Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Time to replace our crappy logo
#1
Posted 21 January 2011 - 07:44 AM
I've used this place before and for the price you can't beat it. Part of the process is selecting logos which have the same look and feel as the ones that you want. The link above are some of those examples.
The process will basically go that we get five options after we get the initial design. Once you pick one, you get unlimited revisions on it. So the only crapshoot really is that we really don't like any of them, normally a few of them will be pretty close to something decent. We'll never get something perfect, or something which pleases everyone, but whatever. It's better than the crap that is up there now!
#2
Posted 21 January 2011 - 09:10 AM
http://thelogocompan...-example.htm#a1
I've used this place before and for the price you can't beat it. Part of the process is selecting logos which have the same look and feel as the ones that you want. The link above are some of those examples.
The process will basically go that we get five options after we get the initial design. Once you pick one, you get unlimited revisions on it. So the only crapshoot really is that we really don't like any of them, normally a few of them will be pretty close to something decent. We'll never get something perfect, or something which pleases everyone, but whatever. It's better than the crap that is up there now!
Have you heard of or tried 99designs? Crowd sourcing of things like web page designs and graphics. My company has had some decent luck with them.
#3
Posted 21 January 2011 - 09:16 AM
a
Have you heard of or tried 99designs? Crowd sourcing of things like web page designs and graphics. My company has had some decent luck with them.
tried them.... horrible, horrible results. We got like ten crappy designs and then, similar to ebay sniping, at the last minute like every designer submitted some piece of shit which I could have done in 15 minutes. It filled our quota of 30 "submissions" but it was all unusable crap. Like seriously people submitted stuff which was just a standard font made into a graphic.
Small sample size and all
#4
Posted 21 January 2011 - 09:52 AM
#5
Posted 21 January 2011 - 10:00 AM
#6
Posted 21 January 2011 - 11:47 AM
I can't imagine anyone coming up with something better than this.I'm not sure why my logo keeps getting passed over...
#7
Posted 21 January 2011 - 12:18 PM
And just think of the version that could be used with P&G.I can't imagine anyone coming up with something better than this.
#8
Posted 21 January 2011 - 12:54 PM
2. Start a thread in P&G with a link.
3. Profit.
#9
Posted 21 January 2011 - 01:22 PM

Swap out the round thing for a baseball (or an combination of all kinds of balls, sort of like a pie chart with baseball, basketball, soccer, etc), the OSLO for SoSH and under it either spell out Sons of Sam Horn or "Dedicated to all things Baseball/Sports/whatever" or whatever the tagline is. it would translate well to letterhead for when there are fundraising efforts, t shirts and coffee mugs for people who want to feel like they belong to something, and looks relatively professional.
#10
Posted 21 January 2011 - 04:29 PM
#11
Posted 21 January 2011 - 04:31 PM
Here's a half-assed attempt at rendering Orange Julia's suggestion. I'm not certain that the "dedicated...." works well and a better job with the text circling the ball is needed.
I prefer the current tagline of the site, but that looks pretty sharp otherwise.
#12
Posted 21 January 2011 - 05:22 PM
#13
Posted 21 January 2011 - 05:29 PM
#14
Posted 21 January 2011 - 06:40 PM
The question is whether SoSH needs to be explained as Sons of Sam Horn. I can remove it easily enough but the font is a problem. I just chose what I had closest to your example. Find me a freeware version of an appropriate font and I can easily change that, too.I like where you're going, Otto, but it is too busy. I think the baseball needs to not have words on it. I also think it wouldn't hurt to have a soxier font. Like Dirty Sox which is not EXACTLY the red sox logo, but pretty damn close.
#15
Posted 21 January 2011 - 06:41 PM
Maybe more like:I like where you're going, Otto, but it is too busy.
#16
Posted 21 January 2011 - 08:52 PM
#17
Posted 21 January 2011 - 09:34 PM
#19
Posted 21 January 2011 - 11:25 PM
I prefer the current tagline of the site, but that looks pretty sharp otherwise.
Sorry, but it's fucking hideous.
#20
Posted 21 January 2011 - 11:26 PM





