Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Game 7 - Bruins vs. Hurricanes (Win or Start Golfing Part III)
#1
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:11 AM
#2
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:20 AM
Also, haven't seen this posted yet:
But coach Claude Julien wiped out any fears of a Savard shelving after the game. Julien said he had sent Savard off as a precaution and that he will be available for Game 7 tomorrow.
"He'll be fine for the next game," Julien said.
#3
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:31 AM
#4
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:32 AM
#5
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:36 AM
Bruins: 1
Hurricanes: 34
#6
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:50 AM
So who else is going besides myself and TFP so far?
Tito and myself will be in our home in 306 once again.
#7
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:57 AM
#8
Posted 13 May 2009 - 08:58 AM
#9
Posted 13 May 2009 - 09:03 AM
One last time.
Let's hope they don't hear Marleys' chains before July...
#10
Posted 13 May 2009 - 09:30 AM
#11
Posted 13 May 2009 - 09:43 AM
#12
Posted 13 May 2009 - 09:57 AM
The Gameday Haiku:
We took the fight home
Insane amounts of pressure
Now infects our foes
It's all even now
Territory must be earned
In order to win
Nothing else matters
Assaulting them will ensure
Such a victory
Engage in battle
Vengeance will be achieved by
Ending thier campaign
Now they will pay what
The cost is to poke the bear
HERE WE GO BRUINS
#13
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:05 AM
WIN, boys, WIN. Kill them. Beat them. Hit them. Score on them. Embarrass them. You are the better team. You have the better coach. You have the better fans. WIN. WIN. WIN.
#14
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:11 AM
(raises hand)So who else is going besides myself and TFP so far?
#15
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:17 AM
So who else is going besides myself and TFP so far?
My brother and I are going.
#16
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:22 AM
#17
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:24 AM
#18
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:27 AM
Someone posted this on HFBoards, and it's just fucking awesome:
Look higher in this thread.
#19
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:28 AM
Something tells me this is just a revised version of the video posted a couple months back.
#20
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:29 AM
#21
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:30 AM
Look higher in this thread.
Hm. It appears I suck at this thing you call "posting" and perhaps also, "reading."
#22
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:31 AM
I'd go one further and include "seeing."Hm. It appears I suck at this thing you call "posting" and perhaps also, "reading."
#23
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:32 AM
#24
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:34 AM
· View this post
· Un-ignore kenneycb
Now look at what you've made me do.
#25
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:36 AM
You'll be back. They always come back.You have chosen to ignore all posts from: kenneycb.
· View this post
· Un-ignore kenneycb
Now look at what you've made me do.
#26
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:37 AM
I'd go two further and include "thinking."I'd go one further and include "seeing."
#27
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:37 AM
I'd go two further and include "thinking."
You're next tough guy.
#28
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:40 AM
If you wanna do it right, you gotta put it in quotes, so it looks like you're replying to their ignored post.You have chosen to ignore all posts from: kenneycb.
· View this post
· Un-ignore kenneycb
Now look at what you've made me do.
#29
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:42 AM
If you wanna do it right, you gotta put it in quotes, so it looks like you're replying to their ignored post.
When you do that though, it actually shows the post. Negating the purpose of showing him that he was blocked.
#30
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:43 AM
I'd go two further and include "thinking."
I'll go three further and include "internet humoring".When you do that though, it actually shows the post. Negating the purpose of showing him that he was blocked.
#31
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:45 AM
I'll go three further and include "internet humoring".
#32
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:49 AM
#33
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:58 AM
I'd go two further and include "thinking."
I sense a pile-on!!!¡¡¡¡¡ONEHUNDREDELEVEN!!!I'll go three further and include "internet humoring".
#34
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:59 AM
Speaking of not funny...I sense a pile-on!!!¡¡¡¡¡ONEHUNDREDELEVEN!!!
#35
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:59 AM
Haha well played.I sense a pile-on!!!¡¡¡¡¡ONEHUNDREDELEVEN!!!
#36
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:59 AM
Didn't take long the for the Bruins PR guys to send out an email to the mailing list:
I do not want to see this after tomorrow night. I do not want to hear "Thank you fans for your support throughout the season" from the Garden tomorrow night. I do not want to shave after tomorrow night. I want to meet up with RMPS contributors in Round 3. GO BRUINS. FINISH THEM. WIN.
#37
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:59 AM
#38
Posted 13 May 2009 - 10:59 AM
A post-game beverage at DJ's could be in order again. I think a friend of mine will be there.
Will she be able to stand this time?
#39
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:01 AM
Not sure I want her to be able to.Will she be able to stand this time?
#40
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:01 AM
Fixed.Speaking of not funny, I decided to join the conversation.
#41
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:11 AM
Cause lord knows you can't get action any other way.Not sure I want her to be able to.
#42
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:11 AM
As long as he doesn't reenact the end of Kids he should be OK.Cause lord knows you can't get action any other way.
#43
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:12 AM
Pretty much the self-depracating joke I was going for. Thanks for spelling it out though.Cause lord knows you can't get action any other way.
I am/was a perfect gentleman.As long as he doesn't reenact the end of Kids he should be OK.
#44
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:13 AM
Had to make sure everyone understood. You're welcome.Pretty much the self-depracating joke I was going for. Thanks for spelling it out though.
#45
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:19 AM
WILMINGTON -- All quiet here at the Ice Box some 20 minutes prior to the scheduled start of Bruins practice.
Word around the rink, where the lights are dim at the moment, is that only a few of the Bruins, perhaps only three or four, will get on the ice for a workout. Makes sense, given that they are eight months in their daily shoot 'n' skate routine.
Atop everyone's list of ''things to know'': what will be Marc Savard's status for Game 7 tomorrow night at the Garden vs. the Canes. Following the win in Raleigh last night, coach Claude Julien said it was his choice to send Savard to the dressing room with about 10 minutes left in the third period--minutes after ''Savvy'' sustained a leg-to-leg check from Chad Larose.
Julien also said post-game that Savard will be fine to play in Game 7. Chances are, the coach will say the same today, and chances are nearly equal that the 31-year-old Savard will not be made available here to the media.
The Bruins have not closed out a playoff series with a victory on home ice since erasing the Canes in Game 6 in 1999.
The Bruins have won 9 of their 17 Game 7's over their last 70 years. They last won a Game 7 on home ice in the spring of '94 vs. the Habs at the Garden.
We'll keep you posted here as practice plays out and players become available in the next 2-3 hours.
Don't turn away from your boston.com Bruins blog, because we know when you do, and we know where you live, and we know most of your bosses' office lines.
http://www.boston.co...n_from_wil.html
#46
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:30 AM
Well it has come down to this. Game 7 on Garden Ice. The Bruins with a chance to go to the Conference Finals for the first time since 1992. Win tomorrow!
Bruins will win no doubt in my mind game 6 basically was game 7.
#47
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:37 AM
#48
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:40 AM
Just to prove the idiocy of Canes fans, one of my friends from my old college down in South Carolina is a big Canes fan. His facebook status was like, "WTF Canes" and I mentioned something about how big of a mistake it was to let us win Game 6. One of his other friends chimes in and says "Idk what happened man but the Canes NEED to win Game 7"
Kid's new profile picture:
http://imgsrv.kmbz.c...les/Image/Brian
#49
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:44 AM
Pretty much the self-depracating joke I was going for. Thanks for spelling it out though.
Wait, what was that middle part?
I am/was a perfect gentleman.
It's a life-long study in self-improvement, isn't it?
#50
Posted 13 May 2009 - 11:49 AM
Wait, what was that middle part?
It's a life-long study in self-improvement, isn't it?
Jack Edwards was cash last night.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked








