Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Oakland Raiders: Keepers of Our Pick
#51
Posted 24 April 2010 - 01:43 PM
#53
Posted 27 April 2010 - 04:43 PM
#54
Posted 27 April 2010 - 05:28 PM
#55
Posted 27 April 2010 - 09:09 PM
#56
Posted 27 April 2010 - 11:15 PM
#57
Posted 29 April 2010 - 02:21 AM
Also, while no o-line looks good in a compilation video of strip-sacks, theirs did look particularly bad there... Godspeed Campbell.
Pro Football Focus confirms it - the worst pass blocking o-line in the NFL. Only Arizona is close.
They think generally that JaMarcus was only the 6th worst player on the offense last year. Three different offensive linemen, and two wide receivers did more to hinder the cause.
Edited by bowiac, 29 April 2010 - 02:25 AM.
#58
Posted 29 April 2010 - 05:55 PM
#59
Posted 29 April 2010 - 06:07 PM
Edited by Needlenose's Pole, 29 April 2010 - 06:07 PM.
#60
Posted 29 April 2010 - 08:23 PM
#61
Posted 01 May 2010 - 09:38 PM
Looks like a good ol' fashioned QB competition in OAK. It would be great for JMR to do just enough to earn a few starts.
#62
Posted 06 May 2010 - 03:02 PM
Carve the bust: Raiders announced they have released QB JaMarcus Russell.
#63
Posted 06 May 2010 - 04:02 PM
Hey, a guy can dream!
#64
Posted 06 May 2010 - 04:56 PM
Emtman played three more seasons for Miami and Washington. It remains to be seen whether any team will give Russell another shot.
#65
Posted 06 May 2010 - 05:10 PM
#66
Posted 06 May 2010 - 05:28 PM
#67
Posted 06 May 2010 - 07:07 PM
Can you be "done" if you never really started?
#68
Posted 06 May 2010 - 09:41 PM
To answer your question with a question, can he prove to any team that he actually cares enough to deserve a 2nd chance? This isnt Andre Ware or Tim Couch where another team thinks 'maybe that wasnt the right' fill in the blank, the main issue with Jamarcus is effort at this point.
#70
Posted 28 May 2010 - 12:39 PM
#71
Posted 28 May 2010 - 01:48 PM
I dont like seeing Russell steal 36M from an NFL team, but the rules are the rules and signing bonuses are guaranteed. I fully support a much tighter rookie cap to stop this stuff, but what Oakland is doing has no chance to work. I wish the Celtics could sue Rasheed for a lack of effort, but it would be pointless like this.
#72
Posted 13 June 2010 - 01:09 AM
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=5276220
Also, I have heard they are taking a serious look at Flozell Adams.
#73
Posted 13 June 2010 - 09:54 AM
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=5276220
Also, I have heard they are taking a serious look at Flozell Adams.
9-7 here we come.
#74
Posted 19 June 2010 - 04:14 PM
http://sports.espn.g...tory?id=5305785
#75
Posted 19 June 2010 - 07:11 PM
Edited by since67, 19 June 2010 - 07:12 PM.
#76
Posted 30 August 2010 - 08:29 AM
http://www.ibabuzz.c...l-bush-updates/– Quarterback Jason Campbell has a right wrist injury that is more significant at this point than his stinger. It happened on the series previous to the one in which he was injured. He’s had an MRI and X-rays and Cable said it will be evaluated this week.
– Running back Michael Bush will have a “procdure” on his fractured left thumb but wont’ necessarily miss the opener. Cable said Bush would be “protected” but not with a cast.
#77
Posted 13 September 2010 - 07:50 AM
#78
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:23 AM
I don't think #1 overall is out of the question.
#79
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:26 AM
#80
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:32 AM
He actually looked better than the team, though.
#81
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:32 AM
The "Committment To Excellence" on draft day will be fun to watch this season.
I don't think #1 overall is out of the question.
They're still in the AFC West so they should be able to win a few games.
Now if we're really lucky we get the #1 pick, one of the quarterback prospects like Luck or Locker cements his position as super, must draft quarterback, and we turn the pick around for even more talent.
#82
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:32 AM
Al Davis looked near death in his wheelchair yesterday. I mean he literally looked like he was going to die. Did anyone else see that shot of him during the game??
Edited by timlinin8th, 13 September 2010 - 08:33 AM.
#83
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:34 AM
Live long and prosper
#84
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:37 AM
#85
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:41 AM
They're still in the AFC West so they should be able to win a few games.
Now if we're really lucky we get the #1 pick, one of the quarterback prospects like Luck or Locker cements his position as super, must draft quarterback, and we turn the pick around for even more talent.
