Edited by 941827, 01 August 2006 - 06:11 PM.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Hee Seop Choi DFA'd
#1
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:49 PM
#2
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:49 PM

McAdam wonders if this is because they see Youk moving back to third.
Edited by SoxScout, 24 March 2006 - 04:52 PM.
#4
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:50 PM
Per WEEI.
I like the use of the word "per" better than "says", so I'm throwing my considerable weight behind this thread.
#5
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:55 PM
The roster crunch is intense all of the sudden, but the team is getting better. If they go with Hee Seop and Youks (3B) will they cut Lowell? I sorta hope so...
what's the latest on Hee Seop'd defense? I've heard that it's great, and terrible. Defensive stats seem particularly useless for 1Bs, because if range mattered, Millar would've been a great 1B. Anyone have the Fielding Bible in hand?
Edited by Todd Benzinger, 24 March 2006 - 04:57 PM.
#6
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:55 PM
#7
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:56 PM
Edited by templeUsox, 24 March 2006 - 04:56 PM.
#8
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:56 PM
I like the use of the word "per" better than "says", so I'm throwing my considerable weight behind this thread.
I combined the threads rather than delete one.
I'm happy with this deal. Choi is a good insurance policy against Lowell not performing. The question is whether he has options. If he has to be on the ML team, then who goes. I could look this up but I'm about to get out of here.
#9
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:58 PM
While fully understanding the concept of a sunk cost, I can't fathom that they eat the $18MM on Lowell's contract until he's at least had a chance to conclusively prove he's toast by, say, the ASB. That said, this does indicate a lack of faith in the entire 1B/3B grouping, or at least 2 of the 3.that htread has the navel gazing zingers, this one the stats.
An interesting move. Doesn't speak well for the FOs view of Lowell... or of JT Snow, since we now have two lefty 1Bs.
The roster crunch is intense all of the sudden, but the team is getting better. If they go with Hee Seop and Youks (3B) will they cut Lowell? I sorta hope so...
#10
Posted 24 March 2006 - 04:59 PM
Edited by Rudy Pemberton, 24 March 2006 - 05:00 PM.
#11
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:02 PM
There's no stopping this juggernaut.
It will be interesting to see how they play this. Now we have depth everywhere but catcher. Tek has to play a lot. Maybe they'll use someone (Lowell, Snow, Choi) to get a catcher.
#12
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:02 PM
Why the hell release him? So now the Sawks can stash him in AAA? Wow.
http://www.ocregiste...cle_1013435.php
"Choi also has an option remaining and could be sent down to the minors, though he would receive his major-league salary of $725,000"
#13
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:02 PM
#14
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:02 PM
#15
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:04 PM
Great point. I've like Choi for a while, and he's played pretty well in his career against righties; certainly well enough to avoid being put on waivers so that his position can be taken by Olmedo Saenz or Nomar Garciaparra.Sweet, gives the team a TON of options. Lowell stinks? Choi and Youks are your 1b and 3b. This is HUGE.
Choi v. righties career: .250/.353/.455, with most of those ABs coming in Dolphin Stadium and Chavez Ravine. I really, really like this pickup.
#16
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:04 PM
While fully understanding the concept of a sunk cost, I can't fathom that they eat the $18MM on Lowell's contract until he's at least had a chance to conclusively prove he's toast by, say, the ASB. That said, this does indicate a lack of faith in the entire 1B/3B grouping, or at least 2 of the 3.
Sounds like you don't really accept the implications of a sunk cost. The 18M is gone. Making sure he's toast for half a season only worsens the waste of resources.
#17
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
#18
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:05 PM
#19
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:05 PM
#20
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:06 PM
He has good plate discipline and power in a long, lefty swing. He also has options, so he could be stashed in AAA for a little while to see if Snow can be moved.
I was hoping the Sox would trade for him, picking him up for nothing is fantastic.
#21
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:06 PM
Also, am I right in assuming that he had to be passed up by all the non-playoff teams before reaching the Sox?
#22
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:08 PM
Hee-Seop Choi
Height: 6-5
Weight: 240 lbs.
Stick:
Choi has a superb eye and only when badly fooled does the big guy swing at a bad pitch. That said, he has a lot of holes in his swing.
Glove:
His hands are soft and his footwork around the firstbase bag is excellent.
6'5", soft hands...yummy!
#23
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:10 PM
Dodger Math Q&A on Choi
Regarding Choi's defense, from the link above:
Most defensive metrics tag Choi as an average defensive first baseman. Classic fielding metrics like fielding percentage and range factor really like Choi. He contributed a a .997 fielding percentage in 2005 (third among first basemen who played at least 600 innings) and a 10.29 range factor (also third). The modern measures of defense like Choi less, but still put him in the serviceable range. In 2005, he had a 95 rate2 (100 is average), -4 fielding runs against average (zero is average), an .854 zone rating (20th amongst first baseman with 600 innings) and he ranked ninth in probabilistic model of range for first baseman. Choi doesn’t deserve a gold glove, but he isn’t the klutz that he is portrayed as.
