina

The 22-year-old Kennedy can prove himself on one of baseball's biggest stages Saturday afternoon. After a terrific college career at Southern Cal, after earning a $2.25 million signing bonus as the Yankees' top pick in last year's draft and a meteoric rise through every level of their minor-league system this season, Kennedy will make his major-league debut against the Rays at the Stadium.

...

Kennedy, who is 12-3 with a 1.91 ERA in stops at Class A, Double-A and Triple-A this season, is akin in style to Mussina, right down to bending low in the stretch position and throwing a knuckle-curve. "I didn't even know he did it," Kennedy said. "Then I saw him and was like, 'Oh, he does that, too?' We're pretty similar - command, curveball, slider and changeup. Just compete. I know that's what he does and that's what I try to do."



#68 Bob420

  • 762 posts

Posted 10 May 2011 - 08:00 AM

Well, Kennedy was only in the minors for 25 starts before making the bigs and being compared to Mussina.

Ian Kennedy's shaping up as Yanks' mini-Mussina



Kennedy has turned out to be pretty solid. I don't think he could do what he is doing in the AL East but he might have found a nice spot for a career. I just hope that Banuelos and Betances never see the bullpen in defined roles. Brackman is destined for the bullpen so I don't really care about him. But I really hope I don't see Banuelos or Betances in those 7th or 8th inning roles like Hughes and Joba. I have no problem with using them out of the bullpen to get experience but it better be in long relief, low leverage or a spot start here and there.

#69 Doctor G

  • 1,598 posts

Posted 10 May 2011 - 01:09 PM

Brackman might be destined to be traded before being a reliever. He still hasn't demonstrated the ability to throww strikes consistently.

#70 terrynever

  • 3,578 posts

Posted 10 May 2011 - 01:23 PM

I certainly think Hughes has shown the stuff to be a successful major league pitcher. At this point, however, he's really beginning to earn the dreaded "oft-injured" prefix. Maybe my views were tainted by yankee fans bluster re: prospects but I remember everyone from Clippard to Karstens to Chase Wright (poor bastard) being touted fairly highly. None to the level of Joba & Hughes, though.

Do the fans create the hype or are they just parroting what the media are writing? The Moose camparison to Kennedy was easy because they both had the same distinct windup mechanism with their hands. They were both smart college guys. But once we actually saw Kennedy's stuff, you knew he was no Moose. People forget how hard Moose threw in the 1990s with Baltimore. He was filthy.

Kennedy never made any hitter uncomfortable at the plate, at least not against a tough lineup and not with the Yankees. He created his own hype by shutting out Toronto for seven or eight innings in September of 2007 but the Blue Jays were a swing-happy team playing out the season who had never seen the kid before.

Never trust April or September big league results from new players.

#71 Rudy Pemberton


  • just plum doesn't understand


  • 25,031 posts

Posted 11 May 2011 - 02:24 PM

Re: Ian Kennedy, he's been pretty damn good with the D'backs. A 114 ERA+ with BB rate of 3, and a K rate near 8 is solid. He was awful with the Yankees in '08, but he was also hurt.

#72 LMontro

  • 530 posts

Posted 11 May 2011 - 06:22 PM

Do the fans create the hype or are they just parroting what the media are writing?


This guy definitely blames the media

Posted Image

#73 Montana Fan


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,027 posts

Posted 11 May 2011 - 10:29 PM

Posted Image


No doubt about it, there's the real 40 year old virgin.

#74 Worst Trade Evah


  • SoSH Member


  • 10,824 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 09:22 AM

Jeter is just lucky people are still fooled by empty batting averages. Posada may be hitting only .165, but even so he's very nearly as productive offensively as Jeter:

wOBA
Posada: .279
Jeter: .284

wRC+
Posada: 71
Jeter: 75

WPA
Posada: -0.17
Jeter: -0.59

"Clutch"
Posada: 0.34
Jeter: -0.07

Considering the timeliness of production, Posada -- with his .165 batting average -- may still be more productive offensively than Jeter. And no matter how you slice it, he's not really much worse at all. Derek Jeter: maybe a smidge better than the 40 year old ex-catcher hitting .165!

Jeter is increasingly a millstone at the top of the Yankee lineup. Posada is kicked to 9th and now benched basically, while Jeter just cruises along at the lead-off slot. If I were a Yankee fan I'd be going nuts. Why are Jeter's hits or his feelings more important than team wins?

Edited by Worst Trade Evah, 16 May 2011 - 09:28 AM.


#75 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 09:37 AM

Full season numbers confuse things a bit, Posada hasn't hit a HR since April 23 and has a .478 OPS in 62 PAs since. Jeter on the other hand got off to an abysmal start, but has been adequate since, with a .747 OPS in his last 90 PAs.

Jeter should still be hitting near the bottom of the order against RHP, but NY has so many issues in the lineup right now that this isn't one of the bigger problems, right now anyway.

#76 Worst Trade Evah


  • SoSH Member


  • 10,824 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 09:48 AM

Well, I guess if you think those random short-term samples are more indicative than full season samples, you could do that. I don't personally think that Posada is really a .478 OPS hitter, or that Jeter is really a .747 OPS hitter.

I will bet you $25 to the Jimmy Fund that Posada will hit better than .478 OPS AND Jeter will be less than .747 OPS from here to the end of the season.

Edited by Worst Trade Evah, 16 May 2011 - 09:50 AM.


#77 Toe Nash

  • 2,334 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 09:57 AM

Full season numbers confuse things a bit, Posada hasn't hit a HR since April 23 and has a .478 OPS in 62 PAs since. Jeter on the other hand got off to an abysmal start, but has been adequate since, with a .747 OPS in his last 90 PAs.

Jeter should still be hitting near the bottom of the order against RHP, but NY has so many issues in the lineup right now that this isn't one of the bigger problems, right now anyway.

What's Jeter's OPS in his last 90 PA excluding the 2 HR game? We could do this all day.

#78 RingoOSU


  • okie misanthrope


  • 12,366 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:00 AM

Let's break down those 90 PA:
49 PA Apr. 23-May 4: .665 OPS
16 PA May 6-May 8 (@TEX where all the HE'S BACK tabloid headlines appeared): 1.433 OPS
30 PA May 10-15: .457 OPS

#79 Bob420

  • 762 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:20 AM

The problem is there is only 1 9th spot in the order.

#80 maufman


  • SoSH Member


  • 9,919 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:40 AM

Jeter's batted-ball data (Fangraphs) this season is remarkably similar to 2010. Therefore, his 2010 line (270/340/370) is probably the best estimate of Jeter's rest-of-season performance. That would make him a slightly below-average shortstop offensively. Coupled with roughly league-average defense, that makes Jeter overpaid. It doesn't make him an albatross.

#81 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:45 AM

You guys are trying to convince me that Jeter is a shitty hitter? Have you not read my posts here since last summer?

Besides pure performance over the last three weeks, Jeter is on a multiyear deal and has been pretty solid in the field. His possible replacement (Nunez) is far from reliable defensively, so no one is calling for Jeter to sit anymore.

Posada, on the other hand, is a DH-only at this point and certainly in his last year for NY, so it's an easy move to make to try to get things going, especially since chances are pretty good that Montero would be an improvement over him right now.

But yeah, everyone not named Granderson sucks right now, so moving Jeter down has become a minor issue.

#82 rembrat


  • SoSH Member


  • 14,729 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:48 AM

I slightly disagree. His plate discipline is virtually the same as last year but his batted ball numbers are a bit different. Less line drives, more groundballs, and more infield fly balls which back up the idea that he has lost a shit ton of batspeed. Next to go is footspeed and mobility.

The only reason his WAR isn't in the negatives yet is because of his 1.6 fielding value. The Yankees are going to have a real problem on their hands soon enough.

#83 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:50 AM

Yeah, I'm just talking about right now. As you know, I wanted them to offer him 2/14 last winter and let him walk if he didn't like it.

