Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Red Sox claim Max Ramirez off waivers
#1
Posted 05 January 2011 - 04:23 PM
#2
Posted 05 January 2011 - 04:26 PM
Sweet. Plenty of discussion/hopeful speculation on this here the past few days.per Rotoworld.
I'm really, really stunned that so many teams passed on the guy.
I'm guessing they'll waive either Mark Wagner or Matt Fox to clear a roster spot, though some have suggested Nava is an extraneous OF now and could get the boot from the 40-man.
Edited by mabrowndog, 05 January 2011 - 04:30 PM.
#3
Posted 05 January 2011 - 04:28 PM
#4
Posted 05 January 2011 - 04:37 PM
Sox finally get their man. It would be great if one of Max or Salty pans out to be a legitimate long-term catching option. Still confused why the Rangers DFA him. Perhaps they just had cold feet in general taking on Lowell?
It would be great if Buchholz could end up pitching to both Salty and Ramirez at some point while all 3 are in a Red Sox uniform. Doubly so because that would be a sign that both are MLB-capable catchers in the team's eyes.
#6
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:00 PM
Positives: Basically free. Has generally high IsoD, especially in his stints in the majors (though that is only 140 PAs). Had a studly 2008 in AA. Even adjusting his BABIP down would make that year studly.
Negatives: Has stalled in AAA the last two years. His IsoD looks good, but he lost his power, and his OBP looks good only when he has BABIP fueled rage.
Hey, we need catchers and catchers are often late bloomers because of the myriad responsibilities they have. The biggest positive is that he cost almost nothing.
#7
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:16 PM
Interesting bat, not really a C, more of a 1B/DH. @willwoodboston: quick scouting report on new #RedSox prospect Max Ramirez?
#8
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:23 PM
#9
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:30 PM
#10
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:33 PM
#11
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:34 PM
Jim Callis weighs in:
We got ourselves our own Montero!
A promising 2008 tearing up the minors, going Rk > AA > AAA and then getting a cup of coffee in TEX at 23 years old. Wrist issues in 2009, so maybe that plus limited exposure and development at the higher levels means there's potential. He's only got 500 career at-bats at AAA spread over the last three years, and only 115 career AB's with TEX (in 2008 and 2010, bookended around zero ML at-bats in 2009). Could TEX even accurately have assessed him given SSS sprinkled with the herk-and-jerk of inconsistent AB's and injury?
I'm optimistic if he can provide passable defense, they can see if the snap in his bat (and power) returns at all post-wrist. Though he's a big whiffer with a CT% under 70%. A lottery ticket and post-Ortiz plan for DH?
Edited by Trlicek's Whip, 05 January 2011 - 05:35 PM.
#12
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:45 PM
I'm optimistic if he can provide passable defense, they can see if the snap in his bat (and power) returns at all post-wrist. Though he's a big whiffer with a CT% under 70%. A lottery ticket and post-Ortiz plan for DH?
Post wrists. Soreness in the right wrist followed by tendonitis in the left wrist in 2009. I think he has potential, but probably needs a full season in AAA, if not two. He hit the cover off the ball during the 2009 winter ball season, slugging .486 with 13 home runs in 210 plate appearances but couldn't translate that into AAA success. From everyhting I have read, his swing is too long. I am wondering if he is having a hard time with turning his wrists over, if there is still some lingering injury there.
#13
Posted 05 January 2011 - 05:57 PM
#14
Posted 05 January 2011 - 06:11 PM
mlbtr: Before the 2010 season, Baseball America wrote that Ramirez is "a plus hitter who works the count and drives the ball to all fields" when healthy. However, the publication described the catcher as a below-average defender with below-average arm strength and well below-average running speed.
Not a catcher, but maybe an interesting bat
#15
Posted 05 January 2011 - 06:28 PM
#16
Posted 05 January 2011 - 07:09 PM
So I guess this means at 1B/DH rotation of Anderson and Ramirez in Pawtucket with
eachboth trying to take Papi's spot next year?
