Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
The Bullpen Thread
#1
Posted 31 March 2010 - 11:29 AM
At first glance, and this has been mentioned elsewhere, this may be a weakness for this team this year. There are IMO too many uncertainties and the depth does not look too good. Now, I don't want to be Chicken Little before the season even starts so I'll just put my thoughts here and allow the discussion to talk me off the cliff.
Closer: Papelbon has not looked sharp in ST. Combined with his heart attack inducing acts of last season and compounded with the taste he left in our mouths in Game 3 of the ALDS, makes me a little nervous.
Setup: Dan Bard looks OK to terrific. I also have faith, for some reason, in Oki. After that we got DelCarmen and his iffy fasttball, Ramon Ramirez (the original one) who turned into a pumkin suddenly.
That makes 5 members.
Questions:
Do the Sox go with a 6 or a 7 man bullpen?
Do they have a long man?
Will Tito need a Loogy? If so who? Can they call Shouse again?
Let's see what we all think on this.
#2
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 31 March 2010 - 12:02 PM
#3
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 31 March 2010 - 12:27 PM
As expected. He threw in a simulated game on Tuesday and is slated to throw 60 pitches in a minor league game on Saturday. Bonser is out of options, so this way the Red Sox will not have to place him on waivers. He could factor into the team's bullpen before long.
#4
Posted 31 March 2010 - 12:28 PM
Forgot abouth Atchison, and what I have read about Schoenweis is that his numbers are not good at all so far.
#5
Posted 31 March 2010 - 01:04 PM
Definitely a relative team weakness heading into the season, IMO.
Projected Opening Day 'pen:
- Paps
- Oki
- Bard
- Ram-Ram
- Atchison
- MDC
In the wings: Boof (DL), either Embree or Schoenweiss
Out: Nelson, Embree or Schoenweiss
I agree with your intial thoughts: Paps, Ramirez, MDC are shaky based on end of '09 and ST. Bard a little less so, though he's the least proven of that front-line bunch. Atchison is an unknown... my guess is he'll be serviceable for a couple of weeks. He's pitched well for most of ST, but had a hiccup recently. If he starts to tail off, then in comes Boof. Embree has been awful, and Schoenweiss' debut wasn't good. I don't get the feeling that Embree would be a LOOGY... Schoenweis a possiblity.
#6
Posted 31 March 2010 - 01:21 PM
#7
Posted 31 March 2010 - 03:07 PM
Both Schoenweis and Embree got lit up in the 8th and 9th of today's game.
#8
Posted 31 March 2010 - 03:12 PM
#9
Posted 31 March 2010 - 03:45 PM
This might have something to do with his 11K/1BB in 9 innings this spring.
#10
Posted 31 March 2010 - 04:02 PM
Embree is not on the 40 man roster (he signed a minor league deal) so options are not relevant. That being said, I also think he should be out the door.
If I counted correctly the Sox have 28 players on the active roster, which must be cut to 25 by Sunday. 13 pitchers are active now including Tazawa, whom I expect to be placed on the DL between now and Sunday. I also expect DiceK to start the season on the DL which leaves 11 active pictchers including Atchison. They may start the season with 11 pitchers but I doubt it, so I expect them to send Reddick down and get another pitcher from either AAA or maybe even give Shouse another shot.
#11
Posted 31 March 2010 - 04:38 PM
IMO, the biggest concern (assuming Paps is just starting slow) is whether Ramon Ramirez or MDC can step-up and pitch in meaningful situations. If neither of them can regain their effectiveness, our pen looks very thin in high leverage situations.
#12
Posted 31 March 2010 - 05:54 PM
#13
Posted 31 March 2010 - 06:34 PM
Out of those three you mentioned, I think it has to be Bard if anyone is taking that role away from Oki. Okajima's proven himself rather capable in that role over the last few years and though I can't find a statistic for it, I'd be interested to see what the conversion % of his holds opportunities are, especially those in the 8th inning. It has to be well above the league average since he came into the league.
Bard's gotten a lot of press (and rightly so), but while there's still a fair amount unproven about him; however, if the Sox want him to be the closer of the future, then he's going to have to get late game experience some time.
MDC is, as EP Sox Fan noted, inconsistent and coming back from injury and will likely stay in that middle relief role, based on how Tito has used him the last few seasons.
Ramon, who did show an ability to perform under pressure last season, looked very overworked, to the point that he was suffering from a dead arm by midway through the season when his numbers dropped. I wouldn't be afraid of using him in a high leverage situation (all in all last year, he only gave up 7ER to 71TBF in high leverage situations) because he showed that he could do it, I would just want Tito to limit his usage considerably more than he did last season.
#14
Posted 31 March 2010 - 07:36 PM
Year RHB LHB
2007 .512 .648
2008 .661 .547
2009 .906 .467
#16
Posted 01 April 2010 - 08:47 AM
#17
Posted 01 April 2010 - 01:38 PM
I'm rooting for the guy but I'm not holding out much hope after allowing 10 ER while recording 7 outs.
#18
Posted 01 April 2010 - 03:04 PM
#19
Posted 01 April 2010 - 03:30 PM
#20
Posted 01 April 2010 - 03:51 PM
The higher quality of the Sox pitching staff plus the improved defense should certainly help, but there's still going to be plenty of innings for the pen, unfortunately.
Delcarmen gives up 2 runs on 2 hits and a walk in 1 2/3 innings today...looks like he might still not be the answer, based on his spring, although I'd have expected his ERA to be higher than 3.24 at this point. We'll see..
#21
Posted 01 April 2010 - 04:18 PM
Here's a comparison of the two courtesy of Fangraphs.
Not much to like about the way either pitcher is trending. Nelson's numbers look slightly better but that's only because Schoeneweis was flat out awful last season. Historically, Nelson has been the better strikeout pitcher, although his K/9 has come back to earth in the last few season. In addition to his poor K/0 ration, Schoenenweis' K/BB and BB/9 have been headed in the wrong direction for the past few years. Neither one had especially good years versus LHB last season but Nelson was a bit better.
For whatever reason, Extra Bases seems to think Schonenweis is the favorite to get the job. Based on everything I can glean from the numbers, and especially as bad as Schonenweis was last season, Nelson looks like the better bet.
#22
Posted 01 April 2010 - 04:22 PM
Delcarmen gives up 2 runs on 2 hits and a walk in 1 2/3 innings today...looks like he might still not be the answer, based on his spring, although I'd have expected his ERA to be higher than 3.24 at this point. We'll see..
Those 2 runs probably don't score if the Red Sox IF had still been in the game instead of the Pawsox IF. It's not just that you don't have to use those middle relievers as much, you can get away with less damage when you do use them, too.
Edited by judyb, 01 April 2010 - 04:30 PM.
#23
Posted 01 April 2010 - 04:30 PM
Not much to like about the way either pitcher is trending. Nelson's numbers look slightly better but that's only because Schoeneweis was flat out awful last season. Historically, Nelson has been the better strikeout pitcher, although his K/9 has come back to earth in the last few season. In addition to his poor K/0 ration, Schoenenweis' K/BB and BB/9 have been headed in the wrong direction for the past few years. Neither one had especially good years versus LHB last season but Nelson was a bit better.
For whatever reason, Extra Bases seems to think Schonenweis is the favorite to get the job. Based on everything I can glean from the numbers, and especially as bad as Schonenweis was last season, Nelson looks like the better bet.
Abraham is probably right, because Schoeneweis has an out on April 15, while Nelson's isn't until June. If Schoeneweis can't hold onto the job, they'll still have a chance to try Nelson later.
#24
Posted 01 April 2010 - 04:46 PM
Good point, and I was coming back to note that...but still, all accounts say he looked pretty damn bad up to that point.
#25
Posted 01 April 2010 - 04:46 PM
Not much to like about the way either pitcher is trending. Nelson's numbers look slightly better but that's only because Schoeneweis was flat out awful last season. Historically, Nelson has been the better strikeout pitcher, although his K/9 has come back to earth in the last few season. In addition to his poor K/0 ration, Schoenenweis' K/BB and BB/9 have been headed in the wrong direction for the past few years. Neither one had especially good years versus LHB last season but Nelson was a bit better.
For whatever reason, Extra Bases seems to think Schonenweis is the favorite to get the job. Based on everything I can glean from the numbers, and especially as bad as Schonenweis was last season, Nelson looks like the better bet.
