Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo

RealFantasy: Pigskin- Draft & Discussion Thread


  • Please log in to reply
3147 replies to this topic

#1 bsj


  • Renegade Crazed Genius


  • 14,873 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 08:47 PM

This is the thread in which the draft will take place, and all discussion from this point on should take place.


The Results Page:

QUOTE
***Here is the link to the results chart: --->CLICK HERE FOR DRAFT RESULTS<---


Here is the draft order and team assignments:
1 roundegotrip Round Ego Bears
2 dgilpin Gilpin Bengals
3 3rd Degree 3rd Degree Bills
4 Dollar Buck-ing Broncos
5 D Jack's Dome D Jack Browns
6 SeoulSoxFan Seoul Buccaneers
7 BoSoxFink BS Fink Cardinals
8 Morgan's Magic Snowplow Morgan's Magic Chargers
9 UNCSoxFan5 UNC Chiefs
10 The Needle Needle Colts
11 Myt1 Myt Cowboys
12 Sille Skrub/Stuart Scott's Lazy Eye Sille Stuart Dolphins
13 Titoschew Titos Eagles
14 bsj BSJ Falcons
15 DaughtersofDougMirabelli Daughters 49ers
16 ilol@u LOL Giants
17 DeathoftheBambino Death Jaguars
18 Teddy's Dirtbag SonDirtbag Jets
19 JulE6JulE6's Lions
20 Woburn Diaspora Woburn Packers
21 ToxicSmed Toxic Panthers
22 bball831 Bball Patriots
23 dylan marsh Marsh Raiders
24 RedOctober3829 Red October Rams
25 mascho Mascho Ravens
26 ChemistrySchemistry Chemistry Redskins
27 kanga12/majorwibi Kanga Wibi Saints
28 Ferm Sheller Sheller Seahawks
29 Hendu's Gait Hendu Steelers
30 dabombdig Da Bomb Texans
31 MysticMerlin Mystic Titans
32 MarcSullivaFan Marc Sulli-Vikings
Draft will be serpentine style, as was the baseball draft.

Making Your Pick: Formatting

When making picks, let's all stick to the same general format for consistency:

Full players name, current NFL team, position he will play on your team in bold
(If any players on your chart need to be moved as a result of this pick, please provide detailed instruction including full name of player to be moved and new position)

Photo of your draft pick

Explanation


Here is an example of how we should make our pick, quoted (slightly modified) from the baseball draft. You can provide more or less detail in your explanation. Its up to you.


Example:

QUOTE
The Walloping Wonderkinds are proud to select:

Jeremy Guthrie, Baltimore Orioles, SP
(Move Aba Alvarez to RP)



Some health concerns last year, and his having a slow start so far but as consistent as they come. And pitching for the O's meant having top 3 worst run support in the entire league among pitchers over 150 innings pitched.

Career lines of 3.97 ERA, 1.29 WHIP with 139 BB / 283 SO.

At age 30, he's much older than Haren, Lester (my two top picks for 2nd round) at 24, but should be a steady, if not spectacular #1 on the Wonderkinds.

P.S. Indians had DFA'd him in 07 before being picked up by the O's, thus the baseball card pic.



Time Limit on Picks
A couple notes. We will have a slightly more tight [i]time limit on picks. Each team owner will have a 6 hour window to make a pick before their pick is skipped. 2 exceptions:

1- On weekends, Saturdays and Sundays, the time limit will be 12 hours
2- The clock will freeze from 12 midnight to 6 am EDT. So. If someone picks at 10pm, and the next guy hasn't picked by midnight, they will use 2 hours of time from 10pm until midnight, and then the clock starts again at 6am with them having 4 more hours.

Also, the owner who has the wraparound picks only gets ONE 6 hour window. Then, they are skipped.

Any owner who as 2 consecutive picks skipped will have his/her team reassigned, so please, only commit if you plan on being able to check back frequently. Also, please understand that even WITH these time windows being instituted, this is a LONG TERM draft. I am hoping that we are able to get through one half a round a day on average. Given he roster requirements below, that means this should take at least 6 weeks, if not more. I'd like to to finish it before the NFL season begins at the very latest.