I would think yes, so long as Theo's willing to accept a platooned DH for $800K. Uses up 2 roster spots but if Ramirez can catch Lackey it would give the team its backup catcher and backup 1B, in addition to the starting DH.
Not sure what the pickup immediately adds to what the Sox have with Lavarnway, but I have to laugh that the price on these two fell from Buchholz + Lowell to virtually nothing, within two years.
#17
Posted 05 January 2011 - 07:58 PM
I hope they sit him down and read him the riot act and tell him that he's been pissing away his chance at a decent career. Get him to API in Arizona with Pedroia and Youks and see what he can do in 2011.
Wait, what? Is there some evidence of an attitude problem that I missed? Not being snotty, I just haven't seen the "pissing away" part yet.
#18
Posted 05 January 2011 - 09:29 PM
#19
Posted 05 January 2011 - 09:40 PM
Ceiling for us is likely a backup 1B/DH type...bench role. Not bad for free.
#20
Posted 05 January 2011 - 10:39 PM
#21
Posted 05 January 2011 - 10:46 PM
If it makes the Rangers feel better they're still welcome to take Lowell
If I got to choose, at this point I'd offer Lawrence instead.
#22
Posted 05 January 2011 - 11:29 PM
I was thinking of it in the sense that he wasn't in the best shape he could be, not that he was an attitude problem and hence the admonition to go to API.Wait, what? Is there some evidence of an attitude problem that I missed? Not being snotty, I just haven't seen the "pissing away" part yet.
#23
Posted 06 January 2011 - 12:57 AM
Could be a poor man's V. Martinez. I do not see him being a Papi replacement.
#24
Posted 06 January 2011 - 09:27 AM
#25
Posted 06 January 2011 - 09:39 AM
Can still be an asset as a part time catcher....a guy who can hit, play 1b, and play catcher, even if only once in a while, would be incredibly valuable as a 25th man on the roster. Certainly think he'll be in the minors to start the season and so the Sox get a better since of where his future lies, but a pretty intriguing pick him up. Surprised he got all the way to the Sox, no crappy teams wanted to take a flyer?
If his wrist heals, I agree that he can play a meaningful bench role for the Sox as a C/DH/1B/PH in 2012. He might be a third-stringer in all those positions, but as 25th man with upside at bat, he is a welcomed addition to the Sox depth-chart. Max could "rake" before he hurt his wrist.
Edited by SoxFanSince57, 06 January 2011 - 09:42 AM.
#26
Posted 06 January 2011 - 10:24 AM
He's a free Mike Napoli Light. This is almost exactly the role I wanted Napoli for (except with even less catching).Can still be an asset as a part time catcher....a guy who can hit, play 1b, and play catcher, even if only once in a while, would be incredibly valuable as a 25th man on the roster.
Now the question is whether Ramirez or Darnell McDonald would be a more valuable 25th guy. There are not that many times when two of three outfielders will be out of the lineup but Papi will be in it.
The other impact this has -- when the Oki deal is official they will have to move either Coello or (much more likely) Nava. Hopefully they can get him to a team that is thin in the OF where he won't be the third best guy in AAA.
I actually think you'll see Linares in the Pawtucket OF before long, and it would be good to make room for him; in the meantime, there's Bell and Bates and maybe even Daeges.
Bottom line is that this one move for a potential 25th guy may have spelled the organizational end for both our starting LF and CF from last year. How strange is that?
#27
Posted 06 January 2011 - 10:28 AM
He's out of options, which is why he was waived.So I guess this means at 1B/DH rotation of Anderson and Ramirez in Pawtucket with each trying to take Papi's spot next year?
He'll compete with McDonald for the last bench spot. If he looks bad in ST there's a pretty good chance of sneaking him through waivers at the right time, but not if he looks good and healthy.
#28
Posted 08 January 2011 - 08:04 AM
He's out of options, which is why he was waived.
PeteAbe confirms this. It also explains why so many teams passed on claiming him.
In response to a number of questions from readers, new Red Sox catcher Max Ramirez is out of minor-league options. So if he does not make the team out of spring training, he would have to be designated for assignment.