I'd be of the mind that last season might be an outlier for Schoeneweis due to the death of his wife and his back and forth as a player. Based on that, he should be somewhere a bit below league average, but not as bad as his 09 numbers would suggest.
#26
Posted 02 April 2010 - 10:42 PM
#27
Posted 03 April 2010 - 05:16 AM
$$
And Tito didn't trust him the last couple of months of the season in "clutch" situations.
#28
Posted 10 April 2010 - 07:51 AM
Why is it that baseball teams have absolutely no use for a relief pitcher who can pitch in 2-3 games per week and shut down other teams for multiple innings? Bard proved his value in that role last year, and now that Francona trusts him he has a completely differentrole and workload, one that is as likely to ruin that great arm as it is to help the Red Sox actually win.
#29
Posted 10 April 2010 - 08:21 AM
Why is it that baseball teams have absolutely no use for a relief pitcher who can pitch in 2-3 games per week and shut down other teams for multiple innings? Bard proved his value in that role last year, and now that Francona trusts him he has a completely differentrole and workload, one that is as likely to ruin that great arm as it is to help the Red Sox actually win.
I don't know that baseball teams in general have no use for such a reliever--look at how the Yankees used Park the other night. I think Francona has decided that Bard and Okajima are the 7th/8th inning guys, though, and that means they each pitch one inning per outing. I don't know whether it's relevant that it seems like in previous years Francona frequently got burned when he tried to "steal" an extra inning with Delcarmen, Okajima, or the like. And of course, Papelbon lost it in his second inning in game 3 of the Yankees series just now.
#30
Posted 10 April 2010 - 08:28 AM
Who would you rather NOT have so we could have Saito at $7M? Scutaro? Papelbon? Cameron? Beltre?
Just curious.
#31
Posted 10 April 2010 - 08:32 AM
The pen is not going to be a force. I think we can all concede that. But it's also not going to be inept, at least not when the team puts it in some better spots.
I think they ultimately trade for an arm. Before then it might get someone like Buchholz for a stretch when Dice returns.
Ramirez and Delcarmen falling apart has been enormous.
#32
Posted 10 April 2010 - 08:39 AM
#33
Posted 10 April 2010 - 08:44 AM
Seriously, they played 1 game, had a day off, played 2 games, had a day off, played 1 game.
#34
Posted 10 April 2010 - 08:55 AM
#35
Posted 10 April 2010 - 09:15 AM
It seems like Francona has never really used a reliever that way, at least not regularly. I'm not sure if it's his style, or if it's some combination of 1, Sox starters generally going long enough where 1 or 2 guys for an inning each works, and 2, the bullpen not generally having a "multiple inning" guy. But that's the way it's worked out, and occasionally it burns him (in games that go 12+ and he's down to the last guy in the pen).
#36
Posted 10 April 2010 - 09:36 AM
Justin Masterson says hello.
That was exactly his role last year and in 08. When Francona has had a multiple inning guy he has used him in that capacity.
#37
Posted 10 April 2010 - 10:54 AM
That was exactly his role last year and in 08. When Francona has had a multiple inning guy he has used him in that capacity.
Tito turns every reliever into essentially a single-inning guy. Check the game logs on Masterson. About 70% of his relief appearances were for an inning or less.
This pen is going to be underwhelming to say the least if the big 3 {Papelbon, Bard, and Okajima} have significant rough patches this season.
Edited by Harry Hooper, 10 April 2010 - 10:59 AM.
#38
Posted 10 April 2010 - 10:54 AM
Gms
4 Bard
3 Okajima
2 Papelbon
2 Atchison
2 Schoeneweis
1 Delcarmen
1 Ramirez
#39
Posted 10 April 2010 - 12:12 PM
Just curious.
I thought he signed for 3.2?
#40
Posted 10 April 2010 - 12:48 PM
Just curious.
Yeah... first of all it was 3.2 mil for one year, phragle is correct.
Second of all, even if it was 7 million... they're the freaking Boston Red Sox. Crying poor over 7 mil seems pretty ridiculous when the team spends 150 mil or so every year on payroll.
#41
Posted 10 April 2010 - 12:51 PM
#42
Posted 10 April 2010 - 02:35 PM
Embree wants in, or out.