#84 rembrat


  • SoSH Member


  • 14,729 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 10:58 AM

I was talking about mauf's post!

I'm very aware of your position on Jeter.

#85 maufman


  • SoSH Member


  • 9,919 posts

Posted 16 May 2011 - 01:05 PM

I slightly disagree. His plate discipline is virtually the same as last year but his batted ball numbers are a bit different. Less line drives, more groundballs, and more infield fly balls which back up the idea that he has lost a shit ton of batspeed. Next to go is footspeed and mobility.

The only reason his WAR isn't in the negatives yet is because of his 1.6 fielding value. The Yankees are going to have a real problem on their hands soon enough.


He has 2 pop flies this season, compared to 2 pop-ups all last season. I didn't think that was a significant difference.

The difference in line drives is more significant, but I'd be surprised if it stays that way. His 2010 LD rate (16.1%) was well within the bottom quartile, and his 2011 rate (12.9%) is worse than all but one qualifier posted in 2010. Also, LD rate tends to regress toward the mean to a greater extent than other batted-ball stats. I'm not saying Jeter will bounce back to league average; I'm just saying he'll bounce back to his quite modest 2010 LD rate. Expecting less than that seems like wishful thinking to me.

#86 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 05 June 2011 - 11:45 PM

A bit of recent observation, as the slow crawl towards 3000 continues:

Jeter now has a very impressive .942 OPS when batting in the first inning, with a remarkable .463 OBP. Unfortunately, for the remainder of the game he has a .579 OPS, with a .292 OBP.

Also, not sure what it means, but Jeter has not struck out in his last 52 PAs, which is the longest streak of his career.

He was pretty brutal on D this weekend, costing CC one and maybe two runs Saturday, but I guess that's not really news.

#87 mabrowndog


  • Ask me about total zone...or paint


  • 29,372 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 12:22 AM

Morgan Ensberg just dissed Jeter on live TV. He's doing color work for the NCAA Baseball regionals, calling tonight's Stanford-Illinois game.

Somehow the conversation with the PBP guy drifted to batters who flinch and feign injury when they're jammed by a pitcher on the handle of the bat. Ensberg is asked if he ever pulled anything like that. "Naww, that's bush league. Just play the game the right way. There's no need for that."

PBP guy asks the obvious follow-up. "Soooo... What about Derek Jeter when he claimed he was hit on the hands, though the replay showed the ball never touched him?"


Ensberg: "That was bush."

#88 terrynever

  • 3,578 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 05:47 PM

Morgan Ensberg just dissed Jeter on live TV. He's doing color work for the NCAA Baseball regionals, calling tonight's Stanford-Illinois game.

Somehow the conversation with the PBP guy drifted to batters who flinch and feign injury when they're jammed by a pitcher on the handle of the bat. Ensberg is asked if he ever pulled anything like that. "Naww, that's bush league. Just play the game the right way. There's no need for that."

PBP guy asks the obvious follow-up. "Soooo... What about Derek Jeter when he claimed he was hit on the hands, though the replay showed the ball never touched him?"


Ensberg: "That was bush."

Good to know Morgan Ensberg has found a job that suits his talents. I only knew him as the guy who got beat up and held hostage in a motel room. Now he's a college baseball analyst. Good for him.

#89 mt8thsw9th


  • anti-SoSHal


  • 12,938 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 05:53 PM

You sound bitter.

#90 terrynever

  • 3,578 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:42 PM

You sound bitter.

Nah. I just think it's funny that a guy like Ensberg would go out of his way to trash Jeter. I thought there was some kind of professional code there. Or perhaps Ensberg felt he didn't get a fair chance with the Yankees in 2008 when he compiled a .506 OPS in 74 ABs. That's probably closer to the truth. It's tough for any player when the end is near, whether it's Jeter or Ensberg.

By the way, I think the Yankees can win it all with Jeter at shortstop this year. I know all the stats are against it but I don't see any team out there without flaws, often at shortstop. I'll take my chances with Jeter in a pennant race one more time. Not so sure he'll have anything left for 2012.

