Eh, eh's the only regular in the lineup. I think that has more to do with it than thinking Ortiz wouldn't retaliate.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
9/30 - Halladay throws 40-pitch CG shutout
#101
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:45 PM
Eh, eh's the only regular in the lineup. I think that has more to do with it than thinking Ortiz wouldn't retaliate.
#102
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:45 PM
#103
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:46 PM
#104
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:46 PM
#105
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:46 PM
#106
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:47 PM
Tomorrow?
#107
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:47 PM
#108
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:48 PM
#109
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:48 PM
#110
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:48 PM
#111
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:48 PM
Edited by Papelbot, 30 September 2009 - 06:49 PM.
#112
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:48 PM
I don't see any reason for him to even be starting this game. With his back just shut him down. He's not going to help in the post season.
#113
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:49 PM
#114
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:49 PM
#115
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:49 PM
Seriously... we can't afford to be wasting the likes of Fernando Cabrera.
#116
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:50 PM
#117
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:50 PM
#118
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:50 PM
He's injured. That's not necessarily the same thing as being done, even in the mid-40s. I'm looking forward to Wake's next start in April.
#119
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:50 PM
I think this is his just taking one for the team here. Who would have have to start in this slot?
#120
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:51 PM
#121
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:51 PM
It would be amusing to see if anyone noticed.
#122
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:52 PM
If he has successful surgery, there's no reason to think he wont be the same guy who is a bargain at 4 mil.
#123
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:52 PM
EDIT-- Tiggers take the lead, 4-2
Edited by Redkluzu, 30 September 2009 - 06:54 PM.
#124
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:53 PM
#125
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:53 PM
#126
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:53 PM
#127
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:54 PM
@ 4 million bucks for the innings + ERA he gives us even if he only lasts 4 - 5 months I agree with you even if he's painful to watch now.
#128
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:54 PM
#129
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:55 PM
#130
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:55 PM
As exciting as the Nats hitting a game winning grand slam? (A day after Dukes runs face first into the scoreboard and flips backward to win it) For those wondering why you should hold onto Paps until his arm is hamburger meet, let me introduce you to Krod.
By the way, despite how Wake is performing today, do you think he would return to a limited capacity (first half/pen/spot start) or is he the kind of guy who would want to start all year? I would ask on the main board, but I can't. I am curious to see how he views his role.
Edited by joelmon, 30 September 2009 - 06:56 PM.
#131
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:58 PM
The good news is they wont have a crippled double play machine at third base, or a corpse behind the plate next year.
#132
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:58 PM
#133
Posted 30 September 2009 - 06:58 PM
By the way, despite how Wake is performing today, do you think he would return to a limited capacity (first half/pen/spot start) or is he the kind of guy who would want to start all year? I would ask on the main board, but I can't. I am curious to see how he views his role.
I became a member very recently, but before I started posting here I followed for a long time and I can tell you that Wakefield is a divisive topic. He's like debating abortion, gay rights, and social justice in one sitting.
#134
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:01 PM
I think I need wine instead.
What the hell is going on?
#135
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:01 PM
#136
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:03 PM
As exciting as the Nats hitting a game winning grand slam? (A day after Dukes runs face first into the scoreboard and flips backward to win it) For those wondering why you should hold onto Paps until his arm is hamburger meet, let me introduce you to Krod.
By the way, despite how Wake is performing today, do you think he would return to a limited capacity (first half/pen/spot start) or is he the kind of guy who would want to start all year? I would ask on the main board, but I can't. I am curious to see how he views his role.
Well, from various examples throughout his career, he seems willing to fill any role the team asks of him.
At his age, who knows? He may at some point feel differently.
I'm all for Wake starting as many games as possible next year.
Annnnd.... just misssed another dinger.
#137
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:03 PM
You haven't seen the main board debates on JD Drew.
#138
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:04 PM
The team expected and planned for injury to starters by signing several reclamation projects and lining up several AAA starters. Back in June, plenty of us were complaining about Buchholz not getting his chance early enough... that was because Wakefield lasted longer than expected and Penny and Smoltz proved to be durable but mediocre instead of fragile stars. I expect that 2010 will look the same, just with different names. Whether Bowden or Tazawa would be first in line for callup isn't so clear yet.
#139
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:05 PM
Edited by johnlimberakis, 30 September 2009 - 07:06 PM.
#140
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:05 PM
Spot on! You're either a Wakefiel fan or you're not... nobody is gonna change your mind.
#141
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:05 PM
Nope, just paying $3 million for one they aren't using.
#142
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:06 PM
I think I need wine instead.
What the hell is going on?
think ft myers, march 28 or so
#143
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:07 PM
I think I need wine instead.
What the hell is going on?
Bad Wake was going on, until he was replaced by Bad Cabrera. I am bypassing the wine in favor of rum.
#144
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:09 PM
Yeah, that was my favorite WS year. Especially for the Cards.
#145
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:10 PM
I owe you a Mr. Pibb.
#146
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:10 PM
I agree with this. Wakefield (even more this year than in past years) was extremely productive for the first half and was more than worth the $4M he is paid based on that. I truly think that management believes that any production from Wakefield past the first 2/3 of the year is gravy.
Edited by Frito Tankona, 30 September 2009 - 07:10 PM.
#147
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:10 PM
#148
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:11 PM
#149
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:11 PM
#150
Posted 30 September 2009 - 07:11 PM











