I hope so. Otherwise I am so screwed.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
World Series Game 5: A.J. Burnett vs. Cliff Lee
#51
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:40 PM
I hope so. Otherwise I am so screwed.
#52
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:40 PM
#53
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:43 PM
#54
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:44 PM
#55
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:46 PM
You're aware there are MFY fans posting here, aren't you?
Anyway, a poor outing by A.J. could effect his fragile psyche for years to come. We have that going for us, which is nice.
Edited by 5belongstoGeorge, 02 November 2009 - 02:46 PM.
#56
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:51 PM
Has any closer done their job against the Yankees this post season? I can't think of one game where the closer came in and shut them down in a save situation...
#57
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:53 PM
Has any closer done their job against the Yankees this post season? I can't think of one game where the closer came in and shut them down in a save situation...
Nathan, Fuentes, and Lidge have all spit the bit. Add Papelbon to the mix and we've had a tough month with closers.
#58
Posted 02 November 2009 - 02:53 PM
Street and Broxton as well
#59
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:02 PM
#60
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:05 PM
#61
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:06 PM
Hopefully three....
#62
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:22 PM
With Messrs Henry and Epstein a close second.
#63
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:24 PM
Lee will strike out 14.
#64
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:25 PM
#65
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:29 PM

Throw us a bone, Clifford.
#66
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:35 PM
This series might have turned out totally differently if you'd taken the ball for game 2 as I requested then, PUSSY.
#67
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:39 PM
Has any closer done their job against the Yankees this post season? I can't think of one game where the closer came in and shut them down in a save situation...
Fuentes got a save in game 5 of the ALCS in a one run game. He actually had a nice postseason besides the terrible two strike pitch to A-Rod, that was the only hit he allowed in five appearances.
#68
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:41 PM
That homerun is on Mr. Scioscia. As it's been well documented the Yankees had AAA hitters behind Rodriguez.
#69
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:46 PM
#70
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:48 PM
Pretty sure it would be Hal, not George.
#71
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:52 PM
#72
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:54 PM
Yep and yep. Still hoping Girardi will reconsider, even though there's virtually no chance of that.
#73
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:54 PM
Indeed.
#74
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:59 PM
He won't...but wouldn't it be something if he imploded early, and the bullpen gets torn up as well. Would give the Phils at least a little momentum going back to the Bronx.
This is why I hate baseball. I get my hopes up, just to see them dashed.
#75
Posted 02 November 2009 - 03:59 PM
Has Hank been seen at all this PS? Hal and the daughters have been very visible but as far as I can see, Hank's been MIA like Rosemary from a Kennedy Christmas card. Not that I'm complaining, mind - just wondering.
#76
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:00 PM
#77
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:03 PM
#78
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:09 PM
This is a good rule of thumb for future postseason managers. AVOID USING YOUR SHITTY PITCHERS. It's astonishing how Grady II over on the other side is trying to find ways to work Brad Lidge and Joe Blanton into the World Series while Girardi is showing how it's done, trying to maximize the number of innings his actually good pitchers throw.
#79
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:11 PM
#80
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:12 PM
Of course, the question is what kind of effect does that have on them in subsequent years. I'm not sure this will be a big issue for NY, but I definitely think it was one for Cole Hamels this year, as an example.
#81
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:13 PM
I think you need a great bullpen to get to the postseason, but I don't think you necessarily need one to win a championship once you're there. A great closer and power arms in the rotation that can go deep into games and on short rest is really all you need in most cases, as the Yankees have proved during this run.
#82
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:20 PM
Edited by luckysox, 02 November 2009 - 04:20 PM.
#83
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:21 PM
I agree with your premise. Although this Phillies bullpen was awful the entire season and they got to a world series.
I think Spacemans point is a valid one, once you get to the post-season, don't try and get too cute, use your horses.
#84
Posted 02 November 2009 - 04:30 PM
Keith Foulke is Exhibit A on that, although every Red Sox fan will tell you it's worth it.
Having said that, when Rivera throws as few pitches as he does, I don't understand why they don't use him more. Chances are they would be going for No. 28 tonight and not No. 27 if Torre had pitched him in a tie on the road in Game 4 in 2003, instead of using Jeff Weaver, who had a 5.99 ERA and hadn't pitched at all in the postseason up to then.