Proxying

One tool which has been extremely helpful in the baseball RealFantasy draft is proxying. If you see that you will be unable to pick when your turn will be up, please send a short numbered list of 3-4 players to a fellow owner who can make the pick on your behalf. If saves a lot of time and makes for a smoother running draft with less likelihood of dropouts due to waning interest.

Roster Structure

We are going to be drafting offenses and defenses, in addition to a kicker and a punter. That makes a total of 28 rounds.

As far as offense goes, i've allowed for a base setup and a couple of subs. An extra running back for running downs, and an extra WR for passing situations.

Offense
QB
RB
RB
FB
TE
WR
WR
WR
LT
LG
C
RG
RT

On defense, we will be drafting enough LBs and D-linemen to accomodate a 3-4 or a 4-3, and will also be drafting a nickel back.

Defense
DE
DE
DT/NT
DT/NT
ILB
ILB
OLB
OLB
CB
CB
CB
FS
SS

Special Teams
Kicker
Punter

Keep in mind, for both offense and defense, you can move guys around as you would like, but keep in mind, guys playing out of position may hurt your overall defense.

Edited by bsj, 29 June 2009 - 09:00 AM.


#2 DaughtersofDougMirabelli

  • 1,755 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 08:50 PM

So it begins

#3 bsj


  • Renegade Crazed Genius


  • 14,873 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 08:54 PM

Since I posted previously that I would kick things off tomorrow, the clock will officially start ticking as of 6am ET tomorrow morning. HOWEVER, if people are here before that and want to get started early, picks may be submitted as of now.

#4 3rd Degree

  • 2,110 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 08:59 PM

Thank you so much for using the Guthrie pick as your example. Nothing but love for you, SSF, but that's funny.

Everybody please remember to PM the next person on the clock after you make your pick!

#5 roundegotrip

  • 1,939 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:12 PM

Round 1, Pick 1

With the first pick in the 2009 RealFantasy: Pigskin draft, the Round Ego Bears select:


Tom Brady, New England Patriots, QB



We all know who Brady is and what he's capable of, and there's no player I'd rather build a championship team around. There might be some bumps in the road this year as he makes his way back, but I believe Brady is still capable of performing at an elite level for many years to come.

With the right pieces around him, even at 80% of what he has been in recent years, he'd still be one the best quarterbacks in the NFL. I see that as the worst case scenario. It might be a gamble to take Brady right now, but how can I not take the chance?

#6 bsj


  • Renegade Crazed Genius


  • 14,873 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:16 PM

QUOTE (roundegotrip @ Jun 10 2009, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Round 1, Pick 1

With the first pick in the 2009 RealFantasy: Pigskin draft, the Round Ego Bears select:


Tom Brady, New England Patriots, QB



We all know who Brady is and what he's capable of, and there's no player I'd rather build a championship team around. There might be some bumps in the road this year as he makes his way back, but I believe Brady is still capable of performing at an elite level for many years to come.

With the right pieces around him, even at 80% of what he has been in recent years, he'd still be one the best quarterbacks in the NFL. I see that as the worst case scenario. It might be a gamble to take Brady right now, but how can I not take the chance?


Can't really argue the pick. Its a dice roll from an injury perspective. But IF he comes back healthy, there is no better winner in the NFL

PS- Dont forget to PM the next person

Edited by bsj, 10 June 2009 - 09:17 PM.


#7 Ferm Sheller

  • 2,584 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:18 PM

Good pick. At the risk of being a Pats homer, I would have picked Brady first if I owned the pick. As you mention, a bit of a gamble due to the injury, but if BB is willing to take that gamble, so am I.

#8 3rd Degree

  • 2,110 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:18 PM

I just sent dgilpin a PM letting him know he's up.

#9 roundegotrip

  • 1,939 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:21 PM

PM sent.

I'd be lying if I said I didn't second guess this pick a little, but I have faith in Brady, and that's what it came down to.

#10 Dgilpin

  • 2,780 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:31 PM

With the 2nd Pick Bengals select: Philip Rivers - QB, San Diego Chargers



This is a pick I might get slammed on. At this point in the draft I think you really have to walk away with a QB, so it came down to Manning or Rivers for me with the ultimate deciding factor being age. Since I'm looking at building my team not just for next season but for a 5-6 year run. It was important for me to go with a young QB who I felt I could count on to contribute for that entire time. With Manning the Bengals are no doubt in great shape regarding the QB position for the next 2 years, however at 35/36 you have to wonder how effective Manning will be with quite a few miles on the odometer. At 27 I think Rivers is just turning the corner as an elite QB, who whether you like him or not has demonstrated his ability to lead and motivate a team. Taking the Chargers to an AFC Championship game while playing on an injuried knee. Aside from all that he did put up some great numbers last season: Comp.%: 65.3, 4009 yds, 34 TDs, 11 Ints, and a QB rating of 105.3. All without an elite WR.

Edit: Update photo to something more flattering

Edited by Dgilpin, 11 June 2009 - 07:01 AM.


#11 Jed Zeppelin


  • SoSH Member


  • 12,980 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:34 PM

Thoroughly shocked.

#12 dabombdig

  • 179 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:35 PM

QUOTE (Dgilpin @ Jun 10 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
With the 2nd Pick Bengals select: Philip Rivers - QB



This is a pick I might get slammed on. At this point in the draft I think you really have to walk away with a QB, so it came down to Manning or Rivers for me with the ultimate deciding factor being age. Since I'm looking at building my team not just for next season but for a 5-6 year run. So it was important for me to go with a young QB who I felt I could count on to contribute for that entire time. With Manning the Bengals are no doubt in great shape regarding the QB position for the next 2 years, however at 35/36 you have to wonder how effective Manning will be with quite a few miles on the odometer. At 27 I think Rivers is just turning the corner as an elite QB, who whether you like him or not has demonstrated his ability to lead and motivate a team. Taking the Chargers to an AFC Championship game while playing on an injuried knee. Aside from all that he did put up some great numbers last season: Comp.%: 65.3, 4009 yds, 34 TDs, 11 Ints, and a QB rating of 105.3. All without an elite WR.



In order to keep team harmony I would stay away from Ellis Hobbs with your next pic.

#13 3rd Degree

  • 2,110 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:40 PM

The 3D Bills will build their team around:

Peyton Manning, QB



He's no spring chicken at 33, but he is an all-time great and has plenty of football left in him.

His numbers will do the talking for me.



Edited to correct a spelling mistake.

Edited by 3rd Degree, 10 June 2009 - 09:41 PM.


#14 Dgilpin

  • 2,780 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:40 PM

QUOTE (Jed Zeppelin @ Jun 10 2009, 10:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thoroughly shocked.


Honestly 2nd overall was a bad spot for him, I had a few guys I liked in the first round but none probably deserving of the 2nd overall pick. I was hoping for the 10-15 range. Like I said if it was just a QB for next season, Manning is my guy. But I was looking at this from the prespective if I wanted to build a team to compete for the next 5-6 seasons what QB would I select. With that in mind it basically came down to: Rivers, Cutler, Ryan, and E.Manning. Out of that group I Rivers was the guy I liked best. I really felt like last season was a preview of what he's capable of over the next 5-6 years.

#15 roundegotrip

  • 1,939 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:53 PM

Ah, Manning face. Well done.

#16 bsj


  • Renegade Crazed Genius


  • 14,873 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 09:54 PM

Im feelin' I may get the 14th ranked QB at pick 14

#17 DaughtersofDougMirabelli

  • 1,755 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:00 PM

QUOTE (Dgilpin @ Jun 10 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
With the 2nd Pick Bengals select: Philip Rivers - QB, San Diego Chargers

I'm not sure I would take Rivers at 15th, but it's not likely he would make it back to you.

edit:clarity

Edited by DaughtersofDougMirabelli, 10 June 2009 - 10:00 PM.


#18 Ferm Sheller

  • 2,584 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:01 PM

I think we all could foresee that QBs would go early and often in Round One, but I think it's going to get the point that the remaining QBs are so unenticing (and can be easily had in later rounds since we're each limited to one QB) that people will start picking players at other positions in Round One. It will be interesting to see if/when in Round One this trend changes.

#19 Mystic Merlin


  • SoSH Member


  • 17,534 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:03 PM

I like the Rivers pick, but I didn't think anyone would have the balls to pick him over Manning or Roethlisberger.

