Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo

9/26 - Ninja vs. Sumo Wrestler


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1213 replies to this topic

#1201 SemperFidelisSox


  • suzyn


  • 7,150 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 07:19 PM

For what it's worth, there was a report today that the Diamondbacks will listen to offers for SS Stephen Drew this offseason.

#1202 Kilgore A. Trout


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,751 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 07:19 PM

QUOTE (Maalox @ Sep 26 2009, 08:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't give a chocolate-coated cunt what other teams in baseball have.


Well where exactly are you thinking the Red Sox can get this amazing shortstop during a period in the game where the position is incredibly weak? They supposed to make him out of play-doh?

#1203 Jed Zeppelin


  • SoSH Member


  • 13,001 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 07:22 PM

QUOTE (SemperFidelisSox @ Sep 26 2009, 08:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For what it's worth, there was a report today that the Diamondbacks will listen to offers for SS Stephen Drew this offseason.


Could Boston handle twice the Drew? I could.

#1204 Brianish

  • 2,945 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 07:23 PM

QUOTE (Jed Zeppelin @ Sep 26 2009, 08:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Could Boston handle twice the Drew? I could.


I know next to nothing about the guy honestly. How is he?

#1205 P'tucket, rhymes with...


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,253 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 07:50 PM

QUOTE (Kilgore A. Trout @ Sep 26 2009, 08:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well where exactly are you thinking the Red Sox can get this amazing shortstop during a period in the game where the position is incredibly weak? They supposed to make him out of play-doh?


Tek couldn't throw a Play-doh SS out, either.

#1206 P'tucket, rhymes with...


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,253 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 07:58 PM

QUOTE (SemperFidelisSox @ Sep 26 2009, 08:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For what it's worth, there was a report today that the Diamondbacks will listen to offers for SS Stephen Drew this offseason.


He doesn't strike me as the sort of guy you'd give much up for, particularly since they went out and signed Iglesias.

#1207 Kilgore A. Trout


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,751 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 08:04 PM

QUOTE (SemperFidelisSox @ Sep 26 2009, 08:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For what it's worth, there was a report today that the Diamondbacks will listen to offers for SS Stephen Drew this offseason.


Can he start against left handed pitchers?

#1208 Kilgore A. Trout


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,751 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 09:14 PM

QUOTE (Adirondack jack @ Sep 26 2009, 09:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Reyes is erratic at times in the field, but with + range and a rocket of an arm. This seems more risky as it would take a premium piece and in light of his leg problems could back fire into a disaster of a move.


I'd be willing to give up a premium piece for him. Not Bard or Reddick, but any of the other prospects. And it could happen- like I said the Mets might be stupid enough to give up a well above average shortstop. The injury is a risk, but it'd be a risk I'd be willing to take.

QUOTE
Maybe if Rollins becomes available, the price would be reasonable with his disaster of a season at the dish. He's a slick fielder though.


Bad year at the plate or not, if the Phillies give up on Jimmy Rollins then that would be absolutely the most insane move since the Reds traded Frank Robinson. I would happily give up half the franchise for this guy locked up for four years or more. I will go on the record and say that if the Sox somehow get Jimmy Rollins, no matter what the cost, then I will shave my testicles with a dull razor.

QUOTE
To me, it's all about making the safe bets. Holding onto Lowrie seems like the safest route. Adding a Scutaro, Seabass or another plus fielder to go into the season with Lowrie seems like the way the risk averse front office will go.


Agreed. Although I still maintain that Scutaro will be overpriced and I'd rather pass on that and just keep Gonzo this time around.

#1209 86spike


  • SoSH Member


  • 20,500 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 09:48 PM

QUOTE (MartyBarrettMVP @ Sep 26 2009, 07:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If they clinch tomorrow that would be a helluva gut punch.


why?

Does it matter if they clinch tomorrow or clinch on Monday? No, it doesn't.

The MFY were set to hang on to the AL East last Monday when the Sox lost to KC and the Yankees beat LAA. That was it.

So let them clinch. Who cares when it happens? It's been a likelihood for weeks and a definite since Monday.

#1210 MartyBarrettMVP

  • 873 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:07 PM

QUOTE (86spike @ Sep 26 2009, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
why?

Does it matter if they clinch tomorrow or clinch on Monday? No, it doesn't.

The MFY were set to hang on to the AL East last Monday when the Sox lost to KC and the Yankees beat LAA. That was it.

So let them clinch. Who cares when it happens? It's been a likelihood for weeks and a definite since Monday.


I guess I just meant that watching the MFYs celebrate at our expense would suck to watch. I never had delusions that the Sox could eke out the division.

On another note, the Rangers are thrashing the Rays again so it looks like the Sox will have to wait until at least Monday to celebrate.

#1211 SemperFidelisSox


  • suzyn


  • 7,150 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:14 PM

It's embarrassing for the fans, the players, and the organization to watch your main rival celebrate a division title in front of you, not to mention the fact that it will all come as a result of being swept again by a team they're likely to face in the ALCS.

#1212 BucketOBalls


  • SoSH Member


  • 5,132 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:19 PM

QUOTE (MartyBarrettMVP @ Sep 26 2009, 11:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I guess I just meant that watching the MFYs celebrate at our expense would suck to watch. I never had delusions that the Sox could eke out the division.

On another note, the Rangers are thrashing the Rays again so it looks like the Sox will have to wait until at least Monday to celebrate.


Mainly....it would be nice to actually make progress toward clinching rather than risk getting into a Mets situation.

#1213 Maalox


  • full of shit, and proud of it


  • 49,118 posts

Posted 26 September 2009 - 10:57 PM

QUOTE (86spike @ Sep 26 2009, 10:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
why?

Does it matter if they clinch tomorrow or clinch on Monday? No, it doesn't.

The MFY were set to hang on to the AL East last Monday when the Sox lost to KC and the Yankees beat LAA. That was it.

So let them clinch. Who cares when it happens? It's been a likelihood for weeks and a definite since Monday.

It matters because in a just, God-fearing world they would all be put to death in gas chambers like the subhuman scum that they are. That the asinine commie-pinko laws we have in this country prohibit such a merciful mass extermination is imposition enough, without that we should have to watch this conclave of Neanderthal retards jump up and down, shouting and rubbing up against each other in conveniently white uniforms while Tim McCarver drools all over himself.

#1214 jon abbey


  • Shanghai Warrior


  • 11,458 posts

Posted 27 September 2009 - 01:38 AM

QUOTE (Maalox @ Sep 26 2009, 11:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It matters because in a just, God-fearing world they would all be put to death in gas chambers like the subhuman scum that they are. That the asinine commie-pinko laws we have in this country prohibit such a merciful mass extermination is imposition enough, without that we should have to watch this conclave of Neanderthal retards jump up and down, shouting and rubbing up against each other in conveniently white uniforms while Tim McCarver drools all over himself.


You mean Joe Morgan. laugh.gif