| G | AB | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | ||||
| April | 18 | 74 | .216 | .272 | .365 | .636 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 16 | |||
| May | 28 | 99 | .303 | .393 | .556 | .949 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 15 | 22 | |||
| June | 5 | 22 | .455 | .520 | .818 | 1.338 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Ryan Lavarnway
#51
Posted 07 June 2011 - 09:14 AM
#52
Posted 12 June 2011 - 12:07 PM
Lavarnway: 26 G, 1 E, .995 Fldng%, 3 PB, 23 SB, 14 CS, 38% CS
Federowicz: 30 G, 7 E, .970 Fldng%, 0 PB, 27 SB, 12 CS, 31% CS
Just his throwing seems reason enough to be encouraged, at this point. Also, he had 26 PB in 66 G in 2009, 11 PB in 53 G in 2010.
And for good measure:
Lavarnway: 54 G, .278/.357/.493/.850 13 HR, 25 BB, 46 K
Federowicz: 54 G, .287/.345/.411/.756 5 HR, 20 BB, 35 K
Edit: He just hit #14
Edited by tonyarmasjr, 12 June 2011 - 12:13 PM.
#53
Posted 13 June 2011 - 12:31 PM
| G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | TB | GDP |
| 99 | 429 | 366 | 60 | 104 | 14 | 0 | 22 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 89 | 0.284 | 0.375 | 0.503 | 0.878 | 184 | 13 |
#54
Posted 26 June 2011 - 10:32 AM
#55
Posted 27 June 2011 - 01:40 PM
Prospect of the Day: Ryan Lavarnway
Jarrod Saltalamacchia currently holds down the catching job with theBoston Red Sox, with the aging Jason Varitek as the primary backup. Knocking on the door is prospect Ryan Lavarnway, currently on a tear with Triple-A Pawtucket.

Lavarnway was drafted by the Red Sox in the sixth round in 2008, out of Yale, where he holds the Ivy League record for career home runs. Scouts respected his power, but weren't sure if he would hit for much of an average in pro ball, and had serious doubts about his ability to remain behind the plate. He answered the doubts about his bat by hitting .285/.367/.540 with 21 homers for Low-A Greenville in 2009, then a combined .288/.393/.489 with 22 homers and 102 RBI between High-A Salem and Double-A Portland in 2010. He returned to Portland to begin '11 and hit a very similar .284/.360/.510 in 55 games, which earned him a promotion to Pawtucket. In 11 games since moving up, he's hit .356/.420/.667 with another three homers.<br style="line-height: 0.75em; "><br style="line-height: 0.75em; ">All told, Lavarnway is a career .284/.375/.509 hitter in 320 minor league games, with no deterioration in his performance as he's moved up the ladder. Indeed, if anything he's improved, easing scout concerns about a long swing by showing power to all fields. He has decent plate discipline and his strikeout rate has actually declined as he's moved up. Although he won't win batting titles in the majors, I expect that he'll carry the power forward. <br style="line-height: 0.75em; "><br style="line-height: 0.75em; ">The serious question has always been defense, and while Lavarnway has spent much of his career as a DH, his glove has improved. His arm is average, but a slow release inhibited his throwing early in his career, while poor footwork and lack of mobility rendered him less than reliable as a defender: he coughed up 26 passed balls in just 66 games behind the plate in 2009. However, he cut that down to 11 in 53 defensive games last year, and this year he's reduced the rate even further to four passed balls and just one error in 32 games behind the plate.
He's caught a respectable 36% of runners trying to steal on him this year. Red Sox farm director Mike Hazen tells me that Lavarnway has made "very good strides behind the plate with a continuously improving feel working with pitchers and calling games." Hazen also praises Lavarnway's continued improvement with receiving and blocking, which clearly shows up in the statistics. <br style="line-height: 0.75em; "><br style="line-height: 0.75em; ">Although Lavarnway will never win gold gloves, if he maintains his current progress he can be at least adequate defensively, while providing considerable power on the offensive side. We should see him in Fenway later this year, and he could take a larger role on the major league roster in 2012.
Edited by phragle, 27 June 2011 - 01:41 PM.
