Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Curling: Granite, ice and brooms
#101
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:20 PM
#102
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:22 PM
Are you not in front of a TV, because it's on USA network? If that is obviously, I'm sorry, just wanted to point that out. I don't know if it's available online, online feeds have been very tough to find.
#103
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:23 PM
http://www.nbcolympi...k united states
#104
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:33 PM
#105
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:35 PM
#106
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:35 PM
Thank you, and yes I am not currently able to access a television.
#107
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:35 PM
#108
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:36 PM
It is definitely possible. A lot of times the skip and vice are interchangeable in terms of the types of shots they throw.
And I'm aggressive in my strategy, so also would've gone for the shot for four, so I'm not going to fault him for that. Try to end the game right there if you can.
#109
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:36 PM
He got one and it needed to be at least two. It wasn't a disaster, but it wasn't great, either. There was no touch to that shot, he just chucked it down the ice.
#110
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:36 PM
#111
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:37 PM
#112
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:45 PM
Edit: It overcurled just a bit too much. And Denmark capitalizes.
Edited by mjm3773, 18 February 2010 - 02:48 PM.
#113
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:48 PM
Denmark's last shot is the type of shot you could never expect Shuster to make right now.
Edit - HE HIT A SHOT! Ok, now it's Denmark's chance to blow it. C'mon, miracle.
Edited by johnmd20, 18 February 2010 - 02:49 PM.
#114
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:49 PM
Which they make - and another extra end.
Edited by mjm3773, 18 February 2010 - 02:50 PM.
#115
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:49 PM
#116
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:50 PM
#117
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:50 PM
And they hit the shot and it goes to the 11th and sets Shuster up perfectly to miss the final shot. I'm already scared.
#118
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:51 PM
#119
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:57 PM
At least that's how I always play extra ends with hammer.
#120
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:57 PM
#121
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:58 PM
At least that's how I always play extra ends with hammer.
hell, I have no idea what I'm talking about and that seems obvious to me. I was shocked when they didn't do that yesterday. There's no color guy online though so all we get is the crowd and the teams chatter. It's kind of cool actually.
#122
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:00 PM
#123
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:02 PM
It seemed like, from what I saw of the other extra ends, they were playing as if they didn't have hammer, just protecting what they had instead of setting things up best for them. The proverbial playing not to lose instead of playing to win.
#124
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:02 PM
#125
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:03 PM
that's sure what it looked like to my untrained eyes. Why leave any rocks around that can get in the way of things? Silly.
#126
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:03 PM
Napkin: "NO!"
#127
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:05 PM
#128
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:06 PM
Man, this final shot is going to be a straight bank shot. If he misses this one, you definitely have to bench him.
#129
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:06 PM
#130
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:07 PM
#131
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:07 PM
#132
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:07 PM
#133
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:08 PM
Holy crap, holy crap, holy crap, I cannot believe it. That was a shot I could hit and I've never curled. They have to take him out but who cares now because it's too late?
#134
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:08 PM
The benefit of that as well - is that it would've eliminated the possibility of a jam - which is exactly what happenned.
#135
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:08 PM
unfuckingreal.
0-4 with winning shots. They should be 3-1 and sitting prime right now.
#136
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:08 PM
#137
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:08 PM
Except for the fact that in the biggest moments Schilling was dominating and Shuster shits the bed every single time.
#138
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:08 PM
Thank god for hockey.
#139
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:09 PM
Thankfully, Schilling came through in the clutch.
#140
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:09 PM
clearly they should hire me
How does Shuster ever show his face at an event again?
#141
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:10 PM
You couldn't possibly conceive of a greater level of suck being televised live around the world. It's just impossible.
#142
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:10 PM
#143
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:10 PM
#144
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:10 PM
Do they actually have subs? Maybe not in a game, but in the tourney itself? Or is it these 4 guys, sink or swim?
#145
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:12 PM
He's Byung-Hyun Kim in 2001.
#146
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:15 PM
"Hi, may I speak to Jeff Gillooly please?"
#147
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:17 PM
How does Shuster ever show his face at an event again?
Because despite the choke job this week, he's still a good curler. He got by a number of talented teams, including his old team, former Olympic bronze medalists, just to get to this point.
Plus, although they have clearly played worse than expected, the US team wasn't considered medal favorites by any stretch of the imagination.
I figure this is just like his Byung-Hyun Kim moments in the 2001 World Series (edit: Johnmd beat me to the analogy). He'll rebound.
Edited by mjm3773, 18 February 2010 - 03:19 PM.
#148
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:19 PM
Well, technically, *they* have played fine, *he's* played like shit.
#149
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:30 PM
Shuster has come to be known as the biggest choke artist of the 2010 Winter Olympics, and is the lone reason the USA curling team has not won a single game this Olympics.
Upon John's pathetic performance at the 2010 games, he has decided to retire from the sport. And an hero.
Shuster said he draws inspiration from Bill Buckner, Brad Lidge, Scott Norwood, and the city of Cleveland.
He currently works as a quality control specialist for Toyota.
#150
Posted 18 February 2010 - 03:40 PM
Actually they all haven't played fine. Benton has played the best of all of them, but it's usually easier for a lead to have a higher percentage, and Smith has played okay, but Isaacson has had a really poor tournament so far as well. Coming into the Denmark game he was dead last in percentage amongst seconds.
If the rest of the team had been playing truly well, Shuster's job at the end of ends would be throwing up guards or having draws to score a 3rd or 4th point instead of making a draw to the button for just one.











