Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
9/21: Pettitte vs. Saunders
#1
Posted 21 September 2009 - 05:34 PM
But tonight, much like the Yankees, I'm back in full effect. I'm hoping that NY has been looking forward to this series for the last week or so, and that's part of the reason for their lackluster play. They were embarrassed in the series here in July, and I'm sure they've been gearing up for this one for a while.
#2
Posted 21 September 2009 - 06:51 PM
Be interesting to see if there's any rust for Pettitte after a 10-day layoff.
#3
Posted 21 September 2009 - 07:40 PM
Jeter SS
Damon LF
Teixeira 1B
Rodriguez 3B
Swisher RF
Posada DH
Cano 2B
Cabrera CF
Molina C
#4
Posted 21 September 2009 - 09:32 PM
edit: 2 and counting.
Edited by aichtal, 21 September 2009 - 09:34 PM.
#5
Posted 21 September 2009 - 09:35 PM
#6
Posted 21 September 2009 - 09:37 PM
#7
Posted 21 September 2009 - 09:54 PM
His velocity's fine. Probably just a bit rusty. Looked good in the second.
#8
Posted 21 September 2009 - 10:10 PM
I thought that shoulder fatigue stuff was bullshit anyway. A classic case of a team with a big lead looking to give an older pitcher a little breather before the playoffs.
#9
Posted 21 September 2009 - 10:16 PM
I don't know if it was bullshit as in a complete lie... but Pettitte said he would've pitched on regular rest if it were a closer race. They were just being careful, because they could afford to.
#10
Posted 21 September 2009 - 10:44 PM
#11
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:03 PM
Douche.
#12
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:05 PM
#13
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:12 PM
#14
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:22 PM
I don't see how NY can keep him, he's a 130 game a year fulltime DH. At least Damon can play the outfield part time if they keep him.
It would be nice if Girardi noticed Matsui was leading the league in HR/PA against lefties, though.
#15
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:27 PM
Edited by SemperFidelisSox, 21 September 2009 - 11:28 PM.
#16
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:32 PM
A 3-year deal for Holliday with a high AAV (allowing him to become a FA when he's still relatively young and probably when the ecomonic situation changes) would be better than a 2 year guarantee for Damon.
#17
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:33 PM
"Oh, he knows the camera's on him, that's why he didn't lay into Rivera!" "Players know that that camera is trained on the dugout."
Jesus, enough already. Shut up you idiots.
Meanwhile, Joe Saunders shoving it up New York's ass. Well, everyone but A-Rod.
#18
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:34 PM
#19
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:36 PM
He's in a really unique position as a Japanese icon, and so I don't think you can apply normal logic to his situation. In the eyes of the Japanese public, Matsui going to almost any other team would be a step down in prestige. Boston would probably be an exception (mostly because of Dice-K), but that's not happening with Ortiz around. Seattle would be an obvious fit, he'd be a nice upgrade on Griffey/Sweeney, but as I've written here before, I'm pretty sure Ichiro and Matsui have some personal issues, which wouldn't normally matter so much, except that Seattle has a Japanese owner who would be quite sensitive to something like that.
If the main Japanese league (I forget the name) used the DH, I'd be sure he'd go back there, but they don't, only the second best league uses it. I think he's going to retire.
#20
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:37 PM
#21
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:38 PM
#22
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:38 PM
#23
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:39 PM
Did Borowski ever get 40?
#24
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:41 PM
I hate the Angels so much.
#25
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:44 PM
Good thing the Red Sox game was meaningless
#26
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:44 PM
#27
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:45 PM
#28
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:46 PM
No Matsui, Swisher hitting 5th, Bruney and Albaladejo in the 7th and 8th when the game was still within reach, etc?
Doesn't he realize that his team needs to win a few? Can't he give guys a rest in the last week of the season AFTER beating teams they might face in the playoffs?
#29
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:47 PM
I'm just happy Tito decided to play his game as meaningless as well, leaving Wakefield out there when he had nothing and pitching MDC - otherwise we'd be looking at 3 in the loss column with 2 more in LA.
#30
Posted 21 September 2009 - 11:52 PM
The Red Sox, Yankees and Cardinals are probably the only three playoff teams who don't have issues or questions about their closers heading into the postseason. Fuentes? Rodney? Broxton? And I don't even know who the Phillies closer is these days now that Lidge has not lost the job. That's why I can't see anyone else but those three (Bos, NY, St. Louis) winning this.
#31
Posted 22 September 2009 - 12:08 AM
#32
Posted 22 September 2009 - 12:38 AM
...Swisher hitting 5th...
Girardi always slots Swisher into the place in the lineup of the guy who's sitting. So if Damon sits, Swisher hits second, Tex sits, Swisher hits third. Presumably this is so that most people hit in their normal spot, but I did think it was a mistake to not have Posada 5th and Swisher 6th today.
#33
Posted 22 September 2009 - 06:34 AM
Why wouldn't he? Honestly I can't believe people are paying any attention to the division like it still means something. What is the sense of going all-out to try for the slim chance to have an extra game at home? You possibly do a lot more damage to your team that way. Now is the time to get your starters out early, give guys, days off, etc. Not to try to win some really meaningless title.
This is how they have done business for the past 6 years. Look at 2007 when the Yankees got within a few games, they didn't change their strategy (still using Gagne late to see what he had, etc) because whether they held on to the division or not they still would have been in the playoffs.
#34
Posted 22 September 2009 - 07:54 AM
A 3-year deal for Holliday with a high AAV (allowing him to become a FA when he's still relatively young and probably when the ecomonic situation changes) would be better than a 2 year guarantee for Damon.
Why in the world would Holliday take a 3 year deal? I don't care what the AAV is.
#35
Posted 22 September 2009 - 09:37 AM
#36
Posted 22 September 2009 - 11:11 AM
#37
Posted 22 September 2009 - 12:30 PM
Well thanks for being such a bitch about it....
#38
Posted 22 September 2009 - 12:40 PM
Broxton hasn't given up an earned run since August 15th. Over that span, in 18 appearances: 18 2/3 innings, 10 hits, 31 Ks, 5 walks. Fireman of the year? Well, he does have 5 blown saves, mostly earlier in the year.
#39
Posted 22 September 2009 - 04:22 PM
You know what? You're right, I was feeling bitchy and I took it on you for no good reason, so I apologize.
#40
Posted 22 September 2009 - 04:35 PM
They were actually right around the trade deadline. He developed a foot problem that he managed to pitch through poorly, but he seems to be long past it now. Still, when you're 300 pounds and throw 100 MPH, a misstep can quickly reaggravate things.
#41
Posted 22 September 2009 - 09:01 PM
This is how they have done business for the past 6 years. Look at 2007 when the Yankees got within a few games, they didn't change their strategy (still using Gagne late to see what he had, etc) because whether they held on to the division or not they still would have been in the playoffs.
Just as a personal clarification, any fear of losing the division comes 99% from the fact that the wild card will have to face the Angels, and Yankees-Angels in the first round is an automatic exit until proven otherwise.
#42
Posted 22 September 2009 - 09:54 PM
No worries - appreciate the apology.
It's happened to all of us at one point or another on this site.
FWIW, your point was a good one - it probably was wishful thinking on my part.












