Josh Beckett's been totally clutch tonight, and I hope the bats, Bard, and Paps are up to the task.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
8/7 Red Sox @ Yankees
#201
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:25 PM
Josh Beckett's been totally clutch tonight, and I hope the bats, Bard, and Paps are up to the task.
#202
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:25 PM
Actually, this is in theory the "off topic" thread. Nip said that "Let's still have fun in the main game thread but please do recognize that most members are coming there to follow along and discuss the game. As such, multiple pictures of light switches in the "ON" position , for example, should probably migrate over to the offtopic thread as they don't really add all that much to anyone's experience."
This is reading much more like the "thinking gamethreads" that we tried a few years ago that no one posted in. Frankly, it's awesome, but I think it's a tad backwards from the intended structure.
Edit: and sorry to Lazer Show and Blacken; I'm glad I was clear enough.
Edited by OCD SS, 07 August 2009 - 08:27 PM.
#203
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:25 PM
#204
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:26 PM
Of course, it helps that Matsui is a lummox.
#205
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:26 PM
Nice end to that inning there.
I'd have to say that by the way Lowell is being used, yes there is concern. The way JD and Bay have been lately it lowers the roster options even more. Bay as DH would be an option to Papi as an example in my mind with Reddick able to be in LF.
#206
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:26 PM
Must have been counting on contact. Which is a fair assumption, Cano has K'd less than 40 times this season.
#207
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:27 PM
What else about it pleased you? No offense or anything, but we're asking for a little more here.
#208
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:28 PM
This is reading much more like the "thinking gamethreads" that we tried a few years ago that no one posted in. Frankly, it's awesome, but I think it's a tad backwards from the intended structure.
Post intelligent, interesting things here. You don't think that a thinking gamethread will work here? That's fine. Go the fuck away.
I am fucking dead serious here.
#209
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:29 PM
#210
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:29 PM
#211
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:29 PM
#212
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:29 PM
Oh so close on that hack by Reddick. I like that kid on this team right about now. Seen him in Manchester NH four times this year and he really was a standout for the SeaDogs.
#213
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:29 PM
#214
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:30 PM
#215
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:31 PM
Woodward to make his debut in the bottom of the inning, I suppose.
#216
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:31 PM
Edited by Blacken, 07 August 2009 - 08:34 PM.
#217
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:32 PM
Doubt it. Chris Woodward probably going in there.
#218
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:33 PM
You're going to have a difficult time convincing all the lurkers that this is where they should go to post the stupid stuff. I like this thing we've got going on here. This is the alternative game thread, truth be told, and reminds me of stuff from back in the day.
#219
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:33 PM
Chris Woodward is with the club and activated. We'll get his debut in the bottom half.
#220
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:33 PM
Sometimes words don't explain the feeling and I think it should be fine to talk feelings as well as analysis. But I guess it was Tek's good throw and the clean crispness of the play.
#221
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:33 PM
#222
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:33 PM
#223
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:34 PM
#224
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:35 PM
#225
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:36 PM
You are good with words, by the way, darlingheart.
And it looks like Phil Phranchise is ready to go. I hope we can knock him around like we have in the past.
#226
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:36 PM
Memo to Pedey: Don't expand the zone!
#227
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:36 PM
I think they need to send Ellsbury at the first chance. Try to get a RISP with Pedroia at the plate.
#228
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:37 PM
Now it's time to remind Hughes that he didn't win any ballgames last year.
#229
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:37 PM
#230
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:38 PM
Color me pleased.
#231
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:38 PM
That's nice. Go post there.
You guys all have the same Game thread you have always had. No one has to post here. So, if you want it to be a certain way, go there.
#232
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:38 PM
#233
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:38 PM
#234
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:38 PM
#235
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:39 PM
#236
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:39 PM
#237
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:40 PM
#238
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:40 PM
#239
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:41 PM
You guys all have the same Game thread you have always had. No one has to post here. So, if you want it to be a certain way, go there.
First of all I'm not a guy. Second of all I am posting here because I am good at thinking. Third of all I can also share feelings about baseball. Fourth, I have no interest in boobs and baseball.
#240
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:41 PM
Is there a reason why he couldn't be the closer of the future? I don't see one.
#241
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:42 PM
Swisher: 0-3, 1BB, 1SO, .000/.250/.000
Cabrera: 1-5, 1RBI, 2BB, 2SO, .200/.375/.200
Jeter: 3-6, 1BB, 1SO, .500/.571/.667
Ramirez vs
Swisher: 1-2, 1HR, 2RBI, .500/.500/2.000
Cabrera: 1-3, .333/.333/.333
Jeter: 0-1, 1BB, .000/.000/.000
#242
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:42 PM
I am fucking dead serious here.
Perhaps your internet persona is to be an arrogant, blustering jack ass, but I'd suggest that you look at what I wrote: No where did I express any dissatisfaction in how this is one has been shaping up, I was pointing out that the "memo" I missed was the difference between what Nip posted and how this gamethread is actually being used. I pointed to a historical precedent, but frankly, this, now is different.
With the Lurkers in the "standard" gamethread raising the number of posters in it, the ability to have multiple, parallel conversations is drowned out (so that after anyone posts, they're 3 pages past the comments) and what didn't work before because no one used it will now work because that's what some of us want, even if the lables as given are a bit backwards.
Perhaps you, of all people, should fucking stop to read and fucking think a bit more before you post.
#243
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:42 PM
#244
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:43 PM
I haven't followed him closely, but I think the best place for him is the 'pen. It seems like he hasn't had any success in the rotation, and has found a niche in relief. Perhaps the heir to Rivera?
#245
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:43 PM
He should be a starter next year, frankly, and the Yankees should not re-sign Pettitte. Of course, they might re-sign Pettitte anyway as Wang insurance, and Wang might be Hughes-ed next year anyway.
If there's any discussion about Joba relieving again, the Yankees should just give up. He belongs in the rotation for good, and anything else risks that shoulder of his. Which would please me as a Red Sox fan, but it would be devastating to Joba's career.
#246
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:45 PM
With the Lurkers in the "standard" gamethread raising the number of posters in it, the ability to have multiple, parallel conversations is drowned out (so that after anyone posts, they're 3 pages past the comments) and what didn't work before because no one used it will now work because that's what some of us want, even if the lables as given are a bit backwards.
Perhaps you, of all people, should fucking stop to read and fucking think a bit more before you post.
Re-read my post.
I stand by what I said.
And I am an arrogant blusterng jackass in real life too.
#247
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:45 PM
#248
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:46 PM
#249
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:46 PM
Me either. Would they keep him in the pen until 2012 or whenever Mo goes away though?
#250
Posted 07 August 2009 - 08:47 PM
Has too many pitches to be a closer. Why waste that?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










