I hopefully explained the general format and patterns well enough in the 1987 Review so that I can do away with most of the explanatory verbiage and just go through the same eight part format.
Part 1: Shape of Draft
Y0 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Y11 Y12 Y13 Y14 Y15 Y16 Y17 HS 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 C 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 WARP 1 13 31 88 145 169 171 211 191 185 179 136 108 102 92 79 52 46 %pk 0 6 15 42 70 80 81 100 91 88 85 65 51 48 44 37 25 22 #Pl 1 8 25 60 79 93 89 94 76 69 63 59 52 45 29 26 22 17 3 0 1 3 6 10 12 20 15 17 18 20 12 11 8 9 8 6 4 6+ 0 0 1 6 7 8 6 11 10 9 8 7 4 5 5 4 1 2 Tot 0 1 4 12 17 20 26 26 27 27 28 19 15 13 14 12 7 6
The season to season WARP3 production pattern is typical of a college oriented draft with a relatively high Y4 total and a relatively low Y11 total. The Y7 total is sharply higher than any other year so the peak appears a little pointer than most, but there’s a good broad peak between Y5 and Y10. That Y5 is part of that broad peak is a little unusual, but it fits with the college orientation.
The pattern for “#Pl” is typical – a quick peak over 90 players per year in the Y5-Y7 range followed by a long decline phase.
The “6+” total jumps to six in Y3 which is quite quick, but again not too unusual for a college draft. The number of 6+ WARP3 seasons peaks at roughly 10 in the early part of the broad peak plateau. The total number of useful players above 3 WARP3 peaks in the high 20s in that same range. This is a typical pattern for a good draft.
Part 2: Types of Players
WARP3 # players total players % of players 100+ 0 0 0 90 5 5 3 80 0 5 3 70 2 7 5 60 1 8 6 50 5 13 9 40 6 19 13 30 3 22 15 20 14 36 25 10 14 50 35 0 74 124 87 <0 19 143 100
It’s generally true that this table is pretty well settled for the late 1980s, college oriented drafts. This draft happens to have a few players right on the cusp of 100 WARP3. Those players represent a strong high end to the draft. The depth is good as well with 13% of players over 40 WARP3 and a relatively high 25% exceeding the 20 WARP3 threshold.
Part 3: Top 40 Players
Rank Rd Pick Team Player Pos School WARP3 1 1 10 CWS Robin Ventura 3B C 99.1 2 62 1390 LA Mike Piazza* 1B-C CC 96.7 3 7 169 Cal Jim Edmonds* OF HS 95.8 4 17 428 Hou Kenny Lofton* OF C 94.5 5 4 90 Hou Luis Gonzalez* 1B C 93.8 6 1 14 Sea Tino Martinez* 1B C 76.6 7 3 76 Mon Marquis Grissom* OF C 70.9 8 8 200 Pit Tim Wakefield* 1B C 61.7 9 1 15 SF Royce Clayton* SS HS 57.5 10 5 121 Bos John Valentin SS C 56.1
Seven of the top ten players are from college and the second best HS player is somewhat of an accumulator, so the high end of this draft is very much college players. The clustering isn’t especially good with three out of the top four players drafted in the 7th rd or (much) later. I know Lofton was a college basketball star, but I’m not sure to what extent that affected his signability and therefore draft position. On the basis of his talent alone he might have been a much higher pick.
The top four players were all longtime star level performers. Piazza will be in the HoF. Edmonds probably should be as well though I’m not sure that he will make it. Gonzalez was a post 30s, post FA service time star which is generally a less valuable commodity.
Martinez, Grissom and Wakefield have all been good players for a long time. It’s always fun to speculate how high up these lists Wake’s knuckleball will take him. Wake already tops the pitchers from his draft class and he should be able to get past the recently retired Martinez and Grissom to become the 6th most productive player from this draft class. I don’t think he’ll be able to crack the top 5 unless he plays deep into his 40s. Still, that’s not too bad for no hit college 1B.
Clayton and Valentin are a good example of how players with similar career production can have wildly different value to the team that drafted them. As we’ll see in a bit, Valentin packed nearly all of his production into his pre-FA years and that makes him one of the most valuable players in this draft class.
Rank Rd Pick Team Player Pos School WARP3 11 1 1 SD Andy Benes RHP C 55.6 12 6 140 LA Erik Karros 1B C 54.0 13 1 17 Cle Charles Nagy RHP C 53.0 14 28 732 Tor Woody Williams* RHP C 49.6 15 1s 30 Stl Brian Jordan* OF C 46.8 16 30 767 Cal Damien Easley* 2B-SS CC 43.5 17 5 120 Phl M Morandini SS C 42.7 18 1 4 Bal Gregg Olson RHP C 41.1 19 1 8 Cal Jim Abbott LHP C 40.0 20 1 3 Atl Steve Avery LHP HS 33.7
Easley and Williams fall into the accumulator category, but this is generally a strong group of second tier players. The bottom three pitchers had their careers cut short by injuries, but that didn’t affect their valuable pre-FA production. You can make the argument that this draft class is twenty deep in “good” players which is quite good.
Rank Rd Pick Team Player Pos School WARP3 21 2 34 Bal Arthur Rhodes* OF HS 33.3 22 3 63 Tex Darren Oliver* LHP HS 32.2 23 6 158 Stl Rheal Cormier* LHP CC 29.1 24 3 82 Tor David Weathers* RHP CC 27.9 25 18 463 Oak Darren Lewis OF C 27.7 26 1s 28 Bal Rickey Gutierrez SS HS 26.3 27 1 25 Tor Ed Sprague 3B C 23.7 28 8 190 Atl Mark Wohlers RHP HS 23.2 29 9 236 Stl Mark Clark RHP CC 22.2 30 1 26 Det Rico Brogna 1B HS 22.0
This level tends to be dominated by back of the rotation starters and relievers and that’s the case here. No, I hadn’t realized Rhodes was drafted as an OF either. I’m not sure when in his career he actually made the conversion to pitcher. I’m definitely comfortable categorizing these players as more “useful” than “good”.
Rank Rd Pick Team Player Pos School WARP3 31 5 112 Atl Turk Wendell RHP C 21.8 32 7 163 Cle Greg McMichael RHP C 21.7 33 6 143 Cal Gary DiSarcina SS C 21.3 34 30 765 Tex Jeff Frye 2B C 20.9 35 8 199 Bos Tim Naehring SS C 20.8 36 3 64 Hou Scott Servais C C 20.3 37 25 641 Bos John Flaherty* C C 19.6 38 11 283 KC Mike Magnante LHP C 17.3 39 7 180 Mon Bret Barberie SS C 16.0 40 30 781 NYY Deion Sanders OF C 15.6
This is a very solid group of useful players – a lot of modest ceiling C draft picks that chipped in several years of solid production. And Deion Sanders who dumped a bucket of water on Tim McCarver (yay!) and was chewed out by Carlton Fisk (ooh!).
Part 4: Top Players Prior to Free Agency
Rank Car Rank Player Pre-FA Post-FA 1 2 Mike Piazza 59.2 37.5 2 10 John Valentin 50.7 5.4 3 1 Robin Ventura 50.1 49.0 4 4 Kenny Lofton 49.6 44.9 5 7 Marquis Grissom 38.2 32.7 6 13 Charles Nagy 37.2 15.8 7 3 Jim Edmonds 37.1 58.7 8 6 Tino Martinez 36.7 39.9 9 5 Luis Gonzalez 32.5 61.3 10 19 Jim Abbott 32.0 8.0 11 11 Andy Benes 31.6 24.0 12 8 Tim Wakefield 30.4 31.3 13 12 Erik Karros 29.6 24.4 14 17 Mickey Morandini 28.8 13.9 15 20 Steve Avery 28.5 5.2 16 9 Royce Clayton 27.4 30.1 17 18 Gregg Olson 27.3 13.8 18 15 Brian Jordan 24.2 22.6 19 22 Darren Oliver 22.3 9.9 20 14 Woody Williams 22.3 27.3 21 30 Rico Brogna 22.0 0.0 22 16 Damien Easley 21.5 22.0 23 32 Greg McMichael 20.9 0.8 24 28 Mark Wohlers 19.9 3.3 25 27 Ed Sprague 19.3 4.4 26 29 Mark Clark 19.1 3.1 27 34 Jeff Frye 17.9 3.0 28 25 Darren Lewis 17.7 10.0 29 31 Turk Wendell 17.5 4.3 30 35 Tim Naehring 17.5 3.3 31 36 Scott Servais 16.3 4.0 32 33 Gary DiSarcina 15.9 5.4 33 23 Rheal Cormier 13.8 15.3 34 26 Rickey Gutierrez 12.3 14.0 35 21 Arthur Rhodes 12.0 21.3 36 24 David Weathers 4.2 23.7
The WARP system may overrate catchers, but Piazza comes in as the 3rd most productive player in this eight year draft period and that sure seems about right. See what happens when you do favors for Italian businessmen from SE PA?
