Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Woodsonity......or the Knick thread
#801
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:00 PM
#802
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:24 PM
#803
Posted 08 April 2012 - 03:05 PM
#804
Posted 08 April 2012 - 04:52 PM
#805
Posted 08 April 2012 - 05:08 PM
Also, that was the first time NY has come back from 10 down with less than 4 minutes to go and won in any game since December 2000. Exhilarating to watch, whew.
#806
Posted 08 April 2012 - 05:21 PM
-Amazing that they could even play with a team that strong defensively without a point guard for the entire fourth quarter. Unreal.
-Tyson. Tyson. Tyson. Maybe the biggest underrated turning point of the game was the refs calling Melo for a foul on Noah in OT when it appeared from the replay that it should've been Tyson's sixth. If that doesn't happen, all the tipouts and hustle plays don't happen, and Melo never even gets the final shot.
-I got so pissed off I actually said "If he shoots again I'm going to murder J.R. Smith's family." Holy crap with that guy. I am impressed though with his defense and rebounding, which ended up making a difference. But not compared to his atrocious shot selection.
-The titanic swing in this game standings-wise cannot be overestimated. Rather than being tied with Milwaukee for the last spot and likely to fall behind (hard to believe they'll repeat this on the road in Chicago) heading into Wednesday night's game, they are now a full game up on the 8th and tonight they'll either be tied for 7th or just two back in the division. If they can play like this, the 4 seed is a real possibility. Go Philly!
#807
Posted 08 April 2012 - 05:52 PM
If OKC can beat MIL tomorrow, there's a good argument to semi-tank Tuesday in CHI and rest up Chandler and Melo for the big Wednesday game in MIL.
#808
Posted 09 April 2012 - 09:35 AM
I'm not really sure what "semi-tanking" entails, other than lowering the threshold for what constitutes garbage time (since they aren't pulling a San Antonio and sending Melo and Chandler straight to Milwaukee). I guess what I'm saying is, I don't think Woodson should have too quick a hook: if they are down 12 with 9 minutes left, I don't think he should sit Melo and Tyson the rest of the way, for instance.
#809
Posted 09 April 2012 - 09:35 AM
Smith has to shoot with this set of personnel, he just needs better shot selection and obviously to hit more. But if Novak can't get free, Baron/Douglas are zeros, Jeffries and Chandler can't generate offense, and Melo is sitting, Smith should be shooting a lot of the time. He will start hitting, he has years of history of being able to score in bunches, he's healthy and he's still young.
If OKC can beat MIL tomorrow, there's a good argument to semi-tank Tuesday in CHI and rest up Chandler and Melo for the big Wednesday game in MIL.
Yeah, I'm not crazy about him, but Smith is the guy that should be shooting for that unit. What always frustrates me about him is that he seems to believe in this odd concept of "earned shots". It feels like every time he pulls down an offensive rebound he responds by taking a three pointer 4 seconds into the new shot clock, or every time he comes away with a steal, he takes a contested 23 foot jump shot.
His percentages are way down though. Does anybody know how far the 3 point line is in China? I wonder if he's been forced to readjust to a new distance or something.
#810
Posted 09 April 2012 - 09:50 AM
Its not that I'm advocating against J.R. Smith shooting, its just the blatant awfulness of the shots he's taking has to improve. The guy is comically opposed to going to the basket, although he has the quickness and athleticism to get there and finish.Yeah, I'm not crazy about him, but Smith is the guy that should be shooting for that unit. What always frustrates me about him is that he seems to believe in this odd concept of "earned shots". It feels like every time he pulls down an offensive rebound he responds by taking a three pointer 4 seconds into the new shot clock, or every time he comes away with a steal, he takes a contested 23 foot jump shot.
His percentages are way down though. Does anybody know how far the 3 point line is in China? I wonder if he's been forced to readjust to a new distance or something.
And can we talk about what a special player Shumpert is turning into? This guy is going to be an All-Star. His shot is improving, he has limitless athleticism and he is an all-world defender already. Plus, he really appears to have the mental toughness to improve his game and thrive in New York.