That does not necessarily mean he would be lost to another team, however. That the Red Sox were able to claim Ramirez means a significant number of teams passed on him. They very well could DFA him and outright him to AAA.
So Ramirez being out of options should not be a signal he will make the team. Beyond his roster status, this is a guy with a career batting average of .217 who has been traded twice and designated once. They're not exactly at risk of losing Johnny Bench.
#29
Posted 08 January 2011 - 10:09 AM
#30
Posted 08 January 2011 - 04:56 PM
I wonder if the delay with formally announcing the Oki signing is related to Ramirez? Maybe the Sox intend to clear room for Oki by DFA'ing Ramirez. Otherwise, it's hard to figure how they clear space for Oki...
I'm glad you mentioned Okajima, because I'd completely forgotten he hasn't been added to the 40-man yet.
Edited by mabrowndog, 08 January 2011 - 04:57 PM.
#31
Posted 10 January 2011 - 03:07 PM
Yep.I wonder if the delay with formally announcing the Oki signing is related to Ramirez? Maybe the Sox intend to clear room for Oki by DFA'ing Ramirez. Otherwise, it's hard to figure how they clear space for Oki...
brianmacp Brian MacPherson
To make room for Okajima, the #RedSox placed Max Ramirez on waivers, and he was claimed by the Cubs.
#32
Posted 10 January 2011 - 03:14 PM
#33
Posted 10 January 2011 - 03:26 PM
Bye Max...ohh well...No suprise right?
Edited by travis bickled, 10 January 2011 - 03:27 PM.
#34
Posted 10 January 2011 - 04:26 PM
I would much rather they traded their 8th outfielder, Daniel Nava, for anything at all, including the various proverbial demeaning things, than lose an interesting guy like Ramirez.http://www.boston.co...as/extra_bases/
Bye Max...ohh well...No suprise right?
#35
Posted 10 January 2011 - 04:29 PM
I would much rather they traded their 8th outfielder, Daniel Nava, for anything at all, including the various proverbial demeaning things, than lose an interesting guy like Ramirez.
Totally agree. Assuming he was on the 40 man roster, this is a somewhat puzzling move. Nava is filler.
#36
Posted 10 January 2011 - 04:43 PM
Why lose Nava now if they may have to place Ramirez on waivers in a few months anyway (as he is unlikely to make this team)?I would much rather they traded their 8th outfielder, Daniel Nava, for anything at all, including the various proverbial demeaning things, than lose an interesting guy like Ramirez.
#37
Posted 10 January 2011 - 04:49 PM
Yup. This is a case of Theo trying to sneak a guy with no options -- and who went unclaimed by most of the AL last week -- through waivers again, while keeping other prospects with options as assets. If it had to be done, now was the time to do it.Why lose Nava now if they may have to place Ramirez on waivers in a few months anyway (as he is unlikely to make this team)?
And in looking at the Cubs' situation, even though they had room on the 40-man, they're even less likely to keep Ramirez on the 25-man when they break camp than the Sox would have been. So it's not like we can hang Theo out to dry for not considering that the Cubs might claim him.
#38
Posted 11 January 2011 - 06:38 PM
http://www.boston.co...as/extra_bases/
Bye Max...ohh well...No suprise right?
Can we still get in on Taylor Teagarden? Might as well work the trifecta.
#39
Posted 11 January 2011 - 06:45 PM
Can we still get in on Taylor Teagarden? Might as well work the trifecta.
That joke would have been funnier had it not been made already, one page earlier.
#40
Posted 12 January 2011 - 12:56 AM
Why lose Nava now if they may have to place Ramirez on waivers in a few months anyway (as he is unlikely to make this team)?
Not so sure he wouldn't with Salty's injury history. But, as posted above, this was the time to try and sneak him thorugh.
Who knows? Maybe we'll be trading Nava for Ramirez straight up in April.
#41
Posted 12 January 2011 - 07:39 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