Valentin was one of my favorite players and during his career I bitched plenty about how underrated he was, but even I was shocked to see him grade out so highly in terms of pre-FA production. When I do the summary of all players that reached 50 WARP3 prior to free agency, you’ll see that he’s in a very select group of players. He really was a fantastic player in the mid-90s.
And then he really fell off a steep, steep cliff. His pre-FA production made him a peer of Ventura and Lofton and his post-FA production made him a peer of Gary DiSarcina. Ouch.
Befitting a deep draft there is sizable group of thirteen “good” players who produced between 27-38 WARP3 in their pre-FA years. These were all good and valuable players in their pre-FA years. Note that Wakefield’s pre-FA service was interrupted by a hideous year in AAA. Not every “good” player has a smooth and easy transition to MLB. Jordan just misses my subjective 25 WARP3 cutoff. If I add him, then the draft produced eighteen “good” pre-FA players and the only notable players missing are Williams and Easley and a few relievers who weren’t very valuable as pre-FA players anyway. Again, even good deep drafts run out of steam by the 20th best player.
Nagy, Abbott and Avery join Valentin in the group of players whose career total underrated their pre-FA value. Arm injury played a key role in the short careers of Abbott and Avery.
Edmonds, Gonzalez, Wakefield, Clayton and some of the relievers at the bottom of the list are all players who look better by their career total although Edmonds was certainly a very good pre-FA player as well.
Part 5: Players by Round
Round WARP3 WARP/pk WARP/pk (87-94) Players 20 40 60 80 100 1 524.8 20.2 17.9 16 3 5 1 1 1s 73.3 18.3 6.6 4 1 1 2 87.3 3.4 4.1 12 1 3 162.0 6.2 4.6 11 2 1 4 99.6 3.8 2.8 6 1 5 151.5 5.8 3.1 6 1 2 6 130.6 5.0 3.0 9 2 1 7 135.7 5.2 2.5 7 1 1 8 109.2 4.2 2.3 5 2 1 9 49.7 1.9 1.1 8 1 10 12.8 0.5 1.1 5 11 25.6 1.0 1.8 5 12 5.5 0.2 0.8 4 13 1.2 0.0 2.0 1 14 -0.1 0.0 0.7 1 15 13.2 0.5 0.8 5 16 0.7 0.0 0.3 4 17 95.7 3.7 1.5 2 1 18 40.5 1.6 1.1 3 1 19 9.6 0.4 0.4 2 21 4.4 0.2 0.4 1 22 0.1 0.0 0.5 1 23 2.2 0.1 0.5 2 25 20.7 0.8 0.6 3 26 0.9 0.0 0.2 1 28 50.0 1.9 0.5 2 1 29 9.4 0.4 0.2 2 30 80.0 3.1 0.0 3 1 1 32 0.8 0.0 0.3 2 33 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 35 2.9 0.1 0.1 1 38 0.0 0.0 0.1 1 40 -0.1 0.0 0.0 2 41 1.8 0.1 0.0 1 42 -0.3 0.0 0.0 1 58 -0.1 0.0 0.3 2 62 96.7 3.7 0.5 1 1 1997.8
By “WARP/pk” this was a strong draft in the 1st round and the supplemental round, but in general the clustering at the top of the draft isn’t that great. The 60+ and 80+ WARP3 players are scattered throughout the draft. The middle rounds (3 thru 8) are actually the strength of this draft. The two late round sleepers are Piazza, the Norristown paison of Tommy LaSorda, and Lofton who again might have had his basketball career play a role in his low draft position.