#20 roundegotrip

  • 1,939 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:06 PM

It's definitely a gutsy pick. I won't say it's the wrong choice, either, with Rivers coming off the season he just had, his age, and his toughness.

#21 3rd Degree

  • 2,110 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:13 PM

QUOTE (Ferm Sheller @ Jun 10 2009, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think we all could foresee that QBs would go early and often in Round One, but I think it's going to get the point that the remaining QBs are so unenticing (and can be easily had in later rounds since we're each limited to one QB) that people will start picking players at other positions in Round One. It will be interesting to see if/when in Round One this trend changes.


This is what I'm most looking forward to in the first round.

#22 Rick Burlesons Yam Bag


  • Internet Cowboy


  • 16,455 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:30 PM

We're talking about 30 year old, married to a supermodel, already won his SBs and coming off injury Tom Brady as the first pick, right?

Holy crap.

Myt, here is our list for round 1, not in order:

Joe Thomas
Patrick Willis
Nnamdi
Vince Wilfork
Jason Peters
Julian Peterson
Jordan Gross
Larry Fitzgerald
Mario Williams

Send the check to me when you realize that you have the greatest team in this thread by a wide margin. With Tom Brady being chosen first and no one batting an eyelid, that should be in round 3 at the latest.

Yours,

RBYB


#23 Dgilpin

  • 2,780 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:40 PM

QUOTE (Rick Burlesons Yam Bag @ Jun 10 2009, 11:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We're talking about 30 year old, married to a supermodel, already won his SBs and coming off injury Tom Brady as the first pick, right?

Holy crap.

Myt, here is our list for round 1, not in order:

Joe Thomas
Patrick Willis
Nnamdi
Vince Wilfork
Jason Peters
Julian Peterson
Jordan Gross
Larry Fitzgerald
Mario Williams

Send the check to me when you realize that you have the greatest team in this thread by a wide margin. With Tom Brady being chosen first and no one batting an eyelid, that should be in round 3 at the latest.

Yours,

RBYB


Joe Thomas was another guy I debated on, but I still think this early in the draft you have to walk away with a QB you feel can lead your team in the future.

#24 roundegotrip

  • 1,939 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 10:58 PM

Despite the positive reports on the health of Brady's knee, and his comments about wanting to play for another ten years, I did have some reservations about making the pick. All things considered, though, I feel pretty confident building my team around the guy who no less a football luminary than SoSH's own Rick Burlesons Yam Bag said "has a shot at [being the greatest quarterback of all time], depending on how his next 3-5 years go"

Yeah, I'll give him a shot at doing that on my team.

#25 ilol@u

  • 1,410 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 11:21 PM

I agree, Tom Brady is a safe/right number one pick. He's said himself he wants to play for another 10 years and he doesn't exactly need a Randy Moss to be putting up numbers or winning considering he has had Reche Caldwell, Jabar Gaffney, Troy Brown and David Givens as his key WRs before. Hell he doesn't even need a great RB to carry the load.

Philip Rivers im a bit suprised by. He is a top QB, no doubt, but at number 2? But if he's your guy, he's your guy. I doubt he would be there when you pick again, 31 picks later.

#26 Jed Zeppelin


  • SoSH Member


  • 12,980 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 11:29 PM

I'm still trying to figure out if any quarterbacks are worth these top picks. I just watched Matt Cassel lead a less than perfect team to an 11-5 record.

Conventional wisdom says that quarterbacks are most important but I'm not sure real NFL results have proved that to be true. If I'm next in the draft having seen three quarterbacks go first I'm looking at the best line player available and taking him.

#27 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,499 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 11:38 PM

QUOTE (3rd Degree @ Jun 10 2009, 09:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thank you so much for using the Guthrie pick as your example. Nothing but love for you, SSF, but that's funny.

Everybody please remember to PM the next person on the clock after you make your pick!



LOL - it'll be a loooong time before I can live that down!