Another potential font.
#21
Posted 26 January 2011 - 10:03 AM

We have unlimited revisions on the one we pick, I'll make another post with the other options
I'd change the guy to red and the lettering to white of course, ain't changing the theme to this fucking place again for sure
#22
Posted 26 January 2011 - 10:06 AM





#23
Posted 26 January 2011 - 10:14 AM
I think something like this will be the winner
We have unlimited revisions on the one we pick, I'll make another post with the other options
I'd change the guy to red and the lettering to white of course, ain't changing the theme to this fucking place again for sure
I would go with this, or the last one in the next post. This guy has a better swing. The other guy is kind of chopping down at the ball.
Edited by EddieYost, 26 January 2011 - 10:15 AM.
#24
Posted 26 January 2011 - 10:16 AM

I fucking hate the font and the hackneyed, forced baseball but seeing this is first and foremost a discussion forum it kinda works
#25
Posted 26 January 2011 - 11:35 AM
This one caught my eye.
#26
Posted 26 January 2011 - 11:51 AM
assuming unlimited revisions this one also has appeal to me
I fucking hate the font and the hackneyed, forced baseball but seeing this is first and foremost a discussion forum it kinda works
Love this style.
#27
Posted 26 January 2011 - 01:34 PM
I like the concept of these two(with the quote bubble), but I think both(and all the ones Nip had above) are way to blue. It is a RED Sox discussion site.
It's kinda shame you can't make the S's out of Sox or something.
#28
Posted 26 January 2011 - 02:20 PM
That last one looks like it's some kind of pharma logo.
#29
Posted 26 January 2011 - 02:58 PM
Also think this is the best one to work with, but agree with the criticisms. If it can be done with a Sox themed font it will probably look better. Also, instead of using a baseball clip-art for the "o" perhaps just add stitches to the normal font's "o."assuming unlimited revisions this one also has appeal to me
I fucking hate the font and the hackneyed, forced baseball but seeing this is first and foremost a discussion forum it kinda works
#30
Posted 26 January 2011 - 03:38 PM
#31
Posted 26 January 2011 - 03:50 PM
It kind of feels rookie to me. Like Maalox's mother's blow jobs
#32
Posted 26 January 2011 - 04:39 PM
#33
Posted 26 January 2011 - 05:54 PM
I would agree. And it looks like ass anyway.I'm somewhat against using a baseball or the red Sox font anywhere.
Honestly, I'd go simple. Drop the stupid baseball-O from the word-bubble "SoSH" one and see where that gets you.
#34
Posted 26 January 2011 - 06:12 PM
#35
Posted 26 January 2011 - 06:28 PM
Examples: http://www.webdesign...erlapping-text/
http://www.thedesigncubicle.com/
I'll keep searching out an article that shows a bunch of great examples as well.
#36
Posted 26 January 2011 - 09:53 PM
Just my two cents on these initial concepts...I think something like this will be the winner
We have unlimited revisions on the one we pick, I'll make another post with the other options
I'd change the guy to red and the lettering to white of course, ain't changing the theme to this fucking place again for sure
This one has a style/dynamic the others seem lacking, without getting complicated. Perhaps look for a font or fonts that better complement the style of the batter. I'm not sure the tag line lends much in this iteration, almost like it was stuck on after the fact.
IMO: The word bubble seems flat and I don't know that a font change will fix that.
Edited by RetractableRoof, 26 January 2011 - 09:56 PM.
#37
Posted 26 January 2011 - 09:57 PM
assuming unlimited revisions this one also has appeal to me
I fucking hate the font and the hackneyed, forced baseball but seeing this is first and foremost a discussion forum it kinda works
I think this is the best - simple and clean, though I agree about both the baseball (what about a big mouth, it's more in character) and the font.
As a second choice the swinging silhouette is good, but he's wearing a little-league style two-eared batting helmet...so, y'know, he's a puss (again, might be in character for us).
#38
Posted 27 January 2011 - 12:18 AM
Yeah, I think I'm coming around to this one if it drops the tag line. If that logo is used on letterhead and whatnot, the tag line takes away from the simplicity of the graphic. This logo definitely has a more professional feel for those uses vs. the chat bubble. For the site, the logo could always be the focus of the header bar with the tag line written in to the side or below it like it is now.Just my two cents on these initial concepts...
This one has a style/dynamic the others seem lacking, without getting complicated. Perhaps look for a font or fonts that better complement the style of the batter. I'm not sure the tag line lends much in this iteration, almost like it was stuck on after the fact.
IMO: The word bubble seems flat and I don't know that a font change will fix that.
Nip, I understand if you want to avoid Sox-style font. However, are there any other ideas to make the batter silhouette feel more original? It would be great if we could find a way to convey that it's a Sox discussion site (or at least Sox/Boston sports related) without having to write it out. Someone receiving the silhouette on letterhead could think it's a baseball equipment company, or high school baseball clinics, etc. The sleekness of the silhouette is great; it would be better, though, if we could make it less generic.
#39
Posted 27 January 2011 - 02:14 AM
He's also a contortionist, since the arc depicts his swing going behind his back. Shades of Linda Blair in 1973.I would go with this, or the last one in the next post. This guy has a better swing. The other guy is kind of chopping down at the ball.
#40
Posted 27 January 2011 - 04:32 AM

