Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Lets try something different ... win 3 games then play the AAA team
#1
Posted 26 September 2009 - 11:37 PM
No AAA until the WC is clinched shouldnt be that big of an issue
#2
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:17 AM
#3
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:23 AM

Win this one boys. Don't let them clinch on our watch.
Edited by The Yellow Submarine, 27 September 2009 - 12:24 AM.
#4
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:35 AM
I keep telling myself that these games are meaningless, but at some level, I'm not so sure. They haven't actually clinched, the Ranger bats are heating up, and I would hate to see meaningful games late next week. The thought of ending the season series with another MFY sweep...it's not a good thing.
Win please.
#5
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:50 AM
Prove me fuckin wrong.
#6
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:53 AM
Half the team went back to Boston last night, the other half were sent to Anaheim to prepare for the Angels, and nobody on the team has seen Papelbon since they left Kansas City.
#7
Posted 27 September 2009 - 01:12 AM
Prove me fuckin wrong.
Thats what everyone said about the Red Sox vs Angels after losing 8 of 9 in the regular season. The best team does not always win the playoffs, thats why so many WC teams have won the World Series. These 162 games just do not matter if you can make the playoffs, anything can happen then.
#8
Posted 27 September 2009 - 01:24 AM
No AAA until the WC is clinched shouldnt be that big of an issue
Chris Woodward needs to be offered up as a human sacrifice to pay for Francona's lineup sins. First you clinch, then you use your scrubs liberally.
#9
Posted 27 September 2009 - 06:43 AM
I'm gonna wear my Yankees suck shirt today. It's bad luck, but screw it, I'm doing it anyway. All the good luck moves don't seem to be working. If the Yankees clinch today and I have to see them doing their little grab ass on the field in front of my team, then I want everyone for the rest of the day to know damn well what a bitter and petty human being I am towards them. Not that many people will care or even notice, but if my small minded gesture can influence that one small child with a lasting memory of what a douchebag I am about the New York Yankees, then I feel the gesture will be worth it.
Edited by Kilgore A. Trout, 27 September 2009 - 07:37 AM.
#10
Posted 27 September 2009 - 06:56 AM
Tito or Jackie?
#11
Posted 27 September 2009 - 07:55 AM
Unfortunately human sacrifice usually only works if it's not someone we already want to kill.
#12
Posted 27 September 2009 - 08:57 AM
Prove me fuckin wrong.
Of course they look like the inferior team when they're playing like shit. When they're playing well they look like the better team. What does this have to do with anything?
#13
Posted 27 September 2009 - 09:00 AM
And let's not forget the fact that Tito isn't exactly rolling out the line-up that he uses when winning is a priority.
That said, I can understand frustration and emotional reactions when losing to the MFYs. All of us get that these games are not exactly do-or-die, but I daresay that losing to these miscreants pisses off even the most stoic, level headed of Sox fans.
#14
Posted 27 September 2009 - 09:14 AM
ESPECIALLY THE MADOFF BROKER TYPES FROM GOLDMAN SACHS WHO HAVE THE EXCESSIVELY PRICED SEATS AND TRY TO TALK ON THE CELLPHONE TO BE SEEN BUT PAID FOR THE TICKETS WITH GRANDMA'S PENSION MONEY
Those are Yankee fans gentlemen.
Win it for Grandma...
#15
Posted 27 September 2009 - 09:18 AM
my thread title (if we had won yesterday) for today was going to be:
Our HGH Cheater vs. Their HGH Cheater
remember kids, cheaters never prosper... unless you can make a far fetched medical therapy excuse and then no one cares.
#16
Posted 27 September 2009 - 09:43 AM
Not that this is the place for it, but there are all sorts of logical problems with your statement. Don't "inferior teams" play "like shit" when they are facing their superiors and look superior when they are facing their inferiors? In other words, the Sox are a very very good team. That's why they'll make the post-season. But this year the Yankees, mostly using money as a weapon, have put together a superior team. I don't know how you can watch these games since Arod came back and made Tex better and since Wake went down and Smoltz and Penny didn't pan out and not come to this conclusion.
#17
Posted 27 September 2009 - 09:44 AM
Win already.
#18
Posted 27 September 2009 - 09:52 AM
I'm gonna wear my Yankees suck shirt today. It's bad luck, but screw it, I'm doing it anyway.
Why is it bad luck? The Red Sox have won two titles this decade/century/millennium and you managed to cause bad luck with a T-shirt?
#19
Posted 27 September 2009 - 09:55 AM
Silver lining: At least we'll get to clinch a playoff berth at home.
#20
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:01 AM
#21
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:36 AM
Red Sox
Ellsbury - CF
Pedroia - 2B
Bay - LF
Youkilis - 1B
Ortiz - DH
Lowell - 3B
Drew - RF
Varitek - C
Gonzalez - SS
Yankees
Jeter - SS
Gardner - CF
Teixeira - 1B
A-Rod - 3B
Matsui - DH
Swisher - RF
Cano - 2B
Cabrera - LF
Molina - C
#22
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:36 AM
Maybe we've seen the Yankees anointed the superior team every year (except 2008) including the two years the Sox won it all. I think the superior minds will chalk it up to another "crapshoot" when the postseason has played out.
#23
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:43 AM
But the best team wins more often than not, no? Or have superior minds determined that that's not the case anymore.
#24
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:46 AM
Red Sox
Ellsbury - CF
Pedroia - 2B
Bay - LF
Youkilis - 1B
Ortiz - DH
Lowell - 3B
Drew - RF
Varitek - C
Gonzalez - SS
Yankees
Jeter - SS
Gardner - CF
Teixeira - 1B
A-Rod - 3B
Matsui - DH
Swisher - RF
Cano - 2B
Cabrera - LF
Molina - C
#25
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:50 AM
Yes, I believe the teams with the better pitching win in the playoffs, which is why the MFY has not won since 2000. I think it is unclear who has the better staff this year which is why the ALCS will be a lot of fun. Hell, I'm not even sure if the Sox will get by the Angels. Three good teams.
#26
Posted 27 September 2009 - 10:59 AM
I'm taking the over.
#27
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:00 AM
Some may argue that stolen bases are overrated, but when you can't throw anyone out... you're turning bloops into doubles, giving up potential double plays, putting runners in scoring position over and over, and generally looking defeated before the game is even over.
How many bases will the Yanks steal today? +/- 5?''
Sorry for this "morass of negativity".
Enjoy the game.
#28
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:16 AM
Edited by scotian1, 27 September 2009 - 11:16 AM.
#29
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:30 AM
Today's lineup has more to do with resting Martinez than playing Varitek. Yes - Martinez is a marginally better hitter LH and Tek is a questionably better hitter RH - but that is only taking advantage of the occasion. All regulars will be given one or more days off during these last days. Of course - there is that small matter of lowering the magic number from 3 to 0. Probably today won't be a clear step in that direction, if only because of the rain and the Byrd.
#30
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:34 AM
Half the team went back to Boston last night, the other half were sent to Anaheim to prepare for the Angels, and nobody on the team has seen Papelbon since they left Kansas City.
Kotchman can't even make this lineup? He must be bummed.
#31
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:46 AM
#32
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:55 AM
No shit!
Here's a situation where you have a catcher who is either too old or worn out to be anything but horrible... and so you start him (for the 2nd time in 3 days) over a young catcher who could probably use the at-bats. WTF
Edited by teddywingman, 27 September 2009 - 11:56 AM.
#33
Posted 27 September 2009 - 11:57 AM
Or would that be too much of a diss?
#34
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:00 PM
#35
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:02 PM
#36
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:02 PM
#37
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:05 PM
#38
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:07 PM
You would think Varitek would want a day or two off after his performance on Friday. This is upsetting.
#39
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:08 PM
They're trying to accommodate Jewish fans. Yom Kippur starts at sundown.
#40
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:26 PM
It does look like they are going to rerun the game at 8pm, though. At least according to the listing on my TV.
#41
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:28 PM
Red Sox
Ellsbury - CF
Pedroia - 2B
Bay - LF
Youkilis - 1B
Ortiz - DH
Lowell - 3B
Drew - RF
Varitek - C
Gonzalez - SS
Varitek? Did Victor Martinez have to go home to Venezuela to celebrate Yom Kippur or something?
#42
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:29 PM
#43
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:29 PM
Yom Kippur
#44
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:38 PM
Or would that be too much of a diss?
You can't use a DH for anyone but a pitcher.
#45
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:45 PM
#46
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:45 PM
First Astroturf, now this.
#47
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:47 PM
This isn't true.
edit: im wrong. who knew?
Edited by Corsi Combover, 27 September 2009 - 12:56 PM.
#48
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:51 PM
A hitter may be designated to bat for the starting pitcher and all subsequent pitchers in any game without otherwise affecting the status of the pitcher(s) in the game. A Designated Hitter for the pitcher must be selected prior to the game and must be included in the lineup cards presented to the Umpire-in-Chief. ...
It is not mandatory that a club designate a hitter for the pitcher, but failure to do so prior to the game precludes the use of a Designated Hitter for that game.
Sure sounds like it is P only. Weird.
Has this always been the case?
#49
Posted 27 September 2009 - 12:56 PM
#50
Posted 27 September 2009 - 01:09 PM