#28 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,499 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 11:40 PM

QUOTE (Dgilpin @ Jun 10 2009, 10:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
With the 2nd Pick Bengals select: Philip Rivers - QB, San Diego Chargers



This is a pick I might get slammed on. At this point in the draft I think you really have to walk away with a QB, so it came down to Manning or Rivers for me with the ultimate deciding factor being age. Since I'm looking at building my team not just for next season but for a 5-6 year run. It was important for me to go with a young QB who I felt I could count on to contribute for that entire time. With Manning the Bengals are no doubt in great shape regarding the QB position for the next 2 years, however at 35/36 you have to wonder how effective Manning will be with quite a few miles on the odometer. At 27 I think Rivers is just turning the corner as an elite QB, who whether you like him or not has demonstrated his ability to lead and motivate a team. Taking the Chargers to an AFC Championship game while playing on an injuried knee. Aside from all that he did put up some great numbers last season: Comp.%: 65.3, 4009 yds, 34 TDs, 11 Ints, and a QB rating of 105.3. All without an elite WR.



And we have our Guthrie! (So this is how it feels, right? right?)

P.S. STFU SSF - Guthrie pick was still way, way worse.

Edited by SeoulSoxFan, 10 June 2009 - 11:49 PM.


#29 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,499 posts

Posted 10 June 2009 - 11:43 PM

QUOTE (Ferm Sheller @ Jun 10 2009, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think we all could foresee that QBs would go early and often in Round One, but I think it's going to get the point that the remaining QBs are so unenticing (and can be easily had in later rounds since we're each limited to one QB) that people will start picking players at other positions in Round One. It will be interesting to see if/when in Round One this trend changes.


Agree with 3rd Degree - was about to post what's over/under on when the run on QB ends. Sooner or later you have to go with a stud on D to get more value out of the dredge that's the current crop of B-stringers.

#30 roundegotrip

  • 1,939 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 12:16 AM

QUOTE (Jed Zeppelin @ Jun 10 2009, 11:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm still trying to figure out if any quarterbacks are worth these top picks. I just watched Matt Cassel lead a less than perfect team to an 11-5 record.

Conventional wisdom says that quarterbacks are most important but I'm not sure real NFL results have proved that to be true. If I'm next in the draft having seen three quarterbacks go first I'm looking at the best line player available and taking him.


One way to look at it is that there are a lot more good linemen to choose from than good quarterbacks. If there's a run on quarterbacks in a draft with 32 people picking per round, your choices at QB can get really slim really fast if you're stuck watching it happen for too long. Say I'd taken Joe Thomas with the number one pick, my first shot at a quarterback would be pick 64 in the draft, and I would be screwed.

There isn't likely to be a big run on LTs like on QBs, but if there is and I miss out on the top 25 LTs, there are still four other positions on the line to pick premium talent at, or I can draft an elite RT and move him over, whatever, there are options. If the top 25 QBs are gone, though, your only option is to have a crappy QB running your offense.

Edited by roundegotrip, 11 June 2009 - 12:17 AM.


#31 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,499 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 12:22 AM

QUOTE (roundegotrip @ Jun 11 2009, 01:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
One way to look at it is that there are a lot more good linemen to choose from than good quarterbacks. If there's a run on quarterbacks in a draft with 32 people picking per round, your choices at QB can get really slim really fast if you're stuck watching it happen for too long. Say I'd taken Joe Thomas with the number one pick, my first shot at a quarterback would be pick 64 in the draft, and I would be screwed.


True, but I think there are a few that are such cornerstones that they trump the 2nd tier QBs. Between the skills picks in RB/WR, a passable (no pun intended) QB can be had in 2nd round if you pick early in the draft.

Either way, I had Rivers below my pick at #6.


#32 SumnerH


  • Malt Liquor Picker


  • 9,127 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 12:39 AM

QUOTE (roundegotrip @ Jun 10 2009, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Round 1, Pick 1

With the first pick in the 2009 RealFantasy: Pigskin draft, the Round Ego Bears select:


Tom Brady, New England Patriots, QB



For future reference, try to pick a picture that shows your player face-planting, with a supermodel, making an idiotic face, or similar. Finding an entertaining picture is really the most important part of these drafts.