I would also settle for getting the #3 or #4 pick, drafting Robert Quinn out of UNC, and turning him into a fucking wrecking ball as a 3-4 OLB.
#86
Posted 13 September 2010 - 08:50 AM
I would also settle for getting the #3 or #4 pick, drafting Robert Quinn out of UNC, and turning him into a fucking wrecking ball as a 3-4 OLB.
Quinn would be ideal. I love the idea of adding a stud to the front seven with the Raiders pick. Marcell Dareus of Alabama would be a great addition for the defensive line. Cameron Heyward might be a good mcginest type although he seems (interception this weekend aside) like he might not be quick enough to drop into coverage. There are a few wideouts who look scary although I'd rather try to draft wideouts in round two or three than high in round one.
#87
Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:01 AM
#88
Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:11 AM
4-5 wins maybe?
#89
Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:22 AM
#90
Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:24 AM
#91
Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:41 AM
Upside is 7 wins imo. We need to see more but, make no mistake, they lost to a legit SB contender yesterday. They also play the Chiefs and Broncos twice and the entire NFC West.
I agree with 7 wins. The Broncos suck, the Chiefs suck, they could potentially steal one against a Chargers team that is significantly worse than last year, and they also play against the NFC West. The plausible range is probably 3-7 wins.
In the last few years, a 7-9 record has generally landed a pick somewhere between 9-13. Going 3-13 is pretty much guaranteed Top 2-3.
#92
Posted 13 September 2010 - 10:52 AM
A top five pick sets the Pats up for Adrian Clayborn out of Iowa. They need an injection of youth at DE and Clayborn had the size and motor of a young Richard Seymour. Me wants.
He's only listed at 285. If he could get his weight up to 300 and maintain speed, I'd be pretty psyched.
Hard for me to see the Raiders as more than a four win team. They were lucky to be as good as 5-11 last year (30th in DVOA, 31st in pythagorean wins), they were reasonably healthy, and it's going to be very hard for Cable to keep the team going hard in his third year as a coach (this isn't a statistical observations, but it seams that if things are going poorly in years one and two, they go completely pear shaped in year three).
#93
Posted 13 September 2010 - 11:38 AM
#94
Posted 13 September 2010 - 12:33 PM
#95
Posted 13 September 2010 - 12:47 PM
I mean, now that Jamarcus is gone, the Raiders could easily win 8 or 9. Not that I think they will, but fwiw the Vegas O/U was 6 with a lot more juice on the over. They didn't help their cause (or inspire much promise) losing to Tennessee, but you never know in the NFL.
Campbell is an upgrade, but they could have Peyton Manning stand back there and they wouldn't be able to score. That o-line has to be the worst in the NFL. Campbell spent most of the game running for his life. In fact, I'd be very surprised if he makes it 16 games. The ball gets snapped and there are 2 D-linemen in the backfield. Unless that changes, I see the raiders as a 4 win team, even though their schedule is very easy. Remember, while many of those AFC/NFC west teams are sub-par, I bet they all have the Raider's games circled on their schedules as a great chance for a win.
#96
Posted 13 September 2010 - 12:51 PM
Wk Date Game
2 Sep 19 STL @ OAK
3 Sep 26 OAK @ ARI
4 Oct 03 HOU @ OAK
5 Oct 10 SD @ OAK
6 Oct 17 OAK @ SF
7 Oct 24 OAK @ DEN
8 Oct 31 SEA @ OAK
9 Nov 07 KC @ OAK
10 Bye
11 Nov 21 OAK @ PIT
12 Nov 28 MIA @ OAK
13 Dec 05 OAK @ SD
14 Dec 12 OAK @ JAC
15 Dec 19 DEN @ OAK
16 Dec 26 IND @ OAK
17 Jan 02 OAK @ KC
Winnable games (8): Rams, Chiefs (2), Seahawks, Broncos (home), Jaguars, Dolphins, Cardinals
Not-winnable games (7): Chargers (2), Colts, Steelers, Texans, 49ers, Broncos (away)
#97
Posted 13 September 2010 - 12:58 PM
#98
Posted 13 September 2010 - 01:04 PM
The Dolphins doesn't seem winnable to me. That team has talent and good coaching. I understand it's a home game, but I Dolphins are much better. The Seahawks game seems winnable only with an debilitated Hasselback. The ceiling to me seems more 6 wins like last year rather than anything above that.
Jason Campbell is overrated. He could be competent with a staff that would draw up suitable plays, but I don't trust this staff.
#99
Posted 13 September 2010 - 01:14 PM
Looks like an L.A. Raiders jacket. Maybe stolen off the corpse of Easy-E.
#100
Posted 13 September 2010 - 02:55 PM
is that little brittle?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked






