Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Sons of Peter McNeeley- Boxing Thread
#2801
Posted 10 December 2012 - 12:52 PM
I remember Richie dropping an Olympic prospect with one punch, too, but can't find the clip.
#2802
Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:04 PM
So Frazier's most famous landed left hook and Hearns' most famous right cross don't rate? Geez, you're a tough sell.Fellas, fellas, we're talking one-hitter quitters here. Those were beautiful punches, but Duran went down from an accumulation of shots.
#2803
Posted 10 December 2012 - 01:33 PM
Well, I guess he technically hooked off the jab, but I'd count it as a one-punch knockout.
#2804
Posted 11 December 2012 - 12:33 AM
Edited by Infield Infidel, 11 December 2012 - 12:50 AM.
#2805
Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:20 AM
#2806
Posted 11 December 2012 - 01:23 PM
#2807
Posted 11 December 2012 - 02:16 PM
#2808
Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:49 AM
I had another look at the latter of those and I'd forgotten just how brutal that one actually was - I live near Ricky's hometown of Manchester in the UK and was a huge 'Hitman' fan so forgive me.
#2809
Posted 12 December 2012 - 08:02 AM
When Pacquiao KO'd Hatton, there was a 20-30 second period when I thought Hatton might be dead, or at the very least seriously, seriously hurt.Dan Rafael on ESPN was asked about where the Marquez KO stood and said that, while he liked it, it wasn't close to the Sergio Martinez on Paul Williams one or even the one Pacqiao himself landed on Ricky Hatton 2 years ago.
I had another look at the latter of those and I'd forgotten just how brutal that one actually was - I live near Ricky's hometown of Manchester in the UK and was a huge 'Hitman' fan so forgive me.
Ring deaths or life-altering head injuries rarely occur from one-punch KOs, it's almost always sustained beatings that occur over multiple rounds... but it was still a scary moment.
#2810
Posted 12 December 2012 - 10:30 AM
#2811
Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:38 PM
Edited by Deathofthebambino, 13 December 2012 - 03:38 PM.
#2812
Posted 14 December 2012 - 10:32 AM
Say what you want about Merchant, but he always called it like he saw it and didn't care who he pissed off in the process. And that honesty will be missed.
Kellerman is a very smart guy, but he lacks Merchant's brutal honesty, and I worry that HBO telecasts with Max and Lampley (who is a trainwreck at this point) are going to become HBO cheerleading competitions.
Regardless, the end of an era. Merchant at HBO pre-dates my birth and it's hard to imagine watching a huge fight (like this past Saturday) without him ringside.
#2813
Posted 14 December 2012 - 02:57 PM
As for Tyson, he threw this wicked combination we used to work on the mitts all the time - right hook to the liver or floating ribs, followed by a right uppercut. It's just a brutal combination - the body shot gets the head coming down, the uppercut catches the chin as the hands fall to the waist. And, it worked so well with his pendulum movement, he was perfectly set up for the hook when bobbing right.
#2814
Posted 16 December 2012 - 02:07 AM
Come on HBO. He fought a ton of crappy fights on PPV for 6 years and made you a ton of money. But the ride is over.
Showtime with the better card tonight, again.
#2816
Posted 21 January 2013 - 01:20 PM
#2817
Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:40 PM
I think Golovkin is an intriguing guy, but HBO is so desperate to manufacture stars that you have to take anything they say with a huge grain of salt.Anybody see Golovkin fight? I was really looking forward to watching him in action, but he was not that impressive. His defense is suspect and his hand speed is average. His big selling point is supposed to be his power, but he was unable to put down a puffed up jr. middleweight. HBO sure seems all in on him though, making ridiculous Tyson comparisons, and then being sure to cut to him in the locker room post fight, so we could hear him tell his parents he'd been suffering with the flu.
As you alluded to, can Kellerman at least hold off the ridiculous Tyson comparisons until after Golovkin knocks out one top opponent?
Golovkin could be the next middleweight champ, or he could be the next Edison Miranda (remember when he was HBO's "most feared middleweight" once upon a time?).
#2818
Posted 29 January 2013 - 10:20 PM
#2819
Posted 29 January 2013 - 10:52 PM
I think Golovkin is an intriguing guy, but HBO is so desperate to manufacture stars that you have to take anything they say with a huge grain of salt.
As you alluded to, can Kellerman at least hold off the ridiculous Tyson comparisons until after Golovkin knocks out one top opponent?
Golovkin could be the next middleweight champ, or he could be the next Edison Miranda (remember when he was HBO's "most feared middleweight" once upon a time?).
That's a great comparison (miranda). He got put in with somebody with (as hopkins would say) a little bit of 'slickness' and looked unimpressive.
All the buzz around the PED story out of Miami is around MLB and Arod, but for fight fans, I think it's interesting that Yuriorkis Gamboa was one of the guys named.
Gamboa needs steroids for his chin.
