Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
8/14 ANALYSIS Red Sox @ Rangers
#1
Posted 14 August 2009 - 11:08 AM
#2
Posted 14 August 2009 - 11:37 AM
I have never mastered the art of lining up stats, but the numbers can be found here:gameday
Edit to add "this year" re Youkilis.
Edited by InsideTheParker, 14 August 2009 - 11:46 AM.
#3
Posted 14 August 2009 - 01:09 PM
I don't always get the line of reasoning behind the "ok, THIS is the most important series so far this year." I think last weekend was more important, it's just that they completely failed. If they had won 3 of 4 last weekend, this series isn't nearly as importatnt. I get that Texas is our main competition now but if we had won 3-4 last weekend, we're 1/2 game back and 1 game back for the best record in baseball. The stakes don't seem as dire here. I don't see Texas pulling away even if they get the best of us this weekend.
Without Youks, I don't really have high expectations for this weekend. I do think they'll eventually pull out the WC and the starting pitching is going to lead the way. I hope that Tito puts the "right" lineups out there and the offense and defense is good enough.
#4
Posted 14 August 2009 - 02:49 PM
I think every series is more important than the last one here on out. We have to keep pace or do better than the teams behind us. The detroit series raised our playoff chances 12% from a season low of 38%. I don't really see these numbers as end all be all (They come from baseball prospectus) but I think it's just a good perspective. We were more likely to miss the playoffs after NY swept us. However, during that same time period, Tampa has struggled. That 3-1 we put up against detroit has been huge.
I think it's mainly important that we win 1 game in Texas. Just one. 0-3 is 3 games in the standings while 1-2 is only one. If we leave Texas only 1/2 game behind them, then it really doesn't matter Texas beat us in the head to head if we make up a game on them elsewhere. Texas will not win out.
#5
Posted 14 August 2009 - 04:23 PM
1. Josh Reddick, CF
2. Dustin Pedroia, 2B
3. Victor Martinez, 1B
4. Jason Bay, LF
5. J.D. Drew, RF
6. Mike Lowell, 3B
7. David Ortiz, DH
8. Jason Varitek, C
9. Nick Green, SS
-- Jon Lester, LHP
Rangers
1. Omar Vizquel, 2B
2. Michael Young, 3B
3. Marlon Byrd, CF
4. Andrew Jones, DH
5. Josh Hamilton, RF
6. Hank Blalock, 1B
7. David Murphy, LF
8. Jarrod Saltalamacchia, C
9. Elvis Andrus, SS
-- Kevin Millwood, RHP
I haven't yet heard why Ellsbury's out tonight. I hope they're just resting him. Reddick is IMO the best choice without Ells to lead off. As others in here have called for Papi's drop in the lineup, seventh seems to put minimal pressure on him but I can't say I like Papi, Tek and Green in a row. What do you all think?
#6
Posted 14 August 2009 - 04:56 PM
Dear Ms Kluzu,
This is an analysis thread. I can't say what I think. I'm not sure I'm capable of thought on this subject.
Feeling? Sick.
Yours in pain,
ITP
#7
Posted 14 August 2009 - 04:57 PM
Am I reading this right that TEX has L-L-L in the 5-7 spots? Lester needs to make short, quick and painless work of that.
#8
Posted 14 August 2009 - 05:46 PM
Am I reading this right that TEX has L-L-L in the 5-7 spots? Lester needs to make short, quick and painless work of that.
It is doubtful it had much to do with Washington's lineup construction, but Lester does have a slight reverse platoon. Both in his MLB career and in 2009.
Nelson Cruz has been dealing with a bum ankle. It looks like they just put him on the DL this afternoon. That right handed bat probably has more to do with the Lefty dominated middle of the lineup.
edit: I am deluded and mis-read something on b-ref. Lester does have a bit of a reverse platoon developing this year, however in his career RHH's have done slightly better when looking at OPS. Though LHH's have a higher SLG% when looking at 2009 or his career.
2009
vs. RHB .249 / .307 / .356
vs. LHB .248 / .305 / .423
Career
vs. RHP .265 / .337 / .383
vs. LHP .249 / .306 / .394
Back to your classical music.
Edited by Adirondack jack, 14 August 2009 - 06:11 PM.
#9
Posted 14 August 2009 - 07:45 PM
I'm just guessing that Gonzalez might not improve that area too much, but it can't possibly be any worse.
#10
Posted 14 August 2009 - 07:53 PM
#11
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:01 PM
Edited by Laser Show, 14 August 2009 - 08:02 PM.
#12
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:02 PM
Could it a "Lack of Fenway Gun" type thing?
I think his location seems to be a bigger problem than velocity.

Yup. All over the place. And in the middle of the zone.
Edited by BucketOBalls, 14 August 2009 - 08:08 PM.
#13
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:03 PM
#14
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:09 PM
Pitch FX has the last 4 seamer as the fastest pitch of the night at 95.3, with the velocity slowly coming up over the game.
Edited by shepard50, 14 August 2009 - 08:12 PM.
#15
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:27 PM
edit: Lester's motion just seems a bit jerkier than usual, more tentative...doesn't help that he's been working from the stretch almost exclusively.
Edited by Nixon's Hat Stain, 14 August 2009 - 08:29 PM.
#16
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:30 PM
Apparently he has a sore shoulder.
Edited by OCD SS, 14 August 2009 - 08:38 PM.
#17
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:38 PM
Numbness in his right hand. per radio
Edited by mjswarner, 14 August 2009 - 08:39 PM.
#18
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:39 PM
Frankie V said Salty had been throwing lolly-pops back to Millwood all-night. Apparently, his shoulder is barking(link). Unsure if it's the same shoulder he struggled with last year.
#19
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:41 PM
Apparently he has a sore shoulder.
The Rangers broadcasters just said that Salty left with numbness in his right hand. Earlier in the game, I noticed that Salty had trouble throwing back to Milwood. Milwood would have to jump for the throws back to the mound or move off of the mound to catch Salty's throws.
#20
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:44 PM
#21
Posted 14 August 2009 - 08:53 PM
edit: Lester's motion just seems a bit jerkier than usual, more tentative...doesn't help that he's been working from the stretch almost exclusively.
Control, maybe, but velocity is due to the Texas ballpark. It is well known to be slow.
#22
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:10 PM
Edit: In spite of his being enamoured with "small ball".
Edit 2: That was kind of a dumb comment, as the Buchholz gaffe would have never happened if Woodward had bunted successfully.
Edited by Tudor Fever, 14 August 2009 - 10:25 PM.
#23
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:20 PM
#24
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:26 PM
Edited by BucketOBalls, 14 August 2009 - 10:28 PM.
#25
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:27 PM
#26
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:36 PM
Good one.
And as long as we get the win, we can look back and smile warmly, patting Buchholz on the head instead of wanting to bean him for causing us the loss. I still think it wasn't a great move on Tito's part.
Glad Lester won't get the loss with his 11 Ks
Edited by Redkluzu, 14 August 2009 - 10:38 PM.
#28
Posted 14 August 2009 - 10:58 PM
Bottom line: Francisco really does not enjoy pitching consecutive games.
Edit: Clarity
Edited by Manzivino, 15 August 2009 - 03:10 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