Edited by Quintanariffic, 24 March 2006 - 05:17 PM.
#24
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:10 PM
I'm so excited about this move. He's not the defender that JT Snow is, but he's definitely above average with the glove, and I really think he has the potential to become a .260-25-80 guy with the bat if given regular playing time against RHPs. Which could happen if Lowell continues to suck.
He has so much plate discipline that, if he hits .260, his OBP might still be in the .380-.400 range. His upside would be a good fielding but slightly less potent offensive verion of Big Papi. His offensive downside would be the good or bad Bellhorn but much cheaper. Given his age and experience (and the move to a better hitter's park and league), he more likely could be a more powerful firstbase version of Mueller who makes less contact. The FO is moving to make this team younger. Before the end of this season, I believe we will see that their best lineup has Youks and Cho on the corners.
#25
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:10 PM
Maybe the Lowell trade talks that were rumoured when he first got to Boston are starting to heat up again.
Who knows.
#26
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:11 PM
Some more confirmation:
http://dodgerthought...alltoaster.com/
Interesting comments on that blog--apparently he's been a source of great debate. SOSH is mentioned as well.
#27
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:11 PM
Sounds like you don't really accept the implications of a sunk cost. The 18M is gone. Making sure he's toast for half a season only worsens the waste of resources.
You cut bait in March or April with a guy making short money. Doing so for a guy with Lowell's contract and upside (as evidenced by his past performance) is nonsense.
#28
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:15 PM
Whatever, puts a smile on my face, he's a damn good bat to add to the corner infield situation. If he's got an option though I think he has to go down at least to start the season. Hopefully all four (Snow, Youks, Lowell, and Choi) perform and we have more trade chips come the deadline.
#29
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:17 PM
It has been my impression that Snow has been getting by on his defensive reputation; I'm still waiting for my copy of the fielding bible, but Choi has an excellent defensive rep.
He has good plate discipline and power in a long, lefty swing. He also has options, so he could be stashed in AAA for a little while to see if Snow can be moved.
I was hoping the Sox would trade for him, picking him up for nothing is fantastic.
The only reason you don't dump Snow now is that you want Choi to get some ABs in the minors. Having Choi collecting dust on the bench won't do anyone any favors.
However, Snow is Olerud '05/Mientkiewicz '04. He can be jetissoned as soon as a better option is available (i.e., once the Sox think they can find ABs for Choi in the majors).
I suppose this ends any talk of a Carlos Pena acquisition . . . NTTAWWD.
Edited by 941827, 24 March 2006 - 05:20 PM.
#30
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:18 PM
His offensive downside would be the good or bad Bellhorn but much cheaper. Given his age and experience (and the move to a better hitter's park and league), he more likely could be a more powerful firstbase version of Mueller who makes less contact. The FO is moving to make this team younger. Before the end of this season, I believe we will see that their best lineup has Youks and Cho on the corners.
I agree with that last line completely, and I'd love to be right. But I have to ask about the Bellhorn comp that I bolded. Do you mean the 2005 Bellhorn, or the 2004 version? Because if the 2004 version of Bellhorn is his offensive downside, I'm giddy all over, heh.
#31
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:18 PM
#32
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:18 PM
#33
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:18 PM
#34
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:18 PM
You cut bait in March or April with a guy making short money. Doing so for a guy with Lowell's contract and upside (as evidenced by his past performance) is nonsense.
If you believe that the past performance is still likely to be indicative of future results, sure you wait.
But if you have an option that is likely to come close to Lowell's good past results (Choi), and you are convinced that Lowell has lost something and is highly unlikely to return to form, it is a waste of resources to keep trotting him out there and keep Choi in AAA and Pena on the bench.
I have no idea what the FO thinks, but the fact that Lowell has sucked for 1.5 years and looks "cooked" to observers of his ST performance suggest to me that he ain't coming back.
The FO may not agree, and it is reasonable expect him to improve. My point is that IF you believe he's cooked (and I personally do), it is only a further waste of resources to keep playing him until the ASB.
#35
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:20 PM
Red Sox claim 1B Choi off waivers from Dodgers
March 24, 2006
FORT MYERS, FLORIDA (TICKER) -- The Boston Red Sox added some more depth to their bench Friday, claiming first baseman Hee-Seop Choi off waivers from the Los Angeles Dodgers.
Choi, who was a key contributor in Korea's surprise run to the semifinals of the World Baseball Classic, hit .253 with a career-high 15 homers and 42 RBI in 133 games for the Dodgers in 2005.
The 27-year-old made just two errors in 762 chances for a .997 fielding percentage, second among NL first baseman. Boston signed six-time Gold Glove Award winner J.T. Snow in the offseason to back up unproven Kevin Youkilis at first base.
source: http://sports.yahoo....ov=st&type=lgns
#36
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:20 PM
You cut bait in March or April with a guy making short money. Doing so for a guy with Lowell's contract and upside (as evidenced by his past performance) is nonsense.