Thank you Donnie Walsh!
#811
Posted 09 April 2012 - 09:53 AM
And can we talk about what a special player Shumpert is turning into? This guy is going to be an All-Star. His shot is improving, he has limitless athleticism and he is an all-world defender already. Plus, he really appears to have the mental toughness to improve his game and thrive in New York.
Man, I've been talking about that all year. Steve Smith said on NBA-TV last night when analyzing this game: "guys like Shumpert and LeBron can bother Rose". GUYS LIKE SHUMPERT AND LEBRON. Loving that...
#812
Posted 09 April 2012 - 10:05 AM
He really is an elite defender though, and chances are that as he gains experience he'll be even better. And given the strength of the point guard position around the league right now, and the growing number of big, athletic 1's like Rose, Rondo, Wall, and Westbrook, having a guard that can defend those types of players is essential.
#813
Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:11 PM
At the last minute, Shumpert switches places with Fields, allowing him to defend Rose without having to fight through the three screens Chicago set up. It has been a long time since we've had a coach who has the eye to see how the offense is setting up, and the presence of mind to move his elite defender off his assigned guy. This defensive play call obviously worked out brilliantly for the Knicks. I won't bash D'Antoni here, because I can't think of more than a handful of coaches who make this adjustment so quickly and at such a pivotal moment. The more I see from Woodson, the more I think he's a real option next year.
Edited by A Bartlett Giamatti, 09 April 2012 - 02:13 PM.
#814
Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:33 PM
I am happy to bash D'Antoni, I wonder where this team would be right now if Woodson had been in charge the whole year.
#815
Posted 09 April 2012 - 02:46 PM
If you watch the video you see Shumpert looking back at Woodson, who then demonstrably points in the direction of Fields. Shumpert then runs to Fields and tells him to switch up.I read elsewhere that was Shumpert's decision, it certainly scared the crap out of me live for a second. I'd be curious to know definitively whose call that was.
I am happy to bash D'Antoni, I wonder where this team would be right now if Woodson had been in charge the whole year.
#816
Posted 09 April 2012 - 07:35 PM
If you watch the video you see Shumpert looking back at Woodson, who then demonstrably points in the direction of Fields. Shumpert then runs to Fields and tells him to switch up.
Good non-call on the stumble and chaos, with a moving screen that trips them up and completely reorders the play.
#817
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:16 AM
Edited by A Bartlett Giamatti, 10 April 2012 - 08:17 AM.
#818
Posted 10 April 2012 - 08:35 AM
Two potentially beneficial developments for the Knicks last night: OKC takes care of business vs Milwaukee and it's revealed that DRose has a bad ankle and may not play tonight.
I think it was pretty obvious that Rose was pretty hampered on Sunday with that ankle. Yes, Shumpert did a very good job but he wasn't seeing Rose at his physical peak.
#819
Posted 10 April 2012 - 12:54 PM
#820
Posted 18 April 2012 - 11:10 PM
Nuggets: fired their coach after starting the season 17-25
Knicks: fired their coach after starting the season 18-24
Nuggets: under the new coach, 32-8 and up to the 7th seed
Knicks: under the new coach, 15-5 and counting and up to the 7th seed
Nuggets: led offensively by Melo and defensively by 30 year old stud defensive center Marcus Camby
Knicks: led offensively by Melo and defensively by 29 year old stud defensive center Tyson Chandler
Nuggets: lost 4-1 to #2 seed and eventual NBA champions San Antonio
Knicks: ?????
#821
Posted 20 April 2012 - 12:09 PM
Adds more depth to the front line, I guess.
#822
Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:01 PM
#823
Posted 20 April 2012 - 09:59 PM
Three more games to get back in a groove, though. NY had the third best record in the league over the last 20 games coming into tonight at 15-5, with only San Antonio and Indiana ahead of them at 17-3 and 16-4. Also NY beat Indiana for 2 of those 4 losses, and they had a third game in Indiana where they were up by 15 after 3 but just couldn't finish it.