#43
Posted 10 April 2010 - 02:42 PM
Second of all, even if it was 7 million... they're the freaking Boston Red Sox. Crying poor over 7 mil seems pretty ridiculous when the team spends 150 mil or so every year on payroll.
Except for the Sox to pick up his option, it would have cost $7M. And once they declined his option, he was a FA. So maybe he could have come back for $4M or so.
Except it's not 150M, it's $180M. And while you would think that makes your point better, it doesnt. The Sox have done everything they can to stay under the luxury threshold this year. Even spending $4M on Saito would have most likely meant spending $4M less elsewhere.
For a guy who threw close to zero high leverage innings last year, we seem to be missing him an awful lot.
#44
Posted 10 April 2010 - 08:06 PM
From Cot's:
* signed by Boston as a free agent 1/10/09
* 09:$1.5M, 10: club option for price of 2009 earnings
* 2009 salary increases to $2.5M if Saito is on active 25-man roster on Opening Day 2009
* if club does not exercise 2010 option, player will be released
* 2009 performance bonuses: $0.5M each for 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 games
* 2009 roster bonuses based on days on active 25-man roster (not DL): $0.5M each for 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 days
* 2010 performance and roster bonuses: any unearned 2009 bonuses
$2.5M + $1.0M (56 games) + $2.5M (150+ days on active roster) = $6.0M in 2009 earnings
Based on this, it appears everyone is off and the option was worth $6 million, with the potential to be worth $7.5M if he pitched in 70 games in 2010...if I'm understanding the final line correctly.
#45
Posted 11 April 2010 - 04:21 PM
4/09: 5.00
5/09: 4.82
6/09: 4.69
7/09: 4.33
8/09: 6.25
9/09: 5.18
4/10: 9.25 (not including today's suckfest).
The only reason he was remotely good last year in April and May was because he had a sub .200 BABIP for the first three months of the season. Once that normalized, he's been pretty worthless ever since.
#46
Posted 11 April 2010 - 06:40 PM
4/09: 5.00
5/09: 4.82
6/09: 4.69
7/09: 4.33
8/09: 6.25
9/09: 5.18
4/10: 9.25 (not including today's suckfest).
The only reason he was remotely good last year in April and May was because he had a sub .200 BABIP for the first three months of the season. Once that normalized, he's been pretty worthless ever since.
And at the end of the season Delcarmen's xFIP was even higher 5.09 (RR) to 5.32 (MDC)
The reason I'm not losing sleep at night is that we have a lot of replacements.
Just off the top:
Matsuzaka/Wakefield
Bonser
Richardson
Embree
Nelson
Bowden
Cabrera
Ramon A. Ramirez
#47
Posted 11 April 2010 - 10:47 PM
Just off the top:
Bonser
Richardson
Embree
Nelson
Bowden
Cabrera
Ramon A. Ramirez
#48
Posted 11 April 2010 - 11:16 PM
Just off the top:
Bonser
Richardson
Embree
Nelson
Bowden
Cabrera
Ramon A. Ramirez
If you're so worried I'd imagine you have a plan. Why don't you enlighten us?
#49
Posted 11 April 2010 - 11:21 PM
4/09: 5.00
5/09: 4.82
6/09: 4.69
7/09: 4.33
8/09: 6.25
9/09: 5.18
4/10: 9.25 (not including today's suckfest).
The only reason he was remotely good last year in April and May was because he had a sub .200 BABIP for the first three months of the season. Once that normalized, he's been pretty worthless ever since.
At what point do you say the Ramirez-Farrell relationship just isn't generating results and trade this guy for somebody else's relief enigma?
#50
Posted 12 April 2010 - 12:48 AM
Just off the top:
Bonser
Richardson
Embree
Nelson
Bowden
Cabrera
Ramon A. Ramirez
The bullpen depth is certainly weaker than last year, but I have high hopes for Richardson as a LOOGY+, specifically a lefty for three outs L-R-L guy. His velocity and stuff both look pretty good for a left-handed reliever, and his sinker may give him double-play potential. I also think that Bowden's excellent control could make him an effective lower-echelon reliever. If Ramirez or Little Manny goes on the DL with a tired arm, I don't see the first line of replacements as being a big step down.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked








