Maybe Costas feared the Roid Rage!
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
McGwire admits using steroids
#102
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:00 PM
I'm happy they are. Some of his answers were pretty pathetic in this interview. To say that there is no connection between his performance and his PED use is laughable.
#103
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:00 PM
And that is why MLBN is good, they aren't afraid to speak honestly about the tarnishing of the sport. Wouldn't happen on ESPN.
#105
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:03 PM
You're right. But we would get an awesome Stuart Scott hip-hop poetry ad-lib followed by Stan Verrett's "Freeze it! Frame it! THAT is your Canon image of the week!"
#106
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:06 PM
Let's cut to the Jabbawokies dancing live in studio to Rhianna's new hit single "punch my face!"
Edited by Ed Hillel, 11 January 2010 - 08:06 PM.
#107
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:10 PM
#108
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:12 PM
He agreed with Verducci and Rosenthal on their "PEDs obviously enhance performance" argument, and added something to the effect of "they make you stronger, you heal quicker, they made me feel faster ... they even have steroids that can improve your eyesight..."
#110
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:49 PM
Yup, and with regards to the HOF - he didn't have their votes before today and he definitely won't have it moving forward.
#111
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:50 PM
Totally. When was it that Fenway was chanting "STEROIDS!" at Canseco and he flexed his muscles in response? I'm remembering it as '88 or '89. It seemed a given even then that he was juicing, though I can't say I remember anyone else being a glaring suspect at the time, including McGwire.
#112
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:52 PM
Yup, that was the '88 ALCS.
#113
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:52 PM
Edited by Fred not Lynn, 11 January 2010 - 08:54 PM.
#114
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:12 PM
One has to wonder, however, how the public door-closing by these writers might affect any future admissions of PED use from potential candidates going forward. It would seemingly eliminate any chance we'll ever hear such a confession from someone who strongly desires HOF membership.
#115
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:40 PM
Is someone going to ask Bud why this admitted PED-using man will be allowed on a MLB payroll in 2010?
#116
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:43 PM
Someone mentioned up thread that MLB has banned anyone associated with PEDs from entering a club house.
Is that true and if so, then how is McGwire able to hold a hitting coach position?
#117
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:50 PM
What's the difference between him and ARod, Pettitte, et al, in terms of being on a payroll?
#118
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:53 PM
Is that true and if so, then how is McGwire able to hold a hitting coach position?
How can this possibly be true? Last I heard, ARod and Manny were still allowed in their clubhouses.
#119
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:53 PM
No speaka English!!!!
#120
Posted 11 January 2010 - 09:58 PM
I suspect the difference is McGwire consulted a competent attorney.
#121
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:00 PM
They were identified during via the results generated during the voluntary testing phase, which MLB could not use for punitive actions by agreement with the PA. Players identified by mandatory testing now in place are subject to punishment.
Edit: Manny got suspended for positive test results under mandatory testing.
Beyond that, the standard for MLB players is different from the one for minlor league players and team personnel/trainers/etc.
Edited by Harry Hooper, 11 January 2010 - 10:24 PM.
#122
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:04 PM
The big thing here is admitting guilt to steroid use. I got home expecting to read all sorts of details about what McGwire did. What was he taking? When was he taking it? But we get none of that.
If this were real guilt and these were real tears, wouldn't he be coming completely clean? Telling us what he did? Telling us the details of his usage? The real motivation behind it?
Instead, we get this BS "I took steriods to make me heal". Look, if the reason you are coming clean is because you've been living with this incredible guilt of being one of the world's biggest frauds for the last ten years, at least have the decency to make your apology real. Otherwise it's just lame.
#123
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:15 PM
One has to wonder, however, how the public door-closing by these writers might affect any future admissions of PED use from potential candidates going forward. It would seemingly eliminate any chance we'll ever hear such a confession from someone who strongly desires HOF membership
The thing is, for every somewhat informed Verducci, Rosenthal, or Gammons, how many voters do you think there are out there who are more than happy to let this thing slide now that he's simply admitted it? Before you answer, consider how they voted this year, and all the absurd incomprehensible votes that individuals have made over the years. Whether he gets in or not is very much up for debate (I still don't know where I stand on it. Push comes to shove I think he probably won't, but I don't know), but I don't think we should be taking this group of writers as representative of the overall group, when they are clearly at the top.
What I'm interested to see is how other steroids tainted players will react if McGwire has a big boost in his voting come next year. Say hypothetically he gets into the 40-50% range next year, and it's clear that the confession has helped him in the minds of voters. What does, say, a Sammy Sosa do in that situation? If he continues to deny it, his situation stays the same. If he comes out and admits it, it looks like the most cynical ploy imaginable just to get more votes because it worked for McGwire. That would be an interesting situation.
As a total aside, boy does Andy PettiTTe owe Roger Clemens a lot. He came out with the same basic oh I took it to heal, it only happened once or twice, boo hoo spiel, and because it was contrasted with the Amazing Neverending Roger Clemens Freakshow that was happening at the same time, people basically said it's ok Andy, we still love you. A very fortunate one, that Andy is
#124
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:33 PM
#125
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:40 PM
Edit - Didn't see above. Right, I agree.
Edited by Ed Hillel, 11 January 2010 - 10:40 PM.
#126
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:41 PM
You're surprised about a dumb decision made by the US Congress?
#127
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:58 PM
I don't vote because I don't think it makes a difference either way, but this just confirms it.
US Congress: EPIC FAIL
Can we make that a word association on this site?
#128
Posted 11 January 2010 - 10:59 PM
#129
Posted 11 January 2010 - 11:01 PM
The one thing I DO buy is that congress refused to grant immunity. I don't know if it's true or not and, yeah, that was dumb if it's true.
edit: I still watch pro sports, too. I love the competition and I want the athletes to be safe. That's why I want all of it to come out. It's better that some kid realizes that he can't hit 80 homers a year and spends time on the other parts of his game or, even better, other parts of his life (using MLB as an example).
Edited by accidentalsuccess, 11 January 2010 - 11:03 PM.
#130
Posted 12 January 2010 - 12:03 AM
Well, this was the same cast of characters who a few days earlier on MLB Network was singing the praises of Randy Johnson and describing him as a surefire HOFer without once questioning how it is that the best stretch of Johnson's career occurred after he turned 33 and how his career year came at age 38.
#131
Posted 12 January 2010 - 01:36 AM
In his defense...that's EXACTLY why you take steroids; To make you heal, faster, so you can work out again, sooner and more often.
#132
Posted 12 January 2010 - 03:00 AM
Bonds
Sosa
McGwire
Rodriguez
Palmeiro
Ramirez
3 others played in the steroid era but have not been implicated (but who knows whether they really did or did not use):
Grifffey
Thomas
Thome
This is complete long term disaster for baseball.
#133
Posted 12 January 2010 - 06:22 AM
#134
Posted 12 January 2010 - 06:31 AM
The dumb decision was to hold those hearings in the first place. Considering the issues our country was facing back then, it was ridiculous to see Congressmen grilling baseball players over drug use. It's entertainment - if they want to grill entertainers who use illegal drugs, they'd have a heck of a lot of people from various sports and industries in there!
I think Conseco made reference that there's at least one steroid user in the HOF. I suspect there is more than one.
Also, are steroids dramatically worse than cocaine? There are cocaine users in the HOF. Certainly cocaine could help performance. And certainly cocaine use is a worse message (in that it's a more readily available and illegally used drug) to send to kids.
#135
Posted 12 January 2010 - 07:18 AM
I have a tough time buying this. It just seems far too long after the fact, and comes off as a wayto say 'look, I'm really a good guy, I swear I would have admitted it, BUT...'
I have a tough time buying his fake tears too I think the only reason he's close to tears (if they are indeed real) is because he's admitting he's a fake, not because he actually feels bad about cheating the game.
Maybe I'm being overly cynical here, as it looks like a huge portion of the league was doing something to gain an edge, but I think all of this is a well crafted PR stunt in some lame attempt for Big Mac to regain his legacy and possibly get into the Hall.
#136
Posted 12 January 2010 - 07:21 AM
I've seen this statement on the site before. I vividly remember the '88 campaign and Greenwell's contention for the MVP against Canseco, as this year was during the peak of my childhood fanatacism with baseball.
The "steroid" chants for Canseco at Fenway began long before the playoffs. I remember Remy (and Montgomery?) kind of ignoring it, not quite being sure how to address the situation.
Bayko
#137
Posted 12 January 2010 - 08:08 AM
I wonder if Greenwell would be in the Hall today, had he used McGwire's roid recipe?
#138
Posted 12 January 2010 - 08:21 AM
So everything he did on a baseball field after 1993 was thanks to steroids and HGH.
He refuses to believe that the drugs he took enhanced his performance, but how can he deny that they werent performance extending drugs?
I wish Costas asked him that.
edit: 93, not 03
Edited by Guapos Toenails, 12 January 2010 - 01:50 PM.