#56
Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:13 AM
| G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | TB | GDP |
| 21 | 91 | 80 | 14 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 0.338 | 0.418 | 0.613 | 1.030 | 49 | 4 |
#57
Posted 11 July 2011 - 12:14 PM
Here's the best part. After Sunday's game, he talked about just doing his job in Pawtucket. "Trying to play GM is one of the worst things you can do," he told Paul Kenyon of the ProJo. "My job is to come out here and play baseball for the PawSox."
#58
Posted 11 July 2011 - 12:27 PM
#59
Posted 12 July 2011 - 03:05 PM
I'll go ahead and vote yes. He has a combined line of .303, .377, .554 in AA and AAA. He has a pretty high 20%k, but is absolutely crushing the ball for a catcher. If I am interpreting the Davenport translations correctly, he has an MLB equivalent line of .347 .411 .624 in 101 AAA ABs. Additionally, it looks like he may be coming up fast on 21 year old Yankee prospect Jesus Montero, who is putting up a pretty good .289 .346 .418 line in AAA.
A secondary question, should we consider trading Lavarnway for a SP such as Matt Garza? My brain says no, we will make the playoffs with our current staff, and our top 3 pitchers will be healthy for the playoffs. Now, a trade for a Matt Garza type for Josh Reddick seems like a great idea.
#60
Posted 16 July 2011 - 12:32 PM
Considering his improved defense, and ridiculous success with the bat, I am going to ask the question I feel we are all alluding to, is 23 year old Ryan Lavarnway our best prospect right now?
I'll go ahead and vote yes. He has a combined line of .303, .377, .554 in AA and AAA. He has a pretty high 20%k, but is absolutely crushing the ball for a catcher. If I am interpreting the Davenport translations correctly, he has an MLB equivalent line of .347 .411 .624 in 101 AAA ABs. Additionally, it looks like he may be coming up fast on 21 year old Yankee prospect Jesus Montero, who is putting up a pretty good .289 .346 .418 line in AAA.
A secondary question, should we consider trading Lavarnway for a SP such as Matt Garza? My brain says no, we will make the playoffs with our current staff, and our top 3 pitchers will be healthy for the playoffs. Now, a trade for a Matt Garza type for Josh Reddick seems like a great idea.
Josh Reddick is a power bat who plays a very good RF and has shown he can hang in the majors. There is absolutely no way Ryan Lavarnway should be considered a much better propect than he is.
Edited by rodderick, 16 July 2011 - 12:32 PM.
#61
Posted 16 July 2011 - 01:34 PM
I have Reddick ranked as a better prospect, but I want to play devil's advocate here. If you do not doubt Lavarnway's ability to stick at catcher, he should probably be considered the best prospect in the system. There is a roughly 20 run difference in value between a catcher and a RF just based on position. If we assume that Lavarnway is a -5 defender and Reddick is a +10 defender then Lavarnway still gets a 5 run advantage. Right now, I'd say the bats are pretty comparable given Reddick's improvements this year, but Lavarnway probably still has a slight edge there and definitely isn't an inferior offensive player. So, basically, even assuming Reddick plays elite defense in right, if Lavarnway stays at catcher as an everyday player, Reddick is going to have to outproduce him offensively in a way that doesn't seem too likely for him to be a more valuable player.Josh Reddick is a power bat who plays a very good RF and has shown he can hang in the majors. There is absolutely no way Ryan Lavarnway should be considered a much better propect than he is.
If Lavarnway were viewed as an everyday catcher, he very well might be a top 10 prospect in all of baseball. He's not. But, there's starting to at least be an argument that that perception is wrong.
#62
Posted 17 July 2011 - 08:57 AM
Lavarnway went 4-4 yesterday with a HR and a 2B, and now has a .378/.444/.712 line, with 9 homers in 111 at-bats, and 23 across the two levels. Read all that again, slowly. I hate to speculate about his immediate future with the big club (because I am sure someone will be along very soon now to lecture me about small sample sizes, how "proven" veteran C's like Tek are so valuable, about why we can't "rush" him, gotta postpone his arb years, etc. etc.), but at the very least I'd like to see him called up on August 31, played a ton in Sept. (assuming Sox have at least a WC berth locked up by then) and perhaps get added to the postseason roster (he'd be very useful in a National League park when the opposing LOOGY makes his inevitable appearance against Drew or Crawford).
#63
Posted 17 July 2011 - 11:43 AM
Many look like popups off the bat, but just carry and carry. Most of his viewable homers are pulled, but a couple opposite field shots too.
#64
Posted 17 July 2011 - 12:07 PM
#65
Posted 17 July 2011 - 02:23 PM
#66
Posted 17 July 2011 - 02:45 PM
Edited by Carl Everetts Therapist, 17 July 2011 - 02:46 PM.
#67
Posted 17 July 2011 - 04:18 PM
Did you read the report above on his D? Only issue I see is his PB rate-he's thrown people out and has only 1 error.
I agree and am encouraged.
I don't know the catching craft very well.
What is innate/can't be taught and what is coachable?
Is there some sort of special offseason catching program with a former defensive stud etc?
Obviously he is making strides, but what is the most you can do to not waste a bat like his?
#68
Posted 17 July 2011 - 06:10 PM
At the very least I'd like to see him called up on August 31, played a ton in Sept. (assuming Sox have at least a WC berth locked up by then) and perhaps get added to the postseason roster (he'd be very useful in a National League park when the opposing LOOGY makes his inevitable appearance against Drew or Crawford).
Carl Crawford is a gold-glove defender who can score you a game-winning run by simply getting to first base. If Tito ever pinches him in a playoff game, I will personally go Philly on him.
If Lavarnway continues to suggest that he can stick behind the plate, at some point the Sox are going to send him to Gary Tuck's boot camp. The game-calling stuff he can only learn by playing -- it's not innate, to answer the question upthread. Nor is the skill of slowing the game down, a critical one for catchers because they have to juggle so much at once. Some other things can be taught and in fact Lavarnway has made strides -- footwork, quietness, pitch-blocking. etc. Still, we need to bear in mind that catching major-league stuff is not a matter of sticking your glove out there. There's a whole new level of pitch explosiveness that Lavarnway hasn't seen yet.
#69
Posted 17 July 2011 - 08:44 PM
#70
Posted 19 July 2011 - 08:22 AM
| G | PA | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | CS | BB | SO | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | TB | GDP |
| 31 | 133 | 118 | 22 | 45 | 11 | 0 | 10 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 25 | 0.381 | 0.451 | 0.729 | 1.180 | 86 | 4 |
#71
Posted 24 August 2011 - 12:31 PM
#72
Posted 24 August 2011 - 01:15 PM
Probably because they knew they wouldn't have to give up nearly as much as they would for Montero.Gammons was on the radio this afternoon talking about how much teams like Lavarnway at the trading deadline and said, "I know Seattle liked him much better than Montero."
#73
Posted 24 August 2011 - 01:23 PM
Probably because he is closer to the majors and proved he can crush AAA pitching.Probably because they knew they wouldn't have to give up nearly as much as they would for Montero.
#74
Posted 24 August 2011 - 01:30 PM
Getting quick help shouldn't be a factor when your team needs a lot of help.Probably because he is closer to the majors and proved he can crush AAA pitching.
#75
Posted 24 August 2011 - 02:38 PM
Yet it is.Getting quick help shouldn't be a factor when your team needs a lot of help.
#76
Posted 24 August 2011 - 02:49 PM
Gammons was on the radio this afternoon talking about how much teams like Lavarnway at the trading deadline and said, "I know Seattle liked him much better than Montero."
The other factor could be Seattle's evaluation of their defense - if they believe that Lavarnway might stick as a passable C, whereas Montero may not and will end up at 1B/DH, that would make a big difference.
It's hard to imagine that the presence of Lavarnway knocking on the door won't impact the Ortiz negotiations this winter, as well. He's certainly a decent insurance policy, at a minimum. Will his offense make him stick in the majors or does he end up back in Pawtucket to fine tune those catching skills?
#77
Posted 24 August 2011 - 05:01 PM
Gammons was on the radio this afternoon talking about how much teams like Lavarnway at the trading deadline and said, "I know Seattle liked him much better than Montero."
If anyone knows hitting prospects, it's the Mariners.
#78
Posted 15 March 2012 - 01:56 PM
#79
Posted 15 March 2012 - 02:52 PM
Alex Speier has a great podcast interview with Lavarnway about how he's set about learning the craft of catching. Wonderful amount of detail.
That was terrific, thanks for posting it.
#80
Posted 23 June 2012 - 08:43 AM
#81
Posted 17 August 2012 - 05:05 PM
#82
Posted 17 August 2012 - 05:11 PM
#83
Posted 17 August 2012 - 05:14 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