#33 SeoulSoxFan


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,499 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 01:09 AM

QUOTE (roundegotrip @ Jun 10 2009, 10:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Round 1, Pick 1

With the first pick in the 2009 RealFantasy: Pigskin draft, the Round Ego Bears select:


Tom Brady, New England Patriots, QB



2 Guys 1 Lombardi


#34 Chemistry Schmemistry


  • has been programmed to get funky/cry human tears


  • 7,343 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 01:10 AM

QUOTE
Time Limit on Picks
A couple notes. We will have a slightly more tight [i]time limit on picks. Each team owner will have a 6 hour window to make a pick before their pick is skipped. 2 exceptions:

1- On weekends, Saturdays and Sundays, the time limit will be 12 hours
2- The clock will freeze from 12 midnight to 6 am EDT. So. If someone picks at 10pm, and the next guy hasn't picked by midnight, they will use 2 hours of time from 10pm until midnight, and then the clock starts again at 6am with them having 4 more hours.

Also, the owner who has the wraparound picks only gets ONE 6 hour window. Then, they are skipped.

Any owner who as 2 consecutive picks skipped will have his/her team reassigned, so please, only commit if you plan on being able to check back frequently. Also, please understand that even WITH these time windows being instituted, this is a LONG TERM draft. I am hoping that we are able to get through one half a round a day on average. Given he roster requirements below, that means this should take at least 6 weeks, if not more. I'd like to to finish it before the NFL season begins at the very latest.


I think I'm online enough to be a fairly committed team owner. However, I am on a very different schedule in that I tend to stay online until 4-5 a.m. for work, then don't get back to the computer until around 12-1 p.m.. So if there are a lot of picks early in the morning, I might be at risk here. I'll do my best. Whoever picks after me should note that I will never be around in the morning, though.

#35 roundegotrip

  • 1,939 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 02:03 AM

QUOTE (SumnerH @ Jun 11 2009, 12:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
For future reference, try to pick a picture that shows your player face-planting, with a supermodel, making an idiotic face, or similar. Finding an entertaining picture is really the most important part of these drafts.


Roger that.



#36 D Jack's Dome


  • The Jinx


  • 1,836 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 05:29 AM

I'm hyperventilating right now I'm so pumped to do this draft.

Or maybe it's the Brady/Goat picture...

Either way, I'm excited.

#37 The Best Catch in 100 Years

  • 442 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 06:43 AM

I'm going to be traveling for the next 20 hours or so, so apologies if I'm a little late with my pick.

#38 UNCSoxFan5

  • 841 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:54 AM

I am not sure I would have taken Rivers at #9, I was certainly considering it, but was not 100% positive I would.

#39 Morgan's Magic Snowplow


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,122 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:56 AM

Did somebody PM Papelbon's Poutine? I think he is on the clock.

#40 TheNeedle

  • 218 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 07:59 AM

QUOTE (UNCSoxFan5 @ Jun 11 2009, 04:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I am not sure I would have taken Rivers at #9, I was certainly considering it, but was not 100% positive I would.


Can't say he was even in my head for 10, but maybe that's just me. It's fine for a first round pick though if you really like him. I see it a lot like the Tony Sanchez pick by the Pirates on Tuesday... a bit of a reach, but decent enough considering we can't trade draft picks.

#41 DaughtersofDougMirabelli

  • 1,755 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:04 AM

QUOTE (roundegotrip @ Jun 11 2009, 01:16 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
There isn't likely to be a big run on LTs like on QBs, but if there is and I miss out on the top 25 LTs, there are still four other positions on the line to pick premium talent at, or I can draft an elite RT and move him over, whatever, there are options. If the top 25 QBs are gone, though, your only option is to have a crappy QB running your offense.


LT and RT skill sets are completely different. Just taking an elite right tackle and moving him over is not going to be as successful as you might think. The LT needs to be your best pass blocker along with being quick and agile to handle the defenses strongest pass rusher, while the RT is usually a stronger pusher to provide holes for the running back on the right side.

I think there are plenty of good QBs to go around, the Bucs won a super bowl with Brad Johnson.

#42 Morgan's Magic Snowplow


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,122 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:05 AM

QUOTE (Jed Zeppelin @ Jun 11 2009, 12:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm still trying to figure out if any quarterbacks are worth these top picks. I just watched Matt Cassel lead a less than perfect team to an 11-5 record.

Conventional wisdom says that quarterbacks are most important but I'm not sure real NFL results have proved that to be true. If I'm next in the draft having seen three quarterbacks go first I'm looking at the best line player available and taking him.


I think that QB is absolutely without doubt the most important position in football.

