Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Figure Skating
#1
Posted 24 December 2009 - 07:37 AM
#2
Posted 25 January 2010 - 11:55 PM
Well, just got through the US figure skating championship, and Rachel Flatt was pretty impressive in breaking 200 pts combined, first for US women. She's technically solid, artistically mature (if not spectacular), and is pretty unfazed in big competitions.
The real story was the rise of the young 16 year old Mirai Nagasu, who made a bit of news back in Korea with her playful comment to "blow away" Yuna Kim at the Olympics (hey, if folks think Boston sports writers overreact - Korean figure coverage rivals daytime soap writers in their ability to create fake controversies.)
I thought Cohen did really well for someone who's been out of competition this long, but it was pretty clear she needed to enter a few more competition before this event. She still had her grace and the charming smile though.
As far as a US medal? Absolutely - it being Vancouver, the support will be there, and Flatt rarely makes mistakes. She also beat Yuna Kim at the Skate America last year.
However, if Asada Mao can land her triples -- which is a BIG if -- she will compete Kim for the gold. And unless both Kim and Mao make major mistakes, I think the best Flatt can place is 3rd.
US figures is in a bit of a drought, without a big charismatic star. I think Nagasu could be that skater, but her time is in 2014 Winters not now.
#3
Posted 25 January 2010 - 11:59 PM
As far as short track is concerned, that's a sport that would be better followed over a whole season, like baseball - I don't really think this sport (or really any sport) is suited to the "one big race" mentality that the Olympic brand Games are about. I do appreciate how Korea has embraced short track. It is certainly the most commercially under-exploited sports there is, and unbelievably fun to watch.
I would however, warn the fans of Korea, that their nemisis Ohno isn't quite finished yet - and that they say that J.R. Celski is even better...
Celski has to be the favorites in a number of short track events. I like his aggressiveness and the burst. Ohno will be forever hated in South Korea, our own version of ARod, and I will be rooting hard for all other US events except for short track and figures.
#4
Posted 26 January 2010 - 08:55 AM
#5
Posted 27 January 2010 - 06:13 PM
#6
Posted 27 January 2010 - 06:30 PM
I'm stoked.
#7
Posted 27 January 2010 - 09:43 PM
I can't believe this thread has gotten this far without this:


#8
Posted 27 January 2010 - 10:16 PM
Guess not. Not a big fan of the sport, but I think you answered my question. So the world record referred to is for highest points scored?
#9
Posted 28 January 2010 - 10:26 AM
#10
Posted 28 January 2010 - 04:32 PM
#11
Posted 28 January 2010 - 06:05 PM
I'm sure this belongs in the Olympic Hockey thread when it gets started - but I can't think of many teams in sports history under more pressure than the Canadian men's ice hockey team for the 2010 Olympic Winter Games.
There's ALWAYS pressure on the Canada team, since the NHL players began playing - nothing short of the Olympic Championship is acceptable to the Canadian media and the Canadian fans...and they have to overcome a very poor showing in 2006.
And they're at home. Home field isn't always an advantage.
I do also know this - I hope the NHL is able to extend this set-up to Sochi. I think an Ovechkin led Russian team playing at home will be an interesting thing.
#12
Posted 10 February 2010 - 05:24 AM
http://video.nytimes.../...0kim&st=cse
SI also picks her to win the gold as the overwhelming favorite. But Mao just won the last Continentals by landing both of her triples - for the first time in 5 tournaments. This being figure skating, nothing will be guaranteed.
#14
Posted 13 February 2010 - 01:58 PM
That is superb. Thanks for posting it. Another obstacle may stand in Kim's way however, a judge (Miriam Overweller) who has consistently downgraded her jumps is the official technical panel in the women's, often alone in the panel of other judges
Here's the YouTube video that not only does a fantastic job explaining the power of Kim's jumps, but also hints at the controversy:
<youtube>Pmi51qXzOUg&hl</youtube>
Of course, figure skating's judging has always been controversy, with the Russian gold over Canada in 2002 (Wikipedia covers it here), as well as the skating article on Slate.com:
http://www.slate.com/id/2244277/
How does relate to 2010 Women's competition? Overweller's an old time mentor/student of Junko Hiramatsu, a long-time Japanese coach. It's also worth noting that Japan is the world's biggest sponsor of figure skating, and there are just as much heresays and rumors about their corporate influence as there were during the former Soviet Union's "block" voting heyday.
#15
Posted 15 February 2010 - 12:30 PM
Needless to say, he's incredibly proud and incredibly exhausted.
#16
Posted 18 February 2010 - 12:24 PM
What Lysacek is going to have to hope for is Plushenko to 1) fall on the quad and 2) have it downgraded to a triple by failing to complete the revolutions. Lysacek will have a definite edge in prorgam components and spins and footwork, but he'll need some help to get gold. Likewise for Takahashi.
Johnny Weir, along with Oda, Lambiel, and Chan have almost no shot, and will need to be perfect to medal, along with the aforementioned help.
#17
Posted 18 February 2010 - 08:38 PM
PS: just now, in their preview, NBC used video of another J skater (Kozuka Takahiko) as they talked about Takahashi. SO LAME.
Edited by mpjc, 18 February 2010 - 08:44 PM.
#18
Posted 18 February 2010 - 09:19 PM
#19
Posted 19 February 2010 - 12:42 AM
| Planned Elements | Executed Elements | Base Value | GOE | Score | Planned Elements | Executed Elements | Base Value | GOE | Score | |
| Triple Lutz + Triple Toeloop | Triple Lutz + Triple Toeloop | 10 | 1.4 | 11.4 | Quad. Toeloop + Triple Toeloop + Double Loop | Quad. Toeloop + Triple Toeloop | 13.8 | 0.8 | 14.6 | |
| Triple Axel + Double Toeloop | Triple Axel + Double Toeloop | 10.45 | -0.56 | 9.89 | Triple Axel + Double Toeloop | Triple Axel + Double Toeloop | 9.5 | 1 | 10.5 | |
| Triple Flip + Double Toeloop + Double Loop | Triple Flip + Double Toeloop + Double Loop | 9.13 | -0.4 | 8.73 | Triple Lutz + Double Toeloop | Triple Lutz + Double Toeloop | 8.03 | 0 | 8.03 | |
| Triple Axel | Triple Axel | 8.2 | 0.6 | 8.8 | Triple Axel | Triple Axel | 8.2 | -0.36 | 7.84 | |
| Triple Lutz | Triple Lutz | 6.6 | 1.4 | 8 | Triple Lutz | Triple Lutz | 6 | 0.6 | 6.6 | |
| Triple Salchow | Triple Salchow | 4.5 | 1 | 5.5 | Triple Salchow | Triple Salchow | 4.95 | 0.8 | 5.75 | |
| Triple Loop | Triple Loop | 5.5 | 1 | 6.5 | Triple Loop | Triple Loop | 5 | 0.6 | 5.6 | |
| Double Axel | Double Axel | 3.85 | 0.8 | 4.65 | Double Axel | Double Axel | 3.85 | 1 | 4.85 | |
| Straight Line Step Sequence | Straight Line Step Sequence 3 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 4.2 | Straight Line Step Sequence | Straight Line Step Sequence 3 | 3.3 | 1 | 4.3 | |
| Change Foot Combination Spin | Change Foot Combination Spin 4 | 3.5 | 1 | 4.5 | Change Foot Combination Spin | Change Foot Combination Spin 4 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 4.1 | |
| Circular Step Sequence | Circular Step Sequence 4 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 5.1 | Circular Step Sequence | Circular Step Sequence 3 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 4.1 | |
| Fly. Change Foot Sit Spin | Fly. Change Foot Sit Spin 4 | 3 | 0.5 | 3.5 | Change Foot Sit Spin | Change Foot Sit Spin 4 | 3 | 0.7 | 3.7 | |
| Flying Sit Spin | Flying Sit Spin 4 | 3 | 0.8 | 3.8 | Flying Sit Spin | Flying Sit Spin 3 | 2.6 | 0.14 | 2.74 | |
| Totals Executed Elements | 74.93 | 84.57 | Totals Executed Elements | 75.03 | 82.71 |
They TIED in program components, the presentation scores. Plushenko has a 0.3 point edge in jumps, which was where he was supposed to lap the field. However, Lysacek beats him 21.10 to 18.94 in the non-jump elements.
You heard right: Lysacek won because of his superior spins and footwork, something that never would have happened in the old scoring system, when spins and footwork were basically considered presentation.
Also, note that the base value of the executed elements is slightly higher for Plushenko than Lysacek: 75.03 vs. 74.93. Lysacek simply executed his elements better. And visually speaking, Plushenko looked sloppy; Lysacek polished.
Despite the bigger and more spectacular jumps, Plushenko did not execute them particularly well. Guess what, bitch? You had a 3.2 point lead on Lysacek after your quad/triple combo, but you gave up 4.5 points the rest of the way because you couldn't do anything else.
Edited by Fratboy, 19 February 2010 - 12:51 AM.
#20
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:06 AM
The Night They Killed Figure Skating
Plushenko had a great performance. His footwork was great and maybe his spins weren’t quite as good as Lysacek’s, but it wasn’t that big of a difference. He also had a quad toe triple toe that wasn’t even attempted by anyone else. He did both triple axels, so all the jumps were there.
But the judges’ scoring was ridiculous.
Because of it, the sport took a step backward. Brian Boitano did the same thing, technically, in 1988. There are junior skaters who can skate that same program.
In what other sports do you have to hold back in order to win?
The International Skating Union has taken the risk out of figure skating and it makes me sick.
If Plushenko had made some mistakes, then sure, maybe Lysacek deserves gold. But when you take the risk out of skaters’ programs, it doesn’t compute to me.
And it’s not a personal thing. I like Evan. But when you compare performances and have an outcome like this, the sport is going backward. And it hurts me to say it because I love this sport. But the judges made a mockery of it by giving Lysacek the gold.
#21
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:14 AM
Will Brooke reveal her deep, dark secret to Emma and Madison - or will she risk everything to be with her soulmate, Thane?
#22
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:25 AM
I love these two passages:
Stojko is really looking to have it both ways. Lysacek's jumps were executed better than Plushenko's - a casual observer would note nearly all of Plushenko's jumps had wonky landings.
But what Weir was hammered for was not his jumps, but for his presentation. It's almost as if he didn't look at the protocols. But in his mind, he didn't have to, because he's been there, and because the Code of Points shouldn't exist. And he freely admits to having no idea how to fix it, but just knows what's happened isn't "right." Whatever.
The irony is that Lysacek's technically superior to Weir, and Stojko appeared to favor Weir over Lysacek, despite not explicitly saying so.
#23
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:29 AM
#24
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:34 AM
Here's a snippet from today's NYT story on the event:
#25
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:35 AM
Yup, trying the quad and completely blowing it is better than trying something slightly less difficult and executing it perfectly. Sure...
#26
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:54 AM
Think of this logic applied to slalom skiing. You miss a gate but get a pass for it precisely because you tried to cut it too close.
That aside I don't completely blame Plushenko for such a comment, inasmuch as it suggests to me that the International Soap Opera Federation or whatever hasn't done something it could very easily do, which is to state unequivocally: "only executed tricks will be scored. No credit will be given for attempt 1) in satisfaction of a requirement, 2) as or in the context of artistic merit, or 3) as or in any sort of bonus scoring. That is the rule, period. Deal with it." I don't follow this sport but it seems to me that that is an easy thing to at least declare. Has the ISOF not done so? If not, is that because they are too weak or because they secretly want the nonsense to continue? Or if they have, have the monkeys simply thrown so much feces since as to have taken over most of the zoo?
#27
Posted 19 February 2010 - 11:12 AM
That aside I don't completely blame Plushenko for such a comment, inasmuch as it suggests to me that the International Soap Opera Federation or whatever hasn't done something it could very easily do, which is to state unequivocally: "only executed tricks will be scored. No credit will be given for attempt 1) in satisfaction of a requirement, 2) as or in the context of artistic merit, or 3) as or in any sort of bonus scoring. That is the rule, period. Deal with it." I don't follow this sport but it seems to me that that is an easy thing to at least declare. Has the ISOF not done so? If not, is that because they are too weak or because they secretly want the nonsense to continue? Or if they have, have the monkeys simply thrown so much feces since as to have taken over most of the zoo?
It all depends on how you define "executed trick." There are three facets to a jump, for example: the takeoff, rotation, and landing. Everyone succeeds at the takeoff. The rotation can be an issue, because jumps can be over- and under-rotated. And obviously, on the landing, you can be clean, wonky, two-footed, "fall out" without touching the ice, or fall.
There are multiple ways of assessing success, and multiple ways of assessing varying degrees of failure, and this attempts to reconcile them and allow for the permutations. Practically, though, you can't judge this way because you'll hamper the sport technically. Were this the case, the quad would be dead, and the only real difference between men and women would be the triple axel.
#28
Posted 19 February 2010 - 01:40 PM
He lost not in presentation or footwork and spins, but because of poor execution of his elements. Here are his Grades of Execution on his jumps: 0.8, -0.36, 1.0, 0.6, 0.6, 0.0, .8 and 1.0. Here's Lysacek's GOE: 1.4, 0.6, 1.0, -0.56, 1.0, -0.4, 1.4, 0.8. The difference? 1.6 points in Lysacek's favor. The margin of victory? 1.31 points. If Mullet Man had strong, confident landings on his jumps instead of what we got, he would be the winner.
As for the quad being "the future" of the sport: I went through the master sheets and looked at all the scores. Only three skaters performed a quad without being downgraded (usually significantly, by -4 or more). Yes, it likely is the future of the sport, but we're not even close to being to a point where it is something that is necessary to win. There are not enough skaters who can consistently land it cleanly.
I don't think skaters are ignoring the quad and I am sure every one of them is trying to perfect it in practice. Many of the skaters last night are capable of it, but didn't make the attempt because it was too risky. Eventually I think there will be a lot of skaters who can land it consistently. But for now, one of the things I do like about the Code of Points is that it rewards for the myriad other difficult things in figure skating. I think there needs to be some sanity sometimes in how those other things are rewarded, but figure skating shouldn't turn into a jumping competition with a few other elements thrown in as an afterthought.
#29
Posted 19 February 2010 - 03:01 PM
Pain in foot forces Lysacek to scrap quad for Olympics
The defending world champion has ruled out the quadruple toe loop, a four-rotation jump that’s typically worth big points given its high risk and high level of difficulty, because of lingering pain from a stress fracture he suffered last year in his left foot.
#30
Posted 19 February 2010 - 04:53 PM
Plushenko questions judging
He says he was the only leading competitor to land a quadruple jump, and therefore should have secured first place.
It's a bit sad that one of the best skaters in the sport doesn't actually understand the sport. Plushenko's idea of figure skating is just a jumping shootout - do quads until you fall, the person that does the most wins. What a moron.
#31
Posted 19 February 2010 - 05:42 PM
#32
Posted 19 February 2010 - 07:30 PM
There's no doubt in my mind he would have won in a 6.0 system, but that hasn't been around for 5 years. Ironically, the new scoring system helped him more than any other man (it arguably helped Sasha Cohen more than any other woman), and only now, when he fails to execute, does he rail against it.
#33
Posted 19 February 2010 - 08:35 PM
Smart to the 2344598th power. He couldn't have handled it better, IMO. That loud ringing sound you all heard was a few hundred potential sponsors calling simultaneously.
#34
Posted 19 February 2010 - 08:41 PM
.... between (men and Midori Ito) and women ...
#35
Posted 19 February 2010 - 08:42 PM
Smart to the 2344598th power. He couldn't have handled it better, IMO. That loud ringing sound you all heard was a few hundred potential sponsors calling simultaneously.
Agreed. Lysacek was humble and genuine. Hard not to like the guy. Good for him.
#36
Posted 19 February 2010 - 08:47 PM
Edited by SoxScout, 19 February 2010 - 08:55 PM.
#37
Posted 19 February 2010 - 10:13 PM
#38
Posted 20 February 2010 - 02:22 AM
#39
Posted 20 February 2010 - 07:46 PM
The result in the men's was certainly right. We'll see on Sunday and Monday how they do with the dancing, which for me, seems to be the most corrupt judging-wise. Let's see how much movement there is.
To go back to what I talked about in the live thread: Within the last 20 years, there was a ladies world champion who didn't even ATTEMPT a combination: Oksana Baiul in 1993.
Now compare with Surya Bonaly, same competition:
There is absolutely zero question in my mind whatsoever that Surya Bonaly was jobbed, as was Nancy Kerrigan at the Olympics the next year. Oksana didn't attempt a single combination, and Bonaly attempted, and landed cleanly, two. I don't think the differences in spins and footwork (does Oksana even have a step sequence?) even come close to how much Bonaly pwn3d her in the jump elements. And the choreography for Bonaly did not suck as much as was reputed. Oksana just kinda moves and poses and shit, but Bonaly skates.
You can make an argument for Bonaly over Yuka Sato the next year, as she had some shaky landings, but they were much much closer and Baiul and Bonaly.
I believe Paul Wylie got jobbed in the 1992 Olympics as well. He lacked a combination (his "combinations" were sequences), but they were all clean, and Petrenko had four shaky landings, include a fall-out (not a fall, but a fall-out) on a triple axel, I believe. Zero question in mind Wylie should have won that free skate.
#40
Posted 20 February 2010 - 11:55 PM
If you remeber, after Bonaly got robbed there were heated charges of racism and it got really ugly for a while. Not a good moment in figure skating history (and that's not easy to do.)
I like the scoring system, and prevents less of these pure chicanery. However, I can see how it can be confusing for pretty much everyone but the hard-core fans.
I have to say that this Olympic's men's brought me back as a fan, and truly enjoyed Lysacek's performances on and off the rink. And it's good for the sport that he won the gold w/o a quad.
I thought Weir's exchanges with his coach in Russian, as this was his last Olympics for sure, were also touching.
#41
Posted 21 February 2010 - 01:15 AM
Fratboy, do you actually enjoy/respect ice dancing? As our resident figure skating expert, I am curious what you feel about it. I think it's terribly boring and a mockery to real figure skaters. Please correct me if I am wrong, which I may be, but I can't get over the fact that they all have to perform the same routine in the compulsory.
#42
Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:56 PM
You can argue that the jumps aren't real skating - they're tricks - and that spins and footwork are more expressive of what skating really is about. In that sense, with footwork, edging, choreography, and expression, dance may actually be considered the purest form of skating. It's not going to wow you with jumps, but it's intricate, and certainly more difficult than it appears.
#43
Posted 22 February 2010 - 09:36 PM
You can argue that the jumps aren't real skating - they're tricks - and that spins and footwork are more expressive of what skating really is about. In that sense, with footwork, edging, choreography, and expression, dance may actually be considered the purest form of skating. It's not going to wow you with jumps, but it's intricate, and certainly more difficult than it appears.
Indeed. The fact that Lysacek won the gold bodes well for Yuna Kim, as she's a more polished, complete, and graceful skater than any of her competitors. Early news out of Kim's (secretive and well-guarded -- and off athlete's campus) camp is that she's been relaxed and fluid in her early practices.
#44
Posted 22 February 2010 - 10:30 PM
If you have a Liukin video, please share.
Edited by Hendu's Gait, 23 February 2010 - 12:07 AM.
#45
Posted 22 February 2010 - 10:47 PM
http://sports.media....0...g&nil_id=10
#46
Posted 23 February 2010 - 12:04 AM
Belbin and Agosto were robbed.
The use of the ropes to assist the Russians in their lifts and moves was an abomination. B/A and D/S score the SAME on their elements, and D/S soundly beat them on program components, i.e., the artistic.
There is NO FUCKING WAY they should have won the elements. Their twizzles were sloppy, and the program was simply not put together well. Frankly, I hated it.
I wasn't thrilled with B/A's program either. It lacked passion and tempo, and they had mistakes too, but their program was much cleaner than D/S's, enough to the point they should have gotten the bronze.
Ice Dancing judging is the absolute worst.
That said, they got the Gold and Silver medals correct. V/M and D/W were miles ahead of everybody else. D/W are future OGM winners, and good for the Canadians.
#47
Posted 23 February 2010 - 12:07 AM
Frat, did B/A drop them or did MZ/IS drop B/A? Who dropped who?
#48
Posted 23 February 2010 - 12:08 AM
#49
Posted 23 February 2010 - 12:21 AM
Frat, did B/A drop them or did MZ/IS drop B/A? Who dropped who?
From what I read, B/A dropped them. Belbin/Agosto, Virtue/Moir, and Davis/White all used to train at the same club in Michigan. I'm unsure what led to them making the change, but they lost something this season. They've been extremely vibrant in the past, but looked shockingly dull at Nationals and now, the Olympics. I think they made a mistake.
#50
Posted 23 February 2010 - 03:04 AM
The Russians should have lost for the horrible hair/facial hair on the dude alone, but the costuming issues were a huge problem. The Aussie dance was fucked up, and the ropes in the free skate are really straining the rules of fairness in the sport. Politics, though... I think B&A knew that they had almost no chance to medal unless one of the other two North American teams fucked up. I mean, they *lost* points to the Russians in the free skate, and the Russian program wasn't so much better that they deserved to gain on Belbin/Agosto. They looked disappointed in the results, but surprisingly good-natured.
Maybe B&A dropped the coaches because they, too, were more focused on the younger teams and B&A wanted someone who would be more devoted to them? I don't think it's too out of the question.
Ice Dancing is kinda fucked in scoring. I think Apolo Ohno and the chick from Dancing with the Stars should team up and train for the next Olympics. That would be interesting.













