Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Toucher and Rich --- Everyone Else Has Some Work To Do
#1454
Posted 19 January 2012 - 02:12 PM
Who risks their hd TV in a patriots trivia contest and doesn't know Patten caught the td in the super bowl
Fred made a comment yesterday about the contest that indicated there was little risk for the participants. When he heard one guy wanted to risk his 70" TV Fred said, 'We can't make up that difference"
Also, the fact that it was sponsored so heavily by Paul's TV made it almost a sure thing TVs were part of the deal.
Two of the guys also answered "What Patriots defensive back..." with Willie McGinest and Mike Vrabel.
That was the guy that was so sure he'd win he "risked" a 62" TV. I thought mentioned Willie for the first DB questions was just nerves, but the Vrabel answer indicated he isn't all that familiar with positions in football.
#1455
Posted 19 January 2012 - 02:17 PM
That was great. "I said I've been a Pats fan my whole life, not that I know all these details like positions and rules and stuff." Do T+R ever take their "ask a pink hat" bit to Foxboro? That would be a comedic goldmine.Two of the guys also answered "What Patriots defensive back..." with Willie McGinest and Mike Vrabel.
#1457
Posted 19 January 2012 - 02:54 PM
I got to admit, the Patten question killed me. Complete brain fart.
#1459
Posted 19 January 2012 - 04:12 PM
Chatham it was.I can't believe he couldn't get the Patten one. 98.5 has the video on their site.
Did they ever say who was the defender to pick up the Tiki Barber fumble for a TD against the Giants in 03? For some reason I kept thinking it was Chatham...
#1460
Posted 19 January 2012 - 05:23 PM
Edited by NortheasternPJ, 19 January 2012 - 05:23 PM.
#1461
Posted 20 January 2012 - 10:48 AM
Fred made a comment yesterday about the contest that indicated there was little risk for the participants. When he heard one guy wanted to risk his 70" TV Fred said, 'We can't make up that difference"
Also, the fact that it was sponsored so heavily by Paul's TV made it almost a sure thing TVs were part of the deal.
If you remember earlier in the week Fred was making a big deal about having a guy come to his place and do a professional wall mounting on a TV he just got and that you would be stupid to try and do that yourself, and the promotion they are running has Paul's TV offering... free wall mounting. Smart marketing by them and Pauls.
But if I was one of the guys that got his car ruined by Zo I'd be pissed lol.
#1463
Posted 26 January 2012 - 11:51 AM
#1472
Posted 01 February 2012 - 10:49 AM
http://boston.cbsloc...giants-players/
#1478
Posted 02 February 2012 - 05:42 PM
During Maddona's press conference Rich asked her if she's seen ARod's oil painting of himself as a centaur. Fucking hilarious. She claims she hasn't seen it if he has one.
God I hope this makes Sports Center. Surprised she even answered it as it drew a huge laugh.
#1483
Posted 10 February 2012 - 11:49 AM
#1484
Posted 10 February 2012 - 12:10 PM
He was making the same kind of posts on his facebook page before the White House visit. Why is his facebook page suddenly newsworthy? It's a manufactured story reported by lazy journalists and the only team disctraction resulting from this is media driven.I dunno, it's not like they're really reporting on it. Just calling him a douche for garnering attention and hiding behind some BS argument about being an individual and to respect his privacy. He's an idiot and making a non-sensical argument and they're calling him out on it.
Edit. I would say TNR should move on too, but the wackos it inspires to call in might make keeping it a topic of conversation worth it.
Edited by Curtis_Lesspanic, 10 February 2012 - 12:12 PM.
#1485
Posted 10 February 2012 - 01:03 PM
Well yeah, but, again, they are really just pointing out that Thomas is an idiot. If he's going to keep making these posts he should understand that it's going to cause the media to question you so you shouldn't get pissed off and storm off from a press conference when they do. He directly brought attention to his Facebook page by posting his response there. He could've issued a statement, he could've held a press conference, he could've done a million other things. And he chose Facebook. T&R are just pointing out the idiocy in Thomas' argument as they've stated numerous times that they could care less about it.He was making the same kind of posts on his facebook page before the White House visit. Why is his facebook page suddenly newsworthy? It's a manufactured story reported by lazy journalists and the only team disctraction resulting from this is media driven.
Edit. I would say TNR should move on too, but the wackos it inspires to call in might make keeping it a topic of conversation worth it.
That and it's kind of a slow news period. There's only so much time you could spend talking about Welker's drop.
Edited by kenneycb, 10 February 2012 - 01:09 PM.
#1486
Posted 10 February 2012 - 01:56 PM
He was making the same kind of posts on his facebook page before the White House visit. Why is his facebook page suddenly newsworthy? It's a manufactured story reported by lazy journalists and the only team disctraction resulting from this is media driven.
It was a story picked up by national news. Not national sports news, national news news. You can say it doesn't pass your journalistic smell test, but you can't possibly argue the local media should treat it as a non-story.
Also, it's not the media's job to avoid distracting the team.
#1487
Posted 11 February 2012 - 12:44 AM
I dunno, it's not like they're really reporting on it. Just calling him a douche for garnering attention and hiding behind some BS argument about being an individual and to respect his privacy. He's an idiot and making a non-sensical argument and they're calling him out on it.
I'm weirdly sympathetic to his argument, though. He is talking to the sports media as part of his sports job; his pontificating is, in his mind, in a separate sphere. Imagine if you were an activist for some cause or another, but you only worked at it on the weekend. Writing crank newsletters or marching in the street or occupying whatever. Now what if people at your office wouldn't stop hounding you about it, even though you were careful not to bring it into work? That's how I look at it, anyway.
Not to mention the fact that sportswriters/sports radio hosts are shockingly ignorant about politics and current events, and most of them don't even know what the hell he was talking about.
#1488
Posted 11 February 2012 - 01:04 AM
Edited by kenneycb, 11 February 2012 - 01:06 AM.
#1489
Posted 11 February 2012 - 03:45 PM
This analogy isn't apt because my job does not put me out there as a public figure. I'm not sponsoring Capital One. I'm not on TV 82+ times a year. Thomas is an idiot because he's hiding behind the "I'm an individual, respect my privacy, I only want to talk about hockey" statement even he plays one of the major sports and is in various national commercials. He brought national attention to his Facebook page and now he's pissed that people are reading it and asking him about what he says. If he doesn't like the consequences, stop posting or make your page private. It's not that hard and will prevent this Captain Poopypants act whenever it gets brought up. All I want to see is for him to own it instead of pussyfooting around the issue and acting like the victim to something he directly caused. Of course, none of this would have happened if he just issued a statement instead of CAPITALIZING random WORDS in a Facebook POST.
Really, he's just a guy who plays hockey. That we, and the media, choose to follow and report on him isn't any choice of his. He's not a public figure in the sense that he is accountable to the public, like a politician or the head of a public company.
#1490
Posted 11 February 2012 - 04:44 PM
No he is not just a guy that plays hockey. I am just a guy that plays hockey. My men's league games are not televised. Nobody shows up to my games. I actually pay other people for the right to play hockey. If he doesn't want the media to follow him, go back down to the Detroit Vipers or something. I'm sure he'd love that. It's part of the game and if you are a high-profile figure (is that a good enough compromise for your literal interpretation of "public figure"?) that is part of a national ad campaign and the face of one of the more successful franchises in a business that generates billions of dollars and has a worldwide following, then, yes, you are going to have to answer to the media for what you do and say both in and outside of work.Really, he's just a guy who plays hockey. That we, and the media, choose to follow and report on him isn't any choice of his. He's not a public figure in the sense that he is accountable to the public, like a politician or the head of a public company.
Oh, and heads of public companies aren't really accountable to the public, to the extent their not breaking laws or the like. They're accountable to their shareholders, most of which are private citizens and/or corporate entities.
#1491
Posted 11 February 2012 - 08:02 PM
If he wants to be a Tea Partier or anti-government wingnut, that's cool. Just own up to it and quit being such a vag about everything.
#1492
Posted 12 February 2012 - 02:16 AM
We, as fans, make him a public figure. He has no obligation to us, whatsoever. His only obligation is to stop pucks for the Bruins, and in so doing earn his paycheck by providing value to the franchise. I don't want to be obtuse about it, but what obligation does he have to the press? I can see an argument that he owes it to the Bruins to make himself available to the sports media for sports questions, but I really don't have a problem with him segregating his professional life from his political commentary. We talk about the press like they're some kind of non-profit organization devoted to the public good. They're not. I enjoy Mike Felger, but he's just a jerk trying to make a paycheck like anyone else, and I don't think Tim Thomas owes him an answer about a damn thing. Don't like it, don't watch or listen. Personally, I'm glad he wants to keep his politics separate, where if you don't want to hear it, you don't have to. He's not preaching to anyone who hasn't made a conscious decision to go and read his thoughts.
At the same time, doesn't he have the same rights as any of us to go off and rant on Facebook or, as here, in V&N? I don't think he should have to relinquish his right to free speech just because he plays a game for a living. He wants to say his piece, and he doesn't want to discuss it with sports reporters. I don't really have a problem with either of those things. The way you guys are talking, it sounds like you must have loved the straightforward, honest political commentary of Curt Schilling.
#1493
Posted 12 February 2012 - 06:51 AM
He's also not separating his professional life from his political commentary. He wouldn't be in a position to do things like refuse to visit the president or have thousands of people check his page if it wasn't for his professional life. His professional life gives him that kind of pulpit. And he's perfectly aware of it and trying to have it both ways. Sorry. You can't.
Edited by Eric1984, 12 February 2012 - 07:01 AM.
#1494
Posted 12 February 2012 - 07:01 AM
I really don't have a problem with him segregating his professional life from his political commentary
Then he should have. He didn't with the white house non visit. The problem is he's picking and choosing where he wants to keep them separate. You can't have it both ways.
At the same time, doesn't he have the same rights as any of us to go off and rant on Facebook or, as here, in V&N? I don't think he should have to relinquish his right to free speech just because he plays a game for a living
He does but if he does it in a public forum under his name then he has to expect to be asked about it. Especially when bringing up comparisons to Nazi Germany.
The way you guys are talking, it sounds like you must have loved the straightforward, honest political commentary of Curt Schilling.
Curts political stuff was annoying and people just wanted him to shut up but he didn't shy away from questions and hide like Thomas is. I wish Thomas would shut the fuck up as well but he doesn't.
He wants to say his piece, and he doesn't want to discuss it with sports reporters
I want a lot of things in life and don't get them. Tough shit he doesn't want to answer questions, that's not the world he's living in. He brought this upon himself, he brought his political view into hockey. For fucks sake he's got a political statement on his goalie mask.
He should understand by doing this shit he's putting himself in front of the team. He's causing headaches for the organization he works for and may be pissing off his teammates as well. Even Schilling said during Super Bowl week that he wished he didn't make any comments for that very reason.
#1496
Posted 28 February 2012 - 08:05 AM
#1498
Posted 09 March 2012 - 11:33 AM
Rich Shertenlieb
Bad news: Adolfo was just mugged in broad daylight in Brighton.
Good news: The criminals weren't very good at hiding.
Great news: The cops were T&R fans.
Thank you from the T&R show to the Brighton Police Department for helping our friend Adolfo.
#1500
Posted 15 March 2012 - 12:38 PM
Article: http://mlb.mlb.com/n...ws_mlb&c_id=mlb
T&R Rebuttal: http://boston.cbsloc...by-the-builder/
The downside is that I've had the Bob the Builder theme song stuck in my head all day, but it was well worth it.
Reply to this topic
4 user(s) are reading this topic
2 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Grenouille, Bing (1), weeba










