1-4 with a single.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
8/8 Sox @ Yanks Analysis Only Game Thread
#51
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:30 PM
1-4 with a single.
#52
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:30 PM
#53
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:31 PM
Ultimately, that didn't happen though.
#54
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:31 PM
Inexperience out there hurt Youk a bit.
Also, I really liked the mic on the umpire there. Normally I'm not a big fan, but that was nice to have.
#55
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:32 PM
#56
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:33 PM
Not only that, but we get an unfiltered look into A*Rod's gamesmanship. Not that we didn't know about that already, but you get my point.
#57
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:33 PM
Only 1 for 4 lifetime -- hardly a large enough sample to justify playing against the platoon. Bay's hamstring must be worse than first let on.
#58
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:34 PM
Ultimately, that didn't happen though.
What amused me is he was trying to sell that it hit his LEFT (front) shoulder which (if you are going to lie about it) doesn't seem like it's the right shoulder to point at; given the way he ducked and the curveball snapped. The Youkilis error only cost Buchholz three pitches; so at least it wasn't murder on the PC.
#59
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:35 PM
Inexperience out there hurt Youk a bit.
Also, I really liked the mic on the umpire there. Normally I'm not a big fan, but that was nice to have.
I don't trust it either. It is for 2006 and while Youks has only played 1 game in LF since then(the other day) it does has some relevance given Youks error in the 1st. SSS cavaets apply.
#60
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:36 PM
I don't understand how Bay's hamstring affects whether or not Youkilis plays LF or 1B; especially since the LHB platoon is a wash with Reddick/Kotchman.
The more I think about it; this is the perfect day to play Youkilis at 3B, Kotchman at 1B, Reddick in RF, and Lowell at DH. It's no more lefty-heavy than what we have, and I really would like to give Ortiz some rest at some point.
#61
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:39 PM
http://mycroft.mozde...?name=fangraphs - click on "Fangraphs Player Search" to install the Fangraphs search. This should work on IE.
http://mycroft.mozde...eball reference - These do Baseball Reference. The first one is recommended for Mozilla browsers. The second may work with IE, but I have never tried it.
http://mycroft.mozde...e=baseball cube - Baseball cube. IE/Mozilla.
These let you select those sites from your dropdown search (just like you would Google) and type in a player's name to pull up their pages.
Edited by Blacken, 08 August 2009 - 03:40 PM.
#62
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:39 PM
#63
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:39 PM
#64
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:41 PM
The more I think about it; this is the perfect day to play Youkilis at 3B, Kotchman at 1B, Reddick in RF, and Lowell at DH. It's no more lefty-heavy than what we have, and I really would like to give Ortiz some rest at some point.
I think Ortiz is in the lineup because of his 1.031 lifetime OPS against Sabathia, and because Tito always tries to show confidence in struggling players and keep their minds off of recent troubles (like this morning's press conference).
Unfortunately, it doesn't instill much confidence in me...
#65
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:45 PM
But too bad, erased
#66
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:46 PM
Thanks! Eminent usefulness!
Now if RedOctober will share with us how he gets his splits so quickly...
***
Really more of an observation here, but it seems to me that Buck and McCarver are dribbling more splooge over Buchholz than I'd expect, given his struggles over the last two years. His stuff does seem to me on to me.
So far...
#67
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:47 PM
Aside from the one Youk fuckup, he looks pretty composed and is pitching as such.
#68
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:47 PM
I know it's a SSS but he's had a GB rate that some sinkerballers would kill for.
#69
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:47 PM
#70
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:49 PM
#71
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:49 PM
#72
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:50 PM
(Also, that was an absolutely filthy K by Sabathia.)
#73
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:50 PM
#74
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:50 PM
Now if RedOctober will share with us how he gets his splits so quickly...
***
Really more of an observation here, but it seems to me that Buck and McCarver are dribbling more splooge over Buchholz than I'd expect, given his struggles over the last two years. His stuff does seem to me on to me.
So far...
B-Ref PI index, pitcher vs. batter then select vs. certain team.
#75
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:51 PM
#76
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:53 PM
Buchholz is back to sitting on the outside edge, just as he did in his first start in Toronto. Given his problems pitching inside against Baltimore, it seems like a good strategy for the first few innings. Second inning: 8 pitches -- 4 fastballs, 4 changeups.
#77
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:57 PM
Probably because Tek sat for 15 innings last night.
Also, Tim McCarver is a moron. Apparently catchers stretch the hamstring when squatting, but not the quad.
Edited by Ed Hillel, 08 August 2009 - 03:57 PM.
#78
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:57 PM
#79
Posted 08 August 2009 - 03:59 PM
#80
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:01 PM
Also, Tim McCarver is a moron. Apparently catchers stretch the hamstring when squatting, but not the quad.
No I agree with you. What I meant was, why not rest Tek last night and play Kotchman against Burnett so Tek could hit from the right side today with Victor at 1B?
#81
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:03 PM
#82
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:03 PM
| Season | GB/FB | LD% | GB% | FB% |
| 2007 | 1.18 | 28.80% | 38.50% | 32.70% |
| 2008 | 1.52 | 20.90% | 47.70% | 31.40% |
| 2009 | 2.87 | 15.90% | 62.30% | 21.70% |
#83
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:04 PM
I think Tito's catcher rotation is driven more by who is pitching for the Red Sox than who the catcher might hit against. I don't recall the source, but I think Francona intended to have Tek catch Beckett and Lester all the time, and then to mix and match for the remaining 3 starters.
Given Tek's LHH deficiencies, I think this looks like a costly strategy, but Tito does have enormous confidence in Tek behind the plate.
Buchholz is losing fastball location by increasing margins.
#84
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:05 PM
I read somewhere (maybe last night's game thread), that Tito wants Varitek to keep catching Beckett and Lester. Not sure if that is true or not, but it could be one explanation for this lineup decision.
#85
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:07 PM
#86
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:07 PM
#87
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:08 PM
Edited by cshea, 08 August 2009 - 04:08 PM.
#88
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:10 PM
#89
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:10 PM
#90
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:11 PM
I think Green's offline throw cost them more than the BB. If not for that, the Yanks don't score a run and Damon/Teix/A-Rod never get an AB.
#91
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:17 PM
#92
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:17 PM
I agree, but I have read/heard that theory several times. There must be some sort of "clever things to say during game" for announcers blog.
#94
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:18 PM
#95
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:19 PM
Futures at Fenway PitchFX =)
http://brooksbasebal...amp;prevDate=88
#96
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:20 PM
#97
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:20 PM
You really have to see it to believe it, with all the talk of playing down the stretch and anything. Funny they don't mention anything about the midges...
#98
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:21 PM
I was thinking more of that dreadful series in September 2001 against NYY where they lost 4 straight at Fenway: 3-2, 2-1,2-1,1-0 (the last being Mussina's near perfecto).
#99
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:21 PM
I think it could. Was it Jimy who used to screw around with the lineups on a constant basis? It drove me nuts. Everyone is different, but I know when I played I liked to know if I was playing, where I was playing, and where I was hitting. Intellectually it doesn't seem like it should matter, but it certainly can.
Edited by glennhoffmania, 08 August 2009 - 04:22 PM.
#100
Posted 08 August 2009 - 04:23 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