Part 6: Players by School
totWARP3 20+WARP totPlayers 20+Players totPercent 20+Percent HS 387.0 324.0 27 8 19 (22) 20 (23) JC 263.1 219.4 23 5 13 13 C 1347.7 1113.7 93 23 67 (78) 67 (77)
Across the table the college ranks have a 3-4-fold advantage over the HS ranks. Thanks mostly to Piazza the JC ranks are pretty good as well.
All HS players over 20 WARP3
Rank Rd Pick Team Player Pos School WARP3 1 7 169 Cal Jim Edmonds* OF HS 95.8 2 1 15 SF Royce Clayton* SS HS 57.5 3 1 3 Atl Steve Avery LHP HS 33.7 4 2 34 Bal Arthur Rhodes* OF HS 33.3 5 3 63 Tex Darren Oliver* LHP HS 32.2 6 1s 28 Bal Rickey Gutierrez SS HS 26.3 7 8 190 Atl Mark Wohlers RHP HS 23.2 8 1 26 Det Rico Brogna 1B HS 22.0
This is a very thin class. Edmonds is a great player, but there’s not much after him. Clayton has had a long decent career. Avery was very good for a couple very early years. The rest are mostly role players. Generally, these players were drafted towards the top of the draft but as the only really good player Edmonds is a pretty huge exception.
All JC/CC players over 20 WARP3
Rank Rd Pick Team Player Pos School WARP3 1 62 1390 LA Mike Piazza* 1B-C CC 96.7 2 30 767 Cal Damien Easley* 2B-SS CC 43.5 3 6 158 Stl Rheal Cormier* LHP CC 29.1 4 3 82 Tor David Weathers* RHP CC 27.9 5 9 236 Stl Mark Clark RHP CC 22.2
Now that the draft stops at 50 rounds we can finally lock in Piazza as the greatest 62nd rd pick in history. Although with more teams now drafting the 1390th pick does still exist. It probably comes around in the 47th round so perhaps there’ll be another pick #1390 comparable to Piazza. Or maybe not. Easley banked a lot of money from a bad Randy Smith contract after a couple solid years and has hung around long enough for a decent career. The three pitchers are fairly typical JC successes.
All C players over 20 WARP3
Rank Rd Pick Team Player Pos School WARP3 1 1 10 CWS Robin Ventura 3B C 99.1 2 17 428 Hou Kenny Lofton* OF C 94.5 3 4 90 Hou Luis Gonzalez* 1B C 93.8 4 1 14 Sea Tino Martinez* 1B C 76.6 5 3 76 Mon Marquis Grissom* OF C 70.9 6 8 200 Pit Tim Wakefield* 1B C 61.7 7 5 121 Bos John Valentin SS C 56.1 8 1 1 SD Andy Benes RHP C 55.6 9 6 140 LA Erik Karros 1B C 54.0 10 1 17 Cle Charles Nagy RHP C 53.0 11 28 732 Tor Woody Williams* RHP C 49.6 12 1s 30 Stl Brian Jordan* OF C 46.8 13 5 120 Phl M Morandini SS C 42.7 14 1 4 Bal Gregg Olson RHP C 41.1 15 1 8 Cal Jim Abbott LHP C 40.0 16 18 463 Oak Darren Lewis OF C 27.7 17 1 25 Tor Ed Sprague 3B C 23.7 18 5 112 Atl Turk Wendell RHP C 21.8 19 7 163 Cle Greg McMichael RHP C 21.7 20 6 143 Cal Gary DiSarcina SS C 21.3 21 30 765 Tex Jeff Frye 2B C 20.9 22 8 199 Bos Tim Naehring SS C 20.8 23 3 64 Hou Scott Servais C C 20.3There are excellent players at the top of this class and a lot of very good depth. Jim Abbott who ranks 15th amongst college players had a very valuable short career. That’s a huge difference from the HS group. The 3rd ranked HS player, Avery, would be a distant 16th on this list.
Nearly half (seven out of fifteen) of the good players were picked in the first 30 selections with the rest mostly in the 3rd to 8th range so I guess the clustering is ok, but there is definitely a good chunk of mid round sleepers.












