The painful part would be having to listen to McCarver and crew's lovefest with the MFYs.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Another meaningless game!
#351
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:37 PM
The painful part would be having to listen to McCarver and crew's lovefest with the MFYs.
#352
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:38 PM
#353
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:38 PM
I want the Red Sox to win. They just did. That's awesome.
Water.
#354
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:39 PM
Water.
#355
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:40 PM
#356
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:40 PM
Yeah, and Molina is hitting 181/274/193/466 since the ASB (teks OPS is 479 in the same period). But he would be invaluable on the bench, then when we suspect a SBA attempt may be coming and we can replace V-Mart with Molina. Of course, most SBA are made when the team running is tied or ahead, so that makes about as much sense as worrying who the Red Sox backup catcher is going to be in the playoffs.
#357
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:40 PM
Water.
So would I...
#358
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:41 PM
Verlander ≥ Sabathia.
Edwin Jackson ≥ AJ Burnett
To me that alone puts the Tigers chances of stealing the ALDS at 40-45%.
Figure the Angels at 45-50% to knock us off, and the chances of BOS/NY in the ALCS are in the neighborhood of 30%.
Personally, I'd be just about as happy with us both losing as I would having to deal with the psychological strain of meeting those fvckers in the ALCS.
But obviously, DET/BOS would be the ideal.
Edit: 水 (water)
I can relate to this. And it's not about being afraid. It's the sense that you want to beat them SO bad that it just cranks up your blood pressure to the boiling point. Extremely stressfull.
#359
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:42 PM
#360
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:43 PM
#361
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:43 PM
Yep, and the movement on some of his pitches is filthy, just filthy and leading to lots of swings and misses. Good sign Loving how this 4 man rotation looks. And fuck the Yankee fear in here.
#362
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:47 PM
Verlander ≥ Sabathia.
Edwin Jackson ≥ AJ Burnett
To me that alone puts the Tigers chances of stealing the ALDS at 40-45%.
Figure the Angels at 45-50% to knock us off, and the chances of BOS/NY in the ALCS are in the neighborhood of 30%.
Personally, I'd be just about as happy with us both losing as I would having to deal with the psychological strain of meeting those fvckers in the ALCS.
But obviously, DET/BOS would be the ideal.
Edit: 水 (water)
Of course, MFY pitchers face Tiger hitters, and vice versa. But october CC is not very good, and Burnett has never been tested in October and has all the signs of being a choker, so I won't rule out the Tigers if they don't choke away the division. Don't forget the MFY have a catcher who can throw out runners, and the Tigers have the 12th best SB record in the AL, so thats really the key to the series. If they had Tek as backup catcher all would be lost for them and the Tigers would win, but Molina as backup makes the MFY a heavy favourite..
And how can anyone not want an ALCS with the MFY. Avoiding the best team in baseball in winning the WS renders the ring meaningless, at least to me.
#363
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:48 PM
What bosockboy's post meant (to me, and I could be reading this wrong) is that the Sox have the edge in those four games, with the first matchup being even. My point was that the Sox don't necessarily have the edge going into those games, for the reasons I stated. As the omnipotent RimJobMan pointed out, Byrd or some other unexpected pitcher could shock the world and pitch a perfect game. However, playing make believe provides absolutely no useful analysis whatsoever.
If saying that some extreme outlier like a Byrd no-hitter is akin (or just semantics) to whether or not Buch has the edge over Pettitte, then yes, you are correct that it is a useless conversation. Of course individual pitching performances are not a lock, and I don't think that is what bosockboy was suggesting, just that the Sox would have the edge with those match-ups, which is not so much semantics as it is which of those pitchers on average gives their respective team the best chance to win. To that end, I disagree that the Sox have the edge in those two particular matchups.
#364
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:55 PM
If saying that some extreme outlier like a Byrd no-hitter is akin (or just semantics) to whether or not Buch has the edge over Pettitte, then yes, you are correct that it is a useless conversation. Of course individual pitching performances are not a lock, and I don't think that is what bosockboy was suggesting, just that the Sox would have the edge with those match-ups, which is not so much semantics as it is which of those pitchers on average gives their respective team the best chance to win. To that end, I disagree that the Sox have the edge in those two particular matchups.
My point was that Clay has been much better than Pettitte down the stretch, and Pettitte isn't 100% healthy. I'll admit the experience factor is large. I do think Dice-K is the best 4th starter in the postseason now, without a doubt. I'm not budging, there.
#365
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:57 PM
And how can anyone not want an ALCS with the MFY. Avoiding the best team in baseball in winning the WS renders the ring meaningless, at least to me.