#2820
Posted 29 January 2013 - 11:02 PM
Gamboa needs steroids for his chin.
Ha. Can't fake a chin.
#2821
Posted 30 January 2013 - 07:33 AM
Absolutely, if there's any sport that has no chance of effectively policing itself, it's boxing. There is no central authority, or league, and the powers that be can't even handle simple things like appointing competent judges, getting the best fighters to fight each other, getting fighters to make agreed-upon weights, etc.
Boxing is such a disorganized mess that I don't know what there is realistically to be done about it, and I'm not advocating for anything to be done really
Edited by BGrif21125, 30 January 2013 - 08:20 AM.
#2822
Posted 31 January 2013 - 12:30 AM
#2823
Posted 05 February 2013 - 07:46 PM
#2824
Posted 05 February 2013 - 11:27 PM
Trout,btw, is a scary dude. He dwarfed Cotto but Cotto kept bringing it. which is why I love cotto. true throwback fighter. Never scared even when outgunned.
Edited by ElUno20, 06 February 2013 - 12:43 AM.
#2825
Posted 06 February 2013 - 12:52 AM
#2826
Posted 08 February 2013 - 06:49 AM
There's a sick rumor spreading that mayweather will be fighting Devon Alexander in May. Sad sick rumor
This is causing a serious ruckus in the UK, as Alexander has a signed contract for a mandatory defence against England's Kell Brook in 2 weeks time and has pulled out due to an 'injury' - for the 2nd time I might add - then Mayweather tweets later that night that Alexander is the favourite to face him?
2 issues here 1) You have to request an exemption from your mandatory within 90 days of your last fight, which considering Alexander's last fight was Oct 20th, he's missed - and the IBF have said they won't allow a unification BTW. 2) Golden Boy are trying to spread their net of fighters into the UK, pulling a stunt like this against one of the UK's best fighters ain't gonna help that one bit!
http://www.sportingl...ather-ruled-out
Edited by inter tatters, 08 February 2013 - 06:54 AM.
#2827
Posted 19 February 2013 - 06:29 PM
Floyd Mayweather has jumped ship to Showtime/CBS for a six fight deal over a 30 month term. First fight is scheduled for May 4th against Robert Guerrero. Considering Floyd will be 36 this year and has fought six times in the past six years, it will be amazing if he actually fights six times over a two and a half year span.
#2828
Posted 19 February 2013 - 11:09 PM
#2829
Posted 16 March 2013 - 10:32 PM
Got a toe to toe war developing on HBO.
#2830
Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:22 PM
Bradley was out on his feet in the 1st, 2nd, 6th and 12th Rounds. Amazing that he lasted the whole fight.
#2831
Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:28 PM
#2832
Posted 16 March 2013 - 11:37 PM
Bradley v. Provodnikov
Definitely worth catching the replay if you didn't see that one live. Very Rocky-esque vibe.
#2833
Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:52 AM
Bradley v. Provodnikov
Definitely worth catching the replay if you didn't see that one live. Very Rocky-esque vibe.
What a great fight that was last night. It's being replayed on HBO at 10:30 this morning for those who missed it.
#2834
Posted 17 March 2013 - 01:57 PM
I think it was the right decision. I saw Bradley with a narrow victory.
#2835
Posted 20 April 2013 - 10:36 PM
Trout v. Canelo on Showtime has been a real good scrap through 7. Tune in if you can (or set a reminder for the replay).
#2836
Posted 20 April 2013 - 11:07 PM
Edited by BGrif21125, 20 April 2013 - 11:10 PM.
#2837
Posted 26 April 2013 - 11:14 AM
Any of you checked out Matt McGrain's list of the 100 greatest fighters of all time? "Labor of love" doesn't quite do it justice...
http://www.boxing.co...one_100_91.html
#2838
Posted 04 May 2013 - 11:07 PM
Mayweather needs to adjust. Guerrero took the first two.
Edit: Good work by PBF in R3. Guerrero needs to keep counterpunching off Floyd's lead right.
Edited by Marciano490, 04 May 2013 - 11:11 PM.
#2839
Posted 04 May 2013 - 11:39 PM
Zzzzzz.... this is basically every Mayweather fight I've ever seen.
The only good one will be the one he loses.
#2840
Posted 04 May 2013 - 11:48 PM
I thought, after the first 3-4 rounds, this was the best he's looked in awhile. Just a master class. And you can't say he didn't engage, except for R12.
#2841
Posted 04 May 2013 - 11:58 PM
Yeah. He's still just too quick for the guys he's fighting... and he doesn't put himself at risk.
#2842
Posted 05 May 2013 - 12:00 AM
What does that mean, put himself at risk? He was landing 60% of his power shots, what's he supposed to do? It's like saying Buchholz doesn't put himself at risk because he strikes out too may batters.