#139
Posted 12 January 2010 - 08:35 AM
#140
Posted 12 January 2010 - 08:44 AM
Exactly. Even more annoying is the high and mighty stance taken by various ESPN personalities tsk-tsking about baseball while their employer studiously avoids upsetting its partners in the NFL, NCAA and major universities and virtually ignores the rampant PED usage in the NFL and college football.
#141
Posted 12 January 2010 - 09:17 AM
#142
Posted 12 January 2010 - 09:20 AM
I think McGwire came across as sincere, egotistical and somewhat ignorant. It's an interesting study in self-image. He was an elite hitter with or without, not on the level of Bonds but still an elite talent. His ego and self-confidence are so out of proportion he believes the incidental "enhancement" of the drugs are more or less tarnishing his legacy as an elite hitter, rather than augmenting or extending it. His shame seems based purely in what he lost in terms of personal legacy and if true, the entire concept of hiding it from everybody around him. He does seem to recognize he came across as an idiot during the hearings. I can accept his reasoning for doing as he did while there.
It renders as fiction however, the whole staging of the Maris honor and respect thing, the Sosa drama, hugging the kid at home plate, the needed resurgence of the game that year, that day. It confirms it all as a fabrication; a lie. The thing that makes me shake my head is while McGwire seems genuinely ashamed of all of it, through the lens of his ego he can't see the reason clearly, the cause and effect. Maybe that's part of the mindset required to be an elite hitter. The greatness in the mirror can never devalue, lest the meaning of the man in his own mind's eye be obliterated.
That the game is tarnished is pretty much behind us now. My past indignation seems trite in retrospect. Now, it's just sort of sad.
#143
Posted 12 January 2010 - 09:24 AM
That was the major problem. I think if the session hadn't been televised, or at least been relegated to it's normal spot on C-SPAN, then they might have actually gotten something done. But by having it televised on ESPN, it was guaranteed to have a lot more viewers than normal, people who would never otherwise watch a congressional hearing. Because just about every politician is a self-important attention whore anyway, they saw this as one of their few chances to really get face time with an audience that is usually apathetic about politics. And actually trying to solve the problem and getting to the root of the issue is apparently a lot less entertaining than the pointless bombast we were exposed to.
#144
Posted 12 January 2010 - 09:27 AM
This was a great post.
Can we call this hyper-ego the 'OJ effect'?
#145
Posted 12 January 2010 - 09:59 AM
Which is completely backwards if you think about it. The network OWNED by the sport isn't afraid to tarnish itself, but ESPN? Nothing hard-hitting.
And, case in point--Greenburg this morning, saying that during the HR race with McGwire and Sosa he didn't even know a thing about steriods. Yet, 10+ years prior Fenway was chanting "Steroids" at Canseco. But Greenburg, a sports guy, 10 years later, had no idea about steroids in baseball?
Buster Olney this morning was asked about HoF voters and said that he thinks fully 50% of them will not vote for any "known" steriod guy.
Edited by dwightinright, 12 January 2010 - 10:10 AM.
#146
Posted 12 January 2010 - 10:35 AM
So, what I thought was a fairly principled refusal to name any other players when he told Costas that he never talked about it with any other players, never, was . . a line of bullshit to avoid revealing just how deeply into it he was.
#147
Posted 12 January 2010 - 10:47 AM
Bond's ARod and Clemens will be the real tests. In Bonds case, you could knock 10-20%(at a guess) off his numbers and he would STILL be a hall of famer. This doesn't really apply in McGwire's case.
I would love for some guy to come forward and say exactly what they did medical history style. "I took 2 doses of X in august XXXX, 1 srynge of blah at the start of XXXX, etc, etc". Won't happen though.
#149
Posted 12 January 2010 - 12:23 PM
As much as I dislike him, I agree on Bonds had he not indulged. It could be said about some of the others as well. Strangely though all of them, Bonds, Clemens, Canseco, McGwire, et al share the Super-Ego thing. Think of the mindset of a Palmeiro, wagging his finger at Congress sitting there knowing he had an initial positive pending retesting. Is it just stupidity? Did he really believe he could make it go away by saying Tejada gave him vitamins? In Bonds' and Clemens' case their egos are even further enhanced by a profound anger, enough to lead both to trash themselves through reckless denial. It seems to drive them more so than even the money or any other reward aspect of the game. Apparently it's part of the required makeup to achieve at these levels.
#150
Posted 12 January 2010 - 12:26 PM
So everything he did on a baseball field after 2003 was thanks to steroids and HGH.
He refuses to believe that the drugs he took enhanced his performance, but how can he deny that they werent performance extending drugs?
I wish Costas asked him that.
McGwire retired in 2001. I'm not sure what the question is.
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