Wow... two of the stupidest things you've said in... well... at least a day. The backup catcher... especially Molina... has very little if any impact on the odds for the series. Are you effing serious with this?
And if the Yankees don't make the ALCS it doesn't take the shine off the ring at all. The Red Sox can't control what the Yankees do in the ALDS and it has no bearing on how legitimate another Red Sox championship would be.
Good God...
#366
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:58 PM
#367
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:59 PM
The thing is, it's not just who is the better pitcher. The MFY have a better offense the Sox(esp on the road), which reduces the sox pitching advantage somewhat.
Lester vs MFY == CC vs Boston
etc..
I still think it's a winnable series though.
#368
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:59 PM
Meh, it's not really fear of losing to them so much as:
1. Living in NY and not being able to ignore/avoid them if they win.
2. Their obscene $210M payroll and the nauseating way they went out and bought the three best players on the market this offseason, virtually guaranteeing themsleves a playoff spot (while teams like KC and Pit are basically ensured of no shot till the end of eternity).
3. The lovely thought of ARod retiring without a ring.
I dunno, seeing those bastards get taken down in the first round would fill me with a malevolent joy so rich and tasty that it would almost outweigh the stress and excitement of a Yankees/Sox series. Obviously I'd much rather the Sox take them down, but with that possibility comes the concurrent and very real possibility of them avenging their 2004 ALCS loss and getting off the 21st century schneid.
OK, yeah, I'm a little afraid of them.
#369
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:59 PM
#370
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:00 PM
Hold on to Clay being the best 3rd starter too. I mean why not? The only thing that can prove you wrong are the games yet to be played.
#371
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:01 PM
And if the Yankees don't make the ALCS it doesn't take the shine off the ring at all. The Red Sox can't control what the Yankees do in the ALDS and it has no bearing on how legitimate another Red Sox championship would be.
Good God...
SARCASM DETECTOR: MALFUNCTION!
#372
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:02 PM
#373
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:02 PM
I'm not convinced of that... I hope you're right, but I'm not at all convinced.
#374
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:11 PM
#375
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:12 PM
#376
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:15 PM
#377
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:23 PM
#378
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:24 PM
Lester vs MFY == CC vs Boston
etc..
I still think it's a winnable series though.
I get that too, just went with the simplified this vs that.
FWIW I absolutely believe it is a winnable series.
Agree 100%. I also believe that the sour grapes of "sometimes the best team doesn't win" is absolute bullshit. If the MFY doesn't make it to the ALCS, I guess they weren't the better team - just like if the Sox don't make it.
Thanks for clarifying. And I want to believe this, I really do. I just wish I didn't have to double up on my valium every time Daisuke pitched.
I'm no doctor, but I have broken my wrist, and yes, lines are not good. With any luck though it's a situation they can tape up for a couple weeks, but his HR power will definitely be effected.
#379
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:30 PM
#380
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:30 PM
#381
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:31 PM
#382
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:32 PM
See, I want to win, too, and don't care who we go through to do it, but if it IS the MFY's, I'll have to triple my dosage. Maybe it's time to switch to Zoloft.
#383
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:33 PM
F*CK! If it were glove hand I would assume he could play through it. Wait and see.
#384
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:34 PM
#385
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:36 PM
#386
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:40 PM
Yes... And again, I'm no doctor. But where he illustrated the line was - pinky side of hand - may not be effected by throwing as much as if it had been in the thumb side.
I'm looking for ANY silver lining, no matter how insane it might sound.
#387
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:53 PM
#388
Posted 02 October 2009 - 10:59 PM
Of course, he probably could use the practice.
damned if you do....
dammit!
#389
Posted 02 October 2009 - 11:41 PM
http://www.weei.com/...ooks-postseason
So we have Gonzalez's hand, then Drew's shoulder, Baldelli's hip flexor, Lowell's sore ankle (and hip), Green's disk, Lowrie's wrist, Beckett's back, and according to that link Ellsbury was stepped on at some point. We are doing fan-freaking-tastic.
#390
Posted 03 October 2009 - 01:41 AM
"I don't feel any pain," Gonzalez said. "I feel good. I can move my fingers and hand, my wrist. But we'll find out tomorrow. I hope there's nothing big. I can use my hand, and I can squeeze."
I'm thinking it's a hairline fracture and he just tries to play though the pain during the playoffs.
#391
Posted 03 October 2009 - 04:03 AM
That crossed my mind, but I have no idea how painful that might be. Also, I always thought that hairline fractures came from long-term wear and tear, not one blow. Last statement on this, shouldn't a Dope break this out into a thread? We have so few new threads to play with that I'm STILL posting in last night's game thread. Being 8 thousand miles away just before the playoffs makes me want more threads!