#824
Posted 22 April 2012 - 03:49 PM
So NY went a remarkable 9-2 against the Eastern 3-9 seeds (IND/BOS/ATL/ORL/PHI/MIL) under Woodson.
#825
Posted 22 April 2012 - 09:09 PM
It's been impressive what Woodson has done. The Knicks have played hard, they've totally earned the right to get swept again in the first round.So NY went a remarkable 9-2 against the Eastern 3-9 seeds (IND/BOS/ATL/ORL/PHI/MIL) under Woodson.
#826
Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:16 PM
#827
Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:30 PM
#828
Posted 24 April 2012 - 09:10 AM
I know the Knicks are becoming a popular underdog pick against Miami, but I'd much, much rather play Indiana. Nothing I saw in last Sunday's Heat-Knicks game inspired much confidence in me that the Knicks can beat the Heat in a 7 game series. I sincerely hope to be wrong about that.
#829
Posted 25 April 2012 - 12:53 PM
#830
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:13 PM
#831
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:15 PM
With the way Carmelo is playing, I think the Knicks are going to give the Heat a hell of a series.
Shell of a series, maybe.
#832
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:17 PM
So, Amare severely cuts his hand punching a glass case after the game. NY would kill to get out of the remaining 3/65 left on his deal.
He's in a sling and thought to be in some kind of cast.
#833
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:19 PM
#834
Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:16 PM
#835
Posted 30 April 2012 - 11:31 PM
#836
Posted 01 May 2012 - 12:22 AM
So, Amare severely cuts his hand punching a glass case after the game. NY would kill to get out of the remaining 3/65 left on his deal.
To this I say
Although it would be funnier if it happen to Wade.
I blame Isiah.
Edited by AimingForYoko, 01 May 2012 - 12:23 AM.
#837
Posted 01 May 2012 - 07:59 AM
#838
Posted 01 May 2012 - 08:52 AM
I agree wholeheartedly. I was thinking before the series that the Knicks' only faint hope was an injury to Amare so that the offense could flow exclusively through Carmelo. That was a tough way to get to that result, but at least now the Knicks have some shot of winning a game or maybe even two. I doubt they will but now it's possible.Frankly, it's addition by subtraction. Woodson's been playing the two of them together for 30+ minutes a night, and their offensive efficiency is much, much better with Carmelo at the 4 and Amare on the bench. The only way they were going to give the Heat a tough series was by going small anyhow--Woodson didn't do it in the first two games out of, I guess, loyalty to Amare--but now he's forced to. This really should make the Knicks better, unfortunately, it's probably still not gonna be enough to avoid a sweep.
The bigger question in my book is whether Carmelo can ever prosper with another offensive force in the line-up. I see him as a classic catch 22 case of not being good enough to carry a team on his own or able to win with another elite scorer alongside him.
#839
Posted 01 May 2012 - 11:35 AM
I agree wholeheartedly. I was thinking before the series that the Knicks' only faint hope was an injury to Amare so that the offense could flow exclusively through Carmelo. That was a tough way to get to that result, but at least now the Knicks have some shot of winning a game or maybe even two. I doubt they will but now it's possible.
The bigger question in my book is whether Carmelo can ever prosper with another offensive force in the line-up. I see him as a classic catch 22 case of not being good enough to carry a team on his own or able to win with another elite scorer alongside him.
I think it's possible, but not the way that Woodson has been going about it. He's relied too heavily on Carmelo isos. The way to do it would be to run an actual offense and use stretches of the game to go to Carmelo in isolation. It's just not sustainable to rely on one or two guys to create shots for themselves all game long. It wears Anthony down too much, and it takes your other players out of the flow of the offense. When was the last time the Knicks ran a play for Novak? When was the last time Chandler was used as the roll man in the pick and roll? Hell, when was the last time the Knicks ran a play to get Amare an open look from 15-20 feet? Knicks fans were furious with D'Antoni's failure to adapt his offense to his personnel, but Woodson's failure to adapt at all seems to be getting a free pass.