Then I wasn't fully satisfied with the font so I decided to play a bit more. I also thought that "Dedicated to Discussion of all things Red Sox" was a bit wordy and inaccurate. This site has ended up being about more than simply the sox. And its distinctive point of pride is that it aims towards intelligent discussion. So how about changing the motto to something snappier? So I did this:

Hmm. Perhaps, this isn't clear enough. So let's add a word, make the logo larger while toying with the effects. The "not only part" still might be not good enough as it may lead something to think "not only intelligent discussion". Which is true on some occasion. But I do like that it's a bit mysterious and it covers things like other Boston teams and the P&G stuff.

Ok, I think that's passable. And how about experimenting with some white outline to make it a bit more Soxy?

So that's it. I ve only worked on it for a couple of hours. If this was a business project, I would spend days upon days poring over every little detail, so I don't feel like it's the best I could do or the best it can be. If people like it, I can work on it a little bit more.
Regardless, if I were to make a contribution to this discussion is that the colors should match each other better and the motto should reflect Sosh' new reality.
#41
Posted 27 January 2011 - 07:40 AM
#42
Posted 27 January 2011 - 02:46 PM
#43
Posted 27 January 2011 - 03:07 PM
#44
Posted 27 January 2011 - 04:39 PM
#45
Posted 27 January 2011 - 04:57 PM
Even Better

Checkmate.
Edited by TomRicardo, 27 January 2011 - 05:02 PM.
#46
Posted 27 January 2011 - 05:03 PM

I rewrote all the rules.
#47
Posted 31 January 2011 - 08:16 PM
Honestly, I don't think any of these capture the personality of the site.
I agree. We need something that includes the official Red Sox logo - but not one of the modern, corporate ones. Rather, something with old-time style:
#48
Posted 31 January 2011 - 08:30 PM
I agree. We need something that includes the official Red Sox logo - but not one of the modern, corporate ones. Rather, something with old-time style:
Edit-- to note that I really like where Kaufman was going with the color schemes. The darker blue looks much better.
Edited by teddywingman, 31 January 2011 - 08:36 PM.
#49
Posted 31 January 2011 - 09:26 PM
#50
Posted 01 February 2011 - 07:14 AM
Here's another super-simple one:
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