The real question is how much better is the "Number 5" guy (to take a semi-random number) than the "Number 20" guy (to take another semi-random number)? I think there are a few players that are true game changers, but after that you have a lot of guys who might be ranked pretty high on most lists of QBs but are not obviously better than their peers. They've just played in better systems with better talent and more stable coaching.

Cassell is a great example of this, as is Aaron Rodgers. Not to defend Josh McDaniels, but the ease with which the Broncos traded a supposedly "franchise" QB also suggests that many people in the league realize that guys who aren't truly highest echelon QBs are not as valuable as the media and simple stat comparisons would make you think. An interesting test will be what happens with Kyle Orton in Denver. I think he could be pretty successful, despite a weak arm and a penchant for being photographed while hammered.

Edited by Morgan's Magic Snowplow, 11 June 2009 - 08:16 AM.


#43 UNCSoxFan5

  • 841 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:06 AM

QUOTE (TheNeedle @ Jun 11 2009, 08:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can't say he was even in my head for 10, but maybe that's just me. It's fine for a first round pick though if you really like him. I see it a lot like the Tony Sanchez pick by the Pirates on Tuesday... a bit of a reach, but decent enough considering we can't trade draft picks.


Feeling is, that if I won't pick again until 51, then I may be settling for a Mark Sanchez/Chad Pennington type QB later on. I think the measurable difference between those QB's and a top tier QB might be bigger than on the defensive side or with a lineman.

#44 DaughtersofDougMirabelli

  • 1,755 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:11 AM

QUOTE (UNCSoxFan5 @ Jun 11 2009, 09:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Feeling is, that if I won't pick again until 51, then I may be settling for a Mark Sanchez/Chad Pennington type QB later on. I think the measurable difference between those QB's and a top tier QB might be bigger than on the defensive side or with a lineman.

Chad Pennington did just lead the Dolphins to a playoff berth and the 4th best overall record in the AFC at 11-5.

#45 UNCSoxFan5

  • 841 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:25 AM

QUOTE (DaughtersofDougMirabelli @ Jun 11 2009, 09:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Chad Pennington did just lead the Dolphins to a playoff berth and the 4th best overall record in the AFC at 11-5.


But with a fresh draft, I don't think I will come close to having the same type of defense and weapons around Pennington. Just my two cents.

#46 Morgan's Magic Snowplow


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,122 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:29 AM

QUOTE (UNCSoxFan5 @ Jun 11 2009, 09:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
But with a fresh draft, I don't think I will come close to having the same type of defense and weapons around Pennington. Just my two cents.


I understand what you are saying in the abstract, but are we talking about the same 2008 Miami Dolphins?

#47 D Jack's Dome


  • The Jinx


  • 1,836 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:31 AM

2 1/2 hour countdown for poutine...

#48 UNCSoxFan5

  • 841 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:36 AM

QUOTE (Morgan's Magic Snowplow @ Jun 11 2009, 09:29 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I understand what you are saying in the abstract, but are we talking about the same 2008 Miami Dolphins?


Ran for 1800 yards at 4.2 yards a carry, finished 9th in points allowed a game, with 40 sacks and 32 turnovers. That is a pretty solid defense along with a good running game. Again, maybe Pennington isn't the best example of my point.

#49 bsj


  • Renegade Crazed Genius


  • 14,873 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:41 AM

QUOTE (D Jack's Dome @ Jun 11 2009, 09:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
2 1/2 hour countdown for poutine...


Actually, 3 1/2 hours. Poutine went on the clock at 6am ET. At 12 Noon, he will be skipped.

I am PMing him.

EDIT- you probably meant 2 1/2 left...my bad

Edited by bsj, 11 June 2009 - 08:42 AM.


#50 Morgan's Magic Snowplow


  • SoSH Member


  • 6,122 posts

Posted 11 June 2009 - 08:42 AM

QUOTE (UNCSoxFan5 @ Jun 11 2009, 09:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ran for 1800 yards at 4.2 yards a carry, finished 9th in points allowed a game, with 40 sacks and 32 turnovers. That is a pretty solid defense along with a good running game. Again, maybe Pennington isn't the best example of my point.


No worries, I am just giving you shit.

I do think their talent on both sides of the ball is pretty average-to-mediocre. They had an easy schedule and Sparano did a great coaching job.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users