Woodson's entire offense is just ISO plays to Carmelo. There's only a single player in the NBA this season who has used a greater percentage on his possessions in isolation. And his name is JR Smith. That's Woodson's offense; ISO Carmelo, and when he's not on the floor, ISO JR Smith. And that's just not a winning strategy in this league. It's far too predictable and results in too many contested, difficult shots. Woodson needs to devise a way to create open looks for players other than Carmelo; he relies on Carmelo to play a point forward role the same way he did with Joe Johnson, but Carmelo doesn't really have that skill set. Personally, and I know I've said this to the point of it being annoying, I think this playoff series has really taken the sheen off of Woodson. He is what he's always been, clearly.
Edited by Grin&MartyBarret, 01 May 2012 - 11:36 AM.
#840
Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:55 PM
Howard Beck
@HowardBeckNYT
Just landed back in NYC. Stoudemire met w/hand specialist. No serious damage, but he's done for series, according to person w/info.
https://twitter.com/#!/HowardBeckNYT
#841
Posted 01 May 2012 - 02:22 PM
#842
Posted 01 May 2012 - 03:04 PM
I think it's possible, but not the way that Woodson has been going about it. He's relied too heavily on Carmelo isos. The way to do it would be to run an actual offense and use stretches of the game to go to Carmelo in isolation. It's just not sustainable to rely on one or two guys to create shots for themselves all game long. It wears Anthony down too much, and it takes your other players out of the flow of the offense. When was the last time the Knicks ran a play for Novak? When was the last time Chandler was used as the roll man in the pick and roll? Hell, when was the last time the Knicks ran a play to get Amare an open look from 15-20 feet? Knicks fans were furious with D'Antoni's failure to adapt his offense to his personnel, but Woodson's failure to adapt at all seems to be getting a free pass.
Woodson's entire offense is just ISO plays to Carmelo. There's only a single player in the NBA this season who has used a greater percentage on his possessions in isolation. And his name is JR Smith. That's Woodson's offense; ISO Carmelo, and when he's not on the floor, ISO JR Smith. And that's just not a winning strategy in this league. It's far too predictable and results in too many contested, difficult shots. Woodson needs to devise a way to create open looks for players other than Carmelo; he relies on Carmelo to play a point forward role the same way he did with Joe Johnson, but Carmelo doesn't really have that skill set. Personally, and I know I've said this to the point of it being annoying, I think this playoff series has really taken the sheen off of Woodson. He is what he's always been, clearly.
None of this is wrong, but they almost literally have no point guard, and it's pretty damn difficult to run any kind of offense besides an ISO-centric one without a real PG.
#843
Posted 01 May 2012 - 06:36 PM
#844
Posted 02 May 2012 - 09:33 AM
@AAAExtinguisher
#845
Posted 02 May 2012 - 11:22 AM
#846
Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:34 AM
#847
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:31 AM
#848
Posted 04 May 2012 - 01:05 PM
That's all I need to know about him as a so-called "superstar" player.
#849
Posted 08 May 2012 - 09:31 AM
http://probasketball..._medium=twitter
I think they needed to at least try to go after a Jerry Sloan, Phil Jackson, or Stan Van Gundy.
Edit: But in lieu of that, I think the Knicks should seriously consider hiring an "offensive coordinator" in much the same way they brought in Woodson to pair with D'Antoni initially. I have a feeling this will be the off-season that Brian Shaw ends up with a head coaching job, but if not bringing him in to be Woodson's top assistant and to install the triangle on offense would be a good idea.
Edited by Grin&MartyBarret, 08 May 2012 - 10:35 AM.
#850
Posted 09 May 2012 - 08:29 PM
I hope to god that JR Smith opts out. The combination of him and Mike Woodson's ISO happy offense is disgusting to watch. He took twice as many shots tonight as Amare Stoudemire and Steve Novak combined. Just ugly, ugly basketball.
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users