With the chance to take a 3-1 lead on a young team that might have given up after that and had already used his own closer, you let Rivera throw two scoreless innings on 24 pitches or so and give your team a chance to win it. Instead Torre wouldn't violate By The Book Rule No. 1 that your closer can't pitch in a tie on the road.
#85
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:10 PM
Clifton Phifer "Cliff" Lee
Really -- would a Clifford have made the behind the back catch?
#86
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:18 PM
Damon
Tex
Centaur
Swisher
Cano
Gardner
Molina
Burnett
#87
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:25 PM
Damon
Tex
Centaur
Swisher
Cano
Gardner
Molina
Burnett
We're going back to New York; what an atrocity the lineup is. But, hey, you know; lightning could always strike, and somehow the Yankees would win tonight. That would be the best example known to baseball of AL/NL disparity, if it happens. I see no reason it happens, though. That would be the epic fail of all epic fails. Cliff Lee is going to have a field day.
Who wants to start Wednesday's game thread?
#88
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:30 PM
Who wants to start Wednesday's game thread?
I don't think this world series is a good example of the disparity at all between AL/NL teams. Both teams have had good pitching, timely hitting, and players capitalizing on errors by the other team. The MFY obviously have figured out the lineup(at least Ryan Howard), but if the MFY win this game, I could see it being due to continued sloppy play by the Phillies, which isn't a definitive example of AL/NL comparisons, IMO.
#89
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:32 PM
Having said that, when Rivera throws as few pitches as he does, I don't understand why they don't use him more. Chances are they would be going for No. 28 tonight and not No. 27 if Torre had pitched him in a tie on the road in Game 4 in 2003, instead of using Jeff Weaver, who had a 5.99 ERA and hadn't pitched at all in the postseason up to then.
With the chance to take a 3-1 lead on a young team that might have given up after that and had already used his own closer, you let Rivera throw two scoreless innings on 24 pitches or so and give your team a chance to win it. Instead Torre wouldn't violate By The Book Rule No. 1 that your closer can't pitch in a tie on the road.
Rivera threw 39 pitches in last Thursday's game. He's just a freak. Never has one player in any sport done so much with, don't want to say so little, so how about with so few weapons.
#90
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:34 PM
I think using Gaudin would be a "oh we don't care about this game, so just hit against this dude" kind of move. I'd rather avoid that.
#91
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:35 PM
Neither do I. I was unclear. I meant to say that if the Phillies lose tonight, specifically, against tonight's Yankee lineup, it might be a good example of AL vs. NL. I mean, really, if Lee loses to what the Yanks are putting out there tonight, just wow. It could be sloppy play or the Philly bullpen, but, I'm talking extremely specifically: If the Yankees lineup, as it stands now, does well enough to win against Lee tonight, and Lee alone. Then, I feel, it is a good example of AL/NL quality.
Edited by The Smart Dope, 02 November 2009 - 05:37 PM.
#92
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:43 PM
Taken into context with Lee's last start, I don't think it's going to stack up well. A good lineup in an AL park gets shut down, but a shitty lineup in an NL park is a good example? I don't think so.
Edited by brs3, 02 November 2009 - 05:44 PM.
#93
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:46 PM
#94
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:49 PM
#95
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:50 PM
Yes- 5 games this year, with a SSS UZR of -0.9. Granted, only 32 innings logged there this year, but, if need be, I'm glad to say that he can.
#96
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:50 PM
Of course there is plenty of times using guys on short rest has come back to bit a manager also. You just need to know the guys involved. Lee has never pitched on short rest in his ML career. I can understand not wanting to make the experiment now. (And it's not like Blanton was the problem. )
Oh course, there is no sane reason to stick Brad Lidge in a WS game unless you had already used every other pitcher available. And that might include position players. At least he won't be available tonight.
Edited by BucketOBalls, 02 November 2009 - 05:51 PM.
#97
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:52 PM
#98
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:54 PM
I disagree, they're trying to end it now with Burnett going. They might get stomped, but I don't think it'd be because they let down.
#99
Posted 02 November 2009 - 05:57 PM
I can see them packing it in early if Lee is on and they fall behind.
#100
Posted 02 November 2009 - 06:03 PM
This isn't unheard of; it goes against recent trends, but it's not unusual











