Is the Wakefield Era over?
#1
Posted 30 September 2009 - 08:42 PM
Should it be?
There's the thought, I laid it down so you could take it out of context either way.
- Modest Mouse
#2
Posted 30 September 2009 - 08:50 PM
We go through this every winter, and if he can even pitch to his standards for a half a season then he is well worth 4 million dollars.
It just seems like a good time to go out, having made the All Star team. And a third ring would be the cherry on the sundae.
This post has been edited by bosockboy: 30 September 2009 - 08:51 PM
#3
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:01 PM
So it'll come down to him and how hard it is to work through the pain.
There's the thought, I laid it down so you could take it out of context either way.
- Modest Mouse
#4
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:06 PM
#5
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:07 PM
I REALLY want him to get that -- but I can't see how he could do that without also pitching into 2011.
joyofsox.blogspot.com & www.1918redsox.com
#6
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:10 PM
I wonder if he's going under the knife this winter.
There's the thought, I laid it down so you could take it out of context either way.
- Modest Mouse
#7
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:19 PM
I REALLY want him to get that -- but I can't see how he could do that without also pitching into 2011.
Agreed that would be nice to witness, but the way he's been throwing since his injury this seems well out of reach and would hurt the team for him to try it. If he came back in Spring pitching like he did in the first half, 2011 would be reasonable. In the end, I'm sure Timmy wouldn't put his stats over the Sox chances to win.
-Hyde Pard Factor
#8
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:26 PM
I think he'll re-up, have the surgery and give it his best shot to be ready for spring training. If he reaches a point where he doesn't think he can cut it, I think he hangs it up. What I don't see him doing is lingering on the DL, perhaps making a couple rehab starts and trying to be a second half pitcher like Schilling did. If he's not on the Opening Day roster, I think he'll officially retire.
#9
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:26 PM
I wonder if he's going under the knife this winter.
It sounds like it based on this on WEEI.com from 8/30. Below is a quote from the article. If the surgery doesn't solve his problems, I can't see him coming back.
“I think surgery is inevitable in this situation,” he said. “I think it’s a situation where they’re just going to have to go in there and pull that spur out or that piece out. I think that in itself will relieve a lot of the symptoms and it’s not a huge deal where I’m going to be on the shelf rehabbing for two months. It’s more of a two-week type of thing. Let the wound of the surgery heal up and then be ready to go.”
#10
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:30 PM
The compelling reason to not want him back would be to either work in a young pitcher (Bowden, Tazawa) or acquire a superior one (FA, trade). The former doesn't seem like something you want to bend over backwards to accomplish and the latter is indeterminate at the moment.
Yes, I think it's likely he is back. No, I don't want any plan for the season to revolve on him staying healthy for 30+ potentially quality starts. If they want to setup some kind of Clemens system with him, then that's fine. Maybe better conditioning/treatment would help (fewer innings?).
Given that the contract is small and he's something of a fixture for the organization plus a good teammate/community guy to boot I will be surprised if he's not welcomed back. Assuming that he wants to play more, of course. I agree with the above that he is eyeing the win total -- who wouldn't. That's two years though.
So many people have sussed this out correctly that I don't think there's a problem with my confirming they were right.
#11
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:53 PM
I think its just the opposite. I could see him being on "the Smoltz plan" in which he's told to take it slow and easy with an eye toward joining the rotation part way through the summer when there inevitably tends to be an opening in the rotation somewhere. Even if he's not ready by spring training or Opening day, he could be the same kind of low cost rehab lottery ticket that guys like Smoltz or Penny have been.
#12
Posted 30 September 2009 - 09:58 PM
#13
Posted 30 September 2009 - 10:13 PM
If that was true, he would have done it in August.
There's the thought, I laid it down so you could take it out of context either way.
- Modest Mouse
#14
Posted 30 September 2009 - 10:59 PM
If that was true, he would have done it in August.
Well, it's probably two week+rehab after the layoff type deal.
It's possible he volunteered/was asked to put it off due to questions about the other starters. The depth is a little thin right now, and was worse before Dice-K came back.
#15
Posted 30 September 2009 - 11:13 PM
The trick will be to have a backup option to Wakefield who is a much better than Bowden and willing to be in the PawSox rotation if Wake is healthy. That's a very narrow needle to thread. Perhaps Byrd would be willing to spend the early part of next season "on retainer." Pay him $300,000 to play with his kids, but add in incentives up to a couple million on the stipulation that he can be ready to start a major league game within two weeks if the Red Sox call. That would be the kind of innovative thing this front office would be the first to implement.
#16
Posted 01 October 2009 - 12:42 AM
Unfortunately, it's hard to predict when that will be.
#17
Posted 01 October 2009 - 05:51 AM
and you can't slow down..." hunter
#18
Posted 01 October 2009 - 06:15 AM
#19
Posted 01 October 2009 - 06:54 AM
In a bubble, yes, totally agree that is the approach you have to take if he wants back.
Unfortunately it's going to present some problems as he is likely to miss time and/or be ineffective, but the uncertaintainty of his availability will result in some hampering of their ability to bring in quality depth.
Maybe they get another Smoltz type again and face those roster issues when he is ready. Maybe Wake himself fills that role. Yada yada. Hard to really project this stuff. That's just a potential hiccup that Wake woudl bring.
So many people have sussed this out correctly that I don't think there's a problem with my confirming they were right.
#20
Posted 01 October 2009 - 07:42 AM
Wakefield will turn 44 next August. It's completely irresponsible to assume he's going to make 30 starts in a season in which he turns 44. Wakefield figures to throw 100-150 innings with an above average ERA. That's a nice baseline for the minimum the FO should pursue. If it's not there for a reasonable price, hang onto him. If it is, though, I would prefer the FO go in that direction (overpaying for Lackey if that's what it takes...). The 2009 Red Sox have demonstrated that it's extremely difficult to have a healthy and effective rotation that's 6 or 7 pitchers deep. There is no Clay Buchholz in them minors next year waiting for an opportunity to save this team's ass.

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help



This topic is locked






