#2843
Posted 05 May 2013 - 12:12 AM
What does that mean, put himself at risk? He was landing 60% of his power shots, what's he supposed to do? It's like saying Buchholz doesn't put himself at risk because he strikes out too may batters.
Thank you. People just want to see him get hit. Guess what? That rarely happens and when it does it is minor and that is what makes Pretty Boy one of the best of all time. His ability to make the other fighter miss is unparalleled and is a part of boxing whether the people booing in the crowd like it or not.
#2844
Posted 05 May 2013 - 12:22 AM
Thank you. People just want to see him get hit. Guess what? That rarely happens and when it does it is minor and that is what makes Pretty Boy one of the best of all time. His ability to make the other fighter miss is unparalleled and is a part of boxing whether the people booing in the crowd like it or not.
I agree, and this is one of the things about FW that makes me enjoy watching him fight more than almost any other boxer today, but at the same time, this was never a matchup that ever struck me as a bout that FW would lose. In terms of "putting himself at risk", I wish that FW would actually take some more risks, both in terms of weight class (where the last time I feel like he took a serious risk was against Marquez, where his contract apparently allowed him to end up outweighing Marquez substantially without much penalty) and in pure skill, where it's true that there are few fighters that can realistically match up against him, but I still feel like he's too busy protecting his perfect record to take many risks. I mean, entering tonight, what did you think his odds of winning were? 70%? Better than that? As much as I understand it, I don't feel like he's taken many risks as a fighter in the last few years.
Edited by Scoops Bolling, 05 May 2013 - 12:23 AM.
#2845
Posted 05 May 2013 - 12:23 AM
If he doesn't win the Norris Trophy I will be gravely disappointed.
#2846
Posted 05 May 2013 - 12:39 AM
I agree, and this is one of the things about FW that makes me enjoy watching him fight more than almost any other boxer today, but at the same time, this was never a matchup that ever struck me as a bout that FW would lose. In terms of "putting himself at risk", I wish that FW would actually take some more risks, both in terms of weight class (where the last time I feel like he took a serious risk was against Marquez, where his contract apparently allowed him to end up outweighing Marquez substantially without much penalty) and in pure skill, where it's true that there are few fighters that can realistically match up against him, but I still feel like he's too busy protecting his perfect record to take many risks. I mean, entering tonight, what did you think his odds of winning were? 70%? Better than that? As much as I understand it, I don't feel like he's taken many risks as a fighter in the last few years.
It's fairer to criticize his fight selection than his style in the ring, but who would you realistically like to see him fight at this point? Pacquiao would have to win two fights now in order to get back in the conversation. Canelo doesn't have the defense to withstand Floyd, and I don't think he'll look too good against him either. Devon and Bradley are faster than Canelo, but they're basically Floyd-lite, and wouldn't stand a chance. I don't think he'll fight Ishe, as he reps him. He could fight JMM again, but nobody would give him credit for beating a 40 year old Marquez for a second time. Berto is good, but would he get love for beating a guy who got beat up by Guerrero at this point?
Unless you expect him to move up to 160 at age 36 and fight Golovkin, there's just nobody out there.
#2847
Posted 05 May 2013 - 01:50 AM
The criticism revolves around the entertainment value. Paired with his skills, it's insanely effective... and pretty dull.
His fights always feel like a good 12-0 defensive struggle in the NFL -- with the 0 barely ever making it across the 50 yd line on offense. Sure... there is appeal there to a certain crowd - but I think most would rather watch a 35-31 game (including the vast majority of the most intellectual/hardcore NFL fans).
#2848
Posted 05 May 2013 - 08:43 AM
#2849
Posted 05 May 2013 - 10:38 AM
For me, he's captivating not just because of his technical skill, but because there's always a sense during his fights that he's in complete control and can do whatever he wants at any given time. I saw Pedro pitch in the '99 ASG, and it's the same feel. This imminent sense that something's going to happen and that he can ratchet up whatever he needs to win.
#2850
Posted 05 May 2013 - 12:58 PM
For me, he's captivating not just because of his technical skill, but because there's always a sense during his fights that he's in complete control and can do whatever he wants at any given time.
......except knock anyone out
Hell, I'd be happy with a knock-down at this point. Mayweather fights are fun to watch for about 3-4 rounds and then by like round 6 whoever Mayweather's fighting suddenly looks like Rocky chasing the chicken, except the chicken is counter-punching.
From a boxing standpoint it is impossible to ignore Mayweather. He's a once in a lifetime talent, we're talking Tiger/Federer type success, but watching the best fighter of our generation and possibly one of the greatest fighters of all time win 12 round decision after 12 round decision is just bleeding the entire sport dry of interest.
It's a shame too, a fighter like Floyd should be celebrated. Setting aside the fact that he's a domestic abuser (hell, so was Tyson, but the difference is Tyson knocked people out in the first round) his boxing ability is otherworldly, but rather than be recognized that way he will probably go down as just another great fighter from the era when boxing died.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