With Choi on the roster, I'd have no problem cutting Lowell if he's absolutely awful through the end of May or so. I might want to wait a few weeks longer, but still... well before the ASB. But, again, only if he's downright awful all season up to that point. If he's not, then the worst problem you have is platooning Youks and Choi and giving Youks the occassional start at 3rd to rest Lowell. Not a bad possition to be in. I really love this aquisition. I think I like it more than the Pena trade. They got him for nothing and he's probably going to contribute more to the 2006 team. :: big grin ::
#37
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:22 PM
#38
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:22 PM
Edited by Corsi Combover, 24 March 2006 - 05:23 PM.
#39
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:24 PM
Let's just hope Choi doesn't turn into Petagine 2.0
Well, he'll be under our control for 4 more years (assuming he gets optioned for the first month of the year). He'll get playing time eventually.
#40
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:24 PM
If Choi can make his way into the lineup he gives us a LH version of Youks; from a lineup construction veiw this lets Tito alternate Youks - Choi - Lorreta across the bottom/top of the order and still string together a staggering OBP threat in front of Manny/Tiz.
Choi's realistic worst case IMO is the 2004 Bellhorn with a truly disastrous downside of 2005 Bellhorn. However, the former is more likely than the latter given his age and upside. Also, for $750,000, this is another of those no lose deals because, for the money, he is more cost effective than 2005 Bellhorn and what is predicted for 2006 Snow.
I've been waiting to see if he or Carlos Pena with the Tigers would also get released this spring and expected the Sox to grab one or the other. Despite Pena's local connection, I like Choi better. Besides, with just W M Pena, the Sox avoid Pena envy. Usually it's satisfying to hold onto just one big Pena. Two can cause problems. You heard it here first: Choi will have a better season at 1B with the Sox than Nomar will with the Dodgers for less than 10% what Nomar will be paid.
The upside for Pena and Choi combined (both acquired in less than 1 week) could be 70-80 homers combined in a single season.
Edited by The Boomer, 24 March 2006 - 05:30 PM.
#41
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:25 PM
Interesting. Sounds like he was cut to make room for Nomar. Nice to see that we're still getting dividends on that trade.Here's a good discussion of Choi from a Dodger fan site:
Dodger Math Q&A on Choi
Regarding Choi's defense, from the link above:
As for why people are giddy, he's young, he's cheap, and he can probably outproduce Lowell and Snow. As someone mentioned above, it's all about flexibility.
#42
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:27 PM
I love this pick up, and envision that by May, Youks will be starting at 3rd and Lowell will be a bat off the bench and used in games vs. LH pitching with Youks shifting to 1st. I still hold out hope that Lowell can contribute, but he hasn't done much to dispel the notion that he's cooked.
#44
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:31 PM
It all depends on your expectations. Choi is in a lot of ways the anti-Adrian Gonzalez, or the anti-WMP. People on the board (especially VAL, who's made some great posts) have talked about how we seem to have been targeting high-SLG, low-OBP guys recently. Choi put up a .388 OBP in a pitcher's park in 2004. Even if he never turns into a traditional power threat, he gives us a great source of OBP off the bench.While I'm the first to give Theo the benefit of the doubt on matters like this and I certainly like the idea of a fallback plan on Lowell, the optimism on this board so far about this move is astonishing. This will be the fourth team this guy is on in the last three years and he's been a disappointment in all three stops so far. Not exactly an encouraging sign.
Of course you'd like them to get guys with high OBPs and high SLGs, but those guys are rare and expensive. The FO has again found a guy who has a well-defined, above-average skill, and who should help the team. And all for the price of a waiver claim plus $750K.
Edited by Joe D Reid, 24 March 2006 - 05:31 PM.
#45
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:35 PM
#46
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:38 PM
Of course you'd like them to get guys with high OBPs and high SLGs, but those guys are rare and expensive. The FO has again found a guy who has a well-defined, above-average skill, and who should help the team. And all for the price of a waiver claim plus $750K.
Like Pena, Choi has pretty good ISO:
'03: .203
'04: .198
'05: .200
That he has an excellent batting eye to go with it is another bonus.
#47
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:39 PM
putting Choi in AAA just to hold on to Snow would not make much sense.
I will find it so annoying WHEN they do that.
Edited by Todd Benzinger, 24 March 2006 - 05:40 PM.
#49
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:45 PM
His hitting rates are good, except for a low singles rate. I think a lot of baseball observers can't see beyond his low BA, but he has great walk rates, and good line drive power.
I think the main rub against him has been consistency, but I'm not sure how to judge that given his spotty playing time.
I can't find much not to love about H.S. Choi from his charts and numbers.
#50
Posted 24 March 2006 - 05:46 PM
*In 2004, he was the Marlins 2nd best hitter at the time of the trade
*He was one of the better hitters on the Cubs before he got smoked by Kerry Wood
*He wasn't so good after either of those incedents
Love acquasition though. I would buy it dinner, and then make sweet baseball love to it and then call it the next day if it was so inclined. Might wait until Tuesday or Wednesday.