#91 mt8thsw9th


  • anti-SoSHal


  • 12,938 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 06:45 PM

He didn't go out of his way, he was asked a question and gave a three word answer. What should he have said?

#92 Foulkey Reese


  • foulkiavelli


  • 18,793 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 07:01 PM

He didn't go out of his way, he was asked a question and gave a three word answer. What should he have said?

"He's a natural. Young. Handsome. He can play his ass off, playing shortstop for the Yankees. What more do you want? The fact that he's here in the greatest sports town-greatest city in the world-makes it that much better."

#93 terrynever

  • 3,578 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 07:04 PM

He didn't go out of his way, he was asked a question and gave a three word answer. What should he have said?

He could have said "Derek Jeter is not the first guy to do that."

Shane Victorino just leaned into a slow curveball in the first inning tonight against the Dodgers. Mattingly argued, to no avail, that the batter moved into the ball.

Edited by terrynever, 06 June 2011 - 07:05 PM.


#94 mt8thsw9th


  • anti-SoSHal


  • 12,938 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 07:07 PM

He could have said "Derek Jeter is not the first guy to do that."


He's not a Yankee fan, so he has no real need to knee-jerk defend Jeter as you do. I think you're making a lot more out of this than is really there. It was bush league, and all he said was.. it was bush league. I don't really think you need to cite other examples when filling dead air in a college baseball game.

And why would Ensberg wildly predict that Victorino would do something tonight that is vaguely similar, but not what was referenced in the game earlier today? Did Victorino not get hit and then pretend he did?

Edited by mt8thsw9th, 06 June 2011 - 07:09 PM.


#95 terrynever

  • 3,578 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 07:20 PM

He's not a Yankee fan, so he has no real need to knee-jerk defend Jeter as you do. I think you're making a lot more out of this than is really there. It was bush league, and all he said was.. it was bush league. I don't really think you need to cite other examples when filling dead air in a college baseball game.

And why would Ensberg wildly predict that Victorino would do something tonight that is vaguely similar, but not what was referenced in the game earlier today? Did Victorino not get hit and then pretend he did?

I won't defend Jeter's actions that day. It may have been an analomy but it happened and he has to carry that with him the rest of his life. But I also believe that hitters will lean into slow pitches to get on base from time to time.

I stopped defending Jeter a few years ago, for reasons too complex for even me to understand. A lot of it had to do with the A-Rod thing, some with the way he has handled internal team issues like Torre's departure, Girardi's handling of Posada, etc.

Again, it's never pretty when a star player starts going downhill.

#96 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:00 PM

That really was a bush league play. Didn't Posada do it also once after that?

#97 Bob420

  • 762 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:23 PM

The term bush league is bush league.

I don't see anything wrong with what Jeter did. Other guys have done it. Is it really that different than a player making a short hop/trap catch and raising the glove pretending to have caught it? One is trying to get on base and the other is trying to keep a guy off base but they are basically doing the same thing.

#98 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,751 posts

Posted 06 June 2011 - 08:36 PM

The term bush league is bush league.

I don't see anything wrong with what Jeter did. Other guys have done it. Is it really that different than a player making a short hop/trap catch and raising the glove pretending to have caught it? One is trying to get on base and the other is trying to keep a guy off base but they are basically doing the same thing.


That's a fair question, but I think the difference is that at home plate, the ump is necessarily shielded to an extent from many possible HBPs (especially below the waist), whereas on a play in the outfield, it's virtually always in front of the fielder, so the ump should have a clear viewing angle.

Not a huge deal, but I agree with Ensberg.

#99 SoxScout


  • SoSH Member


  • 28,874 posts

Posted 13 June 2011 - 09:21 PM

DKnobler: Doesn't sound good on Jeter. Girardi: "Yeah, I'm worried about it.". MRI now



#100 BroodsSexton

  • 4,571 posts

Posted 13 June 2011 - 09:30 PM

Thoughts and prayers.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Google Mobile (1